Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft to Buy Stake in AOL

NetDanzr writes "According to various sources (Bloomberg, Reuters, CNet), Microsoft is in talks with Time Warner to buy a stake in AOL. While the size of the stake or its prize has not been disclosed yet, Bloomberg speculates that this deal would profit both companies. Microsoft would profit from merging the AOL portal with MSN, as a strategy to catch up with his rivals in this space Yahoo and Google, while Time Warner would gain some ammunition in its fight with a renegade shareholder, Carl Icahn. According to CNBC, AOL is just about to turn the corner and is currently the most undervalued division of Time Warner."

12 of 333 comments (clear)

  1. Oh no. by DrEldarion · · Score: 5, Funny

    Just when you thought the world was safe, evil and evil unite. Been nice knowing you guys. I'm off to read "revelations" to see what's about to go down.

  2. Re:No, NOOOOO! by RapmasterT · · Score: 5, Funny

    Might I suggest a finger gesture instead?

  3. Microsoft + AOL by Ann+Elk · · Score: 5, Funny

    Two great things that... uhh... nevermind.

  4. Two wrongs by tompercival · · Score: 5, Funny

    Is this an example of two wrongs not making a right?

    1. Re:Two wrongs by Guysmiley777 · · Score: 5, Funny

      This is an example of two great big balls of suck combining to form a critical mass of suck the likes of which have never been seen. The sheer density of suckage will actually tear a hole in the internet.

      --
      Coding with assembly is like playing with Legos. Coding an application in assembly is like building a car with Legos.
  5. Re:holy shit! by Coneasfast · · Score: 5, Insightful

    are you guys going to make some jokes about this?

    this is no joke.

    hotmail was good, and it was popular.
    MS took it over and turned it into the most worst email (the low storage, the spam, the restrictions, etc) service ever. nevertheless, people keep using it because it's what they always used or what their friends use.

    now take AOL, something already crappy. i can't possibly imagine what microsoft can do it. maybe this time around people will actually shy away to something else.

    --
    Marge, get me your address book, 4 beers, and my conversation hat.
  6. Re:holy shit! by KDN · · Score: 5, Funny

    Sure, now we're going to be innundated with Windows CD's offering 1000 hours of Windows free with your credit card.

  7. Re:woohoo by richdun · · Score: 5, Funny

    Finally putting the two largest scum of the earth together!!

    SCO's involved in this?

  8. MS was feeling left out.... by MrKahuna · · Score: 5, Funny

    Oracle buys Siebel.
    eBay buys Skype.

    Ballmer: (to Bill via bad cell phone connection) Billy-boy, what are we going to do? They're getting more press than us this week.
    Gates: Eh? Oh hell! ( as he spills his coffee on his lap and hangs up)
    Ballmer: Well, ok if you say so.

  9. Re:This is worrying by sspurrier · · Score: 5, Informative

    Insightful? AOL divested of its contribution to Netscape a couple of years ago. While they still put out a netscape product based on mozilla they are no where near the main contributor to mozilla. Most of the main developers have long since moved on.

  10. Their reason by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 5, Funny

    Microsoft isn't satisfied with the worst portal in the world. Now they want to buy the 2nd worst to guarantee their position.

    --
    Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
  11. If and when they do merge, they'll need a name... by jpellino · · Score: 5, Funny

    So here's the anagrams for AOL and MSN...

    MAL ONS - MAL SON - LAM ONS
    LAM SON - SALMON - ALMS NO
    ALMS ON - SLAM NO - SLAM ON
    MA SOLN - AM SOLN - MAN LOS
    MAN SOL - MANS LO

    "Salmon" has more logo possibilities;
    "Slam On!" will appeal to the x-treme and H4x0r crowd,
    but "Man, S.O.L.!" is probably closer to what most people think of this development.

    --
    "Win treats sysadmins better than users. Mac treats users better than sysadmins. Linux treats everyone like sysadmins."