A Serious Contender for the Couch Throne
TractorJector writes "It is no secret that the competition for global domination in the operating system market has moved from the desktop to the living room couch. The Olive Symphony, a Linux-powered hi-fi wi-fi stereo hub, stands a decent chance for a prime position before the living room throne."
Visit http://www.hifidelio.net/ :)
Looks really rather similar
These guys (hermstedt) need a good kicking at the moment because they are up to version 2.0 of their firmware and still have not released source code.
Putting that to one side, I have one of these and it really is rather good.
Whats it consist of ? A hard drive , a basic display ,a cheap MB , and a cd rom . Sound familiar ?
It should
Those are all components of an XBOX minus the screen . SO figure a display might cost $100 to implement . How much does an XBOX cost ?
Is it cool?
Yes.
Is it worth $899 ?
NO .
I just bought a laptop from dell for less than that .
The price makes it laughable .
Yes, there might not be any benefits to you or most people, which is probably why it is marketed the way it is, but it is not identical to an iPod.
"(Man) tries to live his own life as if he were telling a story. But you have to choose: live or tell." --Sartre
TractorJector writes "It is no secret that the competition for global domination in the operating system market has moved from the desktop to the living room couch.
I was about to say, "No, TractorJector didn't write that. It was cut and pasted verbatim from the first sentence of the article. Have the common decency blah blah blah." But hmm, now this is odd. It seems that every Slashdot story that TractorJector has submitted has been a Mad Penguin article by Christian Einfeldt.
Christian Einfeldt, if you are indeed TractorJector or are affiliated with Mad Penguin in some way, please have the monads to disclose in your Slashdot submissions that you're the one who wrote the article. Really, it's okay to pimp your own stuff one the web. Everybody does it now that blogging is the current fashion. But submitting the articles under a pseudonym (especially ones with naive editors, like Slashdot) is just a wee bit underhanded and deceitful.
Broadband is analog versus baseband which is digital. The fact that using broadband allows using mulitple channels means that overall, yes, can allow for higher bandwidth.. Compare ISDN to DSL. Baseband ISDN has a limitation due to the total amount of bits it can send (compressed lossless) over very specific channels/frequencies. Broadband DSL on the other hand, converts to analog, sends over multiple channels/frequencies.. More channels means aggregation, plus with higher frequencies, higher bandwidths can be accomodated.
You say that broadband is BROADER than things like dialup.. Dialup is technically broadband, but uses frequencies that are lower and thus do not have "distance to central office" limitations that DSL would have. You simply tradeoff speed for compatibility with almost any infrastructure. Your example is correct in colloquial usage of the word broadband, yet I felt some small clarification was in order.
This comment is guaranteed*
*not guaranteed