Slashdot Mirror


New System to Counter Photo and Video Devices

Incongruity writes "News.com is reporting that a team from Georgia Tech has developed and demoed a system that actively searches for and effectively blinds cameras and camcorders within a 10 meter radius." From the article: "In this system, a device bathes the region in front of it with infrared light. When an intense retroreflection indicates the presence of a digital camera lens, the device then fires a localized beam of light directly at that point. Thus, the picture gets washed out."

21 of 401 comments (clear)

  1. I can just see it now... by TheOtherAgentM · · Score: 4, Funny

    Paparazzi Shields for famous celebrities. It's like a force field!

    1. Re:I can just see it now... by ackthpt · · Score: 1, Funny
      Paparazzi Shields for famous celebrities. It's like a force field!

      Ah, just a few years too late.

      Dodi Fayed: "Paparazzi shields to maximum!"
      Chauffeur: "*Hic* no problem! (gee, I'm soused, I think I can slow down and drive at a safer speed now)"
      Dodi Fayed: "Now, where were we, my little princess?"

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    2. Re:I can just see it now... by tambo · · Score: 4, Funny
      Paparazzi Shields for famous celebrities. It's like a force field!

      And also, fertile grounds for the class-action lawsuit craze of 2008. At least the court reporters will have some fun transcribing "My eyes! The goggles do nothing!"

      - David Stein

      --
      Computer over. Virus = very yes.
    3. Re:I can just see it now... by KiloByte · · Score: 2, Funny

      And we don't even need the IR detector, the police is nice enough to give us their own flash. When a sudden bright light is detected, we can flash back, blinding their camera.

      --
      The creatures outside looked from Alt-Right to Antifa; but already it was impossible to say which was which.
    4. Re:I can just see it now... by soft_guy · · Score: 2, Funny

      For people who make a living flashing lights in people's faces to take pictures, this would be very ironic.

      --
      Avoid Missing Ball for High Score
  2. What about glasses ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Can't wait to see how many people will go blind with this contraption!

  3. A Tale. by ackthpt · · Score: 4, Funny
    It was the coldest winter on record and the poor little match girl found she could find no buyers for her wares and she began to shivver.

    She lit a match and felt the warm glow of its meager heat before it burned down to her fingers and she dropped it in the snow. Then she lit another and another until all her matches were gone and she began to feel icy fingers of winter clutching at her tiny frail frame.

    She moved along the street looking for an open door, shelter, any shelter. Then she thought, what's this? She felt a deep warmth the likes of which she had not felt since her mother's embrace. It was glorious. She sat down to rest and soon fell asleep.

    And thus it came to pass, she was found roast to a golden brown, like a Thanksgiving turkey, before the offices of the Central Intelligence Agency.

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    1. Re:A Tale. by QuickFox · · Score: 3, Funny


      perhaps the moderators need to actually READ the post before moderating?

      You must be new here.

      -- The price of eternal vigilance is a dollar a day and half an hour of your time.
      Carefully choose a responsible newspaper. Support it, read it, write to it. Do your part.

      --
      Terrorists can't threaten a country's freedom and democracy. Only lawmakers and voters can do that.
  4. NASA was way ahead on this one. by Crixus · · Score: 2, Funny

    Heck, didn't Alan Bean discover a way to do this in 1969 while on an Apollo 12 EVA? (he says tongue firmly in cheek).

    --
    Ignore Alien Orders
  5. Counter camera devices by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Big deal. International Rescue had them already, 30 years ago, to protect strangers from photographing the Thunderbirds.

  6. Re:Not exactly new by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Are you accusing the editors of duping a story?

  7. Ha! Take that G-Men! by l0ungeb0y · · Score: 3, Funny

    I'm gonna get like 10 for every room 'cause I know you're watching and trying to keep me from talking about the Alie^H^H ...mmmmpppph

    [Remote Peer Quit Unexpectedly]

  8. this is great by drfrog · · Score: 5, Funny

    now the police can give the beat downs without any fear of being caught

    --
    back in the day we didnt have no old school
    1. Re:this is great by bugnuts · · Score: 4, Funny

      That's okay, you can do it back. Just install this on your car to drive through red lights and avoid the photograph.

      Now, we merely need to mount these on the heads of sharks and.... Muhahahhaha!

      Muahahahahha!

    2. Re:this is great by antic · · Score: 4, Funny


      Most slashdotters rely on their general appearance being enough to safely blind any nearby cameras.

      Shame about the smell though...

      --
      'Thats they exact same thing a banana wrench monkey.'
  9. Am I Wrong? by Snorpus · · Score: 5, Funny
    ... or wouldn't a portable one of these be a great way to take out all the cameras in, say, a bank?

    There's still other details to work out, like the armed guards, the exploding ink in the money packets, etc., but I'm glad those Georgia engineers solved one of my problems.

  10. Hopefully my cat has no glases ;) by Mike+Zilva · · Score: 2, Funny

    What about an identical system to flood the sensor with IR light and take the shot ? ;)

  11. Re:What about by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Exactly- those are the two choices for defeating this technology. Of course, then you won't get those neat night-vision see-through-clothes pictures....

    --
    SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
  12. Re:overengineered by RapmasterT · · Score: 2, Funny

    not necessarily, if you simply ringed the area you wanted to "protect" with high output IR LED's you could wash out the photographic opportunity for no more than one quarter metric butt tons of juice by my calculations.

  13. Re:This only works if by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 2, Funny

    In waiting for your response, I will be tucked away nicely out of sight.

    Yeah, that's what you think...

    --
    "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
  14. What a great way to block all security cameras! by amanox · · Score: 2, Funny

    Ha :-) They realy didn't think of that, now did they ? Yeah, sure you can prevent people from taking pictures and stuff, but once installed, they render their own surveillance system useless.