Slashdot Mirror


Discovery Prepares for Return

Kailash Nadh writes "Discovery's astronauts packed up their stuff on Friday as they prepared to undock from the international space station now that NASA has cleared the shuttle to return to Earth next week. Their most difficult task before leaving the station was the maneuvering of a huge cargo container filled with 2 1/2 years worth of trash into the shuttle's payload bay. Once back on Earth, the items would either be disposed of or returned to researchers."

27 of 189 comments (clear)

  1. Aldrin by coflow · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I find it interesting that Aldrin is critical of the shuttle program. I know there are a lot of people unhappy with it, but it seems a name as big as Aldrin being critical has quite a bit of meaning. Hopefully this is a sign of a new approach to space travel in the future.

    1. Re:Aldrin by 0xC0FFEE · · Score: 4, Insightful
      There's quite a bit of tradition at NASA. For example, the CAPCOM is always an astronaut. This person is, alone, tasked with relaying information between command and shuttle crew. Seems experience as an astronaut is mandatory for conveying essential information in critical times.

      So my guess is Aldrin brings up something important to "the continuity of space exploration" in the same way. Whether you thing this is a PR move or not, I think having people with (successful) field experience in the decision structure is tremendously important. I think the 2 shuttle disasters showed how much managers not grounded in reality can be, well, disastrous.

    2. Re:Aldrin by cahiha · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I think having people with (successful) field experience in the decision structure is tremendously important.

      People with field experience should be consulted when the situation warrants it, but making the "part of the decision structure" is probably not a good idea. Astronauts have already demonstrated by their participation in the program that they are willing to make irrational sacrifices for a ride into space. Participation of people with that kind of psychological profile only risks wasting more money on unnecessary space flights.

      Decisions about the shuttle program should be made by impartial and disinterested scientists and engineers, in a broadly-based peer review process, based on the scientific and technological merits alone.

      Note that Aldrin doesn't seem to question the merit of manned space travel, only the vehicle.

  2. Implements of destruction by wowbagger · · Score: 4, Funny

    "... So we went out there with our shovels and rakes and implements of destruction, and we loaded all that trash into the back of a Boeing orbiter, went back inside the space station, and had a Thanksgiving dinner that couldn't be beat."

  3. Come home safe by ZPO · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Come home safe travellers.

  4. Overheard on the NASA PA system by grumling · · Score: 2, Funny
    Once back on Earth, the items would either be disposed of or returned to researchers.

    Attention... Would those of you who have trash from the ISS please come and claim it? If you don't pick up your trash in hanger 12 by 4:00pm, it will be disposed of at your expense. That is all."

    --
    "Well, good luck finding a judge that doesn't run a bestiality site."
    1. Re:Overheard on the NASA PA system by ZakuSage · · Score: 2, Funny

      You have 30 minutes to pick up your trash, or it will be compacted into a cube.
      You have 15 minutes to pick up your trash.
      You have 5 minutes to pick up your trash.
      Your trash has been compacted into a cube. You have 30 minutes to pick up your cube.

  5. Re:Risk your life for Garbage?? by AC-x · · Score: 4, Funny

    Well they're going home anyway, it's not like they're doing the trip just to take the rubbish back

    It's probably useful to know what happens when you keep rubbish in space for several years anyway

  6. Oh boy, here we go by p3d0 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Prepare for the flood of "why don't they just drop the garbage into the atmosphere and let it burn up" questions.

    --
    Patrick Doyle
    I mod down every jackass who puts his moderation policy in his sig. Oh, wait a sec....
    1. Re:Oh boy, here we go by Rhoon · · Score: 4, Informative

      The reason they don't throw it into the atmosphere is for a variety of reasons.

      They catalog everything that comes back. They weigh and measure each piece that is returned. They check it for radiation contamination (something that would spread the radiation if it was sent into the atmosphere to burn up). They do tests and experiments to see how the items faired during a long duration such as 2.5 years in space without the protection of the Earth's atmosphere from all the X-Rays, Gamma Rays, etc...

      It's more than just garbage when it comes back, it turns into a science experiment in of itself. I'm sure they collect just as much data on items in space from the garbage that is brought back as they do from the experiments that used those items in the first place.

      --
      "If all the world's a stage, I want to operate the trap door." - Paul Beatty
  7. Re:Risk your life for Garbage?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    It's the new NASA funding plan:

    1. Collect space garbage
    2. Ebay
    3. Profit!!!

  8. How bout an auction of the Space returned garbage? by Guru+Goo · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Would be any takers if NASA were to auction the space returned garbage on ebay ?

  9. Unmanned flights by roman_mir · · Score: 3, Interesting

    NASA is going to freeze the Shuttle program, but I wonder, Shuttle can fly without anyone on-board, so isn't it possible to do that? Just use the damn thing as a cargo vehicle without people on board. Or have one pilot on it who will take it up, and then if the thing is damaged, have it fly back automagically, and let the pilot stay on the space station and go down with a Soyuz crew.

    1. Re:Unmanned flights by TMonks · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Saying "the shuttle can fly without anyone on board" is very similar to someone asking why we even need commercial pilots, since the planes can take off, fly, and land themselves. If anything were to go wrong with the shuttle, you might not lose over a hundred passengers, but you still lose over a billion dollars in investments. IMHO, Having people on board to make sure that everything is going right is absolutely necessary to protect that investment. After all, how would you feel if an unmanned shuttle performed beautifully in its mission and re-entry, only to crash and burn on the runway, a problem that could have easily been solved with human intervention?

      --
      I, for one, welcome our new karma-whore sig writing overlords
    2. Re:Unmanned flights by doomtiki · · Score: 3, Informative

      In Soviet Russia (this is not a joke), Space Shuttle Buran flew one unmanned orbital flight. It landed in a 57km/h crosswind and was only 1.5m off the center line of the runway. The program was cancelled after the end of Communism in Russia. Buran was destroyed a few years ago when the hanger it was being stored in in Kazakstan collapsed.
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shuttle_Buran
      http://www.buran.ru/

    3. Re:Unmanned flights by bbc · · Score: 2, Informative

      How frickin' hard could it be?

      It's been done before. (Though that wasn't retrofitting, but design--but if you can turn a Volkswagen Beetle into a stretch limo, you can retrofit a shuttle.)

  10. A reason to bringing back the waste. by Chonine · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It is very possible that what we consider waste and what NASA does could differ. Remnants of experiments, minilabs that belong to schools, old journals, outdated equipment, failed equipment... I think a big part of the reason to take it all back is so the engineers can find out failure points, reuse or sell older equipment, for NASA historians and archivists to keep any documentation, and to give loaned items back to their respective owners.

  11. what a fucking dumb-ass comment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    what, are you picturing a stack of black plastic garbage bags piled up in the cargo bay?
    no, they have a multi-purpose module that they carry up into space that holds all the supplies they were bringing.
    While docked, they lift the module out of the cargo bay and dock it to the space station. The crew can then transfer the contents to and from the ISS (what, you thought they loaded everything through the shuttle's airlock?)
    Before undocking, they move the module back into the cargo bay so they can take it back to earth and use it again (what, are they supposed to "send it into the sun" and make a new one for the next trip?)
    Why the hell wouldn't they transfer refuse from the station back into the module since it's going back anyway.
    Where did you get the stupid idea that this added any risk to the mission or that it was desirable or even possible to eject this crap into space and have it burn up in the sun.

    go fuck yourself, dumbass

  12. A better crew for this job by murderlegendre · · Score: 3, Funny

    Next time, get ahold of Richard Benjamin, Tim Thomerson, Richard Kelton, Tricia Barnstable, Cyb Barnstable and Conrad Janis.

    --
    There's a Starman, waiting in the sky / He'd like to come and meet us, but he hasn't got the time.
  13. Why is this filed under 'Science' by fuzzy12345 · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I wasn't watching around the clock, but I saw no evidence of any science being done at all on this mission.

    NASA uses the word 'science' as a figleaf. What they mainly do is engineering, and they badly do what they should have perfected 20 years ago.

    Microchips have become routine, brain surgery has become routine, but in 'rocket science' there's been no progress. It's a process and internal culture issue, and it isn't being fixed.

    --

    Everybody's a libertarian 'till their neighbour's becomes a crack house.
    1. Re:Why is this filed under 'Science' by jkerman · · Score: 2, Informative

      They also installed a new human research rack unit which the ISS crew will be configuring and using for years to come. the ISS is doing most of the ongoing science up there. the shuttle exists to resupply, and most importantly to FINISH the damn ISS so we can actuually get more done up there.

  14. ISS/NASA astronauts chores for 2005 by vchoy · · Score: 2, Funny

    Seems more like an 'itinerary'...but anyways...

    -Go out shopping for food, supplies *tick*
    -Take vehicle for preventative repairs/maintenance (done...sort of)
    -Fill up vehicle *tick*
    -Check tires (give it a kick)
    -Blast off *tick*
    -arrive at camp site
    -Unload food and supplies *tick*
    -Check vehicle still okay (done...issues found)
          * had to go underbonnet to remove some stuff
          * inspected paint job near windscreen?
    -Clean up room
    -Bag trash-rubbish, put back into vehicle *tick*
    -Depart camp site *tick*
    -Arrive home

    (and that's the weekend!)

  15. Re:Hauling The Trash... by jridley · · Score: 3, Interesting

    "hurl this stuff into the sun"

    Yeah. Calculate how much energy that would take. It's actually pretty hard to hit the sun from here.

    Bringing it down in the shuttle is actually far and away the easiest way to get rid of it. Getting it up there was expensive. Once the shuttle is there, and the bay's empty anyway, bringing anything back is not that big a deal. Some extra mass in the deorbit calculations.

    Why would we spend the time and money to build and attach and pilot a remote deorbit pack when we have the shuttle coming back anyway?

    The Enterprise had 400-odd people on it. I guarantee they had some pretty extensive waste recycling systems. But they had matter transmutation, so they didn't actually have to deal with disposal, they could just feed mass in, and get food/water/gold/clothing/whatever they needed back out again. If you think about it, people in a society with that technology would soon come to view looking at actual trash as very disgusting.

  16. Re:Hauling The Trash... by Darkman,+Walkin+Dude · · Score: 2, Funny

    It's actually pretty hard to hit the sun from here.

    Not to mention that its the only one we have. Lets not be hurling random processed debris into what could be a very delicately balanced mass reaction chamber, when we have not got clue one as to what the short or long term effects might be.

    It ain't like a fire, only bigger.

  17. Garbage scow by isomeme · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Their most difficult task before leaving the station was the maneuvering of a huge cargo container filled with 2 1/2 years worth of trash into the shuttle's payload bay.

    When, at the age of seven, I sat enthralled by the Apollo XI landing in 1969, I would never have believed that our most sophisticated space vehicle in 2005 would be an aging garbage truck traveling a couple of hundred miles from Earth to visit a space station with no purpose.

    I can't even think about this for too long; I start shaking with the force of my anger and disappointment.

    --
    When all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a skull.
  18. Re:Hauling The Trash... by clem · · Score: 2, Funny

    Yeah. Calculate how much energy that would take. It's actually pretty hard to hit the sun from here.

    Fine, Mr. Wizard, do your calculations. Just bear in mind while you're doing your math stuff that astronauts are in peak physical condition. Also, they'll be pitching the garbage overhand, not underhand.

    --
    Your courageous and selfless spelling corrections have made me a better person.
  19. Garbage Scow by myowntrueself · · Score: 2, Funny

    Ok, so Scottie started a fight with the Klingons when they referred to the Enterprise as 'a garbage scow'.

    But now the term honestly applies to the Space Shuttle.

    --
    In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.