Slashdot Mirror


Mozilla Lightning Plans to Unify Mail & Calendar

Neil writes "The Mozilla Foundation has published an initial roadmap for 'Lightning', the project to integrate its calendar application Sunbird with its email application Thunderbird."

14 of 256 comments (clear)

  1. Re:New? by nine-times · · Score: 5, Informative
    I thought a calendar was already available for Thunderbird as a plugin.

    It is, and yet Thunderbird still isn't a suitable replacement for Outlook in corporate environments. From what I understand, Lightning aims to fix that.

  2. Thunderbird by Richy_T · · Score: 3, Informative
    The biggest show-stopper for Thunderbird for me was that people would send me little vcs notifications from Outlook and they would just sit in my mozilla inbox as weird looking files rather than get inserted into the calendar. You could import them manually but it was a hassle. I went searching for a solutions but the mozilla people would point their fingers at the thunderbird and the thunderbird people would point their fingers at mozilla and I don't have time to do the job myself so when I was asked if there was an alternative to Outlook... (Calendering is one of the supreme needs of the suits).

    An integration will be most welcome. Though too late to make any big difference here, I still use Mozilla myself and would be happy not to have to decode VCS files in my head.

    Rich

  3. Re:Dogfood? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    "dogfood bugs" are usability issues, according to:
    http://www.mozilla.org/editor/dogfood.html

  4. Re:Critical Bug Fix... or Feature? by xgamer04 · · Score: 3, Informative

    Um, if the Mozilla crew can put together a mail + calendar app that has the usability of Firefox, I'd switch to it. I've never used Outlook, but I do want to ditch my crappy Palm Desktop software.

    --
    When you look at the state of the world, how can you not become a radical, liberal anarchist?
  5. Re:Dogfood? by SneakyNinja · · Score: 3, Informative

    I believe it's from the term 'eating their own dogfood' which means using the tool you're developing. ie, during the build of NT, Dave Cutler made the developers use the beta builds of NT, and it was termed 'eating their own dogfood'.

    This probably means the devs are using the product and mean to fix the bugs they've logged.

  6. Re:Dogfood? by pyros · · Score: 4, Informative
    What exactly is a "dogfood bug," in this context?

    Any bug that prevents them from using the project internally as their official corporate calendar app.

  7. Article title misleading by augustz · · Score: 4, Informative
    Lightning is the working project name for an extension to tightly integrate calendar functionality (scheduling, tasks, etc.) into Thunderbird.

    Thunderbird is doing what it always does. Keep a lightweight email client around, but for those who want/need calander, they can install an extension to give it to them. A lot of good ideas show up in this.

    Futher, this is not a Mozilla Foundation annoucement.

    Q. Will this be Mozilla Lightning(TM)? Is this an official Mozilla Foundation product?
    A. "Lightning" is simply a project code name to keep from having to type or say "Thunderbird extension for tightly-integrated calendar functionality" all the time. The Mozilla Foundation has not yet announced any plans to add Lightning to its set of supported products under any name; indeed, such an announcement would be premature, as the exact composition of Lightning is still very much under discussion.


    A good wiki page on it all is here: http://wiki.mozilla.org/Calendar:Lightning
  8. Re:Why not by n0-0p · · Score: 5, Informative

    There is actually an intelligent response to everyone making this same tired joke. The Mozilla Foundation retargeted development on seperate applications to simplify things for most users. With that done, one of the next major steps (2.0 timeframe) is to break all the shared functionality out into XulRunner (currently being actively developed).

    Eventually all of the apps (FF, TB, SB) will use XulRunner but still be developed and distributed as seperate applications. This should provide the best of both worlds. It will have the tight integration and lower resource usage of the single suite, but without requiring everyone to deal with the headaches of one big monolithic application.

    To anyone interested I'd really advise heading over to the Mozilla wiki and taking a look at what's going.

  9. Re:New? by nine-times · · Score: 5, Informative
    It's probably not an "excuse". There aren't any real drop-in replacements for Outlook's functionality in Windows.

    What's even worse is the situation on the Mac side. Microsoft doesn't even make a real OSX Exchange client. There's Outlook 2001, which only runs in OS9/Classic, and then there's Entourage, which is buggy, unstable, doesn't work properly, and generally stinks. Otherwise, you're stuck with webmail or a normal IMAP client.

    In short, there is not a single OSX application that properly supports Exchange. Public folders are near useless. You can't share mailboxes, calendars, contacts, etc. Meeting requests don't even work properly.

    On linux, at least you have Evolution. Evolution is a pretty good Outlook replacement, but the Windows port isn't done, and Novell hasn't announced any plans for an OSX version (as far as I know).

  10. Re:Emulating Outlook 2003? by Kunta+Kinte · · Score: 3, Informative
    The one question you would have to ask would it support an ecxhange server?

    No. Exchange uses calendaring uses RPC/MAPI or WebDAV.

    If not... Can they pull of "Exchange-like" behavior with calenders and meetings on a pop server?

    No. They use CalDAV for calendar sharing.

    --
    Based on upvotes, Ageism is the only "-ism" Slashdotters care about and think isn't SJW
  11. Re:reminder function, please! by cyrl · · Score: 3, Informative

    Yes, Sunbird is a standalone calendaring application and has "alarms" instead of "reminders" but they do exactly the same thing. I also switched from Outlook to Thunderbird about a year ago, and the only problem I had was getting the HTML eMail exported from Outlook. It would always re-import as plain text, with all the HTML code as text.

  12. Do you want a 'friggin' pony with that?... by Kunta+Kinte · · Score: 3, Informative
    How about adding frigging exchange support to the calendaring app....

    I guess no one on the entire Mozilla Calendar team or the user community, for that matter, has thought of that right? :)

    Not trying to give you a hard time, but what you're asking for would be very, very, difficult. You would essentially have to reverse engineer Microsoft's MAPI over RPC protocol. Many have tried, none have succeeded. Or, if you only support newer versions of Exchange with OWA turned on, use Microsoft's WebDAV based calendar schema built on Exchange WebAccess, like Evolution does.

    Mozilla is doing the best they could I think, they're basing their app on a protocol on the IETF standards track http://ietfreport.isoc.org/idref/draft-dusseault-c aldav/ If an organization wants to get rid of Exchange entirely, they then can give their Outlook users a MAPI plugin that supports CalDAV. We're an opensource plugin at OpenConnector.org.

    --
    Based on upvotes, Ageism is the only "-ism" Slashdotters care about and think isn't SJW
  13. I don't think the Thunderbird plugin does much yet by sillypixie · · Score: 3, Informative

    You would think so. But it doesn't seem to work that way.

    I installed the plugin not long ago, with the expectation that at MINIMUM, you would be able to drag & drop .ics calendar attachments into the calendar. Automatic detection of scheduling requests would be even better.

    It doesn't appear to do even that. As far as I could see, the only way to get scheduling requests into the calendar (regardless of whether you use Sunbird or the Thunderbird plugin) is to save the .ics file to your hard drive and then use the "import" command to import the event.

    Therefore, as far as I can tell, the only advantage to using the Thunderbird plugin at this time, is that it sits in the Thunderbird directory instead of its own directory. And that you open it as a switch to the thunderbird command, instead of as a separate command. Whoop-dee-doo. Not to say that I don't understand that this is a work-in-progress, I am aware of that. I'm sure that .ics detection or drag/drop is high on the to-do list. I still find Sunbird useful, and I'm using it now. I just don't see that there is any level of actual email/calendar integration yet.

    I would love to be wrong about this by the way. Maybe somebody will reply to this and tell me that the plugin has lots of very useful bits - but as long as I have to manage my .ics attachments myself, I can't think of the plugin as getting me much.

    Pix

    --
    don't mess with those geekgrrls
  14. Office 2004 SP2 fixes that. by Daltorak · · Score: 3, Informative

    Microsoft has spent the last year working almost solely on improving Entourage to work better with Exchange. Last week they released Office 2004 Service Pack 2, which contains improvements to everything you've noted as being problems: Public folder support; sharing of mailboxes, calendars, contacts; complete global address list support; ability to do delegation... and so on and so forth. More information on MS's website.