Slashdot Mirror


Fingerprint Payment System Gets Financing

prostoalex writes to tell us Yahoo! News is reporting that Pay By Touch, an electronic payments startup that connects your fingerprint to your wallet, has received an additional $130 million in financing to move forward with their biometric payment system.

33 of 179 comments (clear)

  1. Oh, great. by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Now, thieves will cut the fingers off people they mug.

    Isn't technology wonderful???

    1. Re:Oh, great. by turg · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Now, thieves will cut the fingers off people they mug.
      Oh, yeah. The thief will just take the severed finger into the grocery store and use it right in front of the clerk. That'll work real well.

      Seriously, though, there are biometric devices that confirm whether the finger is the correct temperature.
      --
      <sig>Guvf vf abg n frperg zrffntr
    2. Re:Oh, great. by austad · · Score: 4, Informative

      Temperature can be fooled too with this technique, and it allows one to lift a fingerprint from just about anywhere, including the fingerprint scanner they just used.

      --
      Need Free Juniper/NetScreen Support? JuniperForum
  2. As long as I can pay for gas with my middle finger by Jackie_Chan_Fan · · Score: 5, Funny

    ... actually i'd like to pay for everything with my middle finger...

    Fucking sweet.

  3. Seriously... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ...what is wrong with my credit card?

    1. Re:Seriously... by slashname3 · · Score: 3, Funny

      You already maxed out that card. And with your credit rating, do they actually give out a 401 credit score, you can't get another one.

  4. connects your fingerprint to your wallet by jasonditz · · Score: 4, Funny

    That's going to make it a bitch to type.

  5. Am I missing something? by turg · · Score: 3, Insightful
    From the article:
    Here's how it works: Customers sign up once, by registering a checking account or a credit card, and showing government identification such as a driver's license. The Pay by Touch technology records the lines and ridges of their fingerprints, and translates the data into a numerical algorithm that is stored in a secure database.

    [ . . . ]

    Pay By Touch is sharing the cost of each installation, and it gets a fee per transaction of between 12 and 14 cents, he said.

    That is cheaper than what stores pay for alternative payment methods, he explained. A credit card transaction typically costs a store about 60 cents for an average $25 purchase of groceries. A debit card costs a store about 50 cents
    But it is a credit card or debit/check card transaction. So how are the debit/credit card fees getting paid?
    --
    <sig>Guvf vf abg n frperg zrffntr
    1. Re:Am I missing something? by Kohath · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Once you're identified, the store writes an electronic check from your bank account. The credit card companies aren't involved and don't take their cut.

      The system is much cheaper for stores than credit cards. 60 cents Visa gets is more than ~15 cents Pay by Touch + check costs

      I see these every time I go to the grocery store. I always wonder: what's the benefit to me? What do I care if the store saves 45 cents?

    2. Re:Am I missing something? by JimBobJoe · · Score: 2, Informative

      The article does a lousy job at explaining that (I read that the 12-14 cents per transaction go to Pay by Touch.)

      The Merchant FAQ http://www.paybytouch.com/merchants/faqs.html> on the site says...

      What is the cost to me?
      As a merchant, you make a small investment in the Pay By Touch hardware and processing. This investment is quickly offset, however, by savings you'll realize due to less fraud, shorter tender times, payment type shifts, and the repeat business you can expect from offering your customers a better shopping experience.

      Can I really expect higher profits?
      Yes. In addition to the savings mentioned above, your bottom line will also be improved through the lower transaction costs resulting from your being able to influence your shoppers' payment choices.


      "Influencing your shoppers' payment choices" is alredy done at many stores--when I use my debit card (like at Target) a keypad will appear for my PIN--so that the transaction is run as a debit and not on the MC/Visa system (to run as a credit requires me to select "cancel" as I recall.)

      I believe the big savings are had by encouraging the customer to register their checkbook. Instead of running the transaction as a debit (ACH) or credit charge, Pay by Touch will try it first as an "echeck"--esentially a paper check but without the actual paper (at least, that's how I'm understanding things.)

      If the customer chooses ACH debit or credit card, then the savings aren't there (or Pay by Touch swallows the extra costs.)

  6. Which Finger? by NtroP · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I have a chronic problem with the skin of my thumbs and occasionally my index finger. Do I get to choose and alternate finger? Multiple fingers?

    --
    "terrorism" and "pedophilia" are the root passwords to the Constitution
  7. Wait a while by Profane+MuthaFucka · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Don't sign up for this right away. Wait a while for the bugs to get worked out, and for the early adopters to get robbed blind. Only when the bugs worked out should anyone who is technically literate sign up for this.

    --
    Fascism trolls keeping me up every night. When I starts a preachin', he HITS ME WITH HIS REICH!
  8. Unreliable by Cave_Monster · · Score: 5, Insightful

    We use fingerprint technology at work. Without scanning our fingerprint (in addition to entering a personal code of digits) we cannot get through the door. On occasions this scanner fails to recognise your fingerprint and after a few tries, you either try a different door or get someone else to scan their fingerprint. I cringe at this to be used for payments for this reason, not to mention somebody using standover tactics and forcing you to pay for their purchase or even like the parent mentions, getting your finger cut off.

    1. Re:Unreliable by utnow · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I can think of at least one thing that would make the system a bit more secure.

      When you sign up to use the system, they scan all 10 of your fingers. You assign one (one per hand?) of them as the proper finger(s), and the remaining fingers serve as ALERT fingers. So assuming (like in your scenario) someone is standing over you with a gun you can proceed with the payment (or whatever) as usual (aka, you don't get shot), and the athorities can be alerted that you're in a 'situation'. Just use the wrong finger. Since you set your own 'correct' finger, the guy/gal won't know you've done anything, and will at least think twice before putting a gun to your head and telling you to do it. They can't just cut them all off and try them all since the chance of scanning the wrong ones is too high (8 or 9 out of 10) unless they watch you do it before approaching you. I'm rambling... you get the picture. 3

    2. Re:Unreliable by Heisenbug · · Score: 2, Insightful

      When you sign up to use the system, they scan all 10 of your fingers. You assign one (one per hand?) of them as the proper finger(s), and the remaining fingers serve as ALERT fingers.

      That strike me as 1) an easy secret to steal 2) difficult technology to implement 3) pretty likely to yield false positives, either by misreading or by user error 4) way harder than just using a credit card.

      Sorry, I think I'm actually talking about the whole system here. Carry on ...

  9. unclean unclean by timmarhy · · Score: 2, Funny

    some dirty sod will sitck their finger up their own arse then use it no doubt.

    --
    If you mod me down, I will become more powerful than you can imagine....
  10. Copy-proof? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    One wonders how secure this is after seeing how relatively simple it is to create a fingerprint mold from nothing more than a residual fingerprint.

    The information in credit card magnetic strips can be copied, but the person copying the credit card must at least have physical access (even if only temporarily) to the card in order to make a copy. Using fingerprints, however, is like writing down your PIN on everything you've touched...

  11. No way by evil+agent · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This can't possibly catch on, can it? I mean why would you entrust your confidentiality to something as insecure as a fingerprint? You leave it everywhere you go! Imagine that everytime you leave a room, you leave behind a piece of paper with your credit card number written on it.

    --
    End transmission.
  12. MOD PARENT UP! by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Seriously - have you guys thought how many FSCKING FINGERPRINTS are there in the streets? Any glass, seat, trash can, paper, door handle, glass, clothes, suitcases...

    sheesh! With credit cards at least someone had to steal it first! But now it only takes some scotch tape to do the job. What are those morons thinking?

    1. Re:MOD PARENT UP! by game+kid · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Add me to the Mod Parent Up® petition. Thoughtful of both of you (parent and GP).

      More and more it feels like a shortcut for corporations to find targets for what I call PPA1.

      1 Professional Personal Annoyance, or "targeted advertising"

      --
      You can hold down the "B" button for continuous firing.
  13. Re:Wow by 13bPower · · Score: 3, Funny

    hey buddy, thumb a hundred bucks to help save the clock tower?

  14. For extra security... by Errandboy+of+Doom · · Score: 3, Informative

    ...change your fingerprint every 6 weeks:
    How To Fake Fingerprints

  15. Thanks for the fingerprint! by game+kid · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Thanks for giving me your fingerprint.

    Well, you had to, to give us your 2 cents...

    I'd be OK with the whole idea if it would never be made mandatory for payments...

    --
    You can hold down the "B" button for continuous firing.
  16. Retinal Scanner by Dan+East · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Considering the patent is about to expire on retinal scanning, they ought to wait a few more months and utilize that type of biometric. It is much harder to forge, more accurate, and does not require physical contact (which spreads germs).

    Dan East

    --
    Better known as 318230.
  17. Just one more token... by necro81 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I am not a crypto or security expert, but I gather most experts agree that the more pieces of information you need to provide to be authenticated, the better. For instance, the combination of a personal password with some certificate/token on a USB key is (theoretically) better than either acting alone. Many of the comments in this thread make the point that fingreprints are pretty easily lifted and forged. So, perhaps it is not of much use, from a security standpoint, as a stand-alone authenticator. If, however, it was combined with another token, like the credit/debit card itself, then it could serve in place of the customer's written signature or PIN. That would require a perpetrator to have, at least for a little while, physical access to the card, as well as a print, before going out and defrauding the customer. Using a fingerprint would probably be a little better than using a written signature, which no one ever checks anyway, can also be forged, and could easily be lifted from a number of public documents (or, for that matter, the card itself).

    Anyone think this idea, of combining fingerprints with a physical token, have any merit? Naturally this system could still be forged or broken, but would it be more or less hard to break than the current system of cards and signature/PINs? I think we all have to recognize that, if a perpetrator specifically targets you, it won't be too difficult for them to nail you, but what about more casual and random defrauders?

  18. HEY PAY BY TOUCH, read this finger! by phiberhack · · Score: 2, Funny

    :)

  19. Oblig. Back to the Future by roughapprox · · Score: 3, Funny

    Hey kid, thumb a hundred bucks will ya, help save the clocktower.

  20. Trusted Metrics by QuaintRealist · · Score: 2, Insightful

    There is a more profound problem with using body parts for trusted metrics, which has been brought up on this site and others before. If your "ID" is stolen, you cannot change it. Until, and unless, we can secure digital information (doubtful from this perspective), biometrics will remain interesting but unuseful in wider implementation.

    --
    Using plain ol' text since 1968
    1. Re:Trusted Metrics by tboult0 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually the are number of revocable or cancable biometrics-based technologoies being developed. Securics.com has one and IBM has had many recent press releases on their work. These at least protect against database hacks/insiders so that when (not if) a database is compromised. Also recent work at MSU has show real progress on a fuzzy vault that hides digital keys in a fingerprint. Securics even has a version that mixes a pin/passcode with the cryptograpically transformed print, but neither is stored separately. This means it cannot be used to search for you.

  21. Insufficient Funds by mixmasterjake · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'm sorry sir, your finger was declined. It says here that we're supposed to cut it up...

    --
    TODO: come up with a clever sig
  22. Been there, done that, got the T-shirt.... by deburg · · Score: 2, Informative
    Malaysia car thieves steal finger http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/4396831.st m

    ...

    The car, a Mercedes S-class, was protected by a fingerprint recognition system.

    ...

    But having stripped the car, the thieves became frustrated when they wanted to restart it. They found they again could not bypass the immobiliser, which needs the owner's fingerprint to disarm it.

    They stripped Mr Kumaran naked and left him by the side of the road - but not before cutting off the end of his index finger with a machete.

  23. One Small Problem by Hal+The+Computer · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Do you have any idea how incredibly stupid most people are. How often do you think someone is going to press the wrong finger onto the scanner by accident. After the first time, the police department is going to stop sending in a SWAT team and just call the store and ask if they have another very confused customer.

    --

    int main(void){int x=01232;while(malloc(x));return x;}
  24. A demonstration by jdfox · · Score: 2, Funny

    Here's a helpful diagram of the proper finger to use. As you can see, this method of authentication is so simple that anyone can use it.
    Note also that the the remaining fingers serve as ALERT fingers.