Slashdot Mirror


12Mbps Powerline Broadband Trial Unveiled

An anonymous reader writes "The tiny state of Tasmania in Australia has kicked off the country's first commercial powerline broadband trial. The service is capable of providing Internet connectivity of up to 12Mbps but during trials, it will be limited to 4Mbps. Costs will range from $12 (A$15) to $67 (A$80) per month for speeds between 256Kbps and 4Mbps. Powerline broadband has received wide support from leading vendors including Intel, Motorola and Cisco Systems -- all of whom support an organisation called the HomePlug Powerline Alliance."

14 of 316 comments (clear)

  1. Doesn't this frighten anyone... by Nuclear+Elephant · · Score: 4, Interesting

    ...that our once thought unfounded fears of someone programming our toaster to eat our dog are not not-so-radical?

  2. Reasons to move to Australia: by Elrac · · Score: 5, Funny
    • Cheap, fast IP via powerline
    • No hurricanes!
    --
    When one person suffers from a delusion, it is called insanity. When many people suffer from a delusion it is called Rel
    1. Re:Reasons to move to Australia: by grungebox · · Score: 4, Funny

      But on the downside, you have to be careful in case a dingo eats your baby.

  3. Los Angeles by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    In other news, Los Angeles is working on an implementation of electricity over power lines. Still a few bugs to work out in their implementation though, apparently.

  4. State of Tasmania? by drgonzo59 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Tasmanian Devil reportedly not impressed. Already using 1GBit fiberoptic connection.

  5. RRARGH! by Stanistani · · Score: 4, Funny

    Taz administer broadband network!
    NNNNyehhh, what's up doc?
    Taz eat hacker rabbit!

  6. Misleading headline by Brunellus · · Score: 4, Insightful

    c'mon, guys. Is it asking too much to report the ACTUAL bandwidth used in the trial, instead of some arbitrarily-high number that the users involved will never actually see??

  7. Re:Sad... by MBCook · · Score: 4, Interesting
    You'd think all the communication problems post-Katrina would have taught people something too. I've heard all sorts of stories of people not being able to communicate, police walkie-talkies being useless after a few hours when the battery dies, etc. Considering hams that prepare for this kind of thing know what they're doing and are supposed to prepare and be ready for having no electricity and such.

    This was a big PR chance. I heard in some areas the ONLY way to get messages passed (especially "Is my brother OK" type Health & Welfare traffic) was by hams.

    --
    Comment forecast: Bits of genius surrounded by a sea of mediocrity.
  8. Re:Just makes sense by MightyMartian · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Too bad it's going to knock out so many communications bands, and that it's going to require major rejigging of power lines, and leaves open the question as to why power companies just don't sling fiber on their poles.

    --
    The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
  9. Re:Those MB per month limits are awful by Verteiron · · Score: 4, Informative

    Okay, double posts are bad form, but I just saw the text underneath the pricing table: "Speed reduction once data usage reaches 150% of included data (to ensure your bill remains under control)".

    So in other words, if you pay for the 4Mb/s at about $80/month, you get 2000MB of free data transfer. So you download at full speed for a little over an hour. After that, every megabyte you download after that costs you a dime. Ouch. And I thought Mediacom had a racket running...

    --
    End of lesson. You may press the button.
  10. Radio Frequency interference by kb1cvh · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Will this deployment of Broadband over Powerline cause interference to radio services and be subject to interference from radio services ?

    The American Radio Relay league has information on BPL in the USA at

    http://www.arrl.org/tis/info/HTML/plc/

    The Australian Government has information on BPL at

    http://www.acma.gov.au/ACMAINTER.2490560:STANDARD: 2099729486:pc=PC_2845

    --
    Peter AI6PG
  11. Re:Ham radio? by RokaMoka · · Score: 4, Informative

    Sadly no. If I'm in California, and I'm talking to a flood victim in New Orleans, the BPL in Arizona will block us. The thing people forget about HAM radio is it is single transmitter, around the world. That can ONLY happen when everyone plays very nice. BPL does not place nice.

  12. BPL plays hell with radio. by Nethead · · Score: 5, Informative
    Many, if not all, of the BPL designs that have been deployed to date suffer from a number of technological weaknesses. Perhaps the most critical of these is that BPL is seriously degraded by nearby transmissions from low-powered transmitters from sources like Amateur Radio or CB. In several BPL cities, amateurs have done experimentation that shows that as little as 5 watts of power from a nearby radio transmitter can seriously degrade the performance of BPL. In some cases, the interference logged off a BPL user, requiring a reconnection to the network.

    This fatal flaw will seriously limit the way that BPL can be deployed and will decrease the reliability of a BPL system in any area where it is possible that nearby radio transmitters could be operating. Under the FCC's rules, BPL is an unlicensed device that must accept any interference caused to it by authorized radio services. In the past, and through decades of experience, such interference is rare to other broadband services, such as DSL, cable or satellite. However, in all of the BPL areas tested for susceptibility so far, the unshielded wiring that is used by BPL apparently picks up nearby radio transmitters and overload or otherwise degraded the performance of the system. Although this has been seen at power levels as low as 5 watts from Amateur Radio transmitters, Amateur Radio transmitters can use as much as 1500 watts of power, greatly extending area over which BPL will be unable to tune out these over-the-air signals.

    See the ARRL.org website for more info. http://www.arrl.org/tis/info/HTML/plc/ 73 de W7COM

    --
    -- I have a private email server in my basement.
  13. Hello broadband over power lines, goodbye radio by drwho · · Score: 4, Informative
    Each time there's an article on BPL here on slashdot, I find it neccessary to point out that it is a destructive technology, making HF radio pretty much unusable.

    While you may not think that your neighbor yammering on his CB, or another neighbor listening to broadcast from Radio Swaziland,or listening talk radio on AM broadcast are very important, there are other communications that are also disrupted: HF radio is used by emergency response agencies all over the world. The inadequacy of communications (among other failures of emergency services) was well demonstrated by the recent Hurricane Katrina disaster. BPL will make this worse.

    HF radio, unlike cellular telephones and other centralized radio systems, has the ability to comunicate over long distances without any intermediate infrastructure. The is vital for disaster communications where the infrastructure is overloaded or destroyed.

    Worst hit would be the poorer nations of the world, where telephone service is often unavailable or unreliable, and much of the communication has depended on HF radio. While the interference at a distance will be less, it will still be strong, very easily strong enough to make a weak signal calling for help in Afria disappear in BPL noise generated in Australia or the US.

    It goes both ways: HF radio can also interfere with BPL. I think that, in an area where BPL is interfering with Amateur Radio, that the Amateurs will not hesitate to use more powerful transmitters (if they can afford the electric bill for doing so). These will disrupt BPL, quite easily to the point of being unusable. And I doubt the BPL ISP will let you out of the contract because of such interference! So don't sign up. It's not worth the headache, and the guilt, and angry hams and other angry HF radio users.