Slashdot Mirror


UK Female Sci-Fi Viewers Now Outnumber Males

mosel-saar-ruwer writes "The UK Telegraph is reporting that, due to the popularity of Buffy, Lara Croft, and Xena, female sci-fi viewers now outnumber males, at 51%-49%. From the article: 'People have an impression of sci-fi fans being small men who sit in the dark watching Star Trek but it's not like that now ... There has been an increase in positive female role models, whereas in Star Trek, all the women were either aliens or wore short skirts.'"

46 of 440 comments (clear)

  1. Short Skirts by Valcoramizer · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ...And they mention Xena?

    --
    We raise our slide-rules high.
    1. Re:Short Skirts by moonbender · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Star Trek isn't just TOS, and neither Xena nor Buffy are sci-fi. That is all.

      --
      Switch back to Slashdot's D1 system.
    2. RE: short skirts by Tezkah · · Score: 5, Funny

      They designed a short skirt for some of the female staff in STNG. They even suggested that in the future, males could wear them too.

      Interesting, is that where Futurama gets Zap Brannigan's short short skirt from?

    3. Re:Short Skirts by donscarletti · · Score: 4, Insightful
      I don't get that star trek short skirt stereotype. Granted, I've only really watched TNG and not that much of it either, but I was under the impression that Dr Crusher wears a lab coat over trousers and Counselor Troi wears the ugliest frilly lycra jumpsuit I have ever encountered. I also sure as hell wouldn't want to picture Captain/Admiral Janeway or that even older Admiral I can't remember the name of in tiny miniskirts.

      But as far as I can tell, women seem to like miniskirts at least as much as I do. Especially those tiny denim ones that have been popular for the last two years and I used to love until I saw my sister in one. Think about the popularity of Alley McBeal with female audiences even when the popularity of miniskirts was at an all time low. It seems to be the consensus of most women I know that they would wear miniskirts regularly if they could know that they were safe from their bodies being criticized by other women. Of cause men know not to tease, since if he were to encourage an overweight woman to not wear miniskirts all her friends might be lead by peer pressure and of cause he has to think about the welfare of guys who have a thing for fat chicks.

      However, there is one thing to consider about short skirts. In all societies that men and women both did/do wear skirts, including the Greeks up until a century ago, the ancient Egyptians and the Roman empire, it is/was always the women who wear the long garments and the men who wear the very, very short ones. This is of cause because of practicality since it was expected that a man be active in his day and a woman (at least a wealthy women) should be largely sedentary. Thus, it is obvious in todays times of neo-feminism where women neither aspire to masculinity (faded cargo pants with curry stains) nor conform to the oppressive mold of ancient times that a women wears something that is notably feminine in form but with a four millennium documented track record of practicality.

      --
      When Argumentum ad Hominem falls short, try Argumentum ad Matrem
    4. Re:Short Skirts by arivanov · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Xena is not female empowerment

      Now this is female empowerment in Sci Fi:

      "And just one more thing. On your way back, I'd like you to take the time to learn the Babylon 5 mantra: 'Ivanova is always right. I will listen to Ivanova. I will not ignore Ivanova's recommendations. Ivanova is God. And, if this ever happens again, Ivanova will personally rip your lungs out! Babylon control out. Civilians." [Looks at ceiling.]

      Xena isn't.

      Disclaimer - I am male. I am judging by what my wife likes and what makes her frown in disgust and change the channel.

      --
      Baker's Law: Misery no longer loves company. Nowadays it insists on it
      http://www.sigsegv.cx/
  2. I'm an overweight man by geoffrobinson · · Score: 5, Funny

    who watches sci-fi in well-lit rooms. So much for stereotypes.

    --
    Except for ending slavery, the Nazis, communism, & securing American independence, war has never solved anything.
    1. Re:I'm an overweight man by Fordiman · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Doesn't this article just basically say that the same percentage of women as men watch Sci-Fi (IE: there are, generallly, 51% women and 49% men in the world, thus a 51/49 split between male / female fans is pretty normal), or, moreover, that it's become genderistically mainstream (no longer strictly a male demographic)

      --
      110100 1101000 1101000 1100110 0 1101111 1101000 1100011 1
  3. First to defend Gene Roddenberry by Valacosa · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "...all the women were either aliens or wore short skirts."

    Star Trek would have been much more progressive if Roddenberry wasn't teathered by NBC.

    --
    "Live as if you'll die tomorrow." Ridiculous. You could die later today.
    1. Re:First to defend Gene Roddenberry by NanoGator · · Score: 3, Interesting

      "Star Trek would have been much more progressive if Roddenberry wasn't teathered by NBC."

      Hehe. I have a book about the artwork done for the various Star Trek series. They designed a short skirt for some of the female staff in STNG. They even suggested that in the future, males could wear them too. There actually is a shot somewhere early in the series with a man wearing one of those skirts. They didn't dwell on it. From reading the book, I got the impression that being gay was something that would be around in the 24th century, but not something anybody particularly cared about. They wanted to indicate that it was there, but not have a big dazzling fireworks show about it. The book was vague enough about it, though, that I don't know that I quite interpreted that correctly. Still, it seems fitting.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    2. Re:First to defend Gene Roddenberry by nmb3000 · · Score: 5, Informative

      There actually is a shot somewhere early in the series with a man wearing one of those skirts.

      You can see it here.

      Yeah, I think I'm glad they dumped those. What's too bad is they never refer to them later in the series. Why not take a jab at themselves for a laugh? For example when Riker makes a comment to Picard about how he hates the dress uniform, Picard could reply that, "at least he didn't have to wear those awful skirts."

      --
      "What do you despise? By this are you truly known." --Princess Irulan, Manual of Muad'Dib
      /)
    3. Re:First to defend Gene Roddenberry by drsquare · · Score: 4, Funny

      I live unfortuanately close to Scotland and I can assure you that skirt-wearing Scots aren't all gay, they're mainly just normal transvestites.

    4. Re:First to defend Gene Roddenberry by hunterx11 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Roddenberry originally wanted half of the crew to be female, but NBC said he couldn't do that because it would make it look like "there's a lot of fooling around going on up there." They said he could do one-third women, which he justified by saying, "Well hell, one-third healthy, young women ought to be enough."

      --
      English is easier said than done.
    5. Re:First to defend Gene Roddenberry by geminidomino · · Score: 4, Funny

      It actually did come up in a TNG episode.

      Worf: Why do we have to wear these ridiculous uniforms?
      Riker: It's a formal reception for Admiral Foobar.
      Worf: [mutter] They look like dresses...
      Riker: That's an incredibly outmoded and sexist thing to say! [beat] Besides, you look good in a dress.
      Worf: [Klingon Stare-o-death]

    6. Re:First to defend Gene Roddenberry by NanoGator · · Score: 5, Funny

      "Which episode was that?"

      It was that episode where the Enterprise entered a strange area of space. Mr. Data generated a theory that correctly explained what it was they were experiencing. Riker used a metaphor to describe the phenomenon so bumpkins like me could understand it. Mr. La Forge set up some strange energy thingy to fire at it, but that didn't work. Worf suggested battle stations, but Picard didn't want to appear aggressive. Wesley knew all along what to do but nobody listened to him. Troi said people were scared. I forget how they got out of it but the effect was pretty neat. The most notable aspect of this episode was that the Holodeck was in perfect working order.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
  4. Xena & skirts by toetagger1 · · Score: 3, Insightful
    "...in Star Trek, all the women were either aliens or wore short skirts."
    And I'm sure Xena is the best example to illustrate how this has changed! Don't get me wrong, I'm not complaining!
    --
    who | grep -i blond | date cd ~; unzip; touch; strip; finger; mount; gasp; yes; uptime; umount; sleep
  5. Sweet by Gumpmaster · · Score: 3, Funny

    There's still a chance for me!!!

    --
    Pod Six was jerks- Capt. Murphy
  6. Hmmmm, United Kingdom they say... by Traegorn · · Score: 5, Funny

    *buys first available plane ticket to England*

    1. Re:Hmmmm, United Kingdom they say... by Mr2cents · · Score: 5, Funny

      Great, now they have to do a recount.

      --
      "It's too bad that stupidity isn't painful." - Anton LaVey
  7. Ahh.. by irc.goatse.cx+troll · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Thats a good way to widen your audience -- Just misclassify things as SciFi.

    Laura Croft is no more SciFi than Indiana Jones -- Its adventure.
    Buffy/Xena is Mytho. No Science involved at all, just adjusted beliefs leading to an alternate reality.

    --
    Pain lasts, kid. Its how you know you're alive. Sometimes I think this growing up thing is just pain management-TheMaxx
    1. Re:Ahh.. by fireboy1919 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Firefly is only barely science fiction

      Yeah...and the pope's only barely Catholic. Microsoft's only a little power hungry.

      They've got a consistent mechanism powering the ships (spinning matter/energy converter things). They've got a complete future history that includes the mixing of all peoples (so that everyone now speaks the two widest used languages- Chinese and English), colonization of another galaxy, and a civil war. Then they deal with the results of this - including the law of supply and demand, and variations in society.

      Heck, they even went so far as to explain (**MINOR SPOILER WARNING***) which part of the brain the people who experimented with River used to do it, and why.

      If this isn't Sci-Fi, then what is? You don't have to explain things using the particle-of-the-week (like Star Trek: TNG) just for it to be Sci-Fi.

      In all seriousness, I think you've hit upon the root of the problem. Its sort of hard to classify Sci-Fi because it means different things to different people.

      I would personally consider Firefly/Serenity to be pure, uncut, and mainstream Sci-Fi. I'd go so far as to say that you could use it as an paragon example when someone asks "What is Sci-Fi?"

      But I guess that's just me.

      --
      Mod me down and I will become more powerful than you can possibly imagine!
    2. Re:Ahh.. by QuantumG · · Score: 4, Insightful

      FireFly is more Sci-Fi than StarTrek as Joss Whedon decided he didn't need to throw out Einstein (there's no faster than light travel) and he didn't need to speculate about aliens (as if it is possible to ever realistically present alien life).

      So when you see Captain Kirk go down to random-planet-X-that-always-looks-like-a-californi a-backlot think about how far we've progressed in Sci-Fi by taking the fantasy out of the show, not putting more in.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    3. Re:Ahh.. by QuantumG · · Score: 5, Interesting

      There's no if. Firefly is set in a solar system which contains no less than 12 planets, each with no less than 2 moons, the gas giants with at least 10 moons. Few of these planets/moons were inhabitable when humans came to the system (perhaps just one) but they brought teraforming equipment with them which gives every planet/moon an atmosphere and gravity as near to Earth-that-was as possible. How'd they get there in the first place? With a multi-generation space ark. All consistent with the current laws of physics.. which the possible exception of artificial gravity, which is a necessary conceit to make a space drama recognisable. There's plenty of references in FireFly to an aversion to transhumanism, suggesting that Earth went through the Singularity and FireFly is the story of the survivors. Yeah, you heard me, survivors, the few people who managed to get away from the hell of utopia. You may think having a superintellegent mind controlling your destiny is fun, but I'll take the unknown of the frontier.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
  8. i need clarification by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    do they outnumber the men in mass or in numbers?

    -Sj53

  9. That's not Sci-Fi by evilviper · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Since when does Buffy, Lara Croft, or Xena count as Sci-Fi? It's "FIction" of course, but I don't see any SCIence in any of them.

    --
    Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    1. Re:That's not Sci-Fi by iapetus · · Score: 4, Funny

      Meh. Any sufficiently advanced magic is indistinguishable from science, so it works out the same anyway...

      --
      ++ Say to Elrond "Hello.".
      Elrond says "No.". Elrond gives you some lunch.
  10. Really? by Doomedsnowball · · Score: 4, Funny

    Are you sure?
    Maybe they just "say" they are women.
    Maybe they really are aliens in short skirts!

    *runs and hides*

    --
    7h3$3 4r3n'7 7h3 Ðr01Ð$ ¥0 4r3 £00|{1n9 f0r. M0v3 4£0n9. --OB1
  11. I'll be glad to see the old stereotypes go. by flyingsquid · · Score: 5, Funny
    It's nice to see that people are finally realizing that all the old sci-fi fan stereotypes aren't really accurate. I, for one, am a mature, emotionally well-developed thirty-four year old male with a life and I-

    -hold on, Mom wants me to clean out my room in the basement. Be right back.

  12. Trek women by Wumpus · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "whereas in Star Trek, all the women were either aliens or wore short skirts."

    Or were starship captains for a full 7 season run. At least give them points for trying, OK?

  13. ahem by xpatiate · · Score: 5, Insightful

    speaking as a female sci-fi fan, I feel the need to point out that women can be aliens *and* wear short skirts *and* be positive role models, all at the same time.

    Linking the increase in women viewers to shows being more 'character-led' might seem like a stereotypical generalisation but it rings true for me. The sci-fi I've always been most into is the kind that uses speculative, imaginary environments to explore big ideas and hopefully arrive at some interesting truths about human personalities... rather than the car-chases-in-outer-space kind.

    --
    (music + neurology) * fiction = feedback
  14. Freedom by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Uhura: black, female before a 1964 audience... a receptionist, sure, but never got anyone coffee.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

  15. Scientists... by ari_j · · Score: 4, Funny

    Studies show that British women watch more sci-fi than British men do. The key reasons the researches found for this were that British men are less entertaining than sci-fi and that British women aren't worth taking out on a Friday night, anyhow.

  16. yet some networks want the stereotypes to stay by thepotoo · · Score: 4, Informative
    Anyone ever heard of Firefly?


    Thought so, thanks to their recent bout of slashvertising.

    Joss (IIRC, maybe it was Tim) said that one of the main reasons that Fox axed Firefly was that (and I paraphrase here) the women were "too strong" and the men were "too weak".

    Just a cool little factoid for y'all. I'd bet that Firefly did at at least a little bit to help bring in female viewers (the women I've showed it to think that most of the men are pretty good looking). Haven't watched much Sci-fi apart from that and BSG, but I can safely say that my sister watches BSG solely because she likes Lee Adama.

    --
    Obligatory Soundbite Catchphrase
    1. Re:yet some networks want the stereotypes to stay by EnronHaliburton2004 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Joss (IIRC, maybe it was Tim) said that one of the main reasons that Fox axed Firefly was that (and I paraphrase here) the women were "too strong" and the men were "too weak".

      You would think Fox would appreciate that Firefly had one of the sexiest casts in any SciFi/Fantasy show-- the women were hot, and being strong made them even hotter. Kaylee, anyone? She's even cuter carrying around those tools. The men were hot (Even according to my feminist woman friends), and darnit, Mal and the Doc had a sensitive side, which made them even HOTTER. It was even (*gasp*) a couples show!

      And gosh, and I even liked the plots and the story of the human diaspora.

  17. I'm not surprised by Dark+Paladin · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The last (and so far, first time) I went to Comic-Con was this summer of 2005, and I was surprised by how many women were there. And not just the classical "geek girl" (bad haircut, bad acne, overweight, etc, etc, etc), but how many smart, excited, interesting, and - to display an unfortunate level of sexism perhaps - cute geek girls there were running booths, going to events, buying things, and the like. There were whole sections that seemed to be made just for women. Not in a "ooo - pink!" kind of way or trashy romance, but stories that appeal to more than guys looking for giant breasts, but stories about relationships, or the infamous yaoi booths.

    But girl geekhood is not just regulated to "romance". One lady I went with drooled with me over the Terminator 2 arm replica, and this was a woman that most slashdotters would not pick out as the "geek" of a group of similiar attractive women.

    Personally, I think it's a great thing. Not just because it increases the chances of future geeks to breed and multiply, but it gives an extra dimension to geek hood. Sure, Star Trek was good, but once the sexes became more equal and women could wear more than short skirts, it got better. I've never liked my heroines with just big giggly breasts and chain mail bikinis. With more geek girls, we still have the stereotypes, but I've been seeing deeper and more interesting stories in my geek world. I wonder how well "Serenity" and "Buffy" would have been if Mr. Whedon hadn't tapped into both the male and female side of geekhood. It's been easier to show my wife good geek stuff (like "Battlestar Gallactica") as it looks to include the sexes instead of pretend one doesn't exist.

    So, welcome to our new female geek overlords! While I love my wife dearly, I do wish you ladies had been in greater numbers a decade ago - but at least now I have hope for my two boys, and most importantly, my lovely little geek daughter - because now she can play in my world too.

  18. Immigration to UK Website ... by cpu_fusion · · Score: 5, Funny

    Immigration to UK website soon to be slashdotted.

  19. Its True! by wizzdude · · Score: 4, Informative

    I recently started uni and from what I have seen here, girls are far more into sci-fi and fantasy than boys. I've even got two girls who regularly come to watch SG1 with me and another who is lending me her Firefly boxset in exchange for my BSG.

    Good ol' blighty.

    --
    Mod me down now and I will become more powerful than you can possibly imagine
  20. socially challenged geeks = early adopters by spoogle · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Sometimes nasty things come up out of your past and bite you. Those embarassing messages you posted 15 years ago to alt.sex.bdsm, for example. Or the terrible songs you used to listen to 15 years ago while posting to alt.sex.bdsm, for some reason put onto your ipod, and which pop up in random shuffle only when you are having really hoopy froods to tea.

    There is an awful song by Kate Bush (lyrics here) about socially challenged geeks spending late nights with their computers. Now, of course, everybody spends late nights with their computers, logged on to chat rooms and sending email.

    Likewise, the socially challenged geeks used to be the only ones who watched scifi. And now everyone does.

    What next...?

    --
    Prolog rules
  21. Re:Except by fyngyrz · · Score: 4, Informative
    Star Trek is actual science fiction.

    Technically, Star Trek was fantasy. This is because the plot line contains multiple elements of plot-critical fantasy, on purpose — viewers spent years pointing out that the Enterprise would not "whoosh" as it went by a viewpoint in space, that there is no science behind warp drive, that there are no nerve pathways in the neck that would allow Spock to drop humans (not to mention aliens) right and left, and so on.

    Frankly, I can think of very few honest SF efforts on either video or film. It seems that as soon as Hollywood gets involved, the whole concept of SF flies right out the window. On fairy wings, no less.

    It's that whole science thing. Of course, this is a nation that apparently wants to put "Intelligent Design" into our schools and is led by an extremely superstitious man, so the surprise level is pretty low here. As a nation, we're not very aware of what science is, much less being able to discern what extrapolation from current science might be reasonably considered legitimate.

    --
    I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
  22. I can't believe... by PFritz21 · · Score: 5, Informative

    ...that anyone hasn't mentioned http://www.sg1archive.com/bios/at.shtmlUSAF Lt. Col. Samantha Carter, Ph. D.

  23. This Just In: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    UK lesbians now outnumber male geeks.

    1. Re:This Just In: by AhBeeDoi · · Score: 4, Funny

      Neither of whom can get laid.

  24. SciFi? Not really. Maybe speculative fiction... by ericr · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Uh, Buffy isn't scifi. At best it's fantasy. Xena? Same thing, although I suppose you could call Xena something like "historical dramatic fiction", if you really want to stretch the definition. Lara Croft? Fantasy. See, the problem with too many writers, networks, producers, et al, is that they don't understand the if you want to call something scifi, it needs have some SCIENCE in it. Even 2001 went from scifi to fantasy about halfway through.

    Sure, I'm being pedantic and purist. But it does keep Harlan Ellison from trying to kill me...

    --
    It was Judge Woodlock, in the US District Court for Massachusetts, with a gavel.
  25. Depends on the classification by fm6 · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Buffy and Xena do borrow from mythology, but neither is true to established mythology. Most of the monsters on Buffy were invented for the show, and Xena considers mythological characters (and also historical characters, such as Julius Caesar) to be outlines they can impose their own stories on, without being at all faithful to the originals. (Note that Xena is on a first-name basis with both Julius Caesar and Helen of Troy. Helen was probably not a real person, but the Siege of Troy did happen — at least a thousand years before Caesar was born.) Both Buffy and Xena are more fantasy than mythology.

    Lara Croft and Indiana Jones also rate as fantasy, since their backstories have only token connections to the real world.

    Now, here's the thing: most people don't distinguish between fantasy and science fiction. It may be obvious to you and me that, say, Buffy and Star Trek are different genres. That's because we see vampires as purely imaginary, and interstellar travel as something that could happen someday. But to most people, one is not "more real" than the other, either because they're very credulous about vampires, or they're very skeptical about starships.

    The problem here is that most people who read or watch (or even write) fantasy and SF just don't give a shit about what's scientifically possible and what's not. They just want to escape from reality for a while. Vampires and spaceships, magic and time travel — it's all the same to them. And to someone like that, any precise definition of what's SF and what's not is boring, dweebish nitpicking.

  26. Another measure of equality? by Safe+Sex+Goddess · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Wow, who would have thought having strong women roles would make women more interested in those shows?

    We still have a long way to go to reach equality. I know some of you may disagree...but I've recently decided that a purely scientific measure of gender equality can be attained through clothing. Now if only some social scientist would work out the scale and do the research. Following is an example of what I mean.

    What is your reaction to seeing a man in clothing traditionally reserved for women, such as a skirt? If it illicits no different a reaction, apart from sexual attraction, than seeing a woman in pants then that's when you'll know you have achieved true equality.

    When women are viewed as having equal power with men, then women's clothing will carry the same status as men's clothing for any gender.

    --
    Abstinence is a government conspiracy. www.SafeSexZone.co
  27. Blasphemy! by RyoShin · · Score: 4, Funny

    Are you implying that there's something wrong with short skirts?

  28. these are role models? by dlasley · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Buffy?
    Xena?
    Lara Croft?
    Ok, I'll grant a weak maybe on Lara Croft, but the first two as role models, nope sorry. Plus, as many have pointed out, none of the three are really scifi!

    How about these instead:
    Samantha Carter
    Aeryn Sun
    (I will grant that Claudia Black did guest on Xena once, but her integral role in Farscape should far and away excuse that transgression)

    What we really need are more good role models in every genre, not just scifi, but that will get me on an offtopic rant ...

    John Crichton: That's my underwear!
    Aeryn Sun: What does this say?
    John Crichton: Calvin.
    Aeryn Sun: Well, they're not yours ...
    --
    when it rains, it gets real soggy. when it pours, i'm under the tap just _waiting_ for the joy