Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Yet Another Bulletin Board 2.0 Released

Posted by ScuttleMonkey on from the the-price-is-right dept.

George Maschke writes "Yesterday, lead developer Corey Chapman announced the release of Yet another Bulletin Board 2.0. The new version of this free, open source software adds many new features and improvements, bringing its feature set more in line with that of rival phpBB. YaBB 2.0 may also be downloaded directly for a quick look."

20 of 26 comments (clear)

  1. It's taking a Slashdotting head-on... by G-Licious! · · Score: 2, Funny

    I must investigate this further.

  2. NNTP? by samjam · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The essential lacking feature is generally threaded NNTP access.

    Sam

    --
    blog.sam.liddicott.com
    1. Re:NNTP? by timdorr · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's a PHP script, not a network server.

      --
      Tim Dorr
      Owner/Manger
      A Small Orange
    2. Re:NNTP? by samjam · · Score: 3, Insightful

      and yet.... I've seen and ran webservers written entirely in php.

      PHP has network socket capabilities, can be run outside of a webserver as a standalone scripted app - and with www.swig.org, arbitrary C/C++ libraries can easily be linked in to extend php.

      However, my point wasn't against PHP (the source to which I have made some contributions) but all the various bulletin boards which are really discussion boards most of which seem to re-invent in the face of NNTP because few of the authors even know about it, or anything that cannot be shown in a web browser.

      TWIG was a very good php webmail/nntp news reader; further it is possible to have an NNTP interface to most BB systems except to the degree that they allow editing of existing threaded posts.

      My main grouch was the number of discussions I have an interest in that take place on these foul^H^H^H^Hless than ideal and well tried messaging systems when NNTP is much simpler to read; thank goodness for www.gmane.org that mirrors most mailing lists via NNTP and threaded web interface albeit without the pretty skins and fanciful markup language. It hurts to see 20 year old good systems badly re-written in html and javascript, but only because im contast it hurts to use them.

      The tone of my comment makes me sound like William Caxton railing against the ignorant artists who make use of the printing press for ..... pictures!! ( don't know that he ever did rail against them, but I could probably do a pretty good impression)

      Sam

      --
      blog.sam.liddicott.com
    3. Re:NNTP? by rebug · · Score: 2

      Looks like a Perl script to me.

      --

      there's more than one way to do me.
  3. Yuck by Quattro+Vezina · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Am I the only person who can't stand the whole phpBB/YaBB/UBB forum style?

    Give me a good WWWBoard-based script over that crap any day. Hell, I'll even prefer a 2ch-style script over a crappy UBB-style script.

    --
    I support the Center for Consumer Freedom
    1. Re:Yuck by Saeed+al-Sahaf · · Score: 1

      You might just be that one and only person.

      --
      "Who are in control, they are not in control of anything - they don't even control themselves!" - Glen Beck
  4. Oblig... by CableModemSniper · · Score: 1

    Slashdot is not freshmeat

    --
    Why not fork?
  5. Scoop... by Saeed+al-Sahaf · · Score: 3, Funny

    But apparently it is! With the glaring lack of high quality story submissions suitable for the front page of the Slashdot blog, the "editors" have no choice but to draw from the other OSTG portals as well as commercial "Slavertisment" content. If only more Slashdot visitors would submit quality content that meets the necessary standards.

    --
    "Who are in control, they are not in control of anything - they don't even control themselves!" - Glen Beck
    1. Re:Scoop... by fief · · Score: 1

      Or perhaps-- the editors could seek out good material themselves.

    2. Re:Scoop... by Saeed+al-Sahaf · · Score: 1

      Well, I suppose there is a small statistical possibility.

      --
      "Who are in control, they are not in control of anything - they don't even control themselves!" - Glen Beck
  6. YUCK ! by hummassa · · Score: 1

    No, you have at least me for company.

    --
    It's better to be the foot on the boot than the face on the pavement. ~~ tkx Kadin2048
    1. Re:YUCK ! by silvaran · · Score: 1

      Me too!

    2. Re:YUCK ! by Got+Laid,+Can't+Code · · Score: 1

      Don't forget me!

      --
      Asparagus has many and excellent powers.
  7. Boring by Psionicist · · Score: 1, Informative


    Try www.punbb.org instead. Small, fast, slick.

    1. Re:Boring by Watts+Martin · · Score: 1, Informative

      And PunBB does just about everything that I actually want a bulletin board system to do, without the "kitchen sink" feeling. I was wondering if I was the only person who'd ever run across the thing. (I quasi-integrated it with the Textpattern Blog/CMS for one site for a while, inspired by--well, Textpattern's own web site, where they use PunBB for the same reasons I liked it, and that you cited.)

  8. AJAX by Spy+Hunter · · Score: 1

    AJAX could improve bulletin boards tremendously, why isn't it used more often? Slashdot's comment system could be tremendously improved by a little Javascript and XMLHttpRequest. Imagine expanding comment trees without refreshing the page. The demand is there; there are even some Greasemonkey scripts to hack this capability into Slashdot (though I haven't gotten any to work).

    --
    main(c,r){for(r=32;r;) printf(++c>31?c=!r--,"\n":c<r?" ":~c&r?" `":" #");}
    1. Re:AJAX by edwdig · · Score: 1

      Before the really recent update, Slashdot's HTML was a horrible mess. I don't think you could've grafted AJAX onto that if you wanted to. So give them time before expecting anything majorly new.

      Besides, you're not likely to see anything to results in less page loads. That would reduce advertising impressions.

  9. History of YaBB forks? Yabb/YaPBBSE/SMF by enrico_suave · · Score: 1

    I mean some of it's obvious... but does anyone have some sort of historical perspective of these different forks (or quasi forks/ports)?

    I didn't realize YABB was still under development (not that I looked).

    What's the relationship between YABB --> YAPBBSE / SMF?
    (besides the obvious one's perl and one is php)

    e.

    --
    Build Your Own PVR/HTPC news, reviews, &
    1. Re:History of YaBB forks? Yabb/YaPBBSE/SMF by Juvenall · · Score: 1

      Full Disclosure: I'm a project administrator with YaBB.

      The sort version is YaBB SE was developed as a PHP port of the Perl version primarily by two YaBB staff members. After a few issues such as their code being ripped off, they changed their name to SMF. Aside from a few members such as myself who bounced between the two projects, there never was any official relationship.