IBM-Sony-Toshiba Reveal New Cell Processor Details
BBCWatcher writes "The three main partners in the Cell Processor initiative announced technical details of the new architecture. IBM's documents are particularly revealing. There's much more information on how developers, including open source developers, can access the SPUs (Synergistic Processor Units). As reported earlier, Sony will put the Cell into every Playstation 3 game machine, due early next year. And yes, Cell runs Linux."
oh, here are my glasses...
Progress isn't made by early risers. It's made by lazy men trying to find easier ways to do something. -Heinlein
Synergistic Processor Units?
That's it, the Playstation 3 will definately win the next console war due to exploiting its Synergistic Processor units and developing core competencies to sustain a long-term competitive advantage in the new paradigm. Now that word is out on the blogosphere, Microsoft should just give up.
Bingo, BTW.
Don't forget to chain enough PS3's together to enable the "Sarah Connor" easter egg.
- Just my $0.02, take with a grain of salt, your mileage may vary.
And yes, Cell runs Linux.
... I said that as a joke, but to be sure it hadn't been done, I googled it. I was wrong.
First thing I thought of when I read it was "Duh."
I run Linux on my toaster.
They finally have a TLA with "synergy" in it... doesn't that Godwin the technology, or something?
Incidentally, are they fresh spu? Most civilized people can't stomach spu fresh.
sic transit gloria mundi
So it will be utilizing synergy. That's good. I like my solutions to be customer-focused, and above all synergized. :)
You are not the customer.
There's much more information on how developers, including open source developers...
HOW DARE YOU! You can't include open source developers as a sub category of developers! When you say developers, you better mean closed source developers! We don't let that open source scum use our compilers and such, so we refuse to let the word "developers" mean "all developers". Don't you go insinuating that it should include OTHER TYPES OF DEVELOPERS when we say DEVELOPERS!
And while we are at it, Perl Developers aren't developers either. Lump them in the cryptographers, we don't want them.