Slashdot Mirror


LGP Announces New Competition

Time Doctor writes "Linux Game Publishing announced its new game competition today, wherein an image relating to the game is revealed one pixel a second and competitors can attempt to be the first to guess it. Winner gets the first copy of the game, and the unofficial award of having way too much time on their hands to sit around waiting for pixels to change."

17 of 207 comments (clear)

  1. Never could do these... by Snommis · · Score: 5, Funny

    Why can't I see the sailboat?

    --
    Face it, do something enough times, and it can cause problems.
    1. Re:Never could do these... by Afecks · · Score: 4, Funny

      Why can't I see the sailboat?

      What you need is a fatty-boom-batty blunt, and I guarantee you'll be seeing a sailboat, an ocean, and maybe even some of those big-titted mermaids doing that lesbian shit!

  2. No wild guesses! by grant+murray · · Score: 3, Funny

    They allow guessing but not wild guessing. How silly!

    1. Re:No wild guesses! by ROMRIX · · Score: 3, Funny

      Silly indeed. They are simply hedging their bet by stipulating a commonly overlooked mistake when allowing "contestants" to guess at any given problem. According to Dr. Alfred Zuekec and Raul Paldonis at the Institute of higher Awareness in Peru there is an 22% likelyhood of a contestant guessing right when attempting an answer with a "wild" guess as opposed to a true, well thought out, "random" guess.
      The data they have put together clearly shows an advantage when wild guessing as shown in this formula; g=:(&:^\ ~ wg=:)&:^}~ This among other well known guessing patterns such as the 'Positive Attitude Reinforced' method known as "kurnling", in some circles, also play an important role in establishing a right answer. Whereas the 'Negative Attitude Wild Guess' method often results in a correct answer, the contestant is often disqualified for obvious reasons. No I can't say I blame them for not allowing wild guesses. It saves time and often it saves lives.

  3. We finally made it! by Daneurysm · · Score: 4, Funny

    With innovative ideas and advanced gameplay like this, it is only a matter of time until Linux dominates not just the desktop market, but the gaming market as well.

    1. Re:We finally made it! by Rei · · Score: 3, Informative

      Hey, there are some dang good linux games out there. I just got done playing a couple hours of Scorched3D. I recently had a kick of the development version of UFO: Alien Invasion. My synaptic games list has perhaps 150 entries in it - all free, no effort to install, and while they're not all superb quality, a good number of them are. I mean, even Nethack is starting to look pretty ;) (Vulture's Eye)

      And this is just free linux games that I'm talking about here.

      --
      sed "s/SJW.*$/... never mind. I was about to say something stupid, and also, I'm a troglodyte./Ig"
  4. Games for Linux by nmb3000 · · Score: 5, Funny

    See, there are sweet games for Linux. Geez, I don't know what everybody's always bitching about.

    Wah wah, I can't play Halo! So what? Shut up and go play "Guess the Game".

    What's going to be good is that the image is going to be a screenshot of this very webpage. That's right folks, the answer to Guess the Game is: Guess the Picture! The newest sensation in an already exciting catalog of Linux games!

    --
    "What do you despise? By this are you truly known." --Princess Irulan, Manual of Muad'Dib
    /)
  5. so wait a sec by after+fallout · · Score: 3, Insightful

    they are putting a dynamically generated 1085x814 image that changes once a second on to a site where we here at slashdot are going to check it out repeatedly? That doesn't appear to be a very bright idea.

  6. Re:uh... by ErikPeterson · · Score: 3, Funny

    boring news is better then no news... erm wait no it isnt

    --
    The world's smartest bug zapper www.zapstats.com/kickstarter
  7. Lag by dawhippersnapper · · Score: 4, Funny

    Man this game has horrible latency.

    --
    Freedom is fragile and must be protected. To sacrifice it, even as a temporary measure, is to betray it.
  8. a compressed .jpg? Brillant! by XXIstCenturyBoy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Couldn't they provide something else than a compressed jpeg full of jpeg artifact (zoom the large picture, you will see a the image is composed of 8x8 block of seemingly random pixels)

    How is one supposed to know what the hell is in there if the jpeg compression moves the changed pixels around?

  9. OMG its... by ClaraBow · · Score: 3, Funny

    Nuke Dukem 4D :)

  10. Faster! Faster! by Phrogz · · Score: 4, Insightful
    "...an image relating to the game is revealed one pixel a second... and the unofficial award of having way too much time on their hands to sit around waiting for pixels to change."
    Are we so ADD these days that once per second is way too slow to wait for something?
  11. JPEG?! by dmitriy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    JPEG image can't be revealed one pixel at a time. JPEG image consists of 16x16 MCU (Minimal Coding Units) encoded with DCT and high harmonics discarded (actually, there's more to this). Changing one pixel before encoding changes the whole 16x16 square.

  12. Slashdot Effect by SleepyHappyDoc · · Score: 3, Funny

    Unfortunately, due to the Slashdot effect, no one can see the picture as it changes. Ergo, no one can win.

    Good way to stress-test their web-servers, though.

    --
    Stasis is death. Embrace change.
  13. Re:Assumming it's a 160x120 pixel image... by Oculus+Habent · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The full image is 1280x960. 14 days for the full image.

    --
    That what was all this school was for... to teach us how to solve our own problems. -- janeowit
  14. noise profiling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    There are a few 'interesting' properties of the image that they've posted; firstly the noise doesn't appear to be randomly distributed - there are many more samples in the center of the intensity scale than in the fully dark/fully light regions. The green channel also appears to have a much broader distribution curve than the red or blue channels.

    To get an idea of what might be in the image I can think of a few methods that might provide some insight; performing a low pass filter (eg. gaussian filter) and enhancing what remains with the levels control in photoshop (this should help remove the random high frequency element, but of course you also end up losing all detail in whatever image is left), or if anyone feels up to it, performing an autocorrelation of the image with itself may help (essentially using the profile of the noise in the image to figure out what parts are significant).

    Of course, with only ~1.5% of the image revealed so far it's not very likely that there'll be much to see yet - it's likely that all the meaningful data has been buried in the jpeg noise..