Slashdot Mirror


FEMA Demands Use of IE To File Online Katrina Claims

WebHostingGuy writes "As reported by MSNBC, if you survived the hurricane and are a Mac, Linux or Firefox user you cannot file a claim online. Further, you must have javascript enabled or face rejection. From the site: 'We are sorry for not being able to proceed your requests because you have failed our tests.' Opera and Netscape don't work either." Also reported at InformationWeek. From that story: "To file a claim online at FEMA's Individual Assistance Center, where citizens can apply for government help, the browser must be IE 6.0 or later with JavaScript enabled. That cuts out everyone running Linux or the Mac operating systems, as well as Windows users running alternate browsers such as Firefox or Opera. When TechWeb tested the site using Windows XP and Firefox 1.0.6, the message 'In order to use this site, you must have JavaScript Enabled and Internet Explorer version 6. Download it from Microsoft or call 1-800-621-FEMA (3362) to register' popped up on the screen." Update: 09/08 13:48 GMT by Z : Added word 'Online' to title to clarify story.

18 of 1,165 comments (clear)

  1. One line of code. by TripMaster+Monkey · · Score: 5, Informative

    From TFA:
    Some people also have been having some success using Firefox and the User Agent Switcher extension and setting it to IE6. I tried this and was able to get a little further in the process, but stopped before actually having to fill out a form. I'll leave that to those who really need help.
    Hmm...I tested this myself, and with the User Agent Switcher set to IE, there's no problems at all. Seems to me that the problem with non-IE browsers is a purely manufactured one...one that could be fixed by editing one lne of code.
    --
    ____

    ~ |rip/\/\aster /\/\onkey

    1. Re:One line of code. by Bogtha · · Score: 5, Informative

      We are asking the browser to the website what brand of browser it is and then the website determines what you can and cannot see simply based on that one piece of information. It should be a little different, the web site asks, can you handle JavaScript and a reply of yes from the browser. The website will now send you JavaScript info. Can you handle frames, DHTML, CSS and the list goes on as new technologies are added.

      This kind of thing already exists. You don't ask if Javascript is available, you code your HTML as if it weren't, and make your Javascript alter the document structure. If the Javascript executes, then the structure is how you want, if the Javascript doesn't execute, then it remains in the compatible state.

      Finer-grained control is possible too - Google for object detection versus browser detection. There's also DOM interfaces to check for support for certain things, but they aren't widely supported. "DHTML" is nothing but a buzzword - it's not something a browser can support, frames already have a fallback method, and so on.

      I really think that the User Agent string should be abandoned to prevent poor coupling and cohesion of website and browsers. This User Agent string should be replaced with a list of browser capabilities.

      The User-Agent header is important for working around actual browser bugs, e.g. not being able to cope with compressed content correctly despite claiming to do so.

      --
      Bogtha Bogtha Bogtha
    2. Re:One line of code. by cgenman · · Score: 4, Informative

      On the one hand, I agree that such a system is how an ideal world would operate. On the other hand, I'm guessing a typical conversation would go:

      Server: "Can you handle PNG's?"
      Client: "Yes"
      Server: "Are you sure?"
      Client: "Yes"
      Server: "The entire spec?"
      Client: "Yes"
      Server: "...Are you I.E. 5?"
      Client: "Yes"
      Server: "You're a dirty liar."

      Oh, sure I.E. thinks it handles CSS properly. It will probably even tell you it handles tables properly. It just doesn't.

      I'll be happy the day we can ditch the user agent string. But then again, I'll be happy the day we can use alpha transparency in a PNG on the web.

  2. Re:you know... by arkanes · · Score: 5, Informative
    It's using some retarded fucking captcha implementation using IE XML data islands instead of using one of the 40 million scripts that don't require brower support. Fuckers.

    I hate this stupid shit. And I know it's not even malicious, because I've seen it happen before at government agencies. It's out and out incompetence. Although it seems that given all the other crap FEMA has fucked up lately, this won't even register to most people.

  3. Re:you know... by matth · · Score: 4, Informative

    Yes... there is no "feature" If you install a plugin that makes firefox read as "Internet Exploder" or use Opera's masking the site works.. so umm yeah this looks not good.

  4. Re:you know... by TripMaster+Monkey · · Score: 4, Informative


    I wonder if opera using it's browser masking could do it?

    Don't know about Opera, but Firefox running the User Agent Switcher set to IE 6 works just fine (tested it myself), so I would assume that Opera with browser masking would work as well.

    Anyone out there with Opera installed that could give us a definitive answer?

    --
    ____

    ~ |rip/\/\aster /\/\onkey

  5. Re:ADA? by FuzzyBad-Mofo · · Score: 5, Informative

    The Section 508 accessibility guidelines are a requirement for all U.S. government sites. I have helped to develop several .gov sites, and we take 508 compliance very seriously. I think the people responsible for www.fema.gov are about to get dragged over the coals, and rightly so. Making their website work in one *one* browser is the antithesis of accessibility.

  6. Re:You knew it was coming... by squiggleslash · · Score: 4, Informative
    Ahem! Not only a Mac-using Bush voter, but the editor of Slashdot's Mac section and and activist in the GOP.

    (I recall hearing somewhere that Rush Limbaugh is a big Mac advocate too)

    --
    You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
  7. Working fine in Opera 7 by cgenman · · Score: 4, Informative

    Seems to work fine in opera 7 so long as you Identify as MSIE 6.0. No problem with the capcha or anything.

    Of course, I didn't finish the registration process fully, so I can't say for sure. But it looks like the broweser banning is just a choice on their part rather than a technical limitation.

  8. The text is wrong or was wrong... by Comatose51 · · Score: 5, Informative
    Opera and Netscape don't work either.

    That's not true. Opera works. I spent last weekend volunteering at the Reunion Arena shelter in Dallas. We booted one machine with Knoppix because the Windows install was bad. Mozilla and Konquerer failed to load the page correctly. So I downloaded Opera and it worked. Unless FEMA have gone out of their way to eliminate Opera, you should be able to register with Opera. In other words, there is nothing on that page that Opera cannot handle. We've registered a few hundred people already and a few with Opera.

    The stupid site really ticks me off. Even with IE you will have problems. I think they did the stupid thing in ASP. Every stupid action you take requires exchange of states between you and the server. If you click before that's complete it will give you and error and you might have to start all over. There was nothing on that page that could not have been done with simple HTML

    BTW, yesterday was the first day FEMA started working fully in Dallas. Their computers couldn't network properly so they had to take over OUR PCs to register people by doing exactly the same thing we've been doing. Not only that, they only want those computers, which do not belong to them, to be used only for FEMA registration. In the words of a FEMA worker, "People need money not email or Internet." That would be great if they all knew where the family was or our government was competent enough to provide them with that information. Unfortunately, most people have to look for their family on their own on the Internet.

    --
    EvilCON - Made Famous by /.
  9. Woman calls FEMA and gets runaround by dieScheisse · · Score: 5, Informative

    Just to add to this story...I was listening to a local talk radio station on my way home from work yesterday. They played an interview with a woman who was extremely frustrated, almost to the point of tears, with FEMA and their apparent lack of knowledge on the situation of people displaced by Katrina.

    She called them in order to make a claim and they asked her for her address so they could send her the required paperwork (not sure HOW she called them). She told them she no longer had an address as her home no longer existed. They then asked for her home phone number so they could call her back...she again informned them she no longer had a home. They then asked for her cell phone number. She again told them there was no cell phone service where she is located. They then asked her for her fax number...then her email address....you get the picture.

    FEMA's motto must be "Let's make it hard for people to get the support they need."

    Is FEMA living in a hole, in a cave, in the middle of a desert or what?

  10. accessibility is the way to do this by Sad+Loser · · Score: 4, Informative


    Surely they can be nailed on the accessibility.
    There is a nice helpful link on every page saying that they are committed to accessibility.
    There is even a email address, to allow people who think that accessibility to this site is sub-optimal, to contact them.
    If you know anyone who feels this way, maybe they should send an email to
    FEMAOPA@dhs.gov
    and I'm sure they will be pleased to sort it out.

    --
    Humorous signatures are over-rated.
  11. Very easy to get around this site's requirements by xQuarkDS9x · · Score: 4, Informative

    If you are using Proxomitron and Grypen's Latest Filters for Proxomitron, then this sites "IE only requirement" becomes VERY easy to bypass.

    How do you we do this once Proxomitron and Gryphen's filters are installed? Easy! Open up

    User - Include - Exclude.txt

    Then add the following into this file.

    www.fema.gov $SET(keyword=.js.ajs.code.flash.popup.iesite.)

    Once this is done - you can now visit the site using any god damn browser you want. In my case I tested the registration page under Opera, Firefox, and Mozilla, and as far as FEMA site was concerned, this was my user agent.

    User-Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1)

    So really, I don't know why moronic webmasters, especially for a government or government related site, want to pull shit like this for users whom may not know how to get around "IE only" requirements.

    --
    You must master your joystick like a fisherman masters bait! - Gimpy
  12. Re:you know... by pixelpusher220 · · Score: 5, Informative

    Before we go off the high board (ok, maybe while we're in the air before hitting water anyway...)

    Link and the below snippet:

    This is a case many of us are all to familiar with. One where the 'product' is being used in an environment that it was not intended.

    "Mike Quealy, a FEMA spokesperson, explained to me that they are aware of the issue, and are currently working on a application that supports all of the most popular browsers. Quealy said that the application in question was originally an in-house tool, meant to be used by call center people. Internet Explorer was the official in-house browser, so the application was coded with IE in mind."

    So we have an *INTERNAL* app that was opened to the public, thus adding new browsers for which it was not designed to it's possible clients.

    It's also a good lesson for designing things even when you *know* the environment in which it will be used...that can change and it's best to work with standards rather than the easiest, but perhaps proprietary choice.


    --
    People in cars cause accidents....accidents in cars cause people :-D
  13. Re:you know... by shawb · · Score: 4, Informative

    Why does it matter? Because some people wanted to make kiosks based on donated hardware to set up in New Orleans for this purpose, as well as hopefully contacting worrying family members. Installing windows would A) reduce the security of a kiosk B) cost more money as liscensing would be the most expensive part of the operation C) exclude most older donated hardware and d) take longer per kiosk. This means significantly less kiosks will be able to be be set up.

    And people have run tests that show the website doesn't actually use any IE only features, it simply checks to make sure it is IE and then locks your browser out if it reports as something else. So there is no reason that the site is IE centric anyways.

    --
    I'll never make that mistake again, reading the experts' opinions. - Feynman
  14. He's notorious in the horse community... by jpellino · · Score: 5, Informative

    My wife's an arabian horsewoman and shot up in her chair when she heard he was in charge of FEMA. He nearly broke the International Arabian Horse Association with lawsuits over equine comsmetic surgery, and soon after solicited personal defense funds as part of his work - an ethics violation. He left with the IAHA in a pretty good uproar in the middle of a three year contract. Either way, it was Charlie Foxtrot.

    --
    "Win treats sysadmins better than users. Mac treats users better than sysadmins. Linux treats everyone like sysadmins."
  15. Re:you know... by Basehart · · Score: 4, Informative

    "Especially since the bucks responsible for upgrading the levee system were PERSONALLY slashed from the budget and diverted to Iraq - which in itself was a fucking moronic operation."

    $250 million was cut from the levee maintenance program, which ended up costing the country $50 billion.

    More on this ridiculous state of affairs here

  16. Re:you know... by tgibbs · · Score: 4, Informative

    Bush appoints the (completely unqualified, but old-boy friend of Bush) head of FEMA.

    Even worse, Bush fired Clinton appointee James Lee Witt, who came to the job with several years of experience as head of disaster management in Arkansas. Witt revitalized FEMA, and was highly respected by both Republicans and Democrats, but Bush chose to replace Witt with Joe Allbaugh, Bush's campaign manager. When Allbaugh left the job, Bush appointed Brown to this crucial post--another man with no experience in disaster management (or indeed, any evidence of competence of any kind).