Slashdot Mirror


5 Years of Habitation on the ISS

An anonymous reader writes "The International Space Station has marked five years of continuous human habitation. People started living on the station on November 2, 2000. In five years, the station has hosted 97 people from 10 countries, including 3 commercial passengers. It survived through the Columbia accident and the suspension of shuttle flights. The station is a testbed for long-duration missions to live and work on the Moon and Mars."

12 of 170 comments (clear)

  1. Five Years and no sex by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Slashdot and a space station are almost indistinguishable.

    1. Re:Five Years and no sex by allym · · Score: 5, Funny

      My work arranges visitors from NASA to give talks to schools in Scotland. One night they were chatting to some Glaswegian 'ladies' in a nightclub.

      One of them was asked what he did for a living. The response "Actually, I'm an astronaut" elicited the response "Get tae fuck!" and the ladies stormed off.

  2. Could someone please post accomplishments? by PIPBoy3000 · · Score: 5, Informative

    I'm trying hard to find a solid list of scientific accomplishments for the mission. So far, I'm finding a handful of research articles on microgravity-related changes in human physiology. Hopefully there's more.

    I hope the major accomplishment of the ISS isn't just keeping it in orbit.

  3. Re:Why? by ilyaaohell · · Score: 4, Funny

    Did you just buy a DVD box set of SeaQuest DSV?

    --
    UNIX: A computer user is defined as a programmer. WINDOWS: A computer user is defined as a consumer.
  4. Re:lossage by deathcloset · · Score: 4, Funny

    yes, that money should go to the homeless!

    Well, that or they should put the homeless in the space station at least. I mean, with all this research how has nobody thought of testing the effects of zero g on the homeless?

  5. Re:erm.. by Red+Flayer · · Score: 4, Informative

    "You don't generally notice space stations disappearing when a shuttle explodes."

    Of course not, you're too busy watching the shuttle explode!

    Seriously, though, the US shuttle program & the Russian Soyuz program was the only way to service the ISS at the time of the Columbia crash... so grounding the shuttle program presented a real threat to the continuance of human occupation of the ISS, especially considering Russia's fiscal problems at the time.

    So, yes, it is worth mentioning that inhabitance of the ISS continued during the fallout (no pun intended) of the Columbia crash.

    --
    "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
  6. Re:Seems like only yesterday they started wasting by madshot · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Come on now... do you use any Teflon products? Have you ever used a solar powered calculator?

    Yes, I agree, NASA does cost a lot of money, however I disagree that it's a waste of my money.

    Why would someone build an entire city under sea level knowing full well the ocean might someday come in and destroy it? Ask the residents of New Oreleans.. Any my tax dollars are going to help clean that up.. b.s.

    Why would someone continue to give money to the homeless for years and years and the homeless situation not improve? I'm sorry, but if you're still homeless after 2 years of us trying to help you then you should be deported to Canada. Let them deal with your sorry butt instead of my tax dollars.

    Why should you keep a person on death row for 30 years before putting them to death? I'm sorry, but their needs to be a time limit on that. Again, why waste my tax dollars.

    At leased we have something to show for the space program unless the thousands of other programs that are just draining our system.

    Yes, I know.. I'm gonna get bad Karma for this.. Not all people are equal, not all choices are correct, we need to help our fellow man(woman), we need to balance the budget. Remember, the USA wasn't built on political correctness, it was built on us kicking out the brits.

    --
    Obama = Socialism.
  7. Re:Why? by dr_dank · · Score: 4, Funny

    Let's fix the oceans and live in them, that's more feasible than the moon and mars.

    Yep, a coat a paint and a new rug and that ocean is in move-in condition!

    --
    Where does the school board find them and why do they keep sending them to ME?
  8. Re:erm.. by mcc · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Actually it would be reasonable to expect the complete suspension of a major nation's space program to have negative effects on a space station. Skylab, for example, can be directly seen as a casualty of the suspension of America's space program which resulted from the transition to the Space Shuttle. Space stations need active upkeep and visits from crew if they're going to remain in orbit at all. In a hypothetical universe where Russia and America weren't allies in this decade, when the Columbia accident occurred it would have been a serious problem for the space station-- because in the absence of space shuttle flights post-Columbia the flights run by the Russian space program were necessary to keep the thing inhabited.

  9. Space Research has done much.... by hcob$ · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Think of all the "space-age" technology you have today. Your cell phone, compact radios, great insulation, etc etc. All that was developed from technologies made for the original moon-shot. Expecting benefits from pure research and development in 5 years is insane. Although the station does suck allot of money, it will pay off in the future in new synthesis technologies, habitat sustainability, launch, and commumication technologies.

    --
    Cliff Claven
    K.E.G. Party Chairman
    Founding Leader of: Koncerned for Egalitarin Governance
    1. Re:Space Research has done much.... by Bogtha · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Think of all the "space-age" technology you have today. Your cell phone, compact radios, great insulation, etc etc. All that was developed from technologies made for the original moon-shot.

      And think of how much more advanced it would all be if we'd poured the funding for space exploration into those technologies directly instead of waiting for spin-offs.

      The spin-off argument is a non-starter. If you want fancy mobile phones, throw the research money into mobile phones. If you want better insulation, throw the research money into insulation. If you want to justify space research, then justify it based on how well it accomplishes its intended goals, not on the tech you might be able to scavenge from it for other purposes.

      --
      Bogtha Bogtha Bogtha
  10. 5 years of Ham Radio on the ISS by leighklotz · · Score: 4, Informative
    The ARRL reports:
    ...Five years ago this week, the International Space Station Expedition 1 crew of US astronaut and Expedition 1 Commander William ''Shep'' Shepherd, KD5GSL, and Russian cosmonauts Yuri Gidzenko and Sergei Krikalev, U5MIR, became the first humans to live aboard the ISS.

    The initial Amateur Radio on the International Space Station (ARISS) station gear was already aboard the space station by the time the first crew launched. Later in the month, the Expedition 1 team installed and activated the VHF gear on FM voice and packet under the US call sign NA1SS and the Russian call sign RS0ISS.

    Each of the 12 crews that have lived on the ISS to conduct assembly and research activities has included at least one US radio amateur. The Expedition 12 crew Commander Bill McArthur, KC5ACR, and Russian cosmonaut Valery Tokarev will remain on the ISS until next April. Over the years, crew members have conducted nearly 200 ARISS school group contacts and numerous casual QSOs.