Slashdot Mirror


Acetylene Based Life on Titan?

mindpixel writes "Astrobiology Magazine's Leslie Mullen has a fascinating interview with funky science dude David Grinspoon about the possibility that there may exist a whole new biology on Titan where the extreme cold slows normally explosive reactions to a biologically useful pace." From the article: "What's really new in our paper is that we go into the question of energy sources. If there's life there, what's it going to eat? What kind of food is there? And it turns out there's abundant food because of all this photochemistry in the upper atmosphere, where methane is being turned into other organic molecules. Some of those organic molecules are very energy-rich, and one that we consider in the paper is acetylene. We know it's being made in the atmosphere, we know it's raining down on the surface, and it's been detected at the surface with the Huygens probe. We calculated that, if acetylene is reacting with the hydrogen gas to turn it back into methane, quite a bit of energy is being released. So that's our basis for saying there is something to eat on Titan. We don't know if there are any customers, but there's something on the menu."

32 of 272 comments (clear)

  1. Farts for dinner? by jkc120 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Any intelligent life form that eats farts should be feared. That is all.

    --
    "I drank what?" -Socrates
    1. Re:Farts for dinner? by Froggy · · Score: 5, Funny

      Any intelligent life form that eats farts should be feared. That is all.

      Any Slashdot poster that farts acetylene is to be feared. From as far away as possible.

      --
      It is a woman's prerogative to change other people's minds.
    2. Re:Farts for dinner? by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      We should be feared when we eat bread (the farts of yeast) and honey (the piss of bees). Or a can of beans.

    3. Re:Farts for dinner? by TelJanin · · Score: 4, Funny

      I thought honey was bee barf (not in here mister, this is a Mercedes).

    4. Re:Farts for dinner? by Jeremi · · Score: 4, Interesting
      honey (the piss of bees)


      As I understand it, bees create honey as a convenient way to store sustenance for themselves, not as a waste product. So it's not so much the piss of bees as the cud of bees, or perhaps the canned food of bees.

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
  2. Life of Titan by Tesral · · Score: 5, Funny
    Well, it is possible. Life Jim, but not as we know it. What it does bring up is the star system with nothing but giant planets might have moons with life. Hey, it could happen.

    Now if we could only be successful in finding intelligent life in Washington DC

    --
    Garry AKA -Phoenix- Rising Above the Flames
    Si hoc legere scis nimium eruditionis habes
  3. Misleading headline by millennial · · Score: 3, Informative

    Even just from the summary, it would seem that the life itself is not acetylene-based, just the food the life would eat.

    --
    I am scientifically inaccurate.
  4. life on titan by foobari · · Score: 5, Funny

    Excited missionaries are pulling out their cold weather gear.

    1. Re:life on titan by antifoidulus · · Score: 3, Funny

      Sorry, juvenile comment alert:
      Gotta love any sentence with both the word "missionary" and "pulling out"

    2. Re:life on titan by TheGavster · · Score: 4, Funny

      Missionaries on Titan can only end in tears:

      "On the first day, God created the Earth ..."

      "I live on Titan, how does this apply to me?"
      or:
      "In Soviet Titan, Earth creates God!"

      --
      "Because Science" is one step from "Because old book". Try "Because of my experiment testing my falsifiable assertion".
    3. Re:life on titan by mormop · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Or it could have been touched by his noodly appendage

      --
      Hmmmmmm..... Deep fried and look like Squirrel.
  5. What is life, anyway? by darkmeridian · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Reading the article makes we wonder exactly what life is, anyway. It sounds as though we only require chemical conversion. What if there is a big rock that serves as a catalyst for this conversion of acetylene and hydrogen to methane. Would we think of that as a life form? Or would we require reproduction? Would reproduction be possible in this slow-motion frozen gel we find on Titan?

    It is interesting, though, how the life and the planet co-evolves. Life has really changed Earth and it may have affected Titan, as well.

    --
    A NYC lawyer blogs. http://www.chuangblog.com/
    1. Re:What is life, anyway? by Tesral · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Metabolism and reproduction I do believe are the hallmarks of life. So catalysts are not alive, and plenty of catalysts exist. It has to eat something, and copy itself some how.

      --
      Garry AKA -Phoenix- Rising Above the Flames
      Si hoc legere scis nimium eruditionis habes
    2. Re:What is life, anyway? by Compuser · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Life is:
      1. Ability to store information.
      2. Ability to process stored information to make
      replicas of oneself.
      3. Metabolism (to power the above).

    3. Re:What is life, anyway? by MidnightBrewer · · Score: 4, Insightful

      A quick trip to dictionary.com yielded this answer:

      "The property or quality that distinguishes living organisms from dead organisms and inanimate matter, manifested in functions such as metabolism, growth, reproduction, and response to stimuli or adaptation to the environment originating from within the organism."

      There are some pretty standard requirements; the rock doesn't respond to stimuli, doesn't gorw, doesn't reproduce and doesn't evolve over time. Standard geological phenomena such as erosion don't count.

      --
      "Give a man fire, and he'll be warm for a day; set a man on fire, and he'll be warm for the rest of his life
    4. Re:What is life, anyway? by JanneM · · Score: 5, Insightful

      A nice definition of life is something like "Active maintenance of self in the face of entropy". In other words, something that actively (and successfully) keeps itself functioning and stable even though the vicissitudes of existence constantly try to tear you down.

      Or, shorter, if you fight entropy you're alive. If you don't, you aren't.

      --
      Trust the Computer. The Computer is your friend.
    5. Re:What is life, anyway? by QuantumG · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I like the definition of life which is based on complexity theory. Anything that shows less entropy than the environment of which it is contained is typically alive.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    6. Re:What is life, anyway? by Acius · · Score: 3, Funny

      I think you forgot: 4. Has a sense of humor. Cause life without a sense of humor isn't any kind of life at all. (Sad observation: This post isn't very funny. So shoot me).

      --
      Acius the unfamous
    7. Re:What is life, anyway? by killjoe · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I note how carefully the definition does not mention "evolve" or "evolution". It simply says "adaptation to environment".

      It's amazing what has happened to the US. IN this day and age we are still fighting ignorance every day.

      It seems silly to fight over the definition of life when the good citizens of Pennsylvania have decided that evolution is "just a theory".

      --
      evil is as evil does
    8. Re:What is life, anyway? by Rei · · Score: 3, Interesting

      False. For example, BSE ("Mad Cow Disease") prions have no "blueprints".

      The earliest lifeforms will inherently have no "blueprints". In fact, the earliest proto-life won't necessarily make a copy of itself. What you're likely to see is chemicals that tend to catalyze reactions with various ligands to create chemicals similar to themselves. When the local "soup" becomes more concentrated with chemicals similar in form, eventually self-catalytic cycles can emerge - basically, a puddle of self-catalyzing goo that is a non-distinct "organism" which expands itself slowly outward. Large hypercycles may have many processes (even independent processes) competing for the same ligands and reactants; a particular cycle can benefit itself over its neighbors by beginning to poison its competitors' reactions. Even without membranes walling off distinct "organisms", and with each set of reactions scattered throughout the same space as its competitors, the individual processes can sabotage and even consume each other as ruthlessly as any modern day life. Eventually, membranes can form (membranes are surprisingly easy to establish; many chemicals inherently line up into sheets, which other chemical reactions or simply natural currents can make into small spheres) which provide defense for a tiny area. This area being small, all but one competing hypercycle gets killed off within it. If the remaining side hypercycle contains the processes for producing the membrane itself, you have a very inefficient, but functional, Ur-cell.

      "Information" isn't needed for life. In fact, "information" is a concept that is context-sensitive; nothing inherently has "information", and in fact, our genes only contain "information" when we put those chemical structures in the context of "what will this do to us after a storm of chain reactions ends up down stream?". By themselves, they're just chemicals, reacting as chemicals do.

      --
      Also, I can kill you with my brain.
  6. I wonder... by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Suppose there is intelligent life in there, what will they think of earth creatures?

    "Amazing! The third planet creatures support temperatures so high that none of the titan lifeforms could withstand. Let's call them extremophiles".

    Kinda makes you think...

  7. Reminds me of a Hal Clement story by StefanJ · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Clement's Ice World was set on a unthinkably frigid world where sulfur was a solid and liquified steam covered the surface!

    It was Earth, of course. The protagonist was an alien scientist kidnapped by drug smugglers and forced to analyze a horrific drug they'd been buying from the natives. It's a juvenile, really, but enjoyable by adults as well.

  8. Original Article (long) by Greg+Hullender · · Score: 5, Informative
    Here's a link to the original NASA article by Grinspoon and others. It's pretty long (and part of a longer set of papers) so you might just search for "Titan" and go from there. However, if you have the time, it's fascinating reading, and it does have cool pictures. :-)

    --Greg

  9. Further study needed? by jacks+smirking+reven · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Who elsewould like to see 10 billion taken out of that moon landing money and put towards a few swarms probes to Titan to confirm this. Something to researhc this, and the JIMO mission are what i'd really pushed up schedule. Life outside our planet is the type of scientific and philisophical question that we should make all strides to answering. Jupites moons and Titan are the only places we essentially have left in our immediate solar system that might contain life. We really owe it to ourselves to research these to their final conclusion. I'd be happy to expand humanity into the solar system once we know we're not the only thing on it.

  10. Dave Barry came up with a good answer... by SIGBUS · · Score: 3, Funny

    Life is anything that dies when you stomp on it.

    --
    Oh, no! You have walked into the slavering fangs of a lurking grue!
    1. Re:Dave Barry came up with a good answer... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Life is anything that dies when you stomp on it.

      So 500 pound gorillas aren't alive? They might not die, but they sure got angry with me when I tried that the other day.

  11. Re:Reminds me of that Robotman joke... by rtb61 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    No, nowadays they would stand in a stunned silence trying to decide which corporate executive is the most appropriate one to provide the most profitable answer.

    --
    Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
  12. Genocide by Jozer99 · · Score: 3, Funny

    We should probably make sure they don't find out about the Acetylene genocide going on at every mechanic's garage and construction site every day.

  13. Re:Acetylene *IS* Organic.... by k98sven · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Therefore, to expect the life on another planet may be complex-molecule-based instead of simple-carbon-based is feasible.

    "Complex-molecule-based" versus "simple-carbon-based" ?? Did you make up those terms yourself? Could you please define them? And perhaps elaborate on how this is supposed to follow from the statement "acetylene is organic"?

    Because the statement "acetylene is organic" doesn't mean anything in particular. It's saying that the acetylene molecule has a carbon-carbon bond in it.

    But the other people saying 'no' are (as far as I can tell thru HISTORY) full of horse-hockey.

    Who is saying 'no' to what?

    Tell me exactly what in the world you know about organic compounds on another planet that will/will not produce life, please?

    Since this is the first semi-intelligible statement in your post, I'll try and answer it:

    1) Most scientists believe that life in all its forms, terrestrial or otherwise, follows the laws of chemistry. All life we know of appears to do so.
    In the same way that we also believe that all the universe follows the same laws of physics. We have no reason to believe otherwise. (and the chemistry follows from the physics, anyway.)

    2) We know that certain conditions are required to sustain life regardless of its form. For instance, life requires energy. This follows from the laws of thermodynamics being one of those things believed to be universal in 1).

    3) We have labs. We don't have to go to another planet to figure out how chemistry works at extreme temperatures and pressures.

    Yes, it's flamebait/trollbait. How about you editors/moderators tell me your experience on Titan, [..]

    No, it's just moronic. How about you tell me about all those atoms you've seen yourself? Still believe they exist though, don't you?

    Let the organic/biological scientists determine this, not the uneducated populace.

    David Grinspoon is an adjunct Professor at the University of Colorado. Hardly "uneducated populace".

    Even I don't dare step into this conversation, except as far as I have made my agrument.

    You didn't really make one.

  14. The Bigger Question by lcreech · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Is the impact on religion. The 7th day and so forth. Like Copernicus and Gallileo popping the churches/government bubble isn't pleasent and because of the current polical atmosphere, these times are no exception.

    Not anonymous because I am not afraid, though I may regret it in the near term.

  15. Titan is OURS by patricksevenlee · · Score: 3, Funny
    All these worlds are yours except Europa. Attempt no landings there.

    I'm assuming the warning covers the rest of the solar system. So those little black rectangles can kiss our carbon based rear ends.

    Also, members of the Titan version of Slashdot are probably saying, "I for one welcome our monkey-based overlords."

  16. Now I understand why Huygens lasted 3x too long! by Herve5 · · Score: 3, Informative

    Because the Huygens probe had many platinum-covered appendages, this (catalyst) triggered out the chemical reactions depicted in the OP, which heated the probe much more than expected (it is notorious that the probe's temperature was well above manufacturer's predictions during all descent).
    Then once on ground, this heating continued, and Huygens whose batteries had been designed to last "the 3-hours descent + some margins" in a -150 degree environment, lasted indeed six hours more for being much hotter...

    Hervé, part of the Huygens technical team

    OK, as we are not april 1st now I wonder wether I shoulnd't have posted anonymously :-)

    --
    Herve S.