Slashdot Mirror


Columnist Turned Accidental Baseball Blogger

Carl Bialik from the WSJ writes "Wall Street Journal Online tech columnist Jason Fry started playing around with a New York Mets blog almost a year ago. In today's Real Time column, he outs himself as one of the writers behind Faith & Fear in Flushing, and writes about the stress of blogging: "The downside of being a blog writer? Being a blog administrator. I also wasn't prepared for how much work blogging was. Baseball already took up three hours a night; now it took up four -- at least. Blogging about a thrilling extra-inning win was easy; blogging about a dull-as-dishwater loss wasn't. And with more and more people reading us and commenting about our posts, blogging sometimes became a duty; we wrote at least one new entry for 190 straight days, including ones when one or both of us was tired, on vacation or not particularly inspired."" Heh. Boy, does this refrain ever sound familiar.

21 of 102 comments (clear)

  1. The solution to every IT problem: by Control+Group · · Score: 3, Funny

    Outsource!

    I'm sure there are people in India happy to blog for $1.73/hr.

    --

    Reality has a conservative bias: it conserves mass, energy, momentum...
    1. Re:The solution to every IT problem: by Lev13than · · Score: 4, Funny

      Outsource! I'm sure there are people in India happy to blog for $1.73/hr.

      They tried doing that a few months ago, but readers caught on when the blogs kept referring to "innings" as "overs", "batters" as "batsmen" and "DHs" as "LBWs".

      --
      When you have nothing left to burn you must set yourself on fire
    2. Re:The solution to every IT problem: by th3space · · Score: 2, Funny

      What is that, soccer? Haha! I'm kidding, it's clearly curling.

      --
      "How like you to drag your keyboard to a gun fight." - Aaron Bedard (BANE)
  2. Blogging too much work? by plastid · · Score: 5, Funny

    Do what the slashdot editors do -- just use the same posts over and over with slightly different headlines.

  3. Sucks, doesn't it? by garcia · · Score: 4, Informative

    No one realizes just how much work goes into any "hobby project website" until they start doing it themselves. Recently, I was elected into one position in a hobby association, dumped into the "webmaster" position, and also administer the forum software. Man, was it easy to be on the other side of the table when all I had to do was read what others posted. I had no idea how much work content, coding, and administrating is/was.

    Then you have to deal w/the users of your website. Drama, questions, problems, bugs, whatever. Ugh.

    I'm already burned out from that one particular project and I have my own website, other websites, and real life I have to deal with. I have gotten to the point where at least three days a week are "offline time". I sit down with a book and headphones or do something w/the wife or whatever.

    I have talked about making your hobby your job and the problems that causes. Looks like other people are learning about it too.

    1. Re:Sucks, doesn't it? by stevey · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I've found that running my site on Debian Administration a fair amount of work.

      Choosing the base software was fairly simple, but since then I find I'm making tweaks to the code on an almost daily basis. Sometimes these are just minor things, othertimes I have to make a lot of changes for different reasons.

      (Of course switching to a CSS layout to be all cool like /. doesn't help that ;)

      Even if you allow users to submit content, as I do, there's still a lot of writing I've had to do. With a couple of thousand registered users and a lot more anonymous repeat visitors I still find that only around 1% of users will ever contribute anything.

      Most people seem more interested in reading than supplying content - and I find it unlikely this will ever change significantly.

      In terms of income I get virtually nothing, personally, the Google Adsense subsidises the site's hosting costs - but doesn't cover it 100%. Still it is a hobby, and it is a useful site for a particular audience so I'll keep it going as long as I can..

  4. Why the responsibility? by Pedrito · · Score: 4, Insightful

    And with more and more people reading us and commenting about our posts, blogging sometimes became a duty;

    Only in your own friggin' heads.

    I have a blog that's fairly popular (not the link here and I'm not posting it). Sometimes, if I go a while without posting, I get comments, some quite nasty, asking why (or just complaining that) I haven't posted recently.

    My thought is, "Pay my rent and then we can talk about my responsibility to write this damn thing." I write when I'm in the mood and I don't write when I'm not in the mood. If people can't deal with that for free, then they can go find another blog.

    Any responsibility these guys feel to doing this daily is of their own making. If they're not getting paid for doing it when they don't want to do it, then they're morons. If they ARE getting paid, then they need to stop whining.

    1. Re:Why the responsibility? by fistfullast33l · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I totally agree with you, but for some reason I always get twangs of guilt for committing to do something and not being able to do it. I also think that most people get to the point where they don't want to blog anymore and the blog dies out. My brother's and girlfriend's blogs both suffered from this. I think that it doesn't even matter who reads it, nine times out of ten it's more of how much effort you want to put into it. Most blogs are created out of the user's ideas of, hey, that might be nice to do. Once you get into it, however, you can see how much effort it takes to maintain these things and that usually kills the "nice idea" thoughts in your head. Of course, the Slashdot editors are excellent examples of how to keep a blog going by getting paid for your efforts. I think the dedication level only comes from monetary rewards or something like PJ's from Groklaw where you're carrying a cause on your shoulders. The blogs where people just comment on daily life are a dime a dozen and tend to disappear very freqently.

    2. Re:Why the responsibility? by ErikZ · · Score: 2, Interesting


      Yeah, but my hobby site was more relaxing/fun when it *didn't* pay the rent.

      Now it's bringing in enough money to do that, and I feel obligated to clean up the bugs, be vigilant about spam, redesign the site to something modern, getting upset when artists don't deliver...

      Now it's work.

      --
      Democrats or Republicans. They are both taking us to the same place and they are not afraid of us anymore.
  5. These are the days of "proffesional blogging" by TimeSpeak · · Score: 2, Insightful

    wrote at least one new entry for 190 straight days, including ones when one or both of us was tired, on vacation or not particularly inspired.

    *whiners*
    I guess this goes to show people will read anything reguardless of the quality of content. Hell, your reading this.....

    --
    Am no fek Buddhist, but this is enlightenment.
  6. Put it in perspective by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Blogging is hard? Compared to what? Watching TV? Digging ditches, cleaning septic tanks, plumbing, and about a million other jobs are much harder than merely posting trivial and useless opinions on fluff topics.

    Get real.

  7. You don't HAVE to constantly update... by mozumder · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Just write when you feel like you should. Write only when it means something to you. Don't try to write for the sake of an audience. If you get bored with it, do something else. Or write about different things. Baseball audience doesn't want to hear about your views on music or politics or curling? Well too bad for them!

  8. Yep, it's hard. by frostman · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Keeping that stream of blog posts coming is a lot harder than most people think before they actually try it.

    In that, blogging is no different than any other kind of content creation. Especially non-profit content creation.

    What makes the difficulty surprising, I think, is how many people don't seem to have it. You look around in blogville and see all these people posting at least once a day, and a lot of them have large readerships. But if you look closely you find that a lot of these folks are doing one or more of:

    1. Obsessively blogging about the (boring) details of their lives.
    2. Compensating for a lack of other other social or creative outlets.
    3. Expressing a natural graphomania (lawyer blogs anyone?).
    4. Actually making money (or even a living) with their blogs.

    If none of those apply to you, that leaves the not-so-simple task of regularly trying to write something interesting and suitable for at least amateur publication. Anyone who ever made a zine or a comic will tell you it's a very hard habit to get into. But with blogging, you have the hyper-productive blogs in front of you, and the blog companies telling you how easy it is, and you dive in expecting it to be cake.

    And then there's the whole templates-and-hacking issue, at least if you don't want the blog to be ugly. Yep, lotsa work.

    --

    This Like That - fun with words!

  9. Prepare some ahead of time by G4from128k · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Professional columnists and cartoonists sometimes prepare a few submissions ahead of time. Thought-pieces, retrospectives, discussion of long-term trends, etc. don't depend as much on timely, up-to-the-minute news. If nothing timely inspires an entry or exhaustion strikes, then post one from inventory.

    --
    Two wrongs don't make a right, but three lefts do.
  10. If it becomes work by duncan · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Then get paid for it.

    If you want to blog for the fun of it, don't take it so seriously. If you miss a day that's just too bad. If you regret missing a day, that's fine.

    If I'm on vacation and miss blogging for a few days to a week or two, too bad. And if people complain, let them pay me to do it daily.

  11. Re:I'm not quite dead yet. by Kelson · · Score: 3, Funny

    About the same time they recognize the death of Apple -- uh, I mean BSD -- wait, the web -- OK, how about e-mail -- oh, nevermind.

  12. Re:#1 USA! For Great Baseball! by EmperorKagato · · Score: 4, Informative

    "why do you call it football when there is no goddamn kicking in the game?"

    You kick the ball when making a punt , attempting a field goal, starting the game or half by kicking off to the receiving team and after a touch down you kick the ball to score an extra point.

    For more information about the game please visit http://www.wikipedia.org/ or visit this link.

    --
    ----- You know you have ego issues when you register a domain in your name.
  13. Insightful? by Kelson · · Score: 2, Interesting

    posting trivial and useless opinions on fluff topics

    Like dismissing an entire medium* on Slashdot? That takes a lot of work, doesn't it?

    Sure, those jobs are a lot more physically difficult (with the exception of watching TV). But anyone who spends time programming, writing websites -- heck, just writing -- should recognize that mental work takes effort too. And yes, there are a lot of "fluff" blogs -- probably the majority, though that just reflects Sturgeon's Law.

    Posting fluff is easy. Keeping a schedule, or trying to write something more than "OMG my team won/lost/tied!" takes time and effort, no matter what the topic.

    *IMO, "blogs" are simply a subset of the web, and the label has more to do with the structure and management tools than the actual content. So I don't consider blogs to be any more or less important than the rest of the web.

  14. Re:#1 USA! For Great Baseball! by mph · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Where else holds a World Series for a game only played in one country?
    I'll have to double check my map, but I'm pretty sure that Canada isn't yet a part of the United States.

    (And, of course, baseball is played in many other countries, even if the MLB doesn't have teams in them.)

  15. Familiar? Apples, meet Oranges by dmccarty · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Hemos wrote:
    "we wrote at least one new entry for 190 straight days, including ones when one or both of us was tired, on vacation or not particularly inspired."
    Heh. Boy, does this refrain ever sound familiar.

    Oh yeah, sure. With the exception of Taco's diatribe against Blizzard last week, how much content do Slashdot editors* write in a week? Maybe 50 words?

    * for all values of editors = submission moderators

    --
    Have fun: Join D.N.A. (National Dyslexics Association)
  16. Re:#1 USA! For Great Baseball! by Red+Flayer · · Score: 2

    "Where else holds a World Series for a game only played in one country?"

    Your point is valid (I think it's your point)... don't call it a World Series if only American and Canadian teams get to compete.

    But, then again, don't call it a World's Fair if it's only held in one city/country.

    And, of course, baseball isn't played in Japan, in Korea, in the Dominican Republic, in Venezuela, in Cuba, etc.

    The fact of the matter is that "World Series" is a legacy name, that was created when baseball was really only played in North America... as such, it really was a world series. I think they should open it up to other leagues now, or stop calling it the WS.

    --
    "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai