Slashdot Mirror


20 Things They Don't Want You to Know

theodp writes "PC World spills the beans about a bunch of things technology companies would rather you didn't know, including the lowdown on exploiting Windows' bad security, unlocking cell phones, using an IPod to move music and useless specs." Nothing groundbreaking, but might be a good primer for the non-techie in your life.

78 of 403 comments (clear)

  1. Know anyone who uses MSN Messenger? by ReformedExCon · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "Know anyone who uses Windows Messenger as their instant messaging client? Me neither."

    That's strange, because I don't know anyone who doesn't. Except for a new guy who uses Trillian, but he'll come around when he gets tired of fighting the firewall.

    PC World seems to be in a kind of limbo. It's not technical enough for anyone serious about computers, and it's way over the head of anyone who isn't familiar with computers. I guess that makes it prime reading material for CIOs.

    But seriously folks. I was at the bookstore the other day and picked up a Computer Shopper. When did this new thin format happen? What happened to 500 pages of advertisements?

    I wonder why Slashdot never gets any links to Dr. Dobbs Journal.

    --
    Jesus saved me from my past. He can save you as well.
    1. Re:Know anyone who uses MSN Messenger? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Windows Messenger != MSN Messenger.

    2. Re:Know anyone who uses MSN Messenger? by Tezkah · · Score: 4, Informative

      Trillian supports MSN Messenger as well as AIM/ICQ/Yahoo!/IRC/Jabber etc. It's basically the same as GAIM, and supports most protocols (also supports plugins).

      What I don't understand is what the grandparent is talking about, why would he have to change to MSNger to stop having to fight the firewall? Trillian mimics MSN Messenger in order to connect to MSN servers. The only problems with Trillian for me are high memory usage (although not so bad when compared to MSNger 7.0), slow interface, and Audio/Visual capabilities that only work half the time.

      I've switched to MSNger exclusively because I don't have anyone I chat with regularly on AIM or Yahoo, so the benefits of Trillian/Gaim are much less than the frustrations of incompatibility with MSNger buddies. Besides, you can always break the EULA and remove the ads and such from the MSN client, I recommend SpeedyMSN. Really cleans up the interface, if you can find the download for 2.0 (both speedymsn.tk and speedymessenger.net are down at the time of this writing.) You can bet Microsoft doesn't want people knowing that they can get rid of that pesky ad.... :)

    3. Re:Know anyone who uses MSN Messenger? by ozmanjusri · · Score: 2, Funny

      My goodness. Where have you been hiding?

      Under a bridge. Duh.
      P.S. You shouldn't feed it...

      --
      "I've got more toys than Teruhisa Kitahara."
    4. Re:Know anyone who uses MSN Messenger? by Darkon · · Score: 2, Interesting


      Windows Messenger is sometimes worth keeping because you can run it and MSN Messenger simultaneously - handy if you have two MSN accounts.

    5. Re:Know anyone who uses MSN Messenger? by Alex+P+Keaton+in+da · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I don't think any of us really choose our instant messenger. At work I use ICQ because everyone else at work uses it. BUt I also use AIM, because my little sister is away at school, and she uses AIM. I hate AIM, but if I choose not to use AIM, I am only hurting myself because then I couldn't IM my sister.
      The next logical Question- Why can't I get my sister to switch? All her friends use AIM. And so it goes.

      --
      And All I Ask is a Tall Ship And a Star to Steer Her By
    6. Re:Know anyone who uses MSN Messenger? by displaced80 · · Score: 4, Informative

      True, but Windows Messenger != Windows Messenger, either :-)

      There's MSN Messenger. We all know what that is.

      Then there's Windows Messenger. Which is a sibling of MSN Messenger included in Windows XP

      Finally there's that other Windows Messenger. The one which used to be called WinPopup.

      It'd be nice if different parts of MS could at least make sure this sort of naming confusion didn't happen. Oh well.

      --
      What's the frequency, Kenneth?
    7. Re:Know anyone who uses MSN Messenger? by Txiasaeia · · Score: 2, Informative

      Hard to kill? You right click and exit out of it in the taskbar, then rename C:\progra~1\Messenger to C:\progra~1\M. There, dead.

      --
      Condemnant quod non intellegunt.
    8. Re:Know anyone who uses MSN Messenger? by MerlinTheWizard · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I don't use MSN messenger anymore. It's impossible to use behind a decently configured router, especially the latest version, and MS is perfectly aware of it. Talk about security. Don't make me laugh with fighting firewalls with trillian. MSN Messenger uses uPnP, wich is my worst nightmare - I have always steered clear of Windows firewalls anyway. A good old router is perfectly fine if you want true security. But uPnP? It's exactly like putting sophisticated locks all over your house's doors and giving the keys to all your neighbors, the mailman, some guys that beg for money down the street, and a couple more guys that you know from the local bars. :))

    9. Re:Know anyone who uses MSN Messenger? by MoreDruid · · Score: 4, Informative
      nice to see the distinction between the two Windows Messengers... you almost got it right too! (I'm nitpicking here though)

      Windows Messenger is included in Windows XP and can be used for IM-ing through Microsofts servers (they connect to the same servers as MSN Messenger), but can also be used for IM-ing on your own network using an Exchange Server. MS also has an Exchange IM client if you're using win2k or below.

      Now for the Windows Messenger #2... this is actually called the Windows Messenger Service and is indeed used for popup messages (intended for networks). You can use WinPopup, but on the command line "net send \\IP.here.x.x "message"" will work too. I can remember doing a txt adventure game with one of my collegues using this before IM-ing was invented.
      Heh... those were good times... Anyway, I definately agree with you on the naming convention, but the Windows Messenger Service was around way before Instant Messenging was even invented, so what were they supposed to come up with after AOL and Yahoo! both created a product with "Messenger" in the name (yes I am aware that Google uses the name Talk, but I think that's because their future plans with it are in the voice/VOIP arena)?
      --
      The best weapon of a dictatorship is secrecy, but the best weapon of a democracy should be the weapon of openness.
  2. All in one page/printer friendly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative
    1. Re:All in one page/printer friendly by trb · · Score: 5, Funny

      this is one of those things they don't want you to know.

  3. One more thing they missed... by snotclot · · Score: 4, Insightful

    BITTORRENT...! o_O

    / bet you were expecting something creative like Linux eh? // bleh, 3rd post!

  4. My Super-Bad Computer Speakers by Monte · · Score: 5, Funny

    You mean my speakers can't sink 1,000 watts?!? The deuce you say!

    I love the power ratings on speakers. If those numbers were half true, playing an MP3 would make the streetlights dim in time to the music. And all that power somehow coming from a little 500 mA wall-wart. Science, wonders, and miracles!

    1. Re:My Super-Bad Computer Speakers by HateBreeder · · Score: 5, Informative

      Actually,
      they usually are true.

      But most users don't know how to interpret the numbers.

      For instance, when they said you speaker system is "1000 Watts" I'm pretty sure they meant the PMPO (Peak Music Power) rating, which means:
      (According to http://www.epanorama.net/documents/audio/amplifier _power.html)
      "So called "music power". This power figure tells the power which the amplifier can maximally supply in some conditions. PMPO rating gives the highest measuring value, but this info is quite useless, because there is no exact standard how PMPO power should be measured.

      The reason for this power rating was to show the max capability of equipment for recreating strong musical transients like kettle drums and the like. Similar thing (music power rating) was used in the sixties, and I think it assumed a square wave that swung the whole supply range of the output stage. This alone gives them a factor of two over a clean sine wave note. But the ugliest thing they did was to assume that the high power lasted such a short period of time that the power supply caps would hold the voltages steady without any drooping. In the real world, an under powered PS could be hidden by this ruse and the PMPO might be a factor of 10 or more higher than what could be sustained on a nice instrumental performance.

      Forget what adverts say about peak power or other "power terms" because they are not standardized and anyway comparable between equipments. Just look for "RMS continuous Power" or other reliable power rating (like DIN power). "

      Generally, there isn't any direct mapping between PMPO and RMS (Root Mean Square) since every manufacturer formulates his own PMPO measurements....
      Most of the time the RMS value of a speaker is about 10 times lower than the PMPO rating.
      Which in your case, Means ~100 Watt RMS (This is VERY good for a single channel... but it's kind'a low for a large multi-speaker system).

      Hope this helps.

      --
      Sigs are for the weak.
    2. Re:My Super-Bad Computer Speakers by Handyman · · Score: 5, Informative

      Also, when comparing speaker performance, Watts are definitely not the complete picture.

      The first thing you need to find out is the efficiency of speakers. For instance, my speakers have an efficiency of 92 dB/W, which means that at a power level of 1 W, they will produce 92 dB of sound. As dB is a logarithmic scale, doubling the wattage will increase the number of dBs by 3, so a power level of 64 W will get me a 92 + 3 * 6 = 110 dB sound level. However, a speaker with an efficiency of 80 dB/W will only produce 98 dB for the same amount of power. I've seen efficiencies ranging from 70 dB/W up to the high ninety-somethings, so be careful to check these numbers.

      The second thing you need to find out is the impedance of the speakers, combined with the impedance your amplifier is rated for. For instance, my amplifier is not simply rated as 50 W, but as 50 W for speakers with an impedance of 8 Ohms, and 100 W for speakers with an impedance of 4 Ohms. This can make some difference. Watch out with getting a speaker with very low impedance though: if your amplifier wasn't designed to handle that, they will probably draw too much power, causing the amplifier to get overheated. In addition, you will not be able to open up your volume knob more than a couple of millimeters -- and volume is probably something you like to have detailed control over.

    3. Re:My Super-Bad Computer Speakers by zootm · · Score: 5, Funny

      RMS continuous Power

      Great. Now I have a mental image of Richard Stallman transforming into a fire-breathing, behemoth-sized Godzilla-style Free Software monster.

      "No! Free Software must prevail! I need CONTINUOUSSSS POOOOOWWEEEEERRR"

      Sparks, flames, etc.

    4. Re:My Super-Bad Computer Speakers by Reverberant · · Score: 2, Informative
      The first thing you need to find out is the efficiency of speakers. For instance, my speakers have an efficiency of 92 dB/W, which means that at a power level of 1 W, they will produce 92 dB of sound.

      Everything you wrote is true, but I have to nitpick just a little ;)

      The effeciency of a speakers is given in terms of output per watt at a reference distance (e.g. 92 dB 1 watt at 1 meter). It's generally understood that the sensitivity is measured at 1 meter, but if a loudspeaker specification doesn't give the distance, you might want to be a little suspicious - for example a speaker with an sensitivity of 92 dB 1 watt at 1 centimeter is going to be a lot less efficient than a speaker with an efficiency of 92 dB 1 watt at 1 meter.

      Also, you may sometimes see the speaker sensitivity given as xx dB at 2.83 volts instead of 1 watt - 1 Watt is 2.83V into 8ohms, so a reference voltage of 2.83V is used for non-8ohm speakers.

      One last point for people who buy separate amps and loudspeakers: you're more likely to damage your speakers by using a amp that outputs too little power than too much power. Most speakers can handle a lot of juice for short periods, given enough cool-down time. However, a low-power amp played loudly can cause clipping, and clipping will fry your tweeters pretty quickly.

  5. Extended Warranties Aren't Worth It by squoozer · · Score: 5, Insightful

    We all know this but I can't believe that PC World are actually saying it. They are one of the hardest sellers of extended warranties that I know. They once tried to sell me a warranty for a £10 mouse. IIRC the warranty was £15 but covered me for 3 years! No I don't shop there on a regular basis I just needed a mouse quickly.

    As far as I can tell they make their money from running virus scanners on ill informed customers PC's. Their customer service is awful at best even when they are taking large sums of your money. I suppose that is the result of them being the only show in town. The last thing that really bugs me though is that they always have a security guard on the door.

    --
    I used to have a better sig but it broke.
    1. Re:Extended Warranties Aren't Worth It by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I think I'm right in saying that the PC World (US) publication and the PC World store you're thinking about are completely different.

      Still, you're right about PC World being pretty useless, highly inflated prices etc.

    2. Re:Extended Warranties Aren't Worth It by Monte · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I would agree that extended warranties on PCs aren't worth it, but my rule is:

      1) If it's something that goes on the shelf/table and just sits there, forget the warranty: TV, DVD player, stereo, laptop, PC, etc

      2) If it's something you carry around, small, expensive and likley to break when dropped, consider the warranty: CD player, tape system, mini-disc, PDA, etc

      This has served me in good stead, the two or three extended warranties I have gotten have definitely paid for themselves. But then I'm a klutz.

  6. Another thing wrong by dbIII · · Score: 4, Informative

    They recommend buying things from Dell. For those who are already stuck with things from Dell it is possible to get replacement parts from third parties (even Dell laptop batteries) without having to spend hours on the phone.

  7. Re:Mostly useless. by ruebarb · · Score: 5, Insightful

    every hacker or geek had to start somewhere -

    maybe learning how to copy Ipod tunes to multiple computers is just what the Dr. ordered to start someone down the road to unlocking the next propritary file format -

    RB

    --

    ----------
    ah honey, we're all resplendent - Bill Mallonee
  8. It's PEEEEPLE!!!!! by flyingsquid · · Score: 5, Funny

    Soylent Green is PEOPLE!

  9. Not clever by Ronald+Dumsfeld · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Is it just me, or does anyone else think this is dumb...
    I keep my Windows system pretty well secured, but somehow that doesn't prevent Windows' Security Center from informing me that 'Your computer might be at risk' every morning when I turn on my computer. That message gets old fast. To banish it for good, go to Start, Control Panel, Security Center. Then click Change the way Security Center alerts me in the resources box and uncheck all of the boxes on the resulting screen.
    Your average user should not be doing that.
    --
    Where's the Kaboom?
    There's supposed to be an Earth-shattering Kaboom.
    1. Re:Not clever by B1ackDragon · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I like the other replies, but I think the answer is less "the user doesn't care" and more "it trains the user not to care." The operating system crying wolf every 10 minutes for things that aren't problems (yes, Windows, anti-virus is updated) only serves to mask real security concerns.

      I guess, as always, if you want it done right don't leave it to Windows.

      --
      The snow doesn't give a soft white damn whom it touches. -- ee cummings
    2. Re:Not clever by Tim+C · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If security centre is popping up that message regularly, that would seem to indicate that he is not keeping his system well secured.

      The only time I ever see that is if AVG hasn't had a chance to update itself for a couple of days (eg the machine just hasn't been on at the appropriate time, I've been away, etc) and warns me about it.

    3. Re:Not clever by Bastian · · Score: 4, Funny

      Heh, doesn't everyone ignore those little speech bubbles? Windows spams me more than the v1@gr@ people.

      My personal favorite: On a Windows XP box at work which has no USB2.0 bus that, I get a warning from Windows about having plugged a high-speed USB device into a low-speed USB port every time I plug my USB2 key in.

      Come on, that's not helping me. That's just mocking me for not having the latest hardware.

  10. 20 Things I don't want to know by stoolpigeon · · Score: 5, Funny
    well I can't come up with 20 but here is a start

    • no matter what piece of hardware I buy, at any price, a faster and cheaper one will be out a week later
    • I really do look like a middle aged dad/geek- regardless of my #insert cool tech gadget here#
    • I spend more time getting my apps 'dialed in' than I do actually using them
    • I'll continue to upgrade every time my distro puts out a new release, even though everything works just fine now and my old hardware is having a tough time keeping up
    • At least once this week I'll continue explaining to someone about relational databases long after they have lost all interest.
    • I'll be showing my dad how to burn a cd at least 3 times in the next 2 months
    • my blog peaked that time 3 people read it in one day
    • When I 'signed' that one web petition for 'that cause' nothing happened
    • I'll get to use this in a couple days when this story gets posted again
    • Once again, I'll spend too much time at slashdot
    --
    It's hard to believe that's how Micronians are made. Why don't we see it right now by having you both kiss one another?
    1. Re:20 Things I don't want to know by bhiestand · · Score: 5, Funny
      my blog peaked that time 3 people read it in one day

      Sorry to be the one to tell you, but that was just a faulty counter. The first page hit was when you went to the site to post to the blog. The second was from you viewing the page after posting it, just to make sure everything came out right. Then the third was when you returned a few hours later to check for any replies.
      --
      SWM seeks new sig for a brief fling
  11. Ahhh yes, computer speaker ratings by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 4, Informative

    I always wondered where they got this shit. The first time I encountered it, I literally did a double take. I was poking around computer speakers, I don't remember why, and I came across a little set of desktop speakers. Nothing remarkable except that they were rated to about 300watts.

    Ok now WTF? As it happens, I own professional speakers. They are about 5 feet tall, dual bass drivers, 3-way, etc. Serious speakers in other words. I check on them and they are rated to 200 watts a peice. Sounds reasonable for their size, but would still be pushing it. I'm sure they could handle 200 watts of RMS power, but I really wouldn't want to try it.

    So how the hell can these little speakers handle 300 watts? I mean I can't even figure out a peak computation that would figure it. So I find that it's "PMPO" power. I don't know what PMPO means, Peak Momentary Power Output I've heard but I think SWPOOA would be a better term, Shit We Pulled Out of Our Ass. It seems to have no relation to reality, purely somebody's fantasy.

    For that matter I can't figure out why you'd want that kind of power out of computer speakers. I drive my speakers with a 150 watt amp, that's 75 watts per channel so a little less than half of what they are rated to take. It's overkill in the purest sense of the word. For normal, modern music I rarely drive them beyond 1 watt each. For classical dynamic music, maybe 5 watts. This drives it to nearly painful levels.

    More power is useful in large venues but for computers, who the fuck cares? Speakers are right next to you.

    1. Re:Ahhh yes, computer speaker ratings by Babbster · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The truth is that people who care and know anything understand the situation and are not fooled, while the people who care and don't know anything will never tell the difference. It's always seemed like a nonissue to me...

    2. Re:Ahhh yes, computer speaker ratings by hattig · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I think I once heard that they simply multiplied the actual Watt ratings for the speakers by the number of speakers. So a pair of 10W computer speakers would be 10W * 10W * 2 = 200 MarketingWatts!

      I saw these from a brief Google search: "According how audio industry seems to use the term PMPO (peak music power output), in can be anything from 5 to 100 watts of PMPO that equals one real RMS watt." and "The vendor of the product calculates PMPO based on the maximum power output of the device under perfect conditions and 100% efficiency. These conditions are impossible to obtain, and no device can sustain the PMPO power for any significant length of time without being ruined. The PMPO power relies on the fact that amplifiers can provide short bursts of very high power. Over time, these short bursts when averaged with the lower output powers, gives the real value."

      I have heard a lot less of PMPO in the UK in recent years, maybe they were banned from using it because it is purely a marketing term that has no grounding in reality.

      As an aside, would most computer users be better off getting a real amplifier and real speakers and using them for 10 years rather than dealing with shitty PC speakers? I'm not talking audiophile stuff here, just stuff that you can pick up for a reasonable price. For gaming you'd probably want a decent surround system of course, but most other users?

    3. Re:Ahhh yes, computer speaker ratings by hankwang · · Score: 2, Informative
      I don't know what PMPO means, Peak Momentary Power Output I've heard but I think SWPOOA would be a better term, Shit We Pulled Out of Our Ass. It seems to have no relation to reality, purely somebody's fantasy.

      Indeed. A couple of posters try to explain somewhat reasonable ways to define the number, but the ratings are clearly utter nonsense. To dissipate 50 W peak power (100 W PMPO over 2 speakers) through an ordinary 8 ohm speaker cone, you would need 20 volts and a current of 2.5 amps. Neither the tiny +/-5V power supply nor the small transistors (high internal resistance) would be able to deliver such a power, not even for a microsecond.

      The only definition that I ever read that might produce these PMPO numbers in a measurement is that you shortcut the capacitors in the power supply over a resistor with a value equal to the internal resistance of the capacitors (maybe 0.1 ohm). In that case, PMPO = V^2/4R, where V is the power supply voltage and R the internal resistance of the capacitors. Which has no meaningful value to the sound output whatsoever.

    4. Re:Ahhh yes, computer speaker ratings by DrLex · · Score: 2, Funny
      I don't know what PMPO means, Peak Momentary Power Output I've heard
      Sorry, you heard that wrong. It's Putrid Marketing Power Optimism. While some other posters still try to give a definition of it, I think your SWPOOA comes closest. There might be an official definition of it, as far as I remember it involves measuring the power of a ridiculously short pulse. Even your standard PC case speaker could probably endure 1000W, if it was only applied during 1 microsecond (1000W*1e-6 = 0.001 joules, that surely won't burn the coil). The peak amplitude is only limited by the breakthrough voltage of the coil, once this is reached it's only a matter of applying a pulse short enough to stay below a lethal power dissipation for the speaker. Otherwise all speakers would have an infinite PMPO rating.
      In other words, this rating is so bogus that if you go into a store and a clerk tries to sell you speakers toting their PMPO rating, you should seriously consider shoving the things up his ass.
      I also once saw a speaker in a leaflet with an RMS rating, where RMS was explained as "Real Music Source". I wouldn't buy speakers there either :)
  12. Re:Mostly useless. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    20 things any geek worth his salt already knows

    The submitter has an AOL address! What do you expect?!

  13. Re:My geek life is complete... by m00j · · Score: 2, Funny

    Was the joke that you don't actually live in your parent's basement or that the idea of moving out of it is preposterous? :D

  14. Expensive Printers and warranties by Nightspirit · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I've found that printers typically only last a year, at most (I'm in college, so I use them alot). I've tried most brands (canon, HP, epson, lexmark) and not one of them have lasted over a year.

    Finally I bit the bullet and got a 3 year extended warranty on an all-in-one, and couldn't be happier. Whenever that thing finally breaks (and it will be soon) I'll simply turn it in for a new one.

    1. Re:Expensive Printers and warranties by bladernr · · Score: 4, Interesting
      I've found that printers typically only last a year

      I've had an HP 4000 since 1997. I've printed lots, and I've never had a problem. I know someone who still has an HP 4si (circa 1993). Its not cheap to buy a quality laser printer, but, since I've only bought one printer in 8 years, I think it works out cheaper to buy quality.

      Or, as with anything else, you get what you pay for.

      --
      Sarcasm and hyperbole are the final refuges for weak minds
  15. 21... by advocate_one · · Score: 3, Funny
    how to survive a slashdotting...

    they're not gonna let that one out...

    --
    Donald 'Duck' Dunn: We had a band powerful enough to turn goat piss into gasoline.
  16. Sometime fibs are good by vivekg · · Score: 2, Funny

    BAD fib
    You know Upstream & downstream stuff they will say you will get 256 kbps, 512kbsp and so on. Few weeks back I was at friends place. When sales guy of local DSL Company came to give all info and started to explain how good DSL is from Dial up. He told my friend *DSL is your own lease line* :/? So I interrupted him and said you mean LL? He said like that... Hee so this is how they sales connections and they don't Want to know much about technology. Okay don't explain technology but don't fib... coz one day s/he will know this!

    I found hardware vendor especially owners and a tech guy gives more fibs... for example somebody in shop would like to purchase 2 gig USB pen. Owner told lady that it has driver in USB that take some space so you will always not get exactly 2 gig space. Deal went very well. Some time fibs are good for example in this case you can't explain all the stuff to old lady about why you don't get 2 gig space on USB.

    --
    The important thing is not to stop questioning --Albert Einstein.
    1. Re:Sometime fibs are good by Loonacy · · Score: 4, Funny

      I'm amazed you even understood what s/he was talking about. I thought it was just a bunch of random words strung together to resemble sentences.

    2. Re:Sometime fibs are good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      TRANSLATION

      A few weeks ago, while at a friend's house, I heard the local DSL company's salesman trying to convince by friend to purchase their product. When trying to explain how fast an ADSL line could be when compared to a standard dial-up modem, he said that "DSL is like having your own leased line".

      On another occasion, I overheard a conversation in a shop between a salesman and an old lady. The salesman was trying to explain the difference between 2GB and 2GiB. Rather than use numbers, he said the difference in space was due to a "driver" on the pen.

    3. Re:Sometime fibs are good by Bozdune · · Score: 4, Funny

      Thank you. WHen I read the original post I felt like my dog must feel when he tilts his head sideways.

    4. Re:Sometime fibs are good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Yet Another Translation, by a professional:

      "Sometime Fibs are Good"

      An example of a bad fib:

      Marketing representatives often use fibs to misrepresent the speed of communications service. For example, while visiting a friend a few weeks ago, I heard a local DSL company's sales representative pitching his company's service. He began to explain the advantages of DSL over a dial-up connection, and in doing so he told a fib: he said that DSL is the same as having a leased line. I interrupted him and asked him for confirmation, using the standard acronym "LL" for "Leased Line" to make it clear that I wanted to know if he was suggesting that DSL and a Leased Line were equivalent. The marketing representative replied that DSL and Leased Lines were the same thing, which is patently untrue.

      This example of a bad fib demonstrates the underhanded marketing tactics some sales representatives choose to employ. These fibs lead the customer further from the truth, in the hope that the customer will make an ill-informed and unwise purchase. This tactic is unwise, however, because customers will grow unhappy with their service once they learn the truth.

      An example of a good fib:

      Hardware salespeople, especially the owners of stores and technically oriented sales representatives, sometimes tell less harmful fibs. Once, a merchant was pitching a 2GB USB pen to an older woman who did not seem to understand much about storage space. The merchant, being at heart an honest man, did not want to give his client the impression that he was selling her a full two gigabytes of storage space, because that was untrue, despite the manufacturer's claims. So, he disclosed the truth by telling a small fib: he told her that some of the space on the USB device was already used by software needed by computers accessing the device.

      Although the owner said did not fully explain the difference between the product advertisement and the truth, he did make an effort to show his client that the packaging was misleading and that the product would not fully live up to the expectations advertised. By telling a small fib, he avoided allowing a client to believe a larger lie or allowing her to become confused by technical jargon and unfamiliar concepts. In this case, the result of telling the fib was to bring the client closer to the truth so that she could make an informed purchase.

    5. Re:Sometime fibs are good by LordKaT · · Score: 4, Funny

      I've got some Mod points, and if there was a "+1 What the fuck?" you'd get it.

  17. find-a-human by krunk4ever · · Score: 4, Informative

    i found the find-a-human section quite helpful:

    https://www.quickbase.com/db/bam6rdiey?a=q&qid=5

    You Can Get a Human on the Phone

    Follow the directions at Paul English's Find-A-Human IVR Phone System Shortcuts site to reach a human operator at any of more than 60 cell phone, PC, and travel firms.


    when i know i can find the info online, i won't bother. i need some help that an automated system can't provide or wastes too much time trying to get it to recgonize what i'm saying.

    another winner i thought was:

    Useless Specs: Digital Zoom

    definitely the most useless spec i can't think of at the moment. it tricks unsuspecting buyers into believing their digicam has more 'zoom' than it really has.

  18. Road to Riches - Bet against MS by aelbric · · Score: 4, Funny

    From the article:

    "My PC's firewall, antivirus scanner, spyware remover, pop-up blocker, and spam filter all agree: Windows is sorely lacking in PC security. That situation may not change until Windows Vista (formerly Longhorn) comes out sometime next year."


    Wonder if Vegas is giving any odds on this. Might be easy money.

    --
    nos laetus epulor qui would domito nos
  19. Ink for inkjet printers by daffy951 · · Score: 2, Informative

    There are inkjet printers where it would have been cheaper to buy a brand new printer than buying ink to the old one...

    1. Re:Ink for inkjet printers by Ph33r+th3+g(O)at · · Score: 2, Informative

      The cartridges that come with the printers have very little ink in them. They call them "starter cartridges" or something of the like. So while the printer with ink installed is cheaper, it's probably not cheaper per milliliter of ink.

      --
      I too have felt the cold finger of injustice.
  20. Burst Rates on Hard Drives Do Matter by Dangero · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I think part of the reason that the non-tec savy people stay non-tech savy is because they get so much conflicting bad information. Of course the DSL sales guy lies. He only knows enough about what he's selling to sell it. If he knew more, he wouldn't be selling it or installing it. He'd be doing something much more interesting. But regarding hard drives, I can't believe they are saying that the burst rate does not matter. With a 10 MB+ hard disk cache you better believe that a lot of the information you request is coming burst transfer from the cache. Sounds like they just ran out of good ideas for their list, but they are complete morons for making such an unsubstantiated claim.

  21. MSN messenger IS NOT Windows Messenger by gotr00t · · Score: 4, Informative
    I think you're getting MSN confused with Windows messenger. While the former is a popular chat service that I must admit has a huge user base and lots of features, the latter is a built in "feature" of windows that allows people to display messages on your desktop.

    Many spammers have taken advantage of "windows messenger" spamming by throwing packets at windows messenger in hopes that it will appear on the users' desktop. Disabling the messenger effectively eliminates this.

    1. Re:MSN messenger IS NOT Windows Messenger by ravenlock · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Actually, there are three messengers.

      MSN Messenger is the ad-ridden MSN client
      Windows Messenger is the version without all the blinkety blink, but it's still a MSN client
      Windows Messenger Service is the thing that displays pop-up messages from other conmputers.

    2. Re:MSN messenger IS NOT Windows Messenger by wfberg · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You're confusing "Windows Messenger" with the "Messenger Service".

      MSN Messenger - instant messenger with a lot of doodads, a new version to be downloaded every day. AKA "msn".

      Windows Messenger - instant messenger that can log on to the MSN Messenger network, but also to Exchange/SIP servers, doesn't have many doodads. AKA "that crappy ancient version of msn that won't go away even if you install the newest version".

      Messenger Service - runs in the background on NT and higher, displays irritating "press OK" dialogs with spam from viagra sellers or system administrators. AKA "winpopup".

      --
      SCO employee? Check out the bounty
    3. Re:MSN messenger IS NOT Windows Messenger by Inf0phreak · · Score: 3, Informative

      This localized clique you're talking about is called "Europe". Yes, AIM is widespread in USA (*AOL* Instant Messenger... not really surprising considering all those CDs and whatnot they pollute the world with, now is it?), but the rest of the world has to the best of my knowledge welcomed our messenging overlords.

      --
      ________
      Entranced by anime since late summer 2001 and loving it ^_^
  22. Windows' Bad Security? Give me a break. by Ravatar · · Score: 4, Funny

    TFA states that your Windows Product Key being retrievable is a security risk. What??

    Not to mention the fact that the author uses Windows to manage his passwords, which he cites as another of the software's "security risks". The only security risk in this situation is the article's author.

  23. Some more notes about speaker efficiency by Lonewolf666 · · Score: 5, Informative

    The average small to medium hi-fi loudspeaker tends to have an efficiency in the mid eighty-something dB/W. With something like 50 W of power, this is is quite sufficient for moderate volumes.
    If you want something loud for the party cellar, look for something with 90 dB/W or better. This kind of efficiency is usually found in larger loudspeakers, which can also handle 100W RMS or more. I guess Handyman's speakers belong in that category and would do fine in the party cellar.
    Big P.A. systems for rock concerts tend to have around 100 dB/W, combined with a few thousand watts of power. The resulting volume is quite impressive even in a large hall.

    --
    C - the footgun of programming languages
  24. Locked Cell phone / DRM crap by SynapseLapse · · Score: 4, Interesting

    If you don't want to pay the ridiculous rates that cell phone companies charges for the luxury of putting .jpg/.png/.mid/.mp3/whatever on your cellphone, try out this site:

    http://www.phoneuploader.stellernet.com/

    I've spent the last couple hours uploading Mario .mid files to my phone, it's way too much fun.

  25. Extended warranties are worth it by Savage-Rabbit · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'd add laptops to that list. I have had three of them, my first was a Toshiba which developed a broked LCD display (a month before the 1 year warranty expired) and a loose power connector (After warranty expired). The next one was an IBM laptop which I had for a loooooong time that also developed a broken LCD (After standard warranty expired but this time I bought an extended one). My current machine is a Powerbook which so far has gone through two defective LCD's (Factory flaw which Apple fixed without complaint) and an improperly re-assebled CD/DVD drive that assassinated a Microsoft Office 2004 for Mac disk (Original not pirate copy, also replaced without complaint by Apple although it was not a warranty issue). So does it pay to have an extended warranty? My opinion is a big fat YES but then perhaps I am phenominally unlucky with laptops. I am actually looking forward to finding out what will break down on the Intel-Mac PowerBook I am planning to buy as soon as they become available. One thing is for sure I will buy all the extra insurance for it that I can get.

    --
    Only to idiots, are orders laws.
    -- Henning von Tresckow
  26. When shopping at Dell.. by Trogre · · Score: 5, Funny

    When shopping at Dell
    always, and I mean always, remember to never actually buy your computer there.

    --
    "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
  27. Yes! by volsung · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Between my iBook and my friend's Dell, we've each averaged about 3 serious warranty repairs over the 3 year extended manufacturer's warranty. The first 18 months were usually flawless, and then all that carrying to and fro started to make things fail. Failures included main boards, LCDs, and optical drives, any one of whch could have easily cost more than the $250 warranty to fix.

    I build all my desktop machines with crap parts and no extended warranties, but laptops need the 3 year full service warranty.

  28. And the best of them all by mkro · · Score: 4, Funny

    What PC World doesn't want you to know, is that you can read articles how Tim intended by going straight for the printable version. I give you gold here.

    --
    I shall go and tell the indestructible man that someone plans to murder him.
  29. unlock sim-locked cell phones for free by n01 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Just wanted to let you know that there are lots of site's on the internet that let you unlock your cell phone for FREE (especially Nokias). All you have to do is to enter the IMEI of your phone in some web form, plus some additional info. There's a list at:
    http://www.yesss.at/index.php?id=W01
    It worked great for 'a friend of mine', who had an older Nokia phone.
    Not sure how legal it is to do this, after all you OWN the phone after you bought it, you are allowed to through it against a wall and destroy it, why shouldn't you be allowed to unlock it?

  30. Good heavens by lahvak · · Score: 3, Funny

    what language is the parent written in?

    --
    AccountKiller
  31. Hmm...Secrets by GreyOrange · · Score: 5, Informative

    Secret #576:

    That if you switch to the printer friendly version of most websites you can read the full article without switching pages or having to go through tons of advertisements.

    --

    Insert Witty Remark Here ===>____________________________
  32. It's MAAAANNEQUINS!!!!! by WilliamSChips · · Score: 2, Funny

    Imitation Soylent Green is MANNEQUINS!

    --
    Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
  33. Digital zoom vs. optical zoom, an example by DrLex · · Score: 2, Informative
    Nope, it's not exactly the same, unless you use a camera which allows raw storage of images without lossy compression. But cameras which allow that, will either have no digital zoom, or are not targeted towards the average consumer who thinks digital zoom must be better than optical zoom because it sounds cooler.

    The difference is: with digital zoom, the image is enlarged before compressing. If you just take the image, and enlarge it in Photoshop afterwards, you're also enlarging the compression artefacts. Here's a test with a simple Canon Ixus-i camera:
    Digital zoom: http://www.esat.kuleuven.ac.be/~athomas/images/Zoo mDigital.jpg
    Photoshop: http://www.esat.kuleuven.ac.be/~athomas/images/Zoo mPhotoshop.jpg
    The 'stains' you see on the car's hood in the digital zoom image are not artefacts, but raindrops. As you can see, modern cameras do have quite good interpolation algorithms, maybe even better than Photoshop's bicubic interpolation. The contrast in the digital zoom image is also better because the camera can adapt to the zoomed part only, instead of having to make sure all the irrelevant parts of the image look good as well. In the photoshop image, you would need to increase the contrast to have the same effect, further amplifying the artefacts.

    Nevertheless, the use of digital zoom is never justified unless optical zoom is not available, like with my Ixus-i camera. Or, when you really want to photograph something tiny in the distance and you're already at the maximum of your optical zoom.

  34. I doubt you do much printing by panurge · · Score: 5, Informative
    If you are a college user, bet you hardly use printers at all. (BTW I work for a printing consultancy, and I do happen to know what I'm talking about.) A cheap laser printer is typically designed to last for a couple of hundred thousand pages, a Kyocera will do 350-400000 before even the drum needs replacing, and HP LaserJet 5 and 5M, and the 4000 series, will just soldier on and on. A good ballpark is that a printer is close to optimal loading if it goes through an ink cartridge or a toner a month, and under those conditions with minimal care you are likely to throw it away only when you get tired of it for some reason.

    The probable cause of your problem is that you don't use your printer very much and it dries out/gets full of dust/gets dropped.

    Most cheap all-in-ones are actually designed for low use SOHO owners, but a Canon LIDE series scanner, a cheap base model photo printer and a basic laser together are more capable, more reliable, and cheap to fix if something goes wrong (replacing one item is cheaper than buying the extended warranty on the all-in-one.)

    --
    Panurge has posted for the last time. Thanks for the positive moderations.
  35. Bad assumption by laing · · Score: 4, Insightful

    From TFA: "You Too Can Exploit Windows' Bad Security
    My PC's firewall, antivirus scanner, spyware remover, pop-up blocker, and spam filter all agree: Windows is sorely lacking in PC security. That situation may not change until Windows Vista (formerly Longhorn) comes out sometime next year. Meanwhile here are a few ways to turn Windows' poor security to your advantage."

    As most people here already know, Microsoft does not focus on bug fixes in their new releases. Their primary focus is on new features. Sure, some of the old bugs may be gone -- but some new ones will be sure to pop up with the new functionality. Just because Longhorn is newer, that doesn't make it better or more secure.

      In my personal opinion, Microsoft deliberately ships shoddy software so everyone will flock to the new releases. It's human nature to believe that "newer is better" but that is not always the case. It has proven to be a highly successful business model for M$.

  36. Re:My 2 cents by fmaxwell · · Score: 3, Insightful

    When you overclock your cpu, its "lifetime" will be reduced.

    Like most blanket statements, that one is incorrect. In some cases, the difference between two different speed CPUs is nothing more than on-chip jumpers and markings. If the manufacturer produces 1,000 CPUs and all 1,000 of them can run at the highest speed, they label some for a high speed, perhaps after testing to verify reliable operation, and then label others for the lower speeds. Besides, very few enthusiasts are trying to keep a CPU working for seven years, so even in those cases where there is some reduced lifetime, it's seldom a concern.

    This one its true, but AFAIK the difference will be in the tests that the product has passed. That way they set the brand.

    Seldom is that the case. A Lite-On DVD+-R/W drive sold under the Lite-On name undergoes the same tests as one sold under the Sony name, Hi-Val name, or any other name. Sony, Hi-Val, etc. could not remain price-competitive if they had different, more expensive testing procedures -- especially when Lite-On has already come up with tests that confirm that the drives are functional. Who would you expect to be able to devise a more effective test suite; the manufacturer who designed the product or some third-party reseller who rebrands the drive?

    But in general the article is poor and somehow little useful.

    Another untrue statement. Did you know Amazon's phone number for customer service? Did you know the shortcut to reach a human operator at the list of over 60 cell phone, PC, and travel firms? Did you know that Philips had a zero-dead-pixel guarantee? Did you have a utility to reveal a Windows XP license key? The article provided a lot of useful information. I knew much of it, but that doesn't mean that everyone knows everything in it.

  37. Bass response by Lonewolf666 · · Score: 2, Informative

    There is a (rather indirect) relationship:
    High efficiency is promoted by either
    1) light membranes or
    2) a horn
    Unfortunately, 1) translates into a high resonance frequency, below which the response curve falls off. And 2) requires uncomfortably large enclosures to work for deep frequencies.

    If you don't mind going for big and expensive speakers, however, huge enclosure volumes help with 1) and 2) becomes an option as well. Especially as a "corner horn" that uses your walls as an extension of the horn:
    http://www.klipsch.com/product/product.aspx?cid=2

    --
    C - the footgun of programming languages
  38. No, you didn't already know it. by fmaxwell · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This is stuff the average nerd already knows.

    Some is and some is not. I don't believe you already knew Amazon's customer support phone number, that Philips has a zero-dead-pixel warranty, how to get to a human on 60+ companies' phone systems, and where to download a utility to reveal a Windows license key. You may have known some of what was in the article, but I'll bet that you didn't know it all.

    Sure, the article was not a revelation with each and every paragraph, but it probably provided some useful information to most of the people on Slashdot who read it. I even found one of the linked utilities to be handy.

  39. Awesome! by CarbonJackson · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Nothing groundbreaking, but might be a good primer for the non-techie in your life."

    Cuz that's what I read slashdot for anyway, finding good primers for my non-techie friends to read.

    --

    MikeAtIF*ckStuffedAnimalsDotCom
  40. oh god by kronchev · · Score: 3, Funny

    "Your CPU May Be Much Faster Than You Think"

    In related news, the resulting fires from morons trying to overclock their Dells can be seen from space!

  41. Re:JavaScript popups = ass by PReDiToR · · Score: 2, Informative

    I didn't get those once I started opening each page in a new tab instead of simply clicking the next page link.

    HTH

    --

    Do not meddle in the affairs of geeks for they are subtle and quick to anger
  42. How-To Paginate by FEEBLE*BMX · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This article is in the How-To section of the PCWorld site for some reason. They should write another article called 'How to paginate a 4 page article into 20 pages to maximize your ad revenue.'

  43. It's too bad. by Inoshiro · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Let's look at this from another perspective:

    "I don't think any of us really choose our mailer. At work I use Compuserve because everyone else at work uses it. BUt I also use AOL, because my little sister is away at school, and she uses AOL. I hate AOL, but if I choose not to use AOL, I am only hurting myself because then I couldn't mail my sister.
    The next logical Question- Why can't I get my sister to switch? All her friends use AOL. And so it goes.
    "

    If only there was some kind of simple message ttransport protocol that could communicate between servers, allowing the server type itself to be abstracted out of the equation. People on different ISPs could mail people on others! It'd be a miracle.

    Why do we have the same problem we had with email in th 80s, now with IM clients? The Jabber protocol is designed to work just like SMTP was designed to allow messages between servers. Google's talk service is Jabber (mind you, their Jabber won't connect out to other Jabber servers, which is a pretty lame thing to do).

    Personally, I'm looking into setting up a Jabber server on the same system that does my email/web stuff. When it's working, I'll begin to try and migrate people over (Kopete works with it just fine).

    --
    --
    Internet Explorer (n): Another bug -- that is, a feature that can't be turned off -- in Windows.
  44. Before IM was invented, eh? by ari_j · · Score: 4, Informative

    The talk manpage says that the talk command appeared in 4.2BSD, which was released in August, 1983, according to this history of BSD. Does Windows Messenger Service predate that?