Slashdot Mirror


China Going Up and Coming Down

SoCalChris writes "The BBC writes that China has just completed the world's highest railroad, climbing to 16,640 feet (5,072 meters) above sea level. The cars will be sealed to help passengers cope with the pressure changes from the altitude. The line is expected to begin carrying passengers next year." This news comes at the same time that their Chinese taikonauts return from their spaceflight after just 115 hours in orbit.

33 of 400 comments (clear)

  1. Safety? by mfh · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This just seems unsafe to me. Imagine something goes wrong and the train is stuck up at that altitude. Then what?

    I remember riding a train that had colided with a truck a few years back. This wouldn't likely happen at that altitude, but what could happen would be wildlife and environmental blockage.

    It seems like a challenge to me.

    --
    The dangers of knowledge trigger emotional distress in human beings.
    1. Re:Safety? by QuasiEvil · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I would assume that, like other rail systems that operate in harsh climates, there are backup systems. Figure when BC Rail built their all-electric Tumbler Ridge line, they included a small diesel engine in each locomotive in case the overhead power failed so that the crew wouldn't freeze to death (winters in the Tumbler Ridge area are absolutely brutally cold). While the Qinghai-Tibet Rwy isn't electrified, there just have to be backups for such things. In this case, supplemental heat and bottled oxygen would be the two I'd worry about. Based on what I've read, the average elevation of the line is something like 13,000 feet, which is still perfectly breathable, especially to those accustomed to thin air. (I live at about 7,000, and spend weeks during the summer above 10000-11000.) It's only going to be on the high passes that you have issues with air. I'm guessing that it's not built to Western-type standards of redundancy (because, after all, this still is *China*, who was still running mainline steam locomotives until this year), but I'm sure they have something in case of failures. Figure each coach probably has its own systems, so if one fails, you pile everybody into the working coaches. My guess is that they'll probably get away from the Chinese way of one locomotive per train as well - anything running in those nasty conditions, I'd want at least two units in case one died somewhere en route.

      Add yet another railway to my list of lines I have to go photograph at least once in my life...

    2. Re:Safety? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      This just seems unsafe to me. Imagine something goes wrong and the train is stuck up at that altitude. Then what?

      Then what? No different than what they do right now. Drive a jeep. C'mon, 5,000meters is high, it causes altitude sickness, and COULD be fatal, for some people. However, the pressurization of the cars is for COMFORT, not safety. Right now the only way to get up to Tibet is to either fly, or take a jeep/bus combo over the same 5,000meters. And no, those jeeps are not pressurized. The floors are, however, littered like crazy with empty aspirin packages...

      Get real. People live up there. When I read about this train, the oxygen was the least on my mind. The first thing I thought of was how the Tibetans have been fighting this railroad, without much success (a few people have disappeared, a monk was sentenced to death and then later reduced to life in prison after Amnesty International went ape shit) since it's another permanent infrastructure put in place which makes the Chinese occupation of Tibet more and more permanent.

      Free Tibet!

  2. Great by nihilogos · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Well that seals the cultural genocide of the Tibetan people.

    --
    :wq
  3. Mixed feelings by jmorris42 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Ok, goody for them. Having a third player in space is probably a good thing even if they are the communist Chinese since they probably won't remain communist a lot longer. On the other hand it is just another doomed government 'prestige' program that won't actually acomplish much before being abandoned the second the cost exceeds the publicity value and that always happens long before anything longterm good can happen.

    Nope, the only hope of our species getting off this rock is private enterprise.

    --
    Democrat delenda est
    1. Re:Mixed feelings by jmorris42 · · Score: 1, Insightful

      > governments have done many important things that private enterprise would never have done,
      > from major medical research, to the internet, to all spaceflight to date.

      Exactly. The US went to the moon more than thirty five years ago and the net result is so close to zero it gets lost in the rounding error. A couple hundred rolls of film decomposing away in a climate controlled vault and a couple hundred pounds of rocks. Some would even argue it had a net negative effect since after going to the moon puttering about in orbit was widely seen as an anti-climax. But of course low orbit and establishing a permanent presence was what should have been the priority if the goal was a longterm presence instead of a publicity stunt.

      Give it to the Reds, they at least tried to do the right thing goal wise, but still couldn't really do anything worthwhile before their whole evil empire came crashing down around their ears, leaving their rocket geeks to depend on Western handouts and a supporting role in our boondoggles.

      Yes, government operations have done some fairly important ground work, collected useful information on basic biological processes in space and how to survive there, sent some good 'voyages of exploration' out ahead of the colonists to follow. But the government alone in space would be like Columbus making his voyage of discovery and not being followed up by the hundreds of voyages, mostly private ventures, that followed his path.

      But governments aren't the ones who can do the heavy lifting in space, they can't make a profit and at the current tech level there isn't much of a military use for manned spaceflight. So that leaves private industry. As tech progress marches on it will eventually be practical (read profitable) to get into space and it will be the 'evil' capitalists who will get us there, looking to strip mine the moon or an asteroid probably.

      But lets bring this back more on topic and allow me to burn off some excess karma. The significance of todays event is minimal. Perhaps the Chinese will eventually do something that advances the state of the art in spaceflight but today certainly didn't. A modified Soyuz capsule? Ok, they have to learn to walk before they can run but walking isn't exactly newsworthy.

      Oh but is the second Chinese manned flight. Big whoop. Personally I'm a bit tired of these qualified successes in general. First woman to ___, First Black to ___, First Gay Paraplegic to ___. And this is the SECOND Chinese spaceflight, double boring. Russia got the first guy into orbit before most of the engineers who built this clone were probably born, about as much glory in that as crossing the Atlantic sitting First Class in a British Airways jumbojet. History barely remembers #2, let alone a tortise showing up at #3 when #1 would be* tottering off to the nursing home. Most people can't name the second man on the moon, and only the truly hardcore trivia buffs remember #3.

      * Would be, except Yuri Gagarin died an untimely death in 1968. Everybody else is just following in his footsteps.

      --
      Democrat delenda est
  4. How much did it cost? by clockwise_music · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It also comes at the same time that the number of Chinese people living in extreme poverty rose by 800,000 last year.

    1. Re:How much did it cost? by WindBourne · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Lets put that in perspective.

      America

      China

      These are both about a year ago. Which country has done better in the last year?

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    2. Re:How much did it cost? by 2Bits · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Why don't you turn a little bit of your viewing angle, and think maybe, the whole point of building infrastructure is to help less developed areas to catch up, and hence, reduce the poverty level as a whole?

      Why does everything have to be negative? This is not like building a Liberty statute which serves nothing but for display. This is a modern railway to a remote area which is almost cut off from the world. This might be a catalyst for more economic development, along the line of that railway, from Qinghai all the way to Tibet.

      No one seeems to scream bloody when the US built their railway system link the east and the west over 100 years ago, which had an amazing effect on the development of the country, in terms of economic, social, cultural, etc. No one screamed bloody when the US built the national highways and other infrastructures, in the 1930s amid the biggest economic crisis when people were lining up for soup.

    3. Re:How much did it cost? by meringuoid · · Score: 2, Insightful
      It also comes at the same time that the number of Chinese people living in extreme poverty rose by 800,000 last year.

      Put that in proportion for me, though. How much did the number of Chinese people total rise last year?

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
    4. Re:How much did it cost? by CagedBear · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No one seeems to scream bloody when the US built their railway system link the east and the west over 100 years ago

      Noone except the natives who had been inhabiting this region for a few thousand years. And we all know what happened to their way of life.

  5. The Asian Century by JymBrittain · · Score: 5, Insightful

    While we [the /. crowd] bitch and moan about Microsoft and while the great herd worry more about Britney's spawn than credible science, more about the latest American Idol than engineering and while China and India graduate more scientists and engineers than the US...you can expect many, many more reports like this. The 21st century just may be when the Sino-Communist brand of capitalism eclipses lAmerican power and influence.

    1. Re:The Asian Century by nido · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Besides, the world is now joined at the hip when it comes to economic and social prosperity.

      By "joined at the hip" you're refering to, of course, the present condition where the rest of the world manufactures stuff and sells it to Americans.

      Chinese factories produce widgets. Americans buy them. Americans don't produce anything the Chinese can't make themselves for less, so the ships are filled up with raw materials (including, ironically, cardboard for recycling from all the boxes they just sold us), which the Chinese turn into fancy tech gadgets to sell to Americans.

      China takes all the dollars they earn in trade and buy U.S. Treasury bonds. Georgy Boy uses the money China lends him to pay for his stupid "war" (real wars are declared by an act of congress), and all the other pork-barrel programs politicians pass to get re-elected.

      Trade is only a good thing when it's a two way street.

      The future I 'see' leaves America on the sidelines.

      I buy 'american' when I can, but even so, that's more a symbolic gesture than anything else.

      there's more, but not tonight. Subscribe to America's Last Real Newspaper (American Free Press) for the news you won't get anywhere else.

      --
      Learn the rules so you know how to break them properly.
      www.teslabox.com
  6. Must be light-weight trains by Got+Laid,+Can't+Code · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Are they talking about funicular trolleys or actual heavy rail? Because heavy rail generally sees a 4% grade as a maximum due to, well, physics. Since I'm not aware of any fantastic engineering innovations, this must be some sort of light rail--or at least lighter than standard heavy rail.

    --
    Asparagus has many and excellent powers.
  7. Re:Real shame... by nihilogos · · Score: 5, Insightful

    with expanded access to new goods and services, educational opportunities, and contact with the outside world

    All of the above could have been accomplished without destroying a millenium of scholastic and artistic works. Not to speak of the execution and incarceration of its living representatives.

    Real shame that the standard of living in Tibet has risen steadily from the subsistence level ever since the CCP took control, huh?

    For the Chinese immigrants. The native population are treated as second class citizens. Hundreds of thousands died of starvation when collectivism was first introduced, and most survivors suffer from various disabilities caused by malnutrition.

    --
    :wq
  8. You idiot, Matt Drudge is not a reporter by michaeltoe · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The images on Xinhua are meant to demonstrate the capsule landing. They're not pretending to be actual photos. You should know better than to trust headlines with a question mark at the end of them.

  9. Mod Parent Down by michaeltoe · · Score: 5, Insightful
    This guy is just a sucker who reads more into the headlines on DrudgeReport than he does actual articles anywhere else. There are no 'faked pictures', there are merely CG images meant to demonstrate the landing, very similar to how NASA demonstrated the landing of the mars rovers, where no one was there to photograph it.

    This type of thing goes on all the time in western media, and there was no attempt to pass off the images as actual photographs. It's just a misconception put forth by xenophobic conspiracy nuts.

  10. Sad to see all the sheer arrogance at /. by Taco+Cowboy · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Reading comments here saddens me.

    The sheer arrogance emitted from some posts are really not worthy of slashdot, and/or its readers/posters.

    What China has done, - in terms of the Qinhai-Tibet rail-line, or its spacecraft, - is not better, nor worse, than those from other countries.

    Do we see any comments like the

    " Some of the images of the spacecraft look fake"

    and

    "and the ones that don't look fake show damage on the spacecraft"

    and

    "This just seems unsafe to me. Imagine something goes wrong and the train is stuck up at that altitude?"

    and

    "Well that seals the cultural genocide of the Tibetan people"

    and

    "Wow, you are finally almost to the point where the USA's space program was over 40 years ago. That is impressive"

    and

    "It also comes at the same time that the number of Chinese people living in extreme poverty rose by 800,000 last year"

    ad nauseum

    if the spacecraft or railway is from the United States of America or Russia ?

    This development of sheer arrogance, is not checked, might even venture into the territory of racism.

    I'm an /. old-timer, and I'm really sad to see /. goes to the dog because of these type of postings.

    --
    Muchas Gracias, Señor Edward Snowden !
    1. Re:Sad to see all the sheer arrogance at /. by lysergic.acid · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Seriously. Our war on drugs/terror/Iraq has killed far more people than anything China has done recently, and the Bush administration has openly admitted to lying/presenting falsified data to the U.N. and to the public on more than one account to proceed with our own imperialistic foreign policy. Right now, least of all, Americans should not be criticizing other governments when we should be focusing on keeping our own "democracy" on the right track.

      China announces that they've succeeded in putting a man in space, and our first reaction is that they're lying. But when Bush tries to claim a connection between 9/11 or Al Qaida and Saddam Hussein, the only secular ruler in the Arab world--one which Bin Laden had offer to assassinate for the U.S. when we were allied with his militants, we believe it unquestioningly against the face of all logic.

      I think America's arrogance and ethnocentrism has reached an all time high since the 80's with the post 9/11 surge of blind nationalism. It's sad how caught up our society is in all the superficial displays of patriotism that we blindly following our government leaders into war yet relinquish our democratic perogative to think critically about the actions of our government. It's no wonder that a nation so arrogant and self-righteous faces the problem of intellectual stagnation and is quickly losing its competitive edge in academic and intellectual spheres to other cultures.

  11. Re:Real shame... by Angry+Toad · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Real shame that the standard of living in Tibet has risen steadily from the subsistence level ever since the CCP took control, huh?

    If I could trust a totalitarian government to do anything other than lie, maybe so. As it is they may as well be claiming that Tibetans are made of cheese for all the validity it has.

    Anyway the song that "we're doing it all to raise the natives" has been the standard line of the conqueror all through history, and the natives always get the shaft in the end.

  12. Re:I'm not a transportation engineer... by spitzak · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Trucks and busses are only cheaper if there is already a highway going where you want. Highways are not free, even though a lot of Americans seem to think they are a natural feature of the landscape.

  13. way to go slashdot! by minus_273 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I am really starting to hate the China apologists on /. Way to go! you mention the railroad but you dont mention WHERE the railroad was made. If you read up on it you see that it was made to link China to TIBET where the local population is being wiped out by the chinese communists. Of course they are going to invest in somthing that provides more places for an over crowded china to move people to.

    No, I am not a stoned "free tibet hippie", i happen to come from that part of the world.

    --
    The war with islam is a war on the beast
    The war on terror is a war for peace
    1. Re:way to go slashdot! by ZuggZugg · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The original reclamation of Tibet was brutal. But what the Chinese did to the Tibetans is no more brutal than what the "Americans", "Canadians", "Mexicans", "Peruvians", "Bolivians",...etc did to the natives in the Americas. If anything the Tibeting history is more complex and less brutal.

      Humans seem to me to be territorial and prone to violence. I'm not really condoning it, but why else would you explain the sordid history of humanity killing each other over the same piece of dirt over and over again.

      I not sure I would say that I'm as hard on the Chinese communists as you are. I think the Chinese people in power woke up about 20 years ago and realized that communism and a state run economy were not going to work. They are quickly opening up their economy and they are gradually making the political transformation into something less brutal than what it was 40 years ago...will they fully eliminate communism...time will tell. Maybe they'll succeed with a new hybrid style of government where others have failed?

    2. Re:way to go slashdot! by minus_273 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      i like how you move from ethnic cleansing to politics. I will ignore that for now. Consider what happened in the americas was over a hundred years ago in most cases. What is happening in Tibet is right now. Just becasue something happened somewhere else some time back does not make it ok to do now. I find it amazing that there are people around here defnending the systematic destruction of a religion, race and culture.

      --
      The war with islam is a war on the beast
      The war on terror is a war for peace
  14. Space is great. Tibet is Tibet. by Baldrson · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If there is any payoff to the destruction of US industrial might by moving it to China, their greater space activity is it. They are to be congratulated for a positive application of their growth and I hope they put the US to shame for the failure of its pioneer heritage. But the railroad, for all of its engineering prowess, is just another nail in the coffin of Tibetan self-determination. There are things more important than economic development.

  15. Re:Big Week for China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Wow.

    >You've said that it looks like an "aluminium motor home from..."
    Do you know if it works ok for the job it was designed for? How do the looks matter here?

    >It looks like it can barely support its own weight. Granted, gravity is very weak in orbit, blah blah blah, but doesn't this thing get strapped to the top of a rocket?

    Ignorance is bliss. For things you have no clue about, its best to remain silent or do your own research.

    >It's got burn marks all over it
    >And no apparent heat shielding

    You are speculating. You obvisously have heard the word "heat shielding" and thats about what you know about it.
    "Its got burn marks all over it" - must be the funniest sentence
    I've heard.

    I could continue to post all your trash but I guess we aren;t contributing in a meaningful way on this.

  16. Re:Oh Really? by Silicon_Knight · · Score: 3, Insightful

    They look fake because the little caption on top, in Chinese, says "Simulated Rendering".

      The rest of the images, they must have filmed in the same sound stage that faked the Apollo moon landings.

    -=- Terence

  17. Real purpose by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    A friend of mine returned from China and Tibet two years ago and mentioned the train and how many Chinese made no bones about the fact the train would be used to move many Chinese into Tibet to shift the demographics and help dillute/destroy Tibet as an independent culture.

  18. None of the above by bluGill · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The US rail system is well managed, with one exception: Amtrak. The US railroads have realized that freight does not care too much about how fast it is going, sitting still waiting for another train to pass, and not taking the shortest route point to point.

    So the US rails have decided to focus on freight where they hold nearly 2/3rds of all traffic (compare to less than 1/3rd for Europe's rails). That is good management: do what you can do well, and let someone else deal with what you cannot do well. I would argue that Europe's rails are mismanaged, spending all their energy on moving people when it is much easier to move freight.

  19. Re:Real shame... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Anyway the song that "we're doing it all to raise the natives" has been the standard line of the conqueror all through history, and the natives always get the shaft in the end.

    Funny, that's exactly what most USians are saying about the invasion of Iraq.

  20. Re:I'm not a transportation engineer... by Malc · · Score: 3, Insightful

    And there you go, that's the two major parts of the joke that is N. American railways. The trains can't even keep to the schedule, to the point that you're expecting it to take 20% longer. And secondly the trains are so bloody slow. Eugene to LA is between 800 and 900 miles, which at 60 mph would take 15 hours. You're talking about them averaging 30 mph!!! Most modern countries have their intercity trains running at over 100 mph. The London to Edinburgh trains in the UK top out at 140, and the London to Paris even more on the French side. The UK doesn't have the fastest rail networks either. Your journey by rail should be taking well under 10 hours. At least you will get to enjoy the view, which is very nice in that area.

  21. Re:Free Tibet? by emh0 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Which history books have you been reading? For most of recent history (prior to 1950) Tibet was in effect an independent state. It certainly wasn't considered part of China when Britain invaded Tibet in 1903! Britain then gave it to China because all they wanted was a secure trade route through it. The Tibetans then overthrew the Chinese and by 1906 had regained effective independence. China then descended in to civil war and Europe in to WWI and so everybody lost interest in Tibet until China had become communist and invaded in 1949-50.

    Most of China's historical claim to Tibet is based on the fact that from the 1300s Tibet was ruled by Beijing, which is technically true - but it was not ruled by the Chinese! The Mongols (Ghengis Khan, et. al) invaded China, Tibet, Korea and most of the rest of South East Asia and ruled the whole area from Beijing. That hardly gives China a legitamate claim, and it gives them no more of a claim to Tibet than it to Korea.

    Since the invasion in 1950 vast numbers of Chinese people have been moved in whilst similarly vast numbers of Tibetans have died of starvation or fled to India, Nepal and Bhutan. The Chinese government has systematically sought to destroy the Tibetan culture, religion, and identity, to the point where Tibetans are now outnumbered by Chinese in their own land. This railroad will only accellerate that process.

  22. Soiling capitalism is best left to capitalists! by Tungbo · · Score: 2, Insightful


    They've done a fine job too: Bhopal, US tobacco industry, Pinkertons, South Africa, Love Canal...

    It's most ironic that you were researching for a human rights project.
    Do read some Upton Sinclair and Dickens. Without other moderating
    cultural influences, capitalism have run rough shod over human rights for centuries. The benefit of capitalism is economical, not the promotion of a more humane society.
    Historically, corporate interests attempt to use governmental influences to gain benefits for themselves as often as they want to be left alone. Look at trade tariffs, agricultural subsidies, the East India Company (Is that a company or an arm of the government?) !

    There has never been pure lassiz faire capitalism and there probably never will be. If it comes to be, it's not obvious that you would want to live there.