Slashdot Mirror


Hayabusa Probe Arrives at Destination

david.given writes "The Japanese space probe Hayabusa has just arrived at its destination, the asteroid Itokawa, and is taking pictures. The largely autonomous ion-drive powered vehicle was launched in 2003 and was supposed to have arrived last year, but a solar flare damaged the solar panels causing a reduction in power. It will study the asteroid for two months before collecting a sample from the surface and departing for Earth, which it should reach in 2007. It's a pity that NASA's asteroid rover, which Hayabusa was going to drop off, got cancelled due to budgetry constraints..."

157 comments

  1. Asteroids full of life? by Nerd+Systems · · Score: 0, Troll
    Glad to see that the "speedY" Hayabusa has finally arrived at the asteroid. I am not sure if it will reach this asteroid, and find similar composition materials as is on other surfaces, such as the moon and Earth, or if there will be new chemical elements previously unknown to man.

    Attempts such as this do raise questions, that I am hoping scientists have already researched and are protecting against. We don't want any scientific research to cause issues here on Earth.

    As happened in Andromeda Strain, hopefully the contents of this asteroid, that Hayabusa brings back to Earth, will not have any harmful bacteria or organisms present, that could cause great harm to life on Earth. I know this may sound like a conspiracy therory, but we have no clue what other elements exist outside of our small planet. There are so many others out there in the galaxies and universes, and we are such a miniscule part of things.

    Hayabusa taking longer then expected is kind of ironic though, considering that a Hayabusa is one of the fastest production sport bikes available for sale today. I guess space travel and land travel are two different categories, but hopefully this ion drive engine will be great technology for future missions to space.

    It is nice to see such engineering technologies being created for space travel, which hopefully can be applied to manned missions to other planets, as well as ways for energy efficient travel on Earth potentially being created.

    It is too bad, that NASA didn't include a rover on this mission, would have been nice to explore and perform more testing on surface composition and the like... yet as always, budgets are never there for real research, but always there for wasted efforts in other areas...

    Lets stand by and see some of these beautiful pictures sure to come from this probe...

    --
    Need a Nerd?
    Nerd Systems
    1. Re:Asteroids full of life? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... but we have no clue what other elements exist outside of our small planet.

      Well, yeah, actually, we have a pretty good clue what other elements exist outside of our small planet.

    2. Re:Asteroids full of life? by Nerd+Systems · · Score: 0
      How can scientists here on Earth, have a clue about things that are outside this planet, besides what we have witnessed on the moon, and on it's surface only at that...

      There are so many elements out there on this planet... who says that other planets do not have whole sets of other elements out there, that we have yet to discover.

      We have only explored a very tiny niche of our galaxy, just imagine what all lies in wait outside of the realm of discovered territory?

      --
      Need a Nerd?
      Nerd Systems
    3. Re:Asteroids full of life? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "There are so many elements out there on this planet"

      Maybe billions, right?

      There's this really strange dichotomy between what you post, and the URL you plug in your sig. Wait a mo, your site spells "suppport" as, well, "suppport". So it fits after all.

    4. Re:Asteroids full of life? by lheal · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "new chemical elements"

      There aren't any elements left. We've filled in the chart already. Game over on that one.

      There may be some compounds that we haven't seen, though.

      --
      Raise your children as if you were teaching them to raise your grandchildren, because you are.
    5. Re:Asteroids full of life? by ejito · · Score: 1

      We have many good theories for origins and formations of galaxies, but nothing more than guesses at the specifics of how the brain functions and develops at a neural level.

      The most stated comparison is that we know more about space than the deep sea, though it is questionable.

      When you say we have "no clue" that's a given considering the ~infinite complexity of science and information in any field; but compared to many other fields, space knowledge is well devloped and well off.

    6. Re:Asteroids full of life? by ReformedExCon · · Score: 2, Informative

      Atoms compose elements. A material that is composed of only one type of atom is called an element. Atoms are measured by the number of protons make up their nucleus. This number is called its "atomic number". Hydrogen has 1 proton in its nucleus, Helium has 2, and the count goes up from there.

      Now, we have identified all elements from 1 proton-nuclei (Hydrogen) through 112 proton-nuclei (Ununbium).

      It is theoretically possible that there are other elements that exist in space that we haven't found yet. They would have to be larger than 112 protons per nucleus, though. In our surrounding vacinity, it is highly unlikely that we would find something like that.

      --
      Jesus saved me from my past. He can save you as well.
    7. Re:Asteroids full of life? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "other universes"?! Do you think that this asteroid came from another universe?

    8. Re:Asteroids full of life? by KinkifyTheNation · · Score: 1
      In our surrounding vacinity, it is highly unlikely that we would find something like that.
      Why?
    9. Re:Asteroids full of life? by mtaht · · Score: 5, Informative

      Hayabusa includes the Minerva hopper - gravity on asteroids is so slight that you can get around on springs - no rockets or NASA rovers required. That's the key - that's why planetary exploration makes so little sense - when you can get to an asteroid and mine it - and return for a small fraction of the delta-V required to get back from the moon, or Mars.

    10. Re:Asteroids full of life? by ReformedExCon · · Score: 2, Informative

      Mostly because they are created through heavy-element fusion (Ca and U in the case of Uub) and the resulting element decays into lower-atomic number elements in microseconds.

      So we would need to find some place hospitable for fusion (maybe the Sun) and full of heavy elements (maybe not the Sun).

      --
      Jesus saved me from my past. He can save you as well.
    11. Re:Asteroids full of life? by ejito · · Score: 1
      There may be some compounds that we haven't seen, though.
      The chart is partially arbitrary and will never be "complete" (in the future there will be new lab created elements, though short-lived). Your sibling post was more accurate in saying that we're not likely (near impossible) to discover any "natural" elements beyond the ones on the periodic table.
      There may be some compounds that we haven't seen, though.
      "Some" compounds is an understatement. We pretty much will never run out of new compounds to discover.
    12. Re:Asteroids full of life? by lheal · · Score: 1
      "Some" compounds is an understatement...


      By "some" I meant we might find some on a particular asteroid, not that there were only a few left.

      --
      Raise your children as if you were teaching them to raise your grandchildren, because you are.
    13. Re:Asteroids full of life? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are so many others out there in the galaxies and universes, and we are such a miniscule part of things.

      Wow! Who told you of the other universes? How do you know our secrets?

      - The Illuminati

    14. Re:Asteroids full of life? by ejito · · Score: 1

      In that case, I rescind what I said.

    15. Re:Asteroids full of life? by bronney · · Score: 0

      lol.. *let's read hawkings new book again*

    16. Re:Asteroids full of life? by Trailer+Park+Boy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Because the asteroids in our solar system are made of the same "star-stuff" that Earth is made from. In other words, the elements in our asteroids were made in the same star or stars as the elements in the Earth. So it's unlikely we'd find any elements in an asteroid that we couldn't find here on Earth. That's why.

    17. Re:Asteroids full of life? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unless the, laws of physics, are different in, different areas of space, then, the periodic table will, describe all possible, elements. (All elements up to whatever atomic weight is the highest known/postulated).

      I love when, people who don't, have a clue, make authoritative, posts.

    18. Re:Asteroids full of life? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wooaaaaah comma overload :)

    19. Re:Asteroids full of life? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The typo's fixed now. The others aren't.

    20. Re:Asteroids full of life? by lgw · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The GPP is a troll, but not entirely wrong. We didn't really know that dark matter existed until the recent COBE microwave data confirmed that theory for odd galactic rotation speeds, and we still aren't sure what dark matter really is. Not a new "chemical element" of course, but something weirder. Who knows what else is out there (not on nearby asteroids of course, but OUT there) - all we know is what we see through telescopes from our little backwater. Heck, there might even be new chemical elements, if there really is an "island of stability" past 120 or so (though I hear that hypothesis is losing credibility these days).

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    21. Re:Asteroids full of life? by Kiffer · · Score: 1

      The funny thing about the "island of stability" hypothesis is that the elements just need to be more stable, have slightly longer half lives.

      so element 111 has a half life of 3 seconds and element 114 has a half life of about 30 seconds because its one of the supposed "island of stability" or at least one of it's isotopes is.

      so any way, those half lives are short enough that if a 1000kg lump of the longest lived isotope of 114 was kicked out of the sun, say 3 billion years ago (94608000000000000 seconds)
      thats 3.1536E15 halflives
      I dont think there's going to be much left.
      After 10 half-lives there is 2^-10 (0.098%) left.

      so after 3 billion years our 1000kg would have 3.172e-14% left. or 0.00000003172g,

      expect that my maths is probably wrong,
      and there isn't any left at all...

    22. Re:Asteroids full of life? by Retric · · Score: 1

      We know a lot more about how the brain functions and develops at a neural level than we do about the formation of galaxies, but it's a far more complex system than the formations of galaxies. We have gotten to the point where we know what the meanings are of the patterns of signals sent to the brain from the eyes. We know the grouse functions of most parts of the brain, and each of its cells but it's extremely complex.

      The problem is the brains pattern is important where only the rough shape really matters when dealing with galaxies. The best way to describe this is if you remove a few thousand stars out of galaxies not much happens but if you pick the right few thousand neurons you can have an extremely noticeable effect. And this works on many levels if you damage the right segments of DNA and you can kill a cell while only destroying a minute fraction of it's overall structure.

      As to the oceans we have varied good maps of the whole things and only vague guesses as to a tiny fraction of the overall universe. The idea is that the universe is fairly random and it's not going to affect us so having a vague idea of what's going on seems to satisfy most people. After all I don't really care how many planets orbit the average star within 3,000,000,000 light years of us so our inability to find that out does not really bother most people.

    23. Re:Asteroids full of life? by CheshireCatCO · · Score: 1

      Where are you getting the dark matter information? We know the galaxies were rotating too quickly long before COBE. (In fact, as far as I know, COBE didn't measure rotation speeds of galaxies. It surely wasn't the first, anyway.) Galactic rotation curves were plotted in the 70's by Vera Rubin and others. The evidence for dark matter goes back even farther to the 30's when Zwicky noted that glaxies in clusters were moving too quickly to remain bound to the clusters unless there was more mass there than we could see.

  2. So when it gets there... by millennial · · Score: 4, Funny

    Will it use the magical firewheel of protection, or be followed by a hazy clone of itself that mimics its actions?
    /ryu hayabusa... ninja gaiden. ding.

    --
    I am scientifically inaccurate.
    1. Re:So when it gets there... by nat5an · · Score: 1

      Wow, I figured there would be a ninja gaiden reference in here somewhere, but I didn't think it would be first post. Then again...this is /.

      --
      Head down, go to sleep to the rhythm of the war drums...
    2. Re:So when it gets there... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      gonna izuna drop that bitch asteroid right into... uh, another asteroid. massive karma bonus.

    3. Re:So when it gets there... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What about a Pro Wrestling reference? Eh? Now that Fighter Hayabusa and his notorious "Back Brain Kick" are out of the running, can Star Man default King Slender?

  3. Dance the jig? by Tablizer · · Score: 0

    If it is a robot from Japan, you kind of half expect it to have arms and legs and dance some kind of techno-jig on the roid.

    1. Re:Dance the jig? by TheAdventurer · · Score: 1

      All this talk of probes and roids is making my butt itch.

    2. Re:Dance the jig? by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      All this talk of probes and roids is making my butt itch.

      All this rocket science and we can't get ass medicine that actually works.

    3. Re:Dance the jig? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You really should try to get more fiber into your diet. I recommend bananas, bran muffins, and brown rice. You know, the three B's.

      And... if all else fails, try Metamucil. (A.k.a, the ultimate weapon.)

  4. Gosh, real science over in Japan by ReformedExCon · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I am impressed by the Japanese mission:

    HAYABUSA's mission: to bring back samples from an asteroid and investigate the mysteries of the birth of the solar system.

    And I am sufficiently unimpressed by NASA's inability to even piggyback a rover with this. There is so much science to do that doesn't have to do with rocketry, that doesn't have to do with sending people into space, that doesn't have to do with spending billions on a boondoggle space program that is more concerned with keeping certain government vendors in the money rather than actually getting real science done.

    Mars Rovers: Good NASA
    Space Shuttle: Bad NASA
    Hubble ST: Good NASA
    ISS: NASA can't even send people up there to rendezvous

    I'm sure someone will want to say "what about that big ol' comet we blasted with our satellite. Did we get any samples back? Did we get anything new except maybe a little more practice at aiming our missiles? Not really.

    Hayabusa looks like it's going to be headed back to Earth with samples. Real science. I just wish it were Americans at the leading edge of scientific space exploration.

    --
    Jesus saved me from my past. He can save you as well.
    1. Re:Gosh, real science over in Japan by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      And I am sufficiently unimpressed by NASA's inability to even piggyback a rover with this. There is so much science to do...

      Well, peices of asteroids fall to Earth all the time. It is likely that most asteroid chunks found on Earth came originally from bigger asteroids that smacked into each other. Thus, Japan may be spending millions to get a peice of something that is already in our backyards.

      However, it is true that such samples would not be affected by the usual heat of reentry, and thus possibly offer clues that yard chunks won't.

      Further, there is not enough gravity to run a rover on a typical big asteroid. It would hit a small bump and fly up several feet. However, I have read about test bots with scissor-like legs that kind of slowly scoot along, better designed for super-low gravity.

    2. Re:Gosh, real science over in Japan by antifoidulus · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Hate to break it to you, but in terms of failure rate, the Japanese space program is so far ahead of NASA it isn't even funny, yeah this one was successful, but overall the Japanese space program has been an expensive disaster. They have sent probe after probe after probe only to have them destroyed, they struggle to get even a basic satellite in orbit.....
      NASA isn't perfect, but saying they are "behind" the Japanese space program is well, simply not true.

    3. Re:Gosh, real science over in Japan by LnxAddct · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You sir are clueless about "that big ol' comet we blasted". you can learn just about everything you need to using spectroscopy, and we are examing the inner layers of the comet which required such an impact. Its one thing to bring back a small sample from the top and examine it, its another to evalute a comet as a larger piece and its interior. If you sent a rover to earth from some distant planet and only brought back a small sample, would it be right for them to assume that the whole world was ice, or water, or dirt, or filled with bacteria? Both missions will certainly tell us alot of things that we didn't know before, but NASA's mission is telling us a whole lot more about the composition and general structure. Japan's mission is a little more specific and narrow focused, which makes sense considering that space agencies typically know what others are working on (except for the chinese) so why duplicate work. One thing is for sure, if a comet is ever headed towards earth, NASA's mission brought us a whole lot closer to understanding how to neutralize the threat.

      Who said NASA'a space shuttle was bad? It is revolutionary, just expensive as hell and slightly ahead of its time, even more so then government projects like Arpanet were. As far as ISS goes, the only reason that thing is even in orbit is because of NASA. 6 space agencies claim to be apart of the project, but the only two that have ever done anything are the Russians and Americans. The Americans are also responsible for taking up just about every part of the station, the Russians took up 3. If NASA ever had trouble sending people up, it was simply because of red tape and senseless bureaucracy, the russians are a bit less worried about people dying. Everybody knocks NASA, but they are one of the few space agencies that does kickass things on a regular basis. Sure they could do something cool once and then never again and their saftey record could be perfect, but that isn't the point. Get your facts straight, the truth is that the majority of what we know about space is a as result of NASA. Of course the Russians deserve credit here too.
      Regards,
      Steve

    4. Re:Gosh, real science over in Japan by demondawn · · Score: 1

      Actually, we have NOT been able to examine the inner layers of the comet as we desired; the dust thrown up by the impact obscured the actual crater itsellf far too much, and Tempel 1 overtook the craft that was monitoring the picture.

    5. Re:Gosh, real science over in Japan by helioquake · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That probably isn't exactly fair to ISAS, which has merged with NASDA that was plagued with failure after failure with its H-I and II rockets. These institutions now form JAXA, instead.

      The ISAS's mu-series rocket has been fairly successful, except for a major failure of M-V rocket that carried ASTRO-E1 mission in 2000. So comparing NASA and ISAS is like apple-and-orange comparison that makes no sense, either.

      Hayabusa was launched by ISAS, FWIW.

    6. Re:Gosh, real science over in Japan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      the russians are a bit less worried about people dying
      Well, considering Russians-NASA "people missing in action in recent missions" score table, I'd say you are right ... they ought to be a bit less worried.
    7. Re:Gosh, real science over in Japan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who said NASA'a space shuttle was bad? It is revolutionary, just expensive as hell and slightly ahead of its time

      I think your post of "You sir are clueless" fits right about here. The Orbiter to give it it's proper name is an experimental piece of junk which accomplished exactly none of the goals it was designed to accomplish. Why was the Orbiter built you ask? To lower the cost of moving materials and people to orbit. Did it accomplish that? NO! Did it ever even make it out of the experimental stage? NO! What capabilities did we give up to concentrate on this overpriced blunder of 70's technology? Well we USED to be able to go to our moon (that was with 60's technology). NASA has failed to advance the so-called "Space Program" in the last 35 years. Not what I'd call successful, not even meeting the status quo since we gave up abilities we used to have. If your interested in some inovators in the field you can look at Burt Rutan or even better look at SpaceX for some real inovation in the field. NASA has consistently failed to produce. Not that they havn't had some successes with probes, like the mars rover mission. It is interesting to note that their successes generally cost alot less than their failures. Billions wasted on the Orbiter and a shoestring budget for the rovers. Their even having trouble coming up with the money for staff to continue with the rover mission, but their STILL wasting money on the most colassal FAILURE of an experimental vehicle of all time. Sombodies priorities are in the wrong order.

    8. Re:Gosh, real science over in Japan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hello? Does anybody follow our stalwart little Rovers up on Mars anymore? Initial mission was what, six weeks? Now over a year later they are still catching interesting things like dust devils traveling along the horizon.

      I am not fond of 'manned' missions. The whole 'send people to Mars' diversion is stupid. Not just plain stupid, but stupid stupid stupid. Notice that it is not being driven by NASA internally, but by the executive branch of our federal government. Hey, they write the check. However, I think the current executive branch is a little weak on science.

      NASA has a bunch of robotic missions planned. There are line of probes and rovers in the queue.
      NASA has been landing measurement devices on other planets for a long time, and will continue to do so.

      I applaud the Japanese for this endeavor. It will expand the base of knowledge for all people. It certainly does not call for your shallow, disparaging remarks.

    9. Re:Gosh, real science over in Japan by mhearne · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It always all boils down to money. I don't know your age, but if you are over 50, then you may remember real money. They don't have it anymore, and yet, that's all they seem to talk about.

      I am less interested in the origins of the Universe, and more interested in mining the asteroids. It is very possible, that by mining the asteroids rather than the Earth, that our planet might be saved.

      There is the problem of gravitation, and the effect that might be had on the solar system by changing it's mass around. That is left to be seen. Remember that Einstein omitted instantaneous gravitation, because not enough was known about it at the time.

      Now I think that modern astronomers and physicists do have a great deal more data, and that they can make these predictions more accurately. I also think that bombarding comets is a potential mistake, and very possibly dangerous.

      I also think that it's high time for ancient politics to pass away, and for us to escape the Earth. I am very sorry that I am too old to go, but I do have great hope for the kids.

      Michael

    10. Re:Gosh, real science over in Japan by LnxAddct · · Score: 1

      Those little space planes that reach low orbit are not that big of an advancement. They can't lift much and carry minimal passengers, they also don't go anywhere near where the shuttle has to go. Not to mention, a large part of their structure came from looking at the successes and failures of the Shuttle, real useless it was, eh?
      Regards,
      Steve

    11. Re:Gosh, real science over in Japan by DisownedSky · · Score: 1

      You won't find a much more enthusiastic advocate of manned Mars exploration than Steve Squyres, who leads the MER science team. Why? As a field geologist, he knows he could do so much more and explore much more thoroughlly if he were there with his hammer and hand lens.

      --

      "The impossible often has a certain integrity that the merely improbable lacks" - Dirk Gently

    12. Re:Gosh, real science over in Japan by suitepotato · · Score: 1

      You sir are clueless about "that big ol' comet we blasted". you can learn just about everything you need to using spectroscopy, and we are examing the inner layers of the comet which required such an impact. Its one thing to bring back a small sample from the top and examine it, its another to evalute a comet as a larger piece and its interior.

      This is very true. What would definitely be very cool is to loft a series of telescopes with all the requisite tech on board that would be sent to settle into Martian orbit and monitor it from all sides indefinitely. When an impact occurs, and they sometimes do, we might catch it and be able to see better what was kicked up by the hit. This in addition to monitoring the atmosphere content, weather, and so on. Whenever Mars is in our section of the orbital plane, we get stored data sent back at us to go over and keep the science people occupied while the tech people continue planning the manned mission to do something concrete with all we learn.

      --
      If my grammar and spelling are off, I am [distracted/tired/careless] (take your pick)
    13. Re:Gosh, real science over in Japan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Space Shuttle: Bad NASA?

      How is that? It did what it was deisgned to do. It was expected to have a replacement by now. It's failure rate is well within tolerances. And even those disasters were just operations issues (cheap to fix).

      Hubble: good?

      Is was deployed with screwed up optics.

      ISS: ahead of it's time. The optimism the world had with the fall of the USSR and Eastern Germany has been offset by people who would turn the world back to 1950 (or 650 for some groups)

    14. Re:Gosh, real science over in Japan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You didn't look at SpaceX did you? Try this link:
      http://www.spacex.com/

    15. Re:Gosh, real science over in Japan by centauri · · Score: 1

      Direct visual examination of the crater was obscured, but we should still be able to get some spectroscopic data from the interior.

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Durga.
    16. Re:Gosh, real science over in Japan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those "little space planes" as you call them may not be considered a big advancement in some ways (most of the technology was available afterall), in other ways they are remarkable advances with a great deal of inovation. NASA went from large costs to LEO with the Saturn V's to even larger costs with the Orbiter. Burt Rutan's costs weren't in the same league. They may not carry much yet, but wait for the next model. He's already made significant advances over NASA. And given NASA's record, I'd much rather go LEO in one's of Mr. Rutan's planes or one of SpaceX's rockets any day.

      Although not nearly as much came from the Orbiter as you seem to think. I do believe he looked at the Orbiter and tried very hard to avoid all the mistakes they made. I'm not sure what "successes" your talking about. I previously pointed out that the Orbiter never acheived any of it's goals (can't really call that successful).

    17. Re:Gosh, real science over in Japan by jafac · · Score: 1

      Yeah, and you know what they're going to do to those samples when they're returned?

      Run them through a spectroscope.

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    18. Re:Gosh, real science over in Japan by Have+Blue · · Score: 1

      You can track the performance of the various countries on the official PSL Scoreboard.

    19. Re:Gosh, real science over in Japan by iamlucky13 · · Score: 1
      And I am sufficiently unimpressed by NASA's inability to even piggyback a rover with this.
      You misunderstood that completely. The problem wasn't that they couldn't, but that they felt there were more important places to spend their limited budget. How much do we really need lots of closeup pictures of an asteroid's surface? We (or rather the Japanese) are already getting a few closeup pictures and a sample. Will the extra data be worth the cost, or should it be spent on something like more instruments for the upcoming mission to Pluto, a mission that won't likely see a follow-on for 20+ years. And before you say it, ditching the space shuttle in favor of other missions is not viable until we finish the ISS. We have too much committment to it right now to abandon it.
      Space Shuttle: Bad NASA
      Well, Slashdot as a whole has been through this argument enough I shouldn't bother rehashing the main points, but I don't think you fully consider the program in the big picture of space development and exploration. Too many people are firmly entrenched in the concept that because it costs more than it should and 2 have had fatal accidents that it's an abyssmal failure on NASA's part, and the abundance we've done an learned with it is completely negated by its shortcomings. Remember that the Hubble, which you praised, was not without incident, and the shuttle both delivered to orbit and revisited it to fix a critical flaw.
      I'm sure someone will want to say "what about that big ol' comet we blasted with our satellite. Did we get any samples back? Did we get anything new except maybe a little more practice at aiming our missiles? Not really.
      Back to the Hubble, did we get any samples from that? Very little science involves disecting little green men. Certainly not the Deep Impact mission. Instead we got closeup images of a comet, spectroscopy to learn more about its chemical composition, and a debris field to learn more about its physical properties, all of which may teach us something about the early solar system.
      Hayabusa looks like it's going to be headed back to Earth with samples. Real science.
      Edison gave us real lightbulbs. Maxwell gave us a bunch of equations dealing with electomagnetism. Despite Maxwell's work being less tangible, it was ultimately far more important. You've picked a poor qualifier for identifying "real" science.
  5. While it is fascinating... by demondawn · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ..to get samples from any extra-terrestrial object, I think what is going to be most important out of this project is the ion-driven technology that propels the craft, as well as the re-entry capsule. Though it certianly might have been nice if they could have made the whole craft re-enterable; these things are far from cheap, and anything reusable goes a long way towards motivating people to supporting funding in NASA/JAXA.

    1. Re:While it is fascinating... by DisownedSky · · Score: 1

      Both those things have been done before. Ion propulsion is now fairly mature, and works well for some missions, but has its disadvantages (very low thrust, requires lots of power). Re-entry capsules date back to the 1950s.

      --

      "The impossible often has a certain integrity that the merely improbable lacks" - Dirk Gently

  6. Yes, but... by Stormwatch · · Score: 2

    ...did Hayabusa get his revenge?

    1. Re:Yes, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not sure, but he's definitely an impressive fighter. We'll know more tomorrow.

    2. Re:Yes, but... by HishamMuhammad · · Score: 1

      In 2005, a post mentioning Ninja Gaiden in a thread about something called "Hayabusa" is modded offtopic.

      The sense of geek culture is truly lost here. Or those of us who get it are just too old and too few.

  7. Queue in the dumb Japanese jokes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How many times do we have to make ethnocentric comments that border on racism?

    For one thing, Japanese are more open-minded towards Americans than we are to them.

  8. Amazing coincidence! by lheal · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    The Japanese send a probe to an asteroid, and it's name is "Itokawa".

    Our probes always land on places with names like "Titan" and "XJ-344b".

    Obviously their technology is much more advanced than ours.

    --
    Raise your children as if you were teaching them to raise your grandchildren, because you are.
    1. Re:Amazing coincidence! by Wilson_6500 · · Score: 1

      How can that be, when we go to places that have _numbers_ right in the name?

      I mean, which sounds more scientific: "Engineering Building," or "Building 34/35"? The answer is, of course, neither, because they're both engineering buildings.

      Which, I guess, makes them engineerific. Or is it enginific? It can't be that, otherwise we'd say "scienteer."

    2. Re:Amazing coincidence! by glowworm · · Score: 1

      Even in popular American mythology the planets are named things like P3X-403 ;)

      --
      Orationem pulchram non habens, scribo ista linea in lingua Latina
  9. Typo by lheal · · Score: 2, Informative

    "its name". Sorry.

    --
    Raise your children as if you were teaching them to raise your grandchildren, because you are.
    1. Re:Typo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Come on, was this really necessary?

  10. Bad luck? by edunbar93 · · Score: 1

    From the post: "but a solar flare damaged the solar panels causing a reduction in power."

    And now that it's so very close to its target, we have another one coming.

    --
    "No problem. I have the capacity to do infinite work so long as you don't mind that my quality approaches zero."-Dilbert
  11. Wow... by MeatMan · · Score: 0, Insightful

    whoopty friggin' doo

    Multi-Billion dollar spelunking expeditions in outer space. What could we all POSSIBLY do with billions of dollars right here on Earth to benefit us all right now? Hmmm... alternative energy research? Nah. Cures for debilitating and deadly diseases? Nah. Improving the infrastructures of impovershed nations? Nah. Teaching people how to farm and improving their ability to do so to help keep them from satrving to death? Nah. Let's use it to study big rocks that are floating around in a vacuum and are composed of minerals & metals found right here on Earth already.

    Screwed up priorities by people and governments with billions of dollars to throw around on rock hounding in outer space while watching fellow humans suffer and die due to curable and stoppable causes at this very moment.

    1. Re:Wow... by John+Miles · · Score: 1

      Yep, you've got a point. What's the hurry? We need to fix things inside the cave first.

      --
      Dahlmann tightly grips the knife, which he may have no idea how to use, and steps out into the plain.
    2. Re:Wow... by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think you are missing out the point that a lot of research is being done and money being spent on all the points you stated. I think it is shortsighted to stop all pure science just because there are problems "at home". There will always be problems "at home".

      I wish humans would quit giving each other debilitating but preventable diseases. There isn't much that money can do to stop that. I'm not sure why humans should be wasting so much money curing a disease that people shouldn't be contracting.

      And building infrastructures for impovershed nations, well, the problem is that impovershed nations are generally caused by not necessarily lack of money, the root of the lack of money is corrupt governments and/or lawlessness. There's little point in building necessary infrastructure if thugs are going to be allowed to remain and destroy that infrastructure.

    3. Re:Wow... by LnxAddct · · Score: 1

      The funny thing is how ignorant you are. Read this.
      Regards,
      Steve

    4. Re:Wow... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Next time you go to spend money on something non-essential--let's even postulate that it's something which will teach you something--ask yourself what more socially responsible act you might have committed instead, then do so.

      It would only be consistent.

    5. Re:Wow... by Anthony · · Score: 1
      Granted, corrupt government leads to national poverty. However, lack of resources or lack of control of resources also limits wealth generation, especially during the "nation building phase". This has a big bearing on national wealth. How a country uses the resulting wealth is of course important. At the turn of the 20th Century, Australia and Argentina both had similarly world-leading standards-of-living. This was from both mineral and agricultural production. One country has had stable government, the other, not so consistently stable.

      A new country like Timor Leste is "behind the eight-ball" as most of its premium resources (sandalwood and marble) have been mined. It is now reliant on Australia modifying mineral rights arrangements to allow access to oil and gas royalties, which are being developed by foreign (Aust/British) interests (disclosure: I am a Woodside Petroleum shareholder).

      --
      Slashdot: Where nerds gather to pool their ignorance
    6. Re:Wow... by MeatMan · · Score: 0

      Well, I haven't professed that we should "stop all pure science". You're mistaken to assume that is what I meant. I'm referring to examining asteroids (and comets), at the moment. I think we should undertake those studies, but at a different time. We're probably not going to find out anything we don't already know. We have moon rocks already, why do we need chunks of asteroids?

      I'm all for missions to Mars, and any other planet out there, but wasting so much money sending probes to rocks and chunks of ice in space seems hardly warranted given that the money spent on that type of 'pork barrel' space research could be gathered together and combined to do much more good to help the human race right now. For example, we're not even able to finish the space station at the moment, and the Space Shuttle is about to get scrubbed. The station is very important for research and development, but getting the damn thing finished and developing a replacement transport vehicle seems to me to be a higher priority.

      But we'll send probes to rocks and icebergs in space, gather nothing Earth shattering from it all more than likely, and flush those billions of dollars down the toilet... what a shame.

    7. Re:Wow... by MeatMan · · Score: 0

      A sure sign of a weak mind. Name calling... that's both sad and pathetic. Good luck in your life. I hope things get better for you so you're not so weak in the future.

    8. Re:Wow... by fbjon · · Score: 1

      Your statement includes the assumption that it's possible to fix things "inside the cave". That's quite a wild assumption.

      --
      True confidence comes not from realising you are as good as your peers, but that your peers are as bad as you are.
    9. Re:Wow... by LnxAddct · · Score: 1

      With all due respect, I wasn't name calling. You were making unfounded, uneducated claims about the usefulness of the space program. There are way too many Americans that do that exact same thing and each one of them is a threat to our very important space program. Being called ignorant isn't necessarily an insult, everyone is ignorant on one topic or another, I was simply pointing out one that you were. Granted, I was slightly peeved because it is irritating how many people don't realize the many benefits of NASA.
      Regards,
      Steve

    10. Re:Wow... by MacDork · · Score: 1

      Multi-Billion dollar spelunking expeditions in outer space. What could we all POSSIBLY do with billions of dollars right here on Earth to benefit us all right now? Hmmm... alternative energy research? Nah. Cures for debilitating and deadly diseases? Nah. Improving the infrastructures of impovershed nations? Nah. Teaching people how to farm and improving their ability to do so to help keep them from satrving to death? Nah.

      Yeah. Stupid NASA.

    11. Re:Wow... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hahaha I can tell from your posts, that you love male prostitutes, you know those young boys who dont have hair yet. Yeah you definately smuggle the sausage in your rectum.

  12. In other news by Eric(b0mb)Dennis · · Score: 0

    The asteroid 'Alma' is proving very difficult for said probe to destroy

    --
    Excuse me, I don't mean to impose, but I am the ocean
    1. Re:In other news by 19thNervousBreakdown · · Score: 0

      Until the probe learns jump, roll, jump, roll, jump, roll, wind walk. The probe still has a problem with ghost fish in the Hurricane Pack though.

      --
      <xml><I><am><so><damn>Web 2.0</damn></so></am></I></xml>
    2. Re:In other news by Eric(b0mb)Dennis · · Score: 0

      flails

      --
      Excuse me, I don't mean to impose, but I am the ocean
  13. Any country anywhere, this is cool. by stevesliva · · Score: 2
    This is great for everyone. Thank you Japan, and keep the photos coming. Best of luck with the sample return.

    As an aside, to Japanese spacecraft have particular trouble with solar flares? Or just horrible luck? Didn't they have a Mars probe stagger past that planet but not make orbit for about the same reasons?

    --
    Who do you get to be an expert to tell you something's not obvious? The least insightful person you can find? -J Roberts
    1. Re:Any country anywhere, this is cool. by QuantumG · · Score: 1

      The fact that their probe can undergo damage and continue the mission is impressive all by itself.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    2. Re:Any country anywhere, this is cool. by Ironsides · · Score: 2, Informative

      s an aside, to Japanese spacecraft have particular trouble with solar flares? Or just horrible luck? Didn't they have a Mars probe stagger past that planet but not make orbit for about the same reasons?

      Wiki link on Radiation Hardening

      Basically, it's not just japan that has the problem, it's everyone. Anything in earth orbit is partially protected by the earths magnetic field. The other thing is that you have to be in the path of the flare, this probe was just unlucky. The mars rovers and others would have problems if they were hit.

      --
      Fly me to the moon Let me sing among those stars Let me see what spring is like On jupiter and mars
  14. Seems odd. by bluesoul88 · · Score: 5, Funny

    "A solar flare damaged the solar panels causing a reduction in power."

    Ah, powered by irony. Those Japanese are always on the cutting edge.

    1. Re:Seems odd. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Ah, powered by irony."

        Irony power? Nah, can't be. I don't believe you kids ever even heard of 'doc' Smith.

    2. Re:Seems odd. by Mycroft_VIII · · Score: 1

      Besides a modern bergenholm(sp?) drive would be more efficeint anyway.
          Doesen't have quick the nausea problem when free eigther.

      Mcyroft

      --
      https://signup.leagueoflegends.com/?ref=4c3ed6600b6ea
  15. My tax refund is no budgetary constraint by craXORjack · · Score: 3, Funny
    It's a pity that NASA's asteroid rover, which Hayabusa was going to drop off, got cancelled due to budgetry constraints...

    By cancelling all these pork barrel projects the administration was able to give you a tax refund. I enjoyed my three hundred dollars. It paid for the gas for my huge honkin' SUV for a whole month. It would have been two months except that Dick and George's arab friends raised their prices. But at least all those refunds went to a good cause. If the democrats were still running things a lot of our disposable income would be going to cocaine farmers in South America. But we can rest assured that when the robed men that George Bush holds hands with collect our extra cash that they will do something good with it. I'll bet they have lots of charitable causes that they donate to. Yup, I hear those Saudi's give to lots of worthy organizations... So the next time you complain about not adding some expensive, experimental gadget to some japanese rocket just think for a second about where that money would come from and have a little sympathy for those poor millionaires who would have to cut back on single malt scotch and exotic asian hookers. And for what? So some scientists can drive a remote control car around on an asteroid. We don't need Science to tell us about the universe. Everything you need to know is in the GoOD Book. Want to know how the universe was created? Pick up a Bible and read. It's right there in the first chapter.

    --
    Liberals call everyone Nazis yet they are the closest thing to it.
    1. Re:My tax refund is no budgetary constraint by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are being sacastic, I hope :)

      To those of you who actually agree with this comment, let's just say without Bush, your nation would be $300billion richer.

    2. Re:My tax refund is no budgetary constraint by cfulmer · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Oh come off it. In the current market, nobody has 'control' of prices -- they're set by the laws of supply and demand. Demand is huge right now mainly because the red Chinese economy is booming. Supply, meanwhile, can't be increased. The result is completely predictible to anybody who's taken high school economics: prices go up.

      When there's any blip in supply, as there was with the hurricane, supply actually drops and prices go up again.

      And, in fact, this is what you want -- if the prices were artificially set at some level, we would end up with shortages and rationing: Retirees would still be able to go out crusing on the weekends with their ration, but delivery trucks wouldn't have enough to make their rounds.

      There are certainly people making a mint on this -- the cost of production has not gone up much. But, there was no way for any oil company/country to engineer this.

      As for your tirade about the tax cuts.... As a percentage of the total tax relief, only a small portion went to the "millionaires" -- much more went to those w/ annual incomes under $100K/yr. Person-for-person however, millionaires got more (because they pay substantially higher taxes than the rest of us and thus benefit most from any tax cut), but there are far fewer of them.

    3. Re:My tax refund is no budgetary constraint by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The bible is a fictional book. You may as well suggest reading "Lord of the Rings" as they are both based on fantasy. LotR is much more interesting and believable.

    4. Re:My tax refund is no budgetary constraint by ChePibe · · Score: 1

      My prediction (which I hope is incorrect):

      Grandparent's paranoid rant will be moded "insightful" or "interesting" in no time.

      Parent's post, which is based in common sense, will probably be moded as "flamebait" or "troll" just as quickly.

      If you were looking for karma, you should've simply posted, "I hate Bush and think everything in Farenheit 9/11 is true".

    5. Re:My tax refund is no budgetary constraint by Rick+Richardson · · Score: 2, Informative

      The Planetary Society

      NASA Cancels Rover on Joint Japan-US Asteroid Mission

      November 3, 2000

      NASA has canceled the development of a miniature rover, which would have been part of the U.S. contribution to a Japanese mission to an asteroid in September, 2005. The primary reasons for the cancellation were rising costs and weight.

      A Previous President.

    6. Re:My tax refund is no budgetary constraint by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, none of the above replies noticed that the parent was a joke.

    7. Re:My tax refund is no budgetary constraint by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sarcasm, on the other hand, isn't fictional but very real.

    8. Re:My tax refund is no budgetary constraint by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You, sir, are an idiot. OPEC 'controls' (literally) oil prices worldwide via artificial production limitations. Welcome to the real world, dumbass.

    9. Re:My tax refund is no budgetary constraint by craXORjack · · Score: 1

      I think you realize that I was using sarcasm. You should understand then that you are only arguing against what you perceive as my real message 'between the lines' so to speak. Therefore I cannot defend any specific statements I made. You on the other hand made statements that have some truth to them yet don't address the complexity of the situation and other statements that are not at all true.

      You understand the law of supply and demand but want to apply it everywhere. "When all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail." Go learn what a cartel is. Learn what price gouging is. Then work those concepts in with what you already know about supply and demand. You will begin to realize that your current view is overly simplistic.

      Your statement regarding rationing is completely wrong. Go read up on how rationing worked during WWII and you'll have a better idea of how it would work today if we ever need it. No delivery truck would ever sit idle while retirees cruise around. The whole purpose of rationing is to keep the system running.

      No way for any country to engineer this? I think you are a little ingenuous. History has witnessed again and again what regional instability does to commodity futures. Do you really think it is coincidence that a president whose family is so deeply enmeshed in the oil business started an unjustified war in the world's main oil producing region? And even today his administration promotes instability in Venezuela, one of the largest oil producers.

      The tax cuts to the richest Americans have only started to kick in. They will continue to gain more and more over the next ten years. Paying out another hundred dollars a month for gas is difficult for minimum wage earners but isn't even a nuisance to those who can afford a different colored humvee for each day of the week.

      --
      Liberals call everyone Nazis yet they are the closest thing to it.
    10. Re:My tax refund is no budgetary constraint by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nothing claimed in Farenheit 9/11 has ever been disproven. But keeping lying about it. Some fools will believe you.

    11. Re:My tax refund is no budgetary constraint by gstoddart · · Score: 1
      Oh come off it. In the current market, nobody has 'control' of prices -- they're set by the laws of supply and demand.

      Only indirectly, not quite so rigidly as you say.

      There don't exist any truly free-market economies in the world. For things like oil and the like, price is related to supply, but price is also related to things like perceptions about the supply.

      Market speculation (guessing about the outcomes of actual supply and demand) drives the prices as much as the actual supply do.

      When there's any blip in supply, as there was with the hurricane, supply actually drops and prices go up again.

      Ah, but you forget that those prices were going up while the storm was still on-going and the extent of the damage was unknown. The prices spiked on the belief that the storm would cause shortages.

      Companies will increase their prices in an anticipation of a future crunch -- as soon as they possibly can. But, as the real costs slide back down, they're a lot more reluctant to lower those prices in response to 'supply and demand'. So it's not in the interest of a country who has been selling it at > $60/barrel to lower the price to $40/barrel. That, is independant of the actual supply and demand. (Never mind that a 5% increase in raw crude causes a > 5% increase in the price of gas at the pumps.)

      S&D is a useful descriptive tool, but it doesn't control the changes with the precision of some cool mathematical formula --- hold up your thumb and squint, and you'll get a broad idea. For the specifics, it gets way less well defined.

      Cheers
      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    12. Re:My tax refund is no budgetary constraint by cfulmer · · Score: 1

      I agree that OPEC does (or at least tries to do) this generally. They can't do it now because they have reached their maximum production -- they are just about at peak production and are not limiting at all. In fact, OPEC doesn't want prices this high. When the Chinese economy goes into its next recession, OPEC will discover that many people in the rest of the world have switched to smaller cars, natural gas, hybrids and other technologies that are less dependant on oil.

      Being able to set prices means that OPEC has the ability to maximize either its short- or long-term profits. If they maximize short-term profits, then competitors, such as fuel-cells, nuclear power, natural gas & so on will enter the market and their long-term monopoly is gone. On the other hand, if they set prices high enough where they get a good profit but low enough that potential competitors can't make money, they can keep going forever.

    13. Re:My tax refund is no budgetary constraint by cfulmer · · Score: 1

      WRT rationing, I was thinking more along the lines of what was done in the '70s, where even-numbered plates got to buy on even days and odd-numbered plates got to buy on odd days.

      I suppose that if one wanted to institute a huge government program to make centralized decisions about priorities, it'd be possible, although prone to error. I don't think such a program is necessary -- basic economic theory says that easily tradeable goods go to highest-value user.

      I'm not aware of the President's family being enmeshed in the oil business. I know that he personally was in the oil business, and I suspect still knows a number of people there. I'd be interested to learn more, but I don't think it exists.

      Iraq wasn't contributing a large portion of the world oil before the war (remember the sanctions). Oil prices, like those of most commodities now, are most directly related to the Chinese economy. Check the prices of Steel and Copper -- we haven't done anything in the Steel-producing areas of the world, but those prices are high as well. Of course, it's easier for those industries to increase production.

  16. Re: Article Text by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    The article appears wierd in firefox, I meant to attach this to my above post.
    Regards,
    Steve

    Some of the most frequently asked questions about the U.S. space program are "Why go into space when we have so many problems here on Earth?" and "What does the space program do for me?" These are legitimate questions and unfortunately not enough people have been made aware of the vast benefits the space program provides that increase the quality of our daily lives. Applications on Earth of technology needed for space flight have produced thousands of "spinoffs" that contribute to improving national security, the economy, productivity and lifestyle. It is almost impossible to find an area of everyday life that has not been improved by these spinoffs. Collectively, these secondary applications represent a substantial return on the national investment in aerospace research. We should be spending more.

    Out of a $2.4 trillion budget, less than 0.8% is spent on the entire space program! That's less than 1 penny for every dollar spent. The average American spends more of their budget on their cable bill, eating out or entertainment than this yet the benefits of space flight are remarkable. It has been conservatively estimated by U.S. space experts that for every dollar the U.S. spends on R and D in the space program, it receives $7 back in the form of corporate and personal income taxes from increased jobs and economic growth. Besides the obvious jobs created in the aerospace industry, thousands more are created by many other companies applying NASA technology in nonspace related areas that affect us daily. One cannot even begin to place a dollar value on the lives saved and improved lifestyles of the less fortunate. Space technology benefits everyone and a rising technological tide does raise all boats.

    One small example is the Hubble Space Telescope. Much maligned at first because of its flawed optics, it still produced better photographs than anything here on Earth. Once fixed, it has produced even more startling scientific data which we have only begun to understand and apply. One of the many spinoffs from the Hubble telescope is the use of its Charge Coupled Device (CCD) chips for digital imaging breast biopsies. The resulting device images breast tissue more clearly and efficiently than other existing technologies. The CCD chips are so advanced that they can detect the minute differences between a malignant or benign tumor without the need for a surgical biopsy. This saves the patient weeks of recovery time and the cost for this procedure is hundreds of dollars vs. thousands for a surgical biopsy. With over 500,000 women needing biopsies a year the economic benefit, per year, is tremendous and it greatly reduces the pain, scarring, radiation exposure, time, and money associated with surgical biopsies.

    Below is a "small" sampling of the many other ways that space technology has improved our lives and benefited mankind. It is truly a remarkable list and not nearly complete but I believe you will begin to appreciate the answers to "Why do we go in space" and "What does the space program do for me?" So the next time you hear these questions being asked, you will be able to explain it.

    Computer Technology - NASA Spinoffs

    GROUND PROCESSING SCHEDULING SYSTEM - Computer-based scheduling system that uses artificial intelligence to manage thousands of overlapping activities involved in launch preparations of NASA's Space Shuttles. The NASA technology was licensed to a new company which developed commercial applications that provide real-time planning and optimization of manufacturing operations, integrated supply chains, and customer orders.uu

    SEMICONDUCTOR CUBING - NASA initiative led to the Memory Short Stack, a three-dimensional semiconductor package in which dozens of integrated circuits are stacked one atop another to form a cube, offering faster computer processing speeds, higher levels of integration, lower power requirements than

  17. Typical Slashdot Paranoid Illiteracy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I think it's hilarious that slashdot is on the one hand a reliable bastion of mainstream science, pro-evolution, anti-intelligent-design, etc.

    While on the other hand, the readers subscribe to the most bizarre ideas. For example, the parent post (right now the only post at score +5), bemoans the dangers of Japanese space probes bringing back "other elements" from "the galaxies and universes".

    But this is only scratching the surface. You only need to browse a few days to find dozens of highly-moderated posts about secret Pentagon weather-control devices, diseases caused by internet telephonty and so on.

    It would be funny -- even hilarious -- except that the readers of slashdot are actually among the most well-read and technically-minded people in the world. So instead, I must say, woe to the people of Earth!

    1. Re:Typical Slashdot Paranoid Illiteracy by Bushcat · · Score: 5, Funny
      right now the only post at score +5

      But I think he went for the "+5, sympathy" vote. If you met a post like that in the street, you'd smile encouragingly and pat it on the head, inwardly glad that all your own posts had grown up healthy.

    2. Re:Typical Slashdot Paranoid Illiteracy by HishamMuhammad · · Score: 1

      It would be funny -- even hilarious -- except that the readers of slashdot are actually among the most well-read and technically-minded people in the world.

      Believe me, we're not. Unless well-read means several readings of Lord of the Rings and technically-minded means Unix users (of which a constantly larger percentage is MacOSX users, which, eh...).

      And this is not "+5, Funny" -- it's more like "1, Sad But True".

    3. Re:Typical Slashdot Paranoid Illiteracy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      >I think it's hilarious that slashdot is on the one
      >hand a reliable bastion of mainstream science,
      >pro-evolution, anti-intelligent-design, etc.

      >While on the other hand, the readers subscribe to
      >the most bizarre ideas.

      [Unintentionally Funny +1]

      ...or perhaps the same credulity (noun: readiness or willingness to believe especially on slight or uncertain evidence) that allows those who fancy themselves to be intellectually superior to believe and propagate the just-so fairy tales of Darwinism also predisposes them to gullibility on other subjects as well. See SETI, Pyramid Power, UFOs, mind control rays, etc., etc....

    4. Re:Typical Slashdot Paranoid Illiteracy by dan_bethe · · Score: 1

      Hm. Maybe it's because Slashdot is a fluctuating, fluidic, chaotically growing-and-shrinking and coming-and-going cloud of individuals, and not a hivelike conscious collective about which such gross generalizations and stereotypical judgments can be rationally made! :)

    5. Re:Typical Slashdot Paranoid Illiteracy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > I think it's hilarious that slashdot is on the one hand a reliable bastion of mainstream science, pro-evolution, anti-intelligent-design, etc.

      Ostensibly. Clearly it's not true, based on the nonsense that gets posted here.

    6. Re:Typical Slashdot Paranoid Illiteracy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey Dan, have you used your thesaurus much lately?

  18. Amazing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    I thought the GP's post was a brilliant troll, but then I read yours and saw how outclassed he really is.

    Who said NASA'a space shuttle was bad? It is revolutionary, just expensive as hell and slightly ahead of its time

    It's like watching Bobby Flay slice open a flounder. Elegant, deft, and just a little bit repulsive. Bravo!

  19. Sure they are... by Bob+Cat+-+NYMPHS · · Score: 3, Funny

    http://outpostnine.com/editorials/teacher1.html

    "So anyway, the whole "black men have big dicks" stereotype stretches far and wide, even to the nation's 12 year olds. Part of why I'm here is not just to kind of sort of help teach English, but to "broaden cultural perceptions". Break stereotypes, challenge preconcieved notions, all that jazz. That's good and all, but this is one stereotype I think I'm just gonna let slide.

    So anyway, I get asked "bigu dikku" A LOT. Every 2-3 days in fact, which is amazing considering I got asked this question about 2-3 times *in my entire life* in America. Locker room jokes aside. How do you answer that anyway? To a 12-15 year old? I wave them off and say "No no no." Then they say "Oh, sumaru dikku?" (trans. "Small dick?") and OF COURSE that's wrong so I have to correct them. It's just a no-win stiuation."

    1. Re:Sure they are... by Rob+T+Firefly · · Score: 1

      Funny you should mention that, as the next stage in the probe's program is to give the asteroid a good old-fashioned kancho.

    2. Re:Sure they are... by kahei · · Score: 1


      Actually, it's more amazing that the writer of the article can believe stereotypes like 'Japan is a country with few foreigners' even while working there! The Japanese belief that black guys have big dicks is just plain correct, but this whole 'woo, Japan, isolated empire where ancient tradition coexists with giant robots' thing is totally incomprehensible to me.

      As to why his students feel the need to mention it to him all the time, well, I think he might want to consider that it's not that they're fascinated by his penis; it's more that they're just teenagers taking the piss out of their teacher. It does happen, you know :)

      Actually, this reminds me of one time when I was talking to some young female shop assistants in Tokyo and had the following conversation:

      Giggling assistants: What are you doing this weekend?

      Me: Nothing much. You?

      GA: We're going to Mitaka!

      Me: Why Mitaka? It's a dump.

      GA: But there is an american army base near there ! We want to try and fuck some black guys on Saturday. They have the biggest dicks!

      Me: Right... er... see you on Monday, then.

      Not a stereotype, though, just a fact about relative penis size and a tribute to the uninhibited, jaded nymphomania which seems to mark a large chunk of the Japanese population.

      --
      Whence? Hence. Whither? Thither.
    3. Re:Sure they are... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When they ask me I just whip out my 8" long chopstick and say "GOJIRA!!!!"

  20. stupid controller by austad · · Score: 2, Funny

    Actually, the probe would have been there much much sooner, but someone accidentally entered "up, up, down, down, left, right, left, right, b, a, select, start" when they should have entered "up, up, down, down, left, right, left, right, b, a, start".

    It's a common mistake. It's too bad it had to happen on the controls to this thing though.

    NASA has, however, licensed the control technology used on this probe. Unfortunately, they are unsure as to whether or not their current shuttle control systems have enough power to be able to take commands from the unit. Fortunately, when the engineers do something wrong, they will have the assurance of being able to grab the cord 1 foot up from the controls and smack it repeatedly into a cement basement floor with no damage.

    --
    Need Free Juniper/NetScreen Support? JuniperForum
  21. I, for one... by aktzin · · Score: 1

    ...welcome our robotic Japanese asteroid exploring probe overlords, even if they no longer carry NASA rovers. C'mon, laugh! At least I didn't mention Beowulf clusters or Soviet Russia.

    --
    Quantum mechanics: the dreams that stuff is made of.
    1. Re:I, for one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Soviet Russia, the in-joke mentions YOU!

  22. Grasping at straws... by Parallax+Blue · · Score: 1

    It seems like these probes that study asteroids are really grasping at straws. What are we looking for in the asteroids? Are we looking for anything specific? Why are we looking for that? Etc. All knowledge is worth having but searching without a particular goal in mind is unlikely to get good results.

    1. Re:Grasping at straws... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If we knew beforehand what was up there to examine, don't you think we'd be sending fewer space probes?

    2. Re:Grasping at straws... by Graymalkin · · Score: 4, Informative

      There's lots of good reasons to study deep space objects like asteroids and comets. Some of these are purely scientific while others are far more practical. Finding the exact composition of an asteroid for instance helps tell us where in the solar system it formed. Knowing where it began existance and comparing that position to its current one gives us clues on how the solar system has evolved from its accretion disk state. Studying asteroids up close also lets us test our theories on planetary formation, if an asteroid of a particular class is expected to have a particular composition and indeed does it lends weight to that formation theory. It also provides ground truth for other forms of observation and measurement.

      From a practical standpoint it is highly beneficial to know what asteroids are made out of. They're prime targets for space mining ventures at some point. Unlike materials mined from the Moon or Mars there's very little surface gravity to fight to get the material from the asteroid back to Earth. Hence it would be far easier to grab raw silicon or some such off a NEA and return it to Earth than get it off the Moon.

      It also pays off to practice sending craft to rendevous with deep space objects. While current missions are exploratory, at some point they might be defensive. If we see an Earth crossing comet or asteroid in enough time there's a good chance we can alter its trajectory or outright destroy it (if its small enough) if we can successfully put spacecraft in striking distance of it. It is desirable to have a lot of people well versed in that sort of mission. It's also another area where knowing the composition of such objects is useful. Knowing what would be needed to destroy or deflect such an object is much easier when you know how it is going to behave. A rocky dense asteroid will act far differently than a loosely clumped dustball when hit with a nuclear blast.

      --
      I'm a loner Dottie, a Rebel.
    3. Re:Grasping at straws... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      well the next big wars could be fought over water.

      How about doubling our supply? and its probably relatively simple to mine and process in space.

      http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/050907_ceres _planet.html

    4. Re:Grasping at straws... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      RTFA - find the reasons within

    5. Re:Grasping at straws... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      These rocks have a habit of bumping into things, such as the Earth, and causing global catastrophes from time to time.

      The tsunami from even a small one landing in an ocean (say, a few hundred metres in diameter) would make the Indonesian tsunami look like the splash from a pebble. That would be a *bad*day*.

      We are a target of these things. It is valuable to understand them, so that we know how to deal with them if we discover one is going to hit soon. It will take alot of creative engineering to figure out how to shift one. If you don't know what the material properties of an asteroid are, the job would be much harder and riskier.

      In other words, know your enemy.

    6. Re:Grasping at straws... by vertinox · · Score: 1

      What are we looking for in the asteroids? Are we looking for anything specific? Why are we looking for that?

      I don't know what the Japanese scientists are looking for, but these things usually end up opening a portal to hell, releasing a 10,000 year old demon, accidently causing space pirates to avoid intergalatic space police capture, angering a perverted race of aliens with rather large tentacles bent on invading earth, or just plain old waking up something on monster island.

      Don't worry... Some young girl who has provacative clothes transformation power will save the day and Ultraman will probaly make a cameo.

      --
      "I am the king of the Romans, and am superior to rules of grammar!"
      -Sigismund, Holy Roman Emperor (1368-1437)
  23. Motorcycles? by ari_j · · Score: 1
    1. Re:Motorcycles? by wamatt · · Score: 1

      Hayabusas kick ass. Thank you.

  24. mod parent DOWN by glowworm · · Score: 1

    Damn it, I've got the mod points but I decided to post something before I read this -1 flamebait drivel. Now I regret wasting my chance!

    --
    Orationem pulchram non habens, scribo ista linea in lingua Latina
    1. Re:mod parent DOWN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ever heard of irony? Some people just don't get it.

    2. Re:mod parent DOWN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "-1 Flamebait"? I think you mean "-1 The Truth Hurts".

      Don't like it? Deal with it. It's true, though. Your comfortable lifestyle is only sustained by the suffering of billions who live in worse conditions than slaves ever did.

      You will have a pleasant life now, but your children and grandchildren (if, God forbid, you breed) will inherit a husk of an Earth sucked dry by your greed.

      Well, whatever parts of it still remain above water, anyway.

    3. Re:mod parent DOWN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and all that of course is GW's fault? I think not.... go shower with that ugly beeotch called Cindy Sheehan you faggot.

  25. oh!ohh!! by subtropolis · · Score: 0, Troll

    That wasn't flamebait. You want to see flamebait? G E O R G E B U S H is flamebait!

    --
    "Our interests are to see if we can't scale it up to something more exciting," he said.
  26. This just in ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Communications from the Hayabusa probe suddenly and mysteriously fell silent after it returned this image http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/c/cf/Godz illa.jpg.

  27. motorbike by jlebrech · · Score: 2, Funny

    That's one fast motorbike and a hell of a ramp.

    1. Re:motorbike by msim · · Score: 1

      All i can say is thank GOD i wasn't the only one that was thinking this.

      --

      Life is like a box of chocolates, you never know when your gonna get food poisoning.
  28. Hope it goes better..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Than man's earlier findings of precious minerals. Those often were followed up with lots of innocent people being massacred, or having a metal collar snapped around their neck, and literaly stuffed
    like sardines in the hulls of ships.

  29. Re:Cool... by ozmanjusri · · Score: 1

    That's no troll! Ghost Rider's 500hp Hayabusa is a legend! http://www.level66.com/viewer-26831.html

    Actually, I have to admit - when I saw the headline, the first thing I thought was "I knew Hayabusas were crotch rockets, but that's extreme..."

    --
    "I've got more toys than Teruhisa Kitahara."
  30. Probing? by Tavor · · Score: 1
    from the we-dont-do-nearly-enough-probing dept.
    The difference between humans and alien-abductions: Aliens are just rumored to be , but we KNOW we are probing stuff, and in a very big way!
    --
    Windows has detected an undetectable error.
  31. ARTICLE LEFT OUT CRITICAL INFORMATION by Ingolfke · · Score: 1

    It will study the asteroid for two months before collecting a sample from the surface and departing for Earth

    The original press release was edited by the Japanese Government, the original version read as follows:

    It will study the asteroid for two months before awaking Godzilla.

  32. Re: Well Read? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "the readers of slashdot are actually among the most well-read and technically-minded people in the world"

    Would you care to publish the study you did that brought you to this conclusion? The number of times I have seen /.ers using the word "anyways" lends to my belief that you are all a bunch of back-country hicks. This site is only lightly peppered with intelligent conversation anymore.

  33. Flying Toaster by johnthorensen · · Score: 1

    All hail the Flying Toasters!

  34. possible answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So anyway, I get asked "bigu dikku" A LOT. Every 2-3 days in fact, which is amazing considering I got asked this question about 2-3 times *in my entire life* in America. Locker room jokes aside. How do you answer that anyway?

    You say something like: "It's SO big, I had to buy a house with a double garage to park it in there."

  35. I knew I shoulda taken a left at Albuquerque... by phamlen · · Score: 1
    From the article:

    HAYABUSA will not only gather samples but also observe the asteroid with various scientific devices and measures. For that purpose, it is equipped with a Telescope Wide-View Cameras and Light Detection and Ranging, as well as with a Near Infrared Spectrometer. It will also employ a hopping robot, which can move around on the asteroid's surface.

    A hopping robot? Sounds suspiciously like Looney Tunes. The big question is "Did they complete the programming so that it can steal the Explosive Space Modulator from Marvin when he lands on the asteroid?"

    :)

  36. What about the Kin Korn Karn probe? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Hayabusa probe is great and all, but I was hoping the space agencies would recognize the true great of videogame wrestling and name a probe after Kin Korn Karn.

    I mean, he's done so much more for science than Mr. Generic.

  37. New Japanese bromide created... by wcrowe · · Score: 1

    We can put a Hayabusa on an Itokawa, but we still can't cure the common cold.

    --
    Proverbs 21:19
  38. Taking Pictures? by Wizzy+Wig · · Score: 4, Funny

    "The Japanese space probe Hayabusa has just arrived at its destination, the asteroid Itokawa, and is taking pictures." Will the Japanese tourist stereotypes never end?

    1. Re:Taking Pictures? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Be quiet and fix me some sushi!

  39. Ion engines? by DrVomact · · Score: 1

    I've heard talk about ion engines for a long time, but this is the first time I've heard of one actually being used. Of course, it's quite possible I haven't been paying attention... Does NASA use ion engines on its deep space probes? If not, is this a significant breakthrough? That is, are there notable advantages to ion propulsion over conventional rocket engines?

    --
    Great men are almost always bad men--Lord Acton's Corollary
    1. Re:Ion engines? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ion engines thrust really, really slowly (because they need lots of electricity), but for the same amount of fuel they can make about eight to ten times as large a change in velocity if you're willing to wait. So they can make many more manuevers before they go wherever gravity wants them to...

      About NASA, I know they're planning on using them in their Jupiter Icy Moons Orbiter.

  40. Ion by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 0, Troll

    > HAYABUSA is traveling through space using an ion engine.

    Well f*** me! I thought that kind of sh** was still on the drawing board!

    When can I go rent a sleeping pod in a space station?

    Sh**, I can do that too, now? $20 million and dropping?

    Ok, next question. Where's the sexbot?

    --
    (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    1. Re:Ion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Troll? I was trying to be funny, you ignorant twit!

  41. HayabaUSA by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 0, Troll

    > Hayabusa arrived [at asteroid] Itokawa

    Go USA!

    - The scientific observation will be conducted for about two months including sampling and topographic measurement.

    - It will orbit the asteroid, land on it, and bring back a sample from its surface.

    - HAYABUSA employs a new technology - the ion engine

    - Autonomous Navigation System, which enables the probe to approach a far-away asteroid without human guidance.

    - It will also employ a hopping robot, which can move around on the asteroid's surface.

    USA! USA! USA! Our technological superiority is the envy of the world!

    --
    (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    1. Re:HayabaUSA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Troll? I was trying to be witty and post a jab at my own nation's ego. You do realize this is a Japanese endeavour, don't you, you ignorant twit?

      Let's hope some metamoderators "take care of business"...

  42. Where, up Gwen Stefani's ***? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh, that's HaraJUKU...

  43. We already have asteroid samples. by Latent+Heat · · Score: 1
    We already have asteroid samples in the form of meteorites. I suppose we have comet samples in the form of meteoritic dust grains.

    The funny thing is that the meteorites, stuff that falls to Earth, is judged to be mainly asteroids with the odd piece of Moon or Mars. Comets don't seem to generate meteorites, but they generate most of the meteors -- I guess comets are made of too small pieces or grains to make it all the way down without burning up.

    Is there anything we will learn from this asteroid that we don't know from meteorites? Is this asteroid representative of a class of asteroids known from their spectra? It is believed that the known meteorites are a biased sample of the asteroids -- probably it is only a few asteroids that had recent collisions spalling off material that is feeding the current supply of meteorites.

    The two types of asteroid I am most interested are the C-type -- a common type of asteroid but rare among the meteorites. It would be interesting to know the connection between these carbonaceous asteroids and the comets. The other type of asteroid of great interest would be the metallic ones on account of the mining potential.

    1. Re:We already have asteroid samples. by Graymalkin · · Score: 1

      We have meteorites which are great but they can only tell us about an object that already hit us. Much of these objects burned up in the atmosphere which leaves us with only the densest and toughest parts of the object to actually study. Was the whole object the same as the remainder left? Was the object originally composed of entirely different and unexpected classes of materials? These are questions more easily answered by studying intact objects before they've had a chance to slam into us.

      For instance, to date we have only imaged the nuclei of four comets: Halley, Borelly, Wild 2 and Tempel 1. We don't know far more about comets than we do know. The Stardust mission to Wild 2 found that quite a few ideas we had about the comet were completely wrong. The NEAR mission to 433 Eros was likewise very enlightening for planetary scientists. Asteroids like comets are objects we see often enough but don't have a deep understanding of.

      Looking at meteorites is similar in many ways to looking at dinosaur fossils. There were a lot of assumptions made about the nature of dinosaurs because all we had to go on for a long time were fossils. When tracks and nests and other such remains were discovered (or rediscovered and known for what they were) our ideas about dinosaurs changed significantly. While there's a good deal a fossil or meteorite can tell us there's still plenty more that it cannot tell us. A fossil won't necessarily tell us that diplodocuses traveled in herds, a fossilized riverbed with diplodocus tracks will however. That's where missions like Hayabusa, Deep Impact, Stardust, and others come in. They can directly sample deep space objects to help us find the nature of them.

      --
      I'm a loner Dottie, a Rebel.
  44. OT - sig by Man+Eating+Duck · · Score: 1

    Man, that sig is priceless :)

    --
    Are you a grammar Nazi? I'm trying to improve my English; please correct my errors! :)
  45. Hayabusa Probe Arrives at Destination by pebear · · Score: 1

    My Buddy has a Huyabusa 2002 1300cc and that thing can scream !!! He can stand it up doing 100MPH. I hear that the German's call the Huyabusa's (Suzuki GSXR 2002 1300) "The WidowMaker" I know this thing is poerfull, but who would have known they would take them to outer space.... LOL

    --
    Paul E. Bahre