Slashdot Mirror


Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 Released

Juha-Matti Laurio writes "MozillaZine has a report about new Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 release. Among other changes, this minor release includes fixes for the Linux command line URL parsing security flaw. Thunderbird 1.0.7 can be downloaded from the Thunderbird product page. 'Extremely Critical' Secunia advisory will be updated very soon."

135 comments

  1. Radnom thought that just popped in... by sznupi · · Score: 5, Interesting

    You know, I just realised something... For years I've been using various e-mail clients...initially mainly OE, than Thunderbird (with some other in between, for shiorter periods of time). However, my email usage skyrocketed (literally) in last year, since I've been using Gmail. Sudennly...using mails started to be a joy for communication, somehow :/ So...what did I miss while using clients? Or perhaps...what do they miss?

    --
    One that hath name thou can not otter
    1. Re:Radnom thought that just popped in... by GerritHoll · · Score: 1
      Perhaps people don't understand how to configure their mailclient. SMTP server? POP3 server? What's that? It's much easier to go to a website, enter your username and ID and see your mail.

      Or perhaps peop^H^H^H^Hconsumers just like the idea that a big, "don't be evil" Google company can scan their e-mail to create relevant ads, so that they know what to buy.

    2. Re:Radnom thought that just popped in... by sznupi · · Score: 1

      No no, I wasn't wondering about general public - but rather about people like me, who can configure their clients. Or rather - me specifically, since I have no idea if there was some kind of exodus from mail clients to Gmail web interface, resulting also in huge (HUGE) increase in email communication...

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
    3. Re:Radnom thought that just popped in... by NeoSkandranon · · Score: 2, Insightful

      A clean interface.

      Excellent spam filtering (Thunderbird, yours rocked, at least it used to, but it had its shortfalls.)

      Enough storage to never have to delete email.

      Or worry about backing them up.

      Accessiblity (web interface.)

      Those are the points that have me glued to gMail as opposed to thunderbird. Some things the mail client could improve on (spam filtering and interface) while some are inherent of a webmail system (remote backup, storage, etc)

      --
      If you can't see the value in jet powered ants you should turn in your nerd card. - Dunbal (464142)
    4. Re:Radnom thought that just popped in... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      However, my email usage skyrocketed (literally) in last year, since I've been using Gmail.

      There are (at least) two ways to interpret this information. One is that you enjoy emailing more, so you do it more, the other is that you send the same amount of email, it just takes you longer because you have to wade through a web interface instead of using a normal desktop application.

      Did you actually count the number of sent items, or are you just guessing because you seem to spend more time emailing?

    5. Re:Radnom thought that just popped in... by sznupi · · Score: 1

      I use it much, much more, definatelly (previously it was simply checking mail regularly and replying when I had to...the occasions that I initiated some convesation/topic were very rare - could be counted on fingers of one hand perhaps; and now...I make correspondence regularly)

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
    6. Re:Radnom thought that just popped in... by DJCater · · Score: 1

      What about using GMail with Thunderbird? It's possible. Would that increase or decrease your mail usage?

      --
      Sig Appended to the end of comments you post. 120 chars.
    7. Re:Radnom thought that just popped in... by sznupi · · Score: 1

      I really don't think the experiment on myslef is possible...too much placebo/bias. Only observation is somewhat viable...

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
    8. Re:Radnom thought that just popped in... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
      skyrocketed (literally)

      Literally? How? Did you strap your mails to a rocket or something?
    9. Re:Radnom thought that just popped in... by macdaddy357 · · Score: 1

      In addition to Thunderbird, other recently updated apps include Mozilla Night Train, Mozilla Mad Dog, and Mozilla Wild Irish Rose.

      --
      How ya like dat?
    10. Re:Radnom thought that just popped in... by LetterJ · · Score: 1

      Heh. I'm about this close * * to writing a Greasemonkey extension that does nothing but replace "literally" with "figuratively". I figure it will be the most heavily used extension in my browser. And, I'm willing to bet that the number of incidents where I'll see the wrong word will be REALLY low.

    11. Re:Radnom thought that just popped in... by sunwolf · · Score: 0

      You know...I just realized something. But that's for afterwards. The first thing I realized was that you spelled "random" wrong. Then I realized you spelled "realized" with an "s."

      So maybe it's a British thing.

    12. Re:Radnom thought that just popped in... by slazar · · Score: 1

      How about it being always accessible from any computer on the net? Never used Gmail so I am not sure how much "joy" one can get from it.

    13. Re:Radnom thought that just popped in... by wfberg · · Score: 1

      Basically, gmail does a fairly good job of keeping conversations together. This is nothing new, it's called threading, and a heap of e-mail clients are great at it. Just not the ones you mention. (Free) Agent, also a newsreader, truly excelled at this sort of thing; in e-mail as well as newsgroups. Kill filters, Watch filters, sort by date or thread, thread by reference-headers and/or subject, and a few million other options.

      Pegasus mail also did some nice threading (and had insanely configurable filtering. you could have conditional goto's in your numbered filters).

      --
      SCO employee? Check out the bounty
    14. Re:Radnom thought that just popped in... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Portable email with consistant settings and a single sign-in point is most likely what you desired. With Gmail, you don't have to change settings when you visit someone else's home. I solve that with terminal services. My mail client is always connected, along with a half dozen terminal sessions and 2 dozen putty sessions. Terminal server allows me to connect to my desktop from anywhere in the world and maintain my settings from anywhere in the world. If it weren't for Microsoft's monthly denial of service patches, I'd never have to reboot. It's basically my single sign on service to all my other servers.

      I do have Gmail, Yahoo, along with several other email accounts, but the one I use most is the Imap mail that I've left on in my terminal session. It's my simplest settings. When I didn't have that, I was using rocketmail(yahoo), since that was the simplest and also had https for password authentication. That was all before Gmail ever existed. If Gmail came out sooner, I might be using that.

      It also doesn't matter that I know how to set my mail settings, it's just time consuming, and I'd have to delete the settings on someone else's computer. I'd also would'nt see all my folders or all my email, since I store some locally and leave some on the server. I'd also have to make sure I didn't delete my email from the server so that I can see it back on my regular/default email client computer. It's simpler to log onto a session and have everything there, which is what Gmail provides for many people.

      I simplify my life to a single sign on point with terminal services since I do a lot more than just email. I only have to reconnect my sessions about once a month or two. Fortunately, putty has pagent, so I only have to type my ssh key once. I could probably do this on Unix with screen and rdesktop, but Windows is a little more versatile as a desktop for managing windows machines and better suited for switching between keyboard layouts than xmodmap. Unix systems can be managed remotely from any system equally well. I now just need to get vnc over ssh for the new OSX machines working (because of the Stupid Aqua only programs). I can't justify $499 x 4 admins (or even just one copy for 1 admin) for 20 machines.

      For the MAC fanatics: Macs were a good concept in the beginning, but they're getting left behind. The one button mouse is the default, so there's no easy button configuration to switch the 3 button mouse to be left handed, for those of us (especially unix (Xwindows) users) who need a three button mouse. Windows menus all have keyboard shortcuts associated to them by default through the API so programmers don't need to do anything unless they want to. Macs require that the programmers remember to program the keyboard shortcuts, so many programmers don't bother to do all the keyboard shortcuts. The mouse(Yeah, Mickey too) is evil and slows you down. I do as many things through the keyboard shortcuts as I can, because moving back and forth between the keyboard and mouse causes you to lose your bearings. I wish ibm would cheaply license out their pointing nub to everyone and make their signature Thinkpad pointer ubiquitous. It saves a bunch of time when you don't have to readjust and find the home row after you use the mouse.

    15. Re:Radnom thought that just popped in... by sznupi · · Score: 1

      Not British...I'm not native English speaker. (#1 - I'm on 6 year old keyboard now, #2 - that's one ofsometimes confusing differences in pronounciation (I have no idea if that word is correct ;P ) I guess...)

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
  2. Automatic Updates by HateBreeder · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Will it ever work?

    --
    Sigs are for the weak.
    1. Re:Automatic Updates by Bob54321 · · Score: 1

      What do you mean? I get mine on the second Tuesday of every month (except for this month where I didn't...)

      --
      :(){ :|:& };:
    2. Re:Automatic Updates by moro_666 · · Score: 1

      well too bad this item got fixed, otherwise debian machines could just go and click on

      mailto: updateh4x0r@`apt-get update`.hehe.`apt-get install mozilla-thunderbird`.com

      and have the latest version that is in their package repository :D

      have fun ...

      --

      I'd tell you the chances of this story being a dupe, but you wouldn't like it.
    3. Re:Automatic Updates by Nuclear+Elephant · · Score: 3, Funny

      Will it ever work?

      They're emailing these out now just like Internet Explorer updates.

    4. Re:Automatic Updates by Val314 · · Score: 1

      The Auto Update works with fine with the current 1.5 Betas. (so it will be fixed with the next major release)

    5. Re:Automatic Updates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It never does....Also, I have been using tuhunderbird for about a year now and I should say that thunderbird been really crappy as compared to Outlook 2003. The spell check in a separate window is an immature design and also thunderbird just hogs memory...

  3. Re:Problems with the Linux Version by GerritHoll · · Score: 4, Funny
    User: "How do I get Quake 3 to run in Windows?"
    Zealot: "Oh God, I had to install Quake 3 in Windoze for some lamer friend of mine! God, what a fucking mess! I put in the CD and it took about 3 minutes to copy everything, and then I had to reboot the fucking computer! Jesus Christ! What a retarded operating system!"

    You forget the last part: and then all my other games stopped working, because it wrote DirectX version N over DirectX version (N+p) (p>0).

    But what does this have to do with Thunderbird?

  4. Re:Problems with the Linux Version by shish · · Score: 1

    It's a copy & pasted troll that appears in pretty much every article; it's in this one twice already...

    --
    I mod down anyone who says "I will be modded down for this", regardless of the rest of their comment
  5. Last week by j3tt · · Score: 3, Insightful

    1.0.7 has been out for a few days now. A little bit late?

    1. Re:Last week by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      According to the times on the Mozilla servers, Thunderbird got released late Thursday night. This post went up early Saturday morning. I'd say that's fairly good, and "a few days" is better than me not finding out until Thunderbird tells me there's a new release out (which would have been a few more days).

      Now if only they could have added Atom 1.0 support to this release.

    2. Re:Last week by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I think you're thinking of FireFox 1.0.7...

  6. Or you can use the 1.5 beta by matt+me · · Score: 5, Informative

    The 1.5 beta has inline spellchecking, some new RSS features and a nicer options UI.
    http://www.mozilla.org/products/thunderbird/releas es/1.5beta1.html

    1. Re:Or you can use the 1.5 beta by Bob54321 · · Score: 4, Informative

      I have been using the nightly versions of 1.5beta for the last week and haven't run into any problems. The incremental updates are working well, most days these are quite small, about 200KB, athough it was 6MB the other day (but I suppose you expect that with developmental versions)

      --
      :(){ :|:& };:
    2. Re:Or you can use the 1.5 beta by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The incremental updates are working well, most days these are quite small, about 200KB, athough it was 6MB the other day (but I suppose you expect that with developmental versions)

      The 6MB one was probably a full download. If there's no incremental update available (possible if you do an update check while they're still uploading the new files) then it downloads a full version.

  7. Highfalutin' by bubbaprog · · Score: 2, Funny

    Bagh. I still use Eudora Pro 3.0.5. What else could I possibly need from an email client?

    1. Re:Highfalutin' by jfengel · · Score: 1

      Hell, I'd still be using my copy of Eudora Lite if my mail provider hadn't switched to some authentication that Eudora didn't support.

  8. Re:Here is some work for Firefox developers by ZakuSage · · Score: 0

    I'd settle for Firefox being faster on Linux. On the same hardware, Firefox on a Windows 2000 install runs much, MUCH faster then it does on an Ubuntu Linux (or for that matter any Linux I've tried) install. What's all that about?

  9. Did I just notice the Favicon TBird uses? by lowbudget_sw · · Score: 1

    I like the Playboy Bunny Favicon... screencap

    1. Re:Did I just notice the Favicon TBird uses? by lowbudget_sw · · Score: 1

      What/?!!, that couldn't possibly be from surfing porn, not on my machine!

    2. Re:Did I just notice the Favicon TBird uses? by generic-man · · Score: 5, Informative

      That's probably because Playboy is an official mirror of, among other things, Mozilla Thunderbird. Nifty, isn't it?

      --
      For more information, click here.
    3. Re:Did I just notice the Favicon TBird uses? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I grovel at the intelligence and generosity of our pr0n overlords.

    4. Re:Did I just notice the Favicon TBird uses? by Dr.Pepper42 · · Score: 1
      Whoa, that's trippy. Playboy is a...mirror?

      Damn, I'm fiiine!

      --
      Free sex is like a warm toilet seat.... feels good but makes you wonder who was there before you.
  10. Re:Problems with the Linux Version by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I remember a time when trolls used to be a bit more funny...

  11. Re:Here is some work for Firefox developers by NoMercy · · Score: 1

    Don't know about you but my firefox looks better on linux than windows, decent GTK theme, good fonts installed with the font server configured etc.

  12. Lacking security by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's just a pity that they(Moz) don't want people to know about the security issues. 1.0.7 is vulnurable to a DoS, as reported by Georgi, but where's the info on mozilla.org?

    I'd love to use a secure browser.. I used to believe FF was "it", but now I'm searching for alternatives once again..

    1. Re:Lacking security by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A client app is vulnurable to a Denial of Service attack?
      Methinks you are trolling or are using an acronym you don't really understand.

    2. Re:Lacking security by uncleFester · · Score: 1
      I'd love to use a secure browser.. I used to believe FF was "it", but now I'm searching for alternatives once again..

      This has to win a Darwin-Comment award or something... anyone competent in dealing with software or IT knows app security involves at least 2 things:

      1. Intelligent design (incorporating, among other things, security-related prudence)
      2. Quick and intelligent response to failures to #1 (including bug/security fixes)
      .. because nobody ever can design software that's 100% free from security risk.

      Good luck in your quest to find a browser totally free of flaws; be sure to let us know when you find it.

      -'fester
      --
      -'fester
    3. Re:Lacking security by cagle_.25 · · Score: 1

      Bah. Fool! Intelligent Design could never produce a secure browser! Don't you know that 99.9% of *real* computer scientists believe in *evolution*?! ;-)

      --
      Human being (n.): A genetically human, genetically distinct, functioning organism.
  13. Re:Here is some work for Firefox developers by cduffy · · Score: 3, Informative

    I'm going to hazard that what you're seeing is a problem with your distribution, not Firefox itself. Firefox on Linux is quite capable of being pretty.

  14. Combine with Firefox? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As much as I love Thunderbird, I would like to see it integrated with Firefox. I understand that both programs are small, however, when run at the same time they use an insane amount of memory that IE+Outlook Express doesn't. Plus, I would like to be notified of new emails in Firefox without having to open Thunderbird. How long before they merge the two?

    1. Re:Combine with Firefox? by mancontr · · Score: 1

      They were one before in Mozilla Suite, then they splitted in two apps...

    2. Re:Combine with Firefox? by generic-man · · Score: 2, Informative

      Mozilla Suite. Enjoy.

      --
      For more information, click here.
    3. Re:Combine with Firefox? by Moderator · · Score: 1, Informative

      What you're looking for is SeaMonkey. Email + Web browser integrated with all the new features of Firefox and Thunderbird (including the 1.5 branches), and it only uses half the memory of the two. I've found it to load much faster than Firefox on my FreeBSD system, and it's more responsive.

      --
      The World is Yours.
  15. Re:Here is some work for Firefox developers by freezin+fat+guy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    "On the same hardware, Firefox on a Windows 2000 install runs much, MUCH faster then it does on an Ubuntu Linux (or for that matter any Linux I've tried) install. What's all that about?"

    GTK for one. I haven't looked through the source so I will let someone with actual knowlege handle the rest.

    As for fonts, while most distros continue to struggle I notice that recent Redhat variants all have superior font support. In fact when I boot back into Windows one of the first things I notice is that their fonts look worse than Fedora. Every distro should make it a priority to support that quality.

  16. Did I miss the boat? by Monoman · · Score: 1

    Everytime I read about TB or some other mail client I wonder "who the heck is still doing POP3 email"?

    Free web email(Gmail and Yahoo) works great for personal stuff. I think most ISPs these dies provide web mail interface but I NEVER like to use them because ISPs change.

    I guess if you get volumes of email and need a features to manage it all then maybe.

    So my question is who is using TB and the like and why?

    --
    Keep the Classic Slashdot.
    1. Re:Did I miss the boat? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I use it all the time to access my mailbox thru imaps. Works great. Your email is always where you want it.

    2. Re:Did I miss the boat? by pete19 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I'm still using Thunderbird.

      I have four different accounts (ISP, Gmail, general university and CS department email). It's much easier for me to set up POP3 access to each and check them all at the same time with one program.

      All my mail is in the same place, and I can get at old email when I'm offline.

      --
      There is nothing more practical than a good abstract theory.
    3. Re:Did I miss the boat? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I use Thunderbird because it has the best IMAP support of any mainstream client. And I will never use Gmail until it can read my IMAP box.

    4. Re:Did I miss the boat? by theTerribleRobbo · · Score: 1

      a) My hosting service provides POP3 mailboxes, and I need to use day-to-day when responding to visitors, etc.

      b) At work, where we have IMAP + POP3, but no web interface.

    5. Re:Did I miss the boat? by Limburgher · · Score: 1

      Not POP. IMAP. I use webmail on my home server when I'm on the road, and I use thunderbird when I'm home. Since both use IMAP, I get the same mailbox and folders either way.

      --

      You are not the customer.

    6. Re:Did I miss the boat? by mspohr · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If you're glued to a desk with broadband access, gMail is great. If you travel (especially internationally), you need an email client.

      --
      I don't read your sig. Why are you reading mine?
    7. Re:Did I miss the boat? by dipo · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Why?

      Because @gmail.com ist not my only mail-account. There are tons of other accounts I use since my first steps with Internet since 1997. Meanwhile some have a horrible webmail-client, but POP3 ist still in use.
      Otherwise with all Incoming-Mail on gmail, spam would float my 2,6GBs. Yes, I look at the spam, cause of false-positives.

      My Thunderbird is a container for all other adresses - fast, searchable, reliable.

      --
      nothing travels faster than light - except the mind
    8. Re:Did I miss the boat? by Mostly+a+lurker · · Score: 1

      I have not used POP3 in years, but an IMAP client has much to recommend it. I use Gmail for personal email, but for business mail I want both an offline copy and multiple personalities (neither conveniently available with a web based client).

    9. Re:Did I miss the boat? by springbox · · Score: 1

      I have 3 POP3 accounts and 2 IMAP accounts. Thunderbird keeps them all organized and in one place so I only have to check my mail once not 3 or 7 times. It also comes with a spam filter, which was useful when I actually got spam.

    10. Re:Did I miss the boat? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Free web email(Gmail and Yahoo) works great for personal stuff. [...]

      So my question is who is using TB and the like and why?


      Um... for non-personal stuff? I'm using Thunderbird for mail at work.

      At home I'm using Seamonkey because the import process into Thunderbird is a pain in the ass (complicated by the fact that I'm switching OS's), but more relevantly because I have more than one address (incl. my own domain) and want to check newsgroups. Going through a bunch of different web sites gets tedious, I'd much rather just say "get all new messages."

    11. Re:Did I miss the boat? by Bambi+Dee · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I was using TB in part because it was trivial to set it up so it would use the same "physical" local folders on a FAT32 partition shared between Kubuntu and XP. Since I realised I was only using Windows for music apps and the occasional game anymore, I actually switched to Kontact - but the same principles apply, and I'd rather use TB, Eudora, OE, Sylpheed or what have you than webmail.

      My two primary email accounts are free and ISP-independent, so that's not a problem. And both have web interfaces, so I can still check them when I'm wherever. Best of both worlds, et cetera.

      At home, though, it's always POP3/SMTP. I prefer having offline access to my email. It's convenient, and I'm just not comfortable having all these lengthy private conversations lying around "outside".

      And I like having email and usenet (and RSS feeds, should I ever adopt that habit) together. I only follow a couple groups, never downloaded any binaries either, and don't really need a dedicated newsreader.

      I also find it much easier to manage email in a program actually built for that very purpose. The UI beats "even" Gmail. And why would I put a website between myself and my communication?

      And I don't want ads anywhere near my email, much less inside them the way most webmailers seem to enforce it.

      So personally I just don't see the advantage of using webmail. It's nice to have a web interface available in "times of need", but it's been an emergency solution (well, ever since I learned how to configure an email client anyway).

    12. Re:Did I miss the boat? by bheerssen · · Score: 1

      Some of us just like to have our own domains. Be a presence on the internet, that sort of thing. It also provides some measure of privacy in that nobody can access your mail system legally without your permission or a court order.

      If you are running your own email server, then you'll need a client. TB is a good one.

      --
      (Score: -1, Stupid)
    13. Re:Did I miss the boat? by CritterNYC · · Score: 1

      I use Thunderbid for 8 different IMAP accounts, that I can easily check and switch between. Not to mention moving messages between them or to my local mail store. All in a secure client that remembers my passwords to all of them. And created Portable Thunderbird so I can do it from the road, too. Without needing to lug my laptop. And without needing to resort to a crappy webmail interface that is a not-so-close approximation of the features and functionality of a local mail client.

    14. Re:Did I miss the boat? by MerlinTheWizard · · Score: 2, Informative

      A lot of people. I do and have always done. I'm sorry, but I don't want anyone messing with my mail. I'm OK with my ISP doing so, because it's its main job. Not the case of the free email services. Plus: something very important: most, if not all, free email services actually *don't* give any guarantee about the quality of service. Most serious ISPs do. Other reasons, to name a few: 1) I wouldn't be surprised if Google or Yahoo reserved the right to actually use the content of emails for corporate needs (such as building databases of what interests people, etc); 2) Privacy is not guaranteed; 3) Security is not guaranteed; 4) The fact that all e-mails are archived on the server freaks me out. I always configure my e-mail clients to immediately download the content of emails and delete them on the server. This way, I know they don't stay too long somewhere I don't want them to be, plus they are all archived on my own computer. I can't lose any of them; 5) TB (and others) has nice filtering functions, search functions, multiple accounts, etc.

      I don't care much about having a fixed e-mail address "for life". Mind you, pretty much nothing is "for life". If I move out, I'll change addresses and probably phone numbers. That doesn't bother me a lot. Besides, there are e-mail redirection services if you really want to have a fixed e-mail address with the ability of actually changing e-mail accounts/providers. I like that a lot better. That's freedom.

      If just that (but I stated a lot of other serious reasons above), free e-mail services don't satisfy the "geek factor" at all. People who have been in the field for a long time tend to see these as "e-mail solutions for the masses". Inferior solutions for people who don't know any better...

      And last, I'm not comfortable at all with these giant corporations delivering e-mails for everyone. That's freaky. A lot too centralized for my taste.

    15. Re:Did I miss the boat? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Huh? Who's talking about POP3? Thunderbird is quite probably the best IMAP client you can get. I have 4 email accounts and I access them all using the same Thunderbird interface from my work, my home desktop and my home tablet pc. All mail is stored on the servers, except for the archive which is stored in local mail folders (I archived all my mail since 1997). I have working junk mail filter that learns from spam received on all the accounts. Not to mention that moving a message from one IMAP account to another (or to/from the local archive) is as easy as a drag'n'drop. You really missed some boat here...

    16. Re:Did I miss the boat? by Trillan · · Score: 1

      Of course I'm still using client/server mail. IMAP, rather than POP. There's just no way I'd rely on a freemail implementation or my ISP's email, either of which could disappear tomorrow.

      With IMAP, if my email host disappears I still have a locally-cached copy of everything in a format I can upload to another web host. ...plus the interface in a desktop application is 10x better.

    17. Re:Did I miss the boat? by LetterJ · · Score: 1

      Exactly. For some reason, webmail makes sense to people and IMAP doesn't, even though IMAP's as flexible an email solution as is available. Instead, the conversation always seems to be between POP3 (on one computer) and GMail or Yahoo mail. Sure, GMail is great, but I know that my email address will be mine *forever* for a few bucks a year on my domain. Personally, I think webmail took off because it was most people's first experience with centralized, persistant email. What they really like is the ability to get email from anywhere and store it in one place. And, IMAP does a better job of that than GMail or Yahoo and does it with 100% customization of the addresses.

      I funnel all of my POP3 email to a single IMAP account. I can access ALL of my email from any computer using Outlook, Thunderbird, Eudora, webmail/browser, etc. or my laptop with all of my Thunderbird customizations. Read/unread persists as do all of my folders and organization of emails.

      I'm actually using a special IMAP account that's fed by RSS feeds due to all of the things you can do with X-Header's and Thunderbird to organize RSS items as emails. I have a cron job pull all new feed items and put them into this IMAP account and they get sorted, flagged, filtered and otherwise procesed by Thunderbird, but I can view the result with webmail if I'd prefer. And, if I want to run some specialized tool on the mailbox, I can and the results will just be there.

      While many of these solutions are still pretty geeky, there's no reason they couldn't be wrapped into user-friendly services just like GMail is.

    18. Re:Did I miss the boat? by LetterJ · · Score: 1
      There are also tools like IMAPSize that let you backup IMAP email to a filesystem. I use Thunderbird to label email that I want to keep, but only need archive access (using the labels, I just hit "5" and it's marked. Once a month (this morning in fact), I simple load my saved search for those labeled emails, move them to an IMAP folder named "archive" and use IMAPSIze to pull those messages off and into individual .eml files. They're part of my filesystem searches as well as backup scheme after that. I could probably script something to do it all without my intervention, but *completely* automated things have a tendency to fail in ways you don't notice until it's too late, so I like doing just a little bit of work once a month.

      The end result is that I really only delete spam and the rest just become text files on my hard drive, backed up along with the rest of my files. The main reason for keeping old emails (archive and searching for needed old information) is retained and my IMAP account stays lean and quick.

  17. Re:I'm having problems installing on Fedora by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    User: "How do I get Quake 3 to run in Windows?"
    Zealot: "Oh God, I had to install Quake 3 in Windoze for some lamer friend of mine! God, what a fucking mess! I put in the CD and it took about 3 minutes to copy everything, and then I had to reboot the fucking computer! Jesus Christ! What a retarded operating system!"

    You forget the last part: and then all my other games stopped working, because it wrote DirectX version N over DirectX version (N+p) (p>0).

    But what does this have to do with Thunderbird?

  18. Re:Random thought that just popped in... by slide-rule · · Score: 1

    Is it just the 'google factor' at work for you? (Meaning either that Google did the job or that the interface is streamlined and snappy enough to make 'webmail' really work?) For me, I'm not sure. I've used various clients over the past decade+ myself. OE, Eudora, netscape communicator suite, outlook (work thing), evolution, kmail, other odd-balls, and lately g-mail. (Most anything except Mac system clients, really.) My own recollections are that, for me, OE on win probably worked overall the best, but considering the security record, I haven't touched it in many years. Otherwise, IMO, *all* client-side POP/IMAP clients tend to suck ass in some respect or another. (security, config'ability, encryption support, contact management/import/export, mail format import/export, calendar integration, other misc. bits). Also, being someone who jumps around various OS's, various computers (my own, plus relatives and in-laws), config'ing yet another mail client to get to my mail is a PITA. Let alone that I've never had a dialup ISP provide IMAP.

    Now, along comes Google with their AJAX (whatever) web-based thing, and webmail is responsive enough to use withOUT full page-loads any time I click somewhere. I had been just S-POP'ing my gmail to a local client (and to a thumbdrive version of thunderbird), but lately I'm just logging in via the web server and dealing with it there. I will say that I have seen some odd quirks in g-mail's behavior (I reply'ed to a message and it filled out the wrong TO addy) and that there are a few things I'd like thought out differently (various operations and functions are accessed in slightly different ways), so I'm not fully sold there either.

    < dear google >
    If g-mail provided iCal service for people and then linked that over to the gmail accounts, then I'd be a fairly happy guy.
    < /dear google >

    Call me picky, I guess... it'd be fair enough. ;-)

  19. Slackware Package by robw810 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Until Pat updates -current (and /patches), I made a 1.0.7 pack using his slackbuild script:
    http://rlworkman.net/linux/pkgs/mozilla-thunderbir d/

    RW

  20. Integration with Firefox? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'll bet your Eudora Pro 3.0.5 doesn't integrate well with Mozilla Firefox, does it? Can you use the same theme as Firefox to have a consistent looking environment? No. Can you EVEN theme Eudora Pro? No. Plus, Thunderbird and Firefox are both open source, so I'm free to hack it if I want. But I don't need to because the two are already perfect. Well I'd like to see the two integrated better, but that's just me. Plus it's free. You're Eudora Pro is being left behind the new wave of open source software. Join the Mozilla team today! http://www.mozilla.org/ and give Firefox and Thunderbird a spin. You won't be able to go back to IE and Eudora.

    1. Re:Integration with Firefox? by bubbaprog · · Score: 1

      I don't need to "Theme" my email client. I need it to retrieve and send mail. Also, WTF?

    2. Re:Integration with Firefox? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thunderbird isn't integrated with FireFox anymore than Outlook Express is with Internet Explorer. I think you are confused with "Mozilla", the application.

      Hacking your own apps is retarded anyway, chances are your change is going to be clobbered in the next revision. Open Source is only good as the development model, its really irrelvant directly to the end user.

    3. Re:Integration with Firefox? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll bet your Eudora Pro 3.0.5 doesn't integrate well with Mozilla Firefox, does it?

      It doesn't need to. No email client needs to interface with a browser beyond sending it a URL.

      Can you use the same theme as Firefox to have a consistent looking environment?

      Can you realise that an operating system like Windows or Mac, or a toolkit on *nix like Qt gives all the consistency ANY AND ALL applications need? Can you realise that the Mozilla developers fucked that? Can you realise that the time they spent (and continue to spend) on maintaining the XUL interface could have been better spent on making decent, 'consistent looking' NATIVE interfaces for each platform?

      Can you EVEN theme Eudora Pro?

      Thank the fucking lord no!

      Plus, Thunderbird and Firefox are both open source, so I'm free to hack it if I want.

      You are not free to hack it for several reasons: 1) you don't have the knowledge, 2) you're too lazy to ever acquire the knowledge (and no, knowing how to making optimised builds for your K7 doesn't count), 3) whatever changes you make will likely never get integrated back into Mozilla, and 4) any developer worth his salt would not want to wade around in the cess pool that is Mozilla Anything anyway.

      But I don't need to because the two are already perfect.

      Obviously wrong.

      Well I'd like to see the two integrated better, but that's just me.

      You don't even know what you're asking for, do ya? It's ok :-)

      Plus it's free.

      Fortunately. So is Opera, Konqueror, Safari, IE etc.

      You're Eudora Pro

      I'm Eudora Pro? Why thankyou!

      Join the Mozilla team today!

      Ah, but that's just it. You can't.

      You won't be able to go back to IE and Eudora.

      Not sure about that. IE will improve, obviously. Who knows what Eudora will do, but mutt is the ultimate for email.

  21. Re:Problems with the Linux Version by WilliamSChips · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Your points have been disproven just about every time in every thread you've posted that copy-paste troll in. We need a new mod category, -1 Copy-Paste Troll.

    --
    Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
  22. Re:Here is some work for Firefox developers by amcdiarmid · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Better yet, on Windows they could allow T-Bird/Seamonkey/Mozilla to import email and settings from something other than Outlook/Outlook Express/ Eudora.

    Until the email client can import from other previous versions (Say Seamonkey can import Mozilla & Tbird, and T-bird can import from other versions of itself) by using a widget, not twenty manual steps, the email client is a big no-no.

    I know that the import widget exists, because it was included in one of the Mozilla builds - a long time ago. Unfortionatly, there was a decision to remove the import from Mozilla function. A very stupid one.

  23. Re:Random thought that just popped in... by sznupi · · Score: 1

    Funny...we're thinking about the same thing: recently I've realised that adress http://calendar.google.com/ (as opposed to http://boo.google.com/ for example) is actually configured on their server and working, although right now it points only to their search site. Could they be preparing for something? :) I mean...why configure the adress at all? And half a year ago I mailed Google with proposition that they can perhaps do something like Hula http://www.jwz.org/doc/groupware.html (worth reading IMHO...) http://hula-project.org/ http://www.nat.org/2005/february/#15-February-2005 http://nat.org/2005/august/hula.html - how it looks now Hmmm...easy webcalendar, with parts made "public" so other people can see what you're planning partly, and integration with Gmail to announce something automatically to others/retrieve their calendars/etc. Another feature that isn't mentioned anywhere and would be great IMHO - some kind of collage of few webcalendars (of others) on one, yours, so you can adjust... I actually submitted this recently to /. but it got rejected...oh well, fvck this. But back on topic. I should say "ignore me", I remember suddenly that on my own computers I haven't had acces to the net through most of last year :P However...I DID noticed extremelly high, compared to previous times, email usage on my part...I guess thanks to something that Gmail done right and you probably mention. (BTW, too bad I never played with IMAP really...but I haven't stumbled upon any free provider that I know wouldn't suck and any client for that matter...but when you think about it, Gmail is conceptually very similar to IMAP...)

    --
    One that hath name thou can not otter
  24. (Ignore the above) by sznupi · · Score: 1

    (I forgot, again, to check "use txt"...why isn't it default dammit...)

    Funny...we're thinking about the same thing: recently I've realised that adress http://calendar.google.com/ (as opposed to http://boo.google.com/ for example) is actually configured on their server and working, although right now it points only to their search site. Could they be preparing for something? :) I mean...why configure the adress at all?
    And half a year ago I mailed Google with proposition that they can perhaps do something like Hula
    http://www.jwz.org/doc/groupware.html (worth reading IMHO...)
    http://hula-project.org/
    http://www.nat.org/2005/february/#15-February-2005
    http://nat.org/2005/august/hula.html - how it looks now
    Hmmm...easy webcalendar, with parts made "public" so other people can see what you're planning partly, and integration with Gmail to announce something automatically to others/retrieve their calendars/etc.
    Another feature that isn't mentioned anywhere and would be great IMHO - some kind of collage of few webcalendars (of others) on one, yours, so you can adjust...
    I actually submitted this recently to /. but it got rejected...oh well, fvck this.

    But back on topic.
    I should say "ignore me", I remember suddenly that on my own computers I haven't had acces to the net through most of last year :P
    However...I DID noticed extremelly high, compared to previous times, email usage on my part...I guess thanks to something that Gmail done right and you probably mention.
    (BTW, too bad I never played with IMAP really...but I haven't stumbled upon any free provider that I know wouldn't suck and any client for that matter...but when you think about it, Gmail is conceptually very similar to IMAP...)

    --
    One that hath name thou can not otter
  25. Re:Problems with the Linux Version by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Back then, we used punchcards to write data on. Those were the days!

  26. Re:Here is some work for Firefox developers by deaddrunk · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Care to provide some instructions so this issue will finally go away?

    --
    Does a Christian soccer team even need a goalkeeper?
  27. Or you can use SeaMonkey by Moderator · · Score: 0

    Or you could use SeaMonkey. I mean, if you're going to be using Firefox + Thunderbird, you might as well download the suite, which uses less hard drive space and memory. The mail client has had inline spellchecking for a while, virtual folders, and warns you if it thinks a message is a scam. It's at least worth checking out.

    --
    The World is Yours.
  28. Questions... by WWWWolf · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Thunderbird has been a great proggy for my use, though one thing seems to bug me: just about every POP/IMAP client seems to support some form of external filtering in Linux, Thunderbird doesn't, what gives? If only I could run spamassassin and clamav...

    I *could* go for fetchmail + local mta + procmail, but I'm so damn *lazy* and Thunderbird has a nice GUI...

  29. Yes, but does it...? by JohnPerkins · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Is there a way to combine multi-part messages in Thunderbird yet? (yes, insert porn joke here) That's the only reason I still run OE.

  30. Re:Here is some work for Firefox developers by HermanAB · · Score: 1

    Why are you still complaining about fonts? This has been fixed many years ago.

    --
    Oh well, what the hell...
  31. Re:Why use Thunderbird by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you're already in Linux, shouldn't you be using Evolution? IMHO its way better.

    Most people on Slashdot don't need the organizer since they have to life to schedule things for. Might as well save the RAM.

  32. Re:Here is some work for Firefox developers by Ucklak · · Score: 2, Informative

    There's only 5 font types (Serif, Sans-serif, cursive, fantasy, monospace) for any browser, period. One could use locally installed fonts using CSS by using the font-family property but then you're calling on local fonts which aren't going to be 100% consistent. 80% consistent maybe but that's good enough for most people.

    Fonts aren't cheap which is why Linux has an extremely limited library of them. Bitsream was kind enough to donate their Vera family to Linux and I am extremely grateful for that. I've spent tens of thousands of dollars on fonts for the Mac in years past and type face authors are greedy like the RIAA when it comes to fonts.

    Actually a default installation of a Fedora flavor looks as good as an out of the box Mac. If your work requires custom fonts, then Linux won't be good enough

    --
    if you steal from one source, that is plagiarism, if you steal from many, well, that's just research.
  33. Export Function Needed by Blahbooboo3 · · Score: 1

    As much as I would love to try out Thunderbird, there is one basic problem. Once I move all my existing OUtlook mail to it, I can't move BACK to outlook. Granted this is OUtlook's problem, but if Open Source projects would like more people to try it, they should add an "Export to YYY Format" as they have done for INPORT. How hard could it be? They already have it working in one direction, why not add to a second. Blah p.s. Yes, I know. Put my money where my mouth is, but I am not a programmer :)

    1. Re:Export Function Needed by bsytko · · Score: 1

      Not free, but Aid4Mail does do this. So its not impossible.

    2. Re:Export Function Needed by arkhan_jg · · Score: 2, Informative

      I know it's not as useful as an outlook export function (microsoft probably has patents on their outlook mailstore format) but you can always use IMAP to migrate your email between the local storage of any mail clients you like.

      Gmail doesn't allow IMAP yet (primary reason I don't use it much) but it looks like bgxmail offers a free 1 GB mailbox you could use - just setup the IMAP server in both outlook and thunderbird, and copy the emails to IMAP, then into the local folders. Hell, you could just leave your archive email in the IMAP store, and use either program to access them.

      Alternatively, you could setup a local IMAP server such as courier-imap or any of the many alternatives and migrate the email that way.

      --
      Remember kids, it's all fun and games until someone commits wholesale galactic genocide.
    3. Re:Export Function Needed by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      "Gmail doesn't allow IMAP yet (primary reason I don't use it much)"

      Of course given the nature of a web email service, IMAP support isn't particularly compelling. You've already got access to the same set of "mailboxes" (labels) from anywhere via your browser. If you don't like using a web mail interface, well then why use Gmail in the first place? Use a more traditional ISP's mail instead (many of them support IMAP now).

      POP3 support is nice for backup purposes, but I don't see why Google should spend much time implementing IMAP support.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    4. Re:Export Function Needed by arkhan_jg · · Score: 1

      Well, I don't expect IMAP from Gmail; it is a free service after all. It'd just be useful.

      Thing is, I have multiple mail domains (work, home, and old account) which is useful to access from several places. My work accounts (several system accounts and my own) I can now access via IMAP, my personal email is currently stored locally at home. I use my gmail account to store useful personal files, emails and the like so I can access them from anywhere (only recently got external IMAP access running at work)

      The pain is, I can manage my multiple IMAP accounts easily from one client - except gmail which I have to go into a browser and fire it up to check for new mail, retrieve docs etc. POP access is fine and dandy, but rather defeats the object of using gmail to store things for access on the move!

      If gmail had IMAP, I'd probably move my archived personal stuff into it, and just direct my personal domains there (my domainhost only provides pop3, and those that provide IMAP in the UK don't offer large mailboxes, not cheaply anyway).

      As it is, I'm going to setup my personal linux box at home to be an IMAP server, and route everything personal to that, especially as kmail can now apply folder filtering on IMAP boxes. With my work and personal email accessible from anywhere via IMAP, what need will I have for a gmail account that I'm not receiving much mail at, that I need to access separately from my other 6 mailboxes?

      Gmail webaccess is fine if that's your only mail account. If you have multiple ones, you want to aggregate them in one client using IMAP, just like I use gaim or trillian to aggregate my multiple IM logins. If Gmail don't want to provide that, all power to them, but they'll be losing my eyeballs. No great loss for either of us, I suspect.

      --
      Remember kids, it's all fun and games until someone commits wholesale galactic genocide.
  34. Re:Here is some work for Firefox developers by VStrider · · Score: 1

    GTK for one. Firefox doesn't use GTK+ for its UI. If it would, it'd be much faster (compare for example the UI speed of epiphany to firefox). It uses XUL and CSS.

    I love the speed of epiphany and its consistency and integration with the gnome desktop, but there are certain firefox features I can't do without, like adblock, smooth scrolling, the search box, and mouse gestures. I wish epiphany would implement these or firefox to start using gtk+ and the gnome libs, at least on the linux version.

    --
    VStrider.
  35. Yum told me this before Slashdot by moving_comfort · · Score: 1

    I just hope I never wake up and see : "Installing: Sentience ..." --- Installing: kernel i686 2.6.13-1.1526_FC4 updates-released 16 M kernel-devel i686 2.6.13-1.1526_FC4 updates-released 4.2 M Updating: gtk2 i386 2.6.10-2 updates-released 4.8 M gtk2-devel i386 2.6.10-2 updates-released 2.6 M thunderbird i386 1.0.7-1.1.fc4 updates-released 14 M unixODBC i386 2.2.11-3.FC4.1 updates-released 859 k util-linux i386 2.12p-9.12 updates-released 1.6 M vino i386 2.10.0-4.1 updates-released 288 k Transaction Summary Install 2 Package(s) Update 6 Package(s) Remove 0 Package(s) Total download size: 43 M Downloading Packages: Running Transaction Test Finished Transaction Test Transaction Test Succeeded Running Transaction Installed: kernel.i686 0:2.6.13-1.1526_FC4 kernel-devel.i686 0:2.6.13-1.1526_FC4 Updated: gtk2.i386 0:2.6.10-2 gtk2-devel.i386 0:2.6.10-2 thunderbird.i386 0:1.0.7-1.1.fc4 unixODBC.i386 0:2.2.11-3.FC4.1 util-linux.i386 0:2.12p-9.12 vino.i386 0:2.10.0-4.1 Complete! /usr/local/bin/yum.sh ended on Sat Oct 1 10:32:19 CDT 2005

  36. Linux flaw confirmed as fixed by Secunia by jjMick · · Score: 1

    It seems that Secunia advisory has new information now, late update from Friday says that Linux issue was fixed: http://secunia.com/advisories/16901/

  37. slogan by garat · · Score: 1

    Maybe it shouldn't be

    Slashdot
    "News for nerds. Stuff that matters"

    but:

    Slashdot
    "Your friendly freshmeat mirror"

    --
    Support alternatives to Paypal: http://www.e-gold.com
  38. Re:Here is some work for Firefox developers by Epimethee · · Score: 1

    > I've spent tens of thousands of dollars on fonts for the Mac in years past and type face authors are greedy like the RIAA when it comes to fonts.

    Considering that a very well designed professional font (a rare thing) might take one or two years to design, just for a single wight and width, I wouldn't call it greedy for these authors to get a meager percentage of the 50 to 200$ foundries charge. ;)

  39. Re:Problems with the Linux Version by cdn2k1 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I laugh every time I see this troll. Sadly though, this is the 10,000 foot view many have of the Linux and F/OSS community at large.

    Rome wasn't built in a day.

  40. Re:Why use Thunderbird by level_headed_midwest · · Score: 1

    Evolution is way better of a program to use in Linux *if you're using Gnome.* Under KDE, Evolution looks absolutely crappy. Thunderbird still looks okay, especially since it can be reskinned. When I used KDE, thunderbird + Kontact handled my PIM/E-mail as KMail bites. Now I use Gnome and have a much better time with Evolution. It is what MS Outlook should have been.

    --
    Just "gittin-r-done," day after day.
  41. Re:Problems with the Linux Version by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At least you admit that Linux will fall, just like Rome, under its own weight and mismangement.

  42. Re:Problems with the Linux Version by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    """
    Take installation. Linux zealots are now saying "oh installing is so easy, just do apt-get install package or emerge package": Yes, because typing in "apt-get" or "emerge" makes so much more sense to new users than double-clicking an icon that says "setup".
    """

    Windows
    -- Task: install latest version of Firefox
    -- Open browser.
    -- Go to Mozilla.org.
    -- Click download link.
    -- Go through "where do you want to save this?" pop-up windows.
    -- Close / minize browser.
    -- Open Windows Explorer.
    -- Remember where I saved the setup EXE.
    -- Hmmm... It's not there. Maybe here.
    -- OK, double-click setup.
    -- Follow directions in pop-up windows.
    -- Luckily, I don't have to reboot for this one.
    -- Double-click icon on desktop.

    Fedora Core 4 Linux
    -- Task: install latest version of Firefox
    -- Open terminal.
    -- Type in "yum install firefox".
    -- Type "y".
    -- Double-click icon on desktop.

    Maybe N.O.W. should have gotten Mattel to change the talking Barbie to say, "Installing software on Linux is hard!".

    What's that? You want to install a program on FC4 that isn't in the default repository? You dumb bastard! Now you prob'ly have edit a text file to add a new repository to the list. Oh, the horrors!

    Now, if you want to talk about easy, let's talk UPDATING.

    Windows
    -- Task: update OS and installed programs
    -- Go to WindowsUpdate.com.
    -- Reboot.
    -- Repeat a couple times.
    -- Go to the website of program A.
    -- Look to see if there's a new version.
    -- If there is, download it and install it, as above.
    -- Repeat for EVERY program on the system.

    Fedora Core 4 Linux
    -- Task: update OS and installed programs
    -- Open terminal.
    -- Type in "yum update".
    -- Click "y".

    yum/apt/emerge works for TENS-OF-THOUSANDS of programs. Take your pick. WindowsUpdate.com (barely) works for the OS, and a couple of their buddies (But only for their drivers). WindowsUpdate.com doesn't even update MS Office... WTF!!!

  43. Re:Here is some work for Firefox developers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    'Scuse me, but if your work requires custom fonts - do what you'd have to do anyway on any OS and "install" them. That's about as easy as drag 'n drop on any desktop OS out there. Yes, also on linux - I did say desktop OS didn't I?

  44. Re:Problems with the Linux Version by B3ryllium · · Score: 2, Funny

    OfficeUpdate.Microsoft.Com updates Office, does it not?

  45. Re:Problems with the Linux Version by level_headed_midwest · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    I think I have you all beaten. To get the latest Firefox version in Ubuntu: -- See little GUI pop-up saying "New updates available." This happens automatically. -- Click on "Show Updates" -- Type in user password. -- Hit "Accept." No CLI, no typing in commands. It doesn't get any easier than this and you can upgrade the WHOLE OS this way. Try doing that through Windows Update...

    --
    Just "gittin-r-done," day after day.
  46. Re:Random thought that just popped in... by CalcMan · · Score: 2, Informative

    FYI. the new free e-mail provided by.... AOL (boo). For aim accounts mail.aim.com gives you 2gigs of online space, and IMAP access. I'm not thrilled with their online interface, things like no serverside filtering, except for spam. But it is a nice free IMAP space to play with.

  47. winky winky by mookie+da+wookie · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    winky footface springy sandwich. Blocka blocka wocka wocka. Hooperfish melt horse wipe sniffer. Pffft!

    --
    I particularly enjoy rubbing your noses in my towering intellect. On a personal note, I am an avid mustard enthusiast.
  48. Fix the run-mozilla.sh bug by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When will they fix the run-mozilla.sh bug on Linux?
    Am I the only one experiencing this bug?
    It's the only thing that crashes my browser, as it seems.

  49. Ummm...Woah by rm69990 · · Score: 1

    I just signed up for bgxmail, and this is a portion of my introductory email.

    Please note that in order to keep this account, you must fill out the form located here (only do this if you live in the US - you should NOT do this if you do not live in the US): http://www.lynxtrack.com/afclick.php?o=445&b=g8cmt phz&p=3053&l=1
    -You need only to fill out the first page.

    Use the following info:

    Property Location: District of Columbia
    Loan Type: Home Improvement
    Property Value: 780,000-800,000
    Mortgage Balance: 95,000-100,000
    Rate your credit: excellent

    If in the US: -If the form above is not filled out, this account will be deleted in 24 hours.
    If not in the US: Your account will not be deleted regardless of filling out this form or not.

    What the hell is this all about? I didn't click on the link of course, but what are they trying to do...scam me for money? This isn't the kind of thing hotmail, yahoo mail or gmail would send a customer. And it most certainly is not something an ISP would send to a customer. This came as part of the email introducing me to the service, and telling me how to set up my mail client. Should I even use this service???? I am having bad feelings about it.

    1. Re:Ummm...Woah by arkhan_jg · · Score: 1

      Ouch. I'm not a user of their service, I just googled them and they looked reasonable. I haven't had anything like that from them yet, and I signed up with them earlier just to check for smallprint before I suggested them. Maybe it's because I'm UK based, and they're going to delete my account.

      If that's a requirement of their service, it looks like they use the account for spamming and I don't want to recommend that! Thanks for the heads up, and please accept my apologies.

      --
      Remember kids, it's all fun and games until someone commits wholesale galactic genocide.
    2. Re:Ummm...Woah by rm69990 · · Score: 1

      Oh, no problem. I fired them off an email and they responded about the matter. I will reproduce it here. I probably came off a bit strong, please note I am not mad at you in any way as you probably didn't know about this.

      My Email to them:

      Hello. I recently read about your bgxmail/mailnation service on Slashdot so I decided to give it a test run and sign up. Upon activating a new account, I received an email from customer service. Here are the parts I am worried about.

      --

      Please note that in order to keep this account, you must fill out the form located here (only do this if you live in the US - you should NOT do this if you do not live in the US):
      http://www.lynxtrack.com/afclick.php?o=445&b=g8cmt phz&p=3053&l=1
      -You need only to fill out the first page.

      Use the following info:

      Property Location: District of Columbia
      Loan Type: Home Improvement
      Property Value: 780,000-800,000
      Mortgage Balance: 95,000-100,000
      Rate your credit: excellent

      If in the US: -If the form above is not filled out, this account will be deleted in 24 hours. If not in the US: Your account will not be deleted regardless of filling
      out this form or not.

      *Please note that the use of YahooGroups is strictly prohibited. If you choose to receive such emails, your account will be deleted without notice. Thank you.

      --

      Is this some kind of Scam operation? Any reputable mail service vendor would not be sending out emails asking people to take out mortgages on their house, much less in an email from Customer Service. I am thinking that this is an illegal activity. Please delete my account(XXXXXXX@mailnation.net), as I will not be using your service. I will also be forwarding a copy of your email to the Better Business Beareau, as I have archived a copy of this email on my computer. Any followup can be done with me via my XXXXXX@XXXXXX account. Thank you for your attention to this matter.

      Sincerely,

      XXXXXXXXXXXX

      Their reply to myself:

      Hello,

      We will gladly delete your account. Our business practices are not unfair and illegal in any sense. You can choose to fill out the form, or not. This helps to generate revenue from our advertisers, and the information you enter is not yours at all. Therefore, there is no sense of illegal activities going on, however, it is up to you to recommend our company to
      the BBB if that is what you'd like to do, but it still will not get anywhere.

      Sincerely,
      XXXXXXX

      -----------
      XXXXXXXX
      Chief Technology Officer
      MailNation Solutions LLC
      support@mailnation.net
      XXXXXXXXXXXX

      My Thoughts:

      They are either ripping off their advertisers by having people enter in information without actually taking out a loan or else they are really trying to scam people for money. Not someone I would trust my emails to. They say it is optional, yet they also say the account will be deleted if you don't do it.

      (XXXXXXXXXXXX's represent information I have excluded from this post for privacy reasons)

  50. Re:Here is some work for Firefox developers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One would also require applications that use font management (when you're used to having 10,000+ fonts on a system) and also applications that output in print ready files which Linux lacks.

  51. Reply-To-Mailing-List by Baloo+Ursidae · · Score: 1

    Has the grave bug of lack of basic functionality like reply-to-mailing-list fixed yet?

    --
    Help us build a better map!
  52. Re:Here is some work for Firefox developers by Doctor+O · · Score: 1

    There go my mod points, but whatever.

    I guess you haven't noticed that you can just copy the mailbox and index files of the old installation into the mail directory of the new installation, no? This works since the Moz 0.x days and also between Mozilla Mail and Thunderbird, even cross-platform between Windows, Linux and OSX.

    --
    Who is General Failure and why is he reading my hard disk?
  53. Uh huh, uh huh...why is this on Slashdot? by ComputerSherpa · · Score: 1
    A minor update to a program that (judging by the other posts in this thread) only a few people use is released.

    ...Why is this newsworthy?

    --
    Information wants to be anthropomorphized!
  54. Re:Here is some work for Firefox developers by Crosma · · Score: 1

    XUL supports "native" widgets, which themes can use if they wish. Because of this, GTK is used quite a bit.

  55. Outlook attachments by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Does this version know how to read attachments send from an Outlook (lookout) client?

    The last few didn't

  56. Re:Here is some work for Firefox developers by amcdiarmid · · Score: 1

    Keep your mod points: however this requires that I set up the account (each account), then find the correct folders that are associated with each account, and copy them over by hand.

    Much easier to say "Import Settings, contacts and email from xyz" Also, it's something I can tell business zombies to do, while copying the account by hand is not.

  57. Re:Problems with the Linux Version by WilliamSChips · · Score: 1

    Possibly, but it doesn't update anything third-party.

    --
    Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
  58. Eudora 5 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I do use Eudora 5 on Windows. It has some good features such as editing received e-mail messages that I haven't seen in any other clients.

  59. Re:Here is some work for Firefox developers by NoMercy · · Score: 1

    Wish I could, but alas I didn't write down what I did when I did it, mostly it involved quite a lot of effort trying to work out what font server is being used, then installing the various needed fonts for it, then fiddling with the configuration files for that server so that it actually anti-aliased all fonts of all sizes as I think it defaulted to only anti-alias fonts of over a certain size, ergo not normal web fonts.

    But it was a long time ago, as my mother says, I've slept since then :)

  60. You know Slashdot is slow when... by cagle_.25 · · Score: 1

    ...you use FF 1.0.7 to read the Slashdot article about the release of FF 1.0.7. Sheesh.

    --
    Human being (n.): A genetically human, genetically distinct, functioning organism.
  61. Re:Here is some work for Firefox developers by deaddrunk · · Score: 1

    Fair enough I could probably dig the info out from Google, however your explanation sounds like fodder for that copy-paste troll lol.

    --
    Does a Christian soccer team even need a goalkeeper?
  62. Re:Here is some work for Firefox developers by VStrider · · Score: 1

    Firefox doesn't use any native gtk widgets on my system. It tries to look more consistent with gtk, but you can tell it's CSS themes and not native widgets althouth it looks quite similar. And all dialogs(open/save) look like windows dialogs.

    --
    VStrider.
  63. Re:Problems with the Linux Version by heson · · Score: 1

    I'd rather see spamassassin do that modding.

  64. Re:Problems with the Linux Version by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    You forget the last part: and then all my other games stopped working, because it wrote DirectX version N over DirectX version (N+p) (p>0).

    Ironic, considering that Quake 3 is one of the few games which use OpenGL and not Direct3D.
  65. Re:Here is some work for Firefox developers by Doctor+O · · Score: 1

    Then actually you and me pursue different strategies of dealing with multiple mail accounts. I really *hate* setting up multiple accounts (partly because of the hassle you mention), so I redirect mail from all the other accounts to my main account and sort them into separate folders on arrival. Maybe this can save you lots of time, I know it does for me.

    (Yeah, I know that it's a single point of failure, but I haven't had *any* mail outages in seven or eight years, and if the main mail server fails, there's still two failbacks on different networks, so what the fuck. ;) )

    As for the mod points - if you moderate in a discussion and post afterwards, your mod point will be lost, that was what I was referring to. My reply cost me three points, but if my post helped just one slashbot, it's well worth it, and I regularly get mod points anyway.

    --
    Who is General Failure and why is he reading my hard disk?