Shuttleworth on Ubuntu's Direction and Intent
cj2003 writes "Mark Shuttleworth has released a FAQ about Ubuntu's Direction and Intent. It comments on the discussions of funding, of being a Debian-fork or not, of the strange names, and many other 'hot topics' relating to Ubuntu. In his own words: 'This document exists to give the community some insight into my thinking, and to a certain extent that of the Community Council, Technical Board and other governance structures - on some of the issues and decisions that have been controversial.'"
If you don't make a commercial "Ubuntu Professional Edition", how can Ubuntu be sustainable?
I am puzzled, don't Home Editions make money?
Now we are on the naming thing, what's with the "Funky Fairy" naming system?
:-)
Funky Fairy would be an AWESOME name for Ubuntu 6.10!
You know, Microsoft's street address also says a lot about their mentality.
So someone finally made a great distro out of Debian and it's a bad thing?
Yes, but if I had done that my comment would have been well-informed and insightful, leaving no room for anyone to complain. This being Slashdot, I felt it was my duty to shoot from the hip, as it were, and simply fire off my post.
The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
I can tell you for sure that I'm pissed that I can't run Windows XP Home on my quad Opteron machine. Pissed, I tell you! And the lack of software RAID, which is clearly better than spending a few bucks on better performing, platform-independant hardware RAID? Why, if it weren't for the availability of VNC servers for free, XP Home would be totally useless.
Snakes. Why did it have to be snakes?
--
"Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.