Slashdot Mirror
Nintendo Moves Back, Shuffles Release Dates
Press the Buttons has commentary and release dates, now that Nintendo has released their Fall release plans. Frustratingly Metroid Prime Hunters, Mario Kart DS, and Animal Crossing DS have all had their release dates moved back. From the article: " Q1 2006: Metroid Prime Hunters from Nintendo. Bad Nintendo, bad! This game has slipped down the calendar so many times it isn't even amusing anymore. First it fell from a June 2005 release down to August, then to October, and now it's dropped into next year. Here's hoping they're using this extra time to add online multiplayer support, because if not a lot of people are going to be even more disappointed."
I just hope they don't release it too close to the release of Duke Nukem Forever.
That game is supposed to be amazing, and I'd hate to see Nintendo get scooped.
Show me on the doll where his noodly appendage touched you.
I would rather they pushed them back to improve them than release a buggy piece of crap (Battlefield 2).
The real people at fault are the marketing department for setting silly goals , Thankfully nintendo has the sense to push things back .
I don't think there will be any kind of Duke Nukem farce , nintendo do have a long history of shuffling release dates and it normally turns out for the better
The only things certain in war are Propaganda and Death. You can never be sure which is which though
does anyone else think nintendo is trying to kill the DS just by continually pushing back the AAA titles? mario kart and metriod prime hunters are probally the most antcipated titles for the system yet its next year before they feel the stylus, why are they so intent on hurting themselves?
Half-Life was scheduled to be released mid-1996 but was delayed a year because the devs realized it sucked and they had to rewrite it...
503 Sig Unavailable
The Signature could not be accessed. Please try again later or contact the administrator
Maybe it's just me, but isn't this just adding more encouragement to those who (like me) have been waiting to buy the DS until there are more AAA titles available? What are the odds that the price on the DS is going to drop between now and when these games are released (especially MP:Hunters)?
It will be real interesting to see if the two recent releases (Advance Wars and Nintendogs) are going to push hardware sales enough for Nintendo to lay off any cost cutting measures. Certainly there are going to be some pressures from Sony around the holidays, and I don't know if the DS lineup is strong enough to carry the system without a price cut. Will Nintendo try to lo-ball Sony with their older (and arguably inferior) but significantly cheaper system?
Daikatana was released years after it was initially scheduled to come out. And it was still horrible. Delays don't always mean a better game.
Remember how the SNES Zelda shipped late? Or how FF3 slipped and slipped? Remember how late the original Metroid was? Or how late Warcraft 3 shipped? The Sims?
Once it's released, people will forget the delay. As long as the game is good and doesn't ship like buggy junk, bygones will be bygones. Nintendo has a solid track record in this respects, so more than likely in 6 months we will be cooing about how awesome the new Metroid is, and will have forgotten the delays. It's better to have a legendary title tomorrow than a half-baked good game today.
The ______ Agenda
Bah, I waited for Gran Turismo 4... and again... and again... and again.. and again... what 3 years of delays?
Then I was greeted by one of the worst UI's ever.
Bad things happen to games that delay.
The Animal Crossing delay really ticks me off. It leaves me wondering why I rushed to get the DS last year. Nintendo still hasn't managed to produce any good games for it.
I've always been a die hard Nintendo fanboy, but if things don't turn around they're gonna lose me. The turn around for new games is simply unacceptable...
"The world only exists in your eyes. You can make it as big or as small as you want." - F Scott Fitzgerald
Looking back at the past games from Nintendo over the last years many of them felt rushed, not up to the quality that one was used from Nintendo, be it MarioSunshine, ZeldaWindwaker, Pikmin or WarioWareTouched. So while a delay might be annoying, I strongly prefer a delayed game over a rushed one, especially on a console where you will be stuck with that game forever, on the PC at least a rushed game can with a bunch of patches be brought to the quality that it should have had from the begining.
This is exactly the kind of behavior we should be encouraging, not disparaging. How many times have we seen games released too early for no reason other than that was the stated release date, or simply because the Christmas season neared, only to have a buggy piece of crap?
Sure I'm dismayed that the game I'm looking forward to (New Super Mario Bros) continues to be delayed, but I'd rather wait and have a better, longer game than get it now and be less satisfied. I think we could all do with a little less of this "I want it now!" attitude that has become so prevalent in today's high-tech age. Take your time, Nintendo. I know it will be worth it.
In the words of Shigeru Miyamoto: "A delayed game may eventually be good, but a bad game is bad forever"
Modern copyright is theft of culture from everyone and it retards the progress of the useful arts and sciences.
Sept. 6: Rebelstar Tactical Command from Namco
Great. This is Laser Squad Nemesis for GBA, from the folk that did the awsome Laser Squad Nemesis.
Great, great, great.
Don't be a damn fanboy then.
Why is this modded flamebait? It's a reasonable point made in a civil fashion. If you don't agree, try to refute it logically, don't mod it down.
Remember, Nintendo will NOT send you cookies through the post just because you mod down all posts critical of their business strategy.
A lot of the games people are calling "delays" aren't. Animal Crossing DS and Mario Kart DS did not have offical release dates until now, now they do (within the Q4 2005 timeframe that Nintendo offically stated)
Any other release date you heard were just wild guesses (some of them were even in September and January which aren't Q4 2005)
ADVENTURERS! - ANTIHERO FOR HIRE - CARDMASTER CONFLICT
It seems to me that it's lines like the last one from the article that generate unhealthy hype. I'm sure a lot of people would be happy with the game whether it had multiplayer or no, but if everyone gets this bad idea that multiplayer is the only thing that will save the game, then it's failure is certain.
This plus the fact that they pushed back The Legend of Zelda: Twilight Princess (did that even get a slashdot cover?) to spring 2006 makes me a very sad Nintendo user right now. I even preordered Zelda.
I think I'll go make some soup so I can cry into it.
It amazes me how people buy into the rationale that says the longer a game's release is delayed, the better, more finished it will be on release. Pretty much every +5 on this story is patting Nintendo on the back for "taking their time to make a great game".
Does it ever occur to anyone that these delays might negatively affect the production quality of the title? Or perhaps delays have more to do with marketing than development?
Sure, releasing early is a bad idea. But that doesn't mean releasing later guarantees a good game. (Nor does having the word Nintendo on the box)
With Nintendogs and Advance Wars two weeks ago and Castlevania and Another Code at the end of September. The library of AAA titles for the DS is getting to a decent size. Meteos and Kirby are also great purchases. Zoo Keeper is a great puzzle game but is hard to fully recomend due to the price (it's a flash game after all).
The delay on Animal Crossing is distressing though. I've already waited so long.