FBI Agents Put New Focus on Deviant Porn
ErikPeterson wrote to mention an Ars Technica article discussing the FBI's new emphasis on online pornography. From the article: "Last month, the FBI began implementation of an anti-obscenity initiative designed to crack down on those that produce and distribute deviant pornography. According to FBI headquarters, the war against smut is 'one of the top priorities' of Attorney General Gonazalez and FBI Director Robert Meuller. Although law enforcement agencies have always been aggressive when it comes to prosecuting exploitative child pornographers, this new initiative is unique in that it targets Internet pornography featuring consenting adults."
Since deviance is obviously in the eye off the beholder
No kidding. All values are arbitrary. Does a Wolf respect the rights of its prey? Does it ask permission before it tries to penetrate a female? You wouldn't have made such an obviously pointless remark if we were talking about ritual murder or snuff films. This is true even though its obvious the biggest threat to this planet is an overabundance of humans who lack any sort of natural predators.
In our hedonistic society, the only rule is if it causes pain, its bad. This of course, has never completely been rectified with people who actually enjoy pain as a part of their sexual experiences. Hedonism has certainly gotten us to accept damn near every sexual pervisity known to man, but S&M still occupies a true subculture status.
Much of what is depicted in S&M related pornography is illegal in certain jurisdictions, and qualifies as battery or worse. So, that is what the FBI is investigating.
Me, personally, I look forward to the day when dualing is considered a legitimate form of dispute resolution. That way, instead of arguing with tools like yourself, I can just shoot you in the face. I mean, if we are going to call for abandoning any and all values, I personally choose natural law over this hedonistic nonsense.
I don't read or respond to AC posts
You cite one of many stupidities of the OT. There are 613 more. That's why someone who quotes OT script to prove $abomination is wrong just looks like an idiot. You can't try and hold someone to one standard while you, yourself barely follow your own teachings.
Want an example?
Ever look at a girl in lust? You think you ever might do that agian? Then follow your own God's advice and burn your eyes from your head.
After you do that, people might actually give a shit what you think about buttfucking.
I'd rather you do it wrong, than for me to have to do it at all.
The republitards played you like a violin then didn't they. THe govt shrank under clinton/gore you know. You did know that right? Oh and it grew under reagan too. The deficit shrank under carter and clinton and grew under republican presidents. You did know that right?
You got duped because you believed platitudes and lies. The republitards told you that they were for a smaller govt and fiscal responsibility even though no republican president in recent history has ever sharnk the govt or reduced the deficit.
You are an excellent example of the saying "libertarians are republicans who are too ashamed to admit it".
evil is as evil does
The Republican party has been replaced with another party going by the same name.
h tml
I suspect these people or similar are responsible for the growth of the Christian Right:
http://www.religioustolerance.org/reconstr.htm
http://www.publiceye.org/magazine/v08n1/chrisre1.
http://www.mainstreambaptists.org/dominionism.htm
Their goals aren't much different than the Taliban's--establishment of a religious government, death to all non-believers etc. I'm open to the thought that they are more common than it at first seems and are the driving force behind the Christian Right, especially since most every diehard Christian I currently know espouses much of their philosophy. If you have the stomach to watch The 700 Club or Jerry Falwell (Often on Fox News), it sure seems they are heavily influenced. Google for more.
http://www.marxist.com/