Slashdot Mirror


Vint Cerf and Robert Kahn Awarded Medal of Freedom

3l1za writes ""President Bush on Thursday announced the recipients of this year's Presidential Medal of Freedom, the nation's highest civil award." Vinton Cerf and Robert Kahn -- for their design of "the software code used to transmit data over the Internet" -- are among those to be honored next Wednesday. "

149 comments

  1. The history of the award, and the need. by dada21 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This is newsworthy? This is the same President who gave George J. Tenet the Medal of Freedom.

    This is generally cronyism at its worst, and media attention getting at its finest. There is no Constitutional mandate or power. President Harry Truman enacted the medal in 1945 and it was virtually ignored until JFK brought it back -- through an Executive Order in 1963.

    That same Executive Order also expanded the size of unconstitutional government by extending the "Distinguished Civilian Service Awards" board -- yet another cronyist bunch given very nice salaries* by the President.

    I know the political spectrum is well covered here, but does anyone honestly believe a government that is trillions in debt needs a board to give out awards? Disregard any constitutional grounds and focus on the need of the governed. Can't an independent not-for-profit group do the same? BTW, Clinton also gave the award to some ridiculous recipients, so I'm not Bush bashing. This is just a waste of your money.

    *There's almost no oversight or budget restrictions on what the board can be paid: Expenses. Necessary administrative expenses of the Board incurred in connection with the recommendation of persons to receive the Presidential Medal of Freedom, including expenses of travel of members of the Board appointed under Section 3 (a) of this Order, during the fiscal year 1963, may be paid from the appropriation provided under the heading 'Special Projects' in the Executive Office Appropriation Act, 1963, 76 Stat. 315, and during subsequent fiscal years, to the extent permitted by law, from any corresponding or like appropriation made available for such fiscal years. Such payments shall be without regard to the provisions of section 3681 of the Revised Statutes and section 9 of the Act of March 4, 1909, 35 Stat. 1027 (31 U.S.C. 672 and 673).

    1. Re:The history of the award, and the need. by Zevon+2000 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You make some good points, but I'm not sure that the idea of the government recognizing public service itself is bad. What's bad is the cronyism, the recognition of questionably deserving recipients (Jack Nicklaus? Is playing golf well and being paid millions for it really constitute distinguished service?), and maybe even a board whose compensation isn't given proper oversight. Although I don't know about that last bit for sure.

      What this feels like to me is a mix between Knighthood, the Hollywood Walk of Fame, and political party in the White House any given year sucking each other's lollipops. What would be legitimately cool would be an American Knighthood bestowed only on 1-2 deserving people a year. Keep the bar raised high, have to nominating committee serve for a small stipend and the prestige of serving on such a committee, and give us something we can be proud of. As is, it's just another bit of propaganda to mock, and I think we're all get sick of that (both the propaganda and the mocking).

      And of course the real shame is when deserving recipients like Vint Cert and Robert Kahn are overlooked on /. because the merits of the award itself are so questionable. The world needs more Nobel Prizes, and fewer Walk of Fames.

      --
      "Someone somewhere had to wear pants for the first time. The meek and indecisive do not change our world." -Montville
    2. Re:The history of the award, and the need. by x8 · · Score: 2, Informative

      It looks like you missed copying the last sentence of the paragraph you copied from the executive order, which reads:

      "Members of the Board appointed under Section 3(a) of this Order shall serve without compensation."

      Or was this sentence intentionally left out because it contradicts your claim that the board is "yet another cronyist bunch given very nice salaries" ?

    3. Re:The history of the award, and the need. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "but I'm not sure that the idea of the government recognizing public service itself is bad."

      Then why not award it next year at the normal July 4th? He's using the award to play politics rather than on merit.

      I wonder if Vint had chosen not to back Bush and hadn't convinced Google to go along, whether he would be getting the award.

    4. Re:The history of the award, and the need. by slavemowgli · · Score: 1

      Very well said.

      For that matter, if they really wanted to honour someone who's responsible for the Internet as we know it today, then Tim Berners-Lee would also have deserved one. But of course, Tim's a European, and we can't give awards to those pesky foreigners, now can we?

      --
      quidquid latine dictum sit altum videtur.
    5. Re:The history of the award, and the need. by fm6 · · Score: 3, Insightful
      This is generally cronyism at its worst, and media attention getting at its finest. There is no Constitutional mandate or power. President Harry Truman enacted [medaloffreedom.com] the medal in 1945 and it was virtually ignored until JFK brought it back -- through an Executive Order [wikipedia.org] in 1963.
      Dude, get a life. Cronyism is handing out jobs to underqualified friends. Dubya has certainly done his share of that, but it's not the same thing as handing out commerative tchatchkas to people he deems important.

      BTW, there was only one president (Eisenhower) between Truman and Kennedy. So every prexy since Truman, with a single exception has done this.

    6. Re:The history of the award, and the need. by flosofl · · Score: 1

      For that matter, if they really wanted to honour someone who's responsible for the Internet as we know it today, then Tim Berners-Lee would also have deserved one.

      WWW != Internet

      You do realize that Sir Tim built WWW on top of the bedrock that Cerf and others created?

      But of course, Tim's a European, and we can't give awards to those pesky foreigners, now can we?

      Well, considering it's the US Medal of Freedom, I'd say the list of foreigners that have one is pretty small. I know two popes have received one. It's probably as common as an US citizen being knighted in England.

      Keep trying, you've almost got that "anything US does is bad" knee-jerk down pat.

      --
      "This calls for a very special blend of psychology and extreme violence" - Vyvyan "The Young Ones"
    7. Re:The history of the award, and the need. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I once received a Businessman of the Year award from some republican committee or other. I said "Hey this is great!" until I saw that the award ceremony cost $10K and a trip to Washington. Wonder if these people got caught some scheme like this.

  2. allow me to get this joke out of the way first... by schnits0r · · Score: 4, Funny

    KHAAAAAAAN.....yea someone was gonna say it, it may as well be me.

  3. MM Ok by davro · · Score: 5, Informative

    Quote
    "The medal was established by President Truman in 1945 to recognize notable service in the war.
    In 1963, President John F. Kennedy reintroduced it as an honor for distinguished civilian service in peacetime. "

    And this is considered peacetime ?

    1. Re:MM Ok by djward · · Score: 1

      The development for which they are receiving the award occurred during peacetime.

    2. Re:MM Ok by Surt · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure it is peace time. If you check the records, I'm pretty sure you'll find we have no unresolved declarations of war.

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    3. Re:MM Ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      North Korea comes to mind, but that's pretty much ignored nowadays.

      Then there is "major combat operations in Iraq have ended" Iraq, which is a war, albiet probably not the original one.

      Then there is that whole war on terror thing. Osama bin Forgotten...

      Then there are the incursions into Iran and Syria that are going largely unreported. They are more like skermishes rather than a full war though.

      Am I missing anything?

    4. Re:MM Ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Am I missing anything?

      Yeah.. um... you know.. an actual war?

    5. Re:MM Ok by m50d · · Score: 1
      America is not at war with Iraq. America has never been at war with Iraq. Report to your nearest re-education centre immediately!

      (The US can't go to war without (IIRC it's congressional) approval, something the war against Iraq didn't have, hence the doublespeak used when discussing it.

      --
      I am trolling
    6. Re:MM Ok by SharpFang · · Score: 0, Troll

      Yes. Muslim Extremists declaring holy war on the USA.
      The fact you don't have any of -your- unresolved declarations of war doesn't mean there's no war.

      --
      45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
    7. Re:MM Ok by BushCheney08 · · Score: 1

      IIRC, the War Powers Resolution of 1973 gave the President the ability to use military force for 60 days before the situation needed to be revisited by Congress to decide if a formal declaration of war was needed. You may want to note that Bush's infamous "mission accomplished" speech took place about 40 days after the invasion began, thus negating the need for Congress to revisit the situation. Since then it has been an "occupation."

      --
      Be a real patriot: Question authority. Think for yourself. Formulate your own conclusions.
    8. Re:MM Ok by EiZei · · Score: 1

      Police action anyone?

    9. Re:MM Ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Herm. lemee see...
      1. Airstrikes...check
        a) aerial bombs...check
            -bombing campaigns
            -surgical strikes
        b) napalm...check
            -MK77
      2. Ground battles...check
        a) small arms fire...check
        b) machine gun fire...check
        c) mortar fire...check
        d) landmines...check
        e) armored units...check
        f) anti-armor weapons in use...check
            -tow missiles
            -depleted uranium projectiles
      3. Black ops...check
        a) boobie traps...check
            -IEDs
        b) snipers...check
        c) false flag ops...check
        d) propaganda campaigns...check
        e) torturing and execution of captured enemy...check
      4. Costs
        a) soldier's lives...check
        b) POWs...check
        c) innocent civilian lives...check
        d) huge federal cost...check
        e) loss of world standing...check

      Sounds like war to me. The only thing I see missing from what it is now is a serious naval component. The naval operations are mainly support at this point and exclusively from our side.

    10. Re:MM Ok by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      Link. Any comments?

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    11. Re:MM Ok by Landshark17 · · Score: 0

      Congress has not declared war, ergo, it is peacetime. Even if we are fighting wars in Iraq and Afgahnistan.

      --
      This sig is false.
    12. Re:MM Ok by Buzz_Litebeer · · Score: 1

      I really wish other people, you know the ones killing our soldiers in foreign countries, would agree with you.

      Hell, if people only fought us because told them they could, things would be a hell of a lot easier.

      Vint is supporting the president recently, so he is getting "paid" for it. The President is very kind to those who support him, hell, I heard once that he could get someone a job as a lead of a major organization with no previous work in the area of merit.

      --
      If you don't vote, you don't matter, so don't waste your time telling me your opinion
    13. Re:MM Ok by Surt · · Score: 1

      Only:
      http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d107:HJ000 63:@@@L&summ2=m&
      (referred to committee, congress never actually declared the war on terror). :-)

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    14. Re:MM Ok by jamstar7 · · Score: 1
      Scary shit. Basically means, the Regime can manufacture up 'evidence' then act on it.

      Oh, wait...

      --
      Understanding the scope of the problem is the first step on the path to true panic.
  4. Let's not forget by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Aretha Franklin won it, too. As long as we're talking about mighty national heroes, and such. Maybe we should show these two a little R- oh, god, I can't do it!

    1. Re:Let's not forget by game+kid · · Score: 1

      Aretha kicks ass. R E S P-E C T!

      Should we Winsock it to 'em?

      --
      You can hold down the "B" button for continuous firing.
  5. Re:allow me to get this joke out of the way first. by discord5 · · Score: 1

    damn, you beat me to it :-(

  6. Woo! by failure-man · · Score: 2, Funny

    A useless, nationalist-buzzword-laden award from the most dangerous man in the world! What an honor . . . . .
     
    If it were me I'd ask for the lesser award of "presidental medal of awesome." Also, it would come with double prize money.

  7. Unfortunate it wasn't sooner by suso · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    I find it less impressive since its being given by Bush. I realize that its more than the president that desides who receives such an honor. But still, for them to receive a medal of freedom from such a tyrant is disheartening.

    1. Re:Unfortunate it wasn't sooner by CyricZ · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      What stance does suso webhosting take on pro-Republican websites? Do you, as a host of content, actively remove Republican propaganda from your servers?

      --
      Cyric Zndovzny at your service.
    2. Re:Unfortunate it wasn't sooner by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      But still, for them to receive a medal of freedom from such a tyrant is disheartening.

      And you get modded +5 Interesting....

      No slant on slashdot. Nope, none at all. Not one bit of bias what-so-ever.

      With such irrational hatred, it's people like you that scare me, not the president.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    3. Re:Unfortunate it wasn't sooner by suso · · Score: 1

      Does this answer your question?

      http://jar.suso.org/ (click on the brocktoon.net link at the bottom)

      Although I don't agree with Brocktoon, he still has the right to his own opinion and views. I would never censor his website for that reason.

    4. Re:Unfortunate it wasn't sooner by suso · · Score: 0

      And you get modded +5 Interesting....

      To be fair, I did get modded down as offtopic first. I think once someone makes it to +5, its less likely that comment will be modded down. At least that's what I observe. Sure, slashdot may have slant, but its not 100% slant.

  8. And the lies...? by bogaboga · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I need to know what the greatest lie is and who will be honored for it...from the justification for war and the [non-existent] WMDs, and Scooter Libby's lies about that CIA agent, to Iraq's imminent usage of a nuclear device in 45 minutes...and so on. Who will take that honor?

    1. Re:And the lies...? by Agarax · · Score: 1

      Apparently it will go to a drama queen on Slashdot who can't resist the opportunity to bash Bush even when it has absolutely nothing to do with the topic.

      --
      Remember folks, slashdot doesn't have a -1 "disagree" moderation!
    2. Re:And the lies...? by mi · · Score: 1, Informative
      I need to know what the greatest lie is and who will be honored for it... from the justification for war and the [non-existent] WMDs
      Here are some contestants.
      Scooter Libby's lies about that CIA agent
      Big deal -- much higher-placed people have been caught lying under oath...
      --
      In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    3. Re:And the lies...? by John+Nowak · · Score: 1

      And about much more serious things too... like their personal sex lives!!

    4. Re:And the lies...? by Clockwurk · · Score: 1

      If getting a blowjob from an intern was no big deal, why did he lie to a grand jury about it? It seems pretty damn stupid to commit perjury over something so minor.

    5. Re:And the lies...? by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      I dunno, cause he was, you know... married?

      I bet he'd rather risk jail than have to put up with the Clinton She-Bitch howling at him for the next 30 years.

    6. Re:And the lies...? by John+Nowak · · Score: 1

      If you "cheat" on your wife, should they try to fire you at your job too?

    7. Re:And the lies...? by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      The Clinton-is-Satan red-state rednecks seem to think so.

    8. Re:And the lies...? by mi · · Score: 1

      Khmm, why would everyone be so interested in "their" sex lives? Could it have had anything to do with certain sexual harassment lawsuits?.. Still not serious enough for you?

      --
      In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
  9. Why is he giving it now? Why not years ago? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I think he's handing out the award now, because Vint Cerf (ICANN director) is backing Bush's proposal for US controlled DNS and taking Google with him.

    Whether you agree or disagree with the USA control of DNS, if Vint Cerf was deserving of the award then he should have got it years ago, not JUST BEFORE a meeting on the future control of the Internet on 18th November.

    1. Re:Why is he giving it now? Why not years ago? by dada21 · · Score: 1

      This is a very good point, why post AC? The award is generally given on the 4th of July. November is a little bit out of sync.

    2. Re:Why is he giving it now? Why not years ago? by Zevon+2000 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Excellent point. On the other hand, it's certainly possible that no one in the Bush camp had heard of Vint Cerf before Europe started making noises about giving over control of DNS to an international group. Maybe they thought Al Gore really had invented the Internet?

      --
      "Someone somewhere had to wear pants for the first time. The meek and indecisive do not change our world." -Montville
    3. Re:Why is he giving it now? Why not years ago? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe they thought Al Gore really had invented the Internet?

      Okay, but who invented the other one?

    4. Re:Why is he giving it now? Why not years ago? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bush giving out a medal for civilian service? What terrorism! What a swine! ...

      You realize how much of a retard you sound, right? Okay, good. Grow the hell up.

    5. Re:Why is he giving it now? Why not years ago? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      " Bush giving out a medal for civilian service? What terrorism! What a swine! ..."

      Bush giving out bonus's to people for agreeing with him? What terrorism, What a swine! ...

      That's what cronyism is. If Vint had decency he would realize he's being used for short term politics and refuse it.

    6. Re:Why is he giving it now? Why not years ago? by Mike+Schiraldi · · Score: 1

      Same reason they didn't get the Turing Award until just last year.

    7. Re:Why is he giving it now? Why not years ago? by patternjuggler · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think he's handing out the award now, because Vint Cerf (ICANN director) is backing Bush's proposal for US controlled DNS and taking Google with him.

      It's funny because you'd think they would want to distance themselves as much as possible from the administration if they want to convince the rest of the world to maintain the status quo on this issue on technical or economic grounds or whatever (I don't really know what their argument is supposed to be). The more personally interested the US political leaders are, the more it will appear validate the claims of the other countries that something of high political value is at issue and internationalized or localized control is in order, that national sovereignty is at stake, and so on.

    8. Re:Why is he giving it now? Why not years ago? by bugg · · Score: 1

      You know, there was a day when a very large percentage of readers posted AC. I know I probably did for on the order of a year before I finally registered.

      --
      -bugg
  10. Great, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    seeing Bush and "freedom" in the same sentence looks awkward.

  11. WTF? by khasim · · Score: 3, Insightful

    A boxer ... an actor ... a singer ... a different actor ... a baseball player ... a radio personality?

    The Medal of Freedom?

    So the requirements are ... what? It certainly isn't "distinguished service" anymore.

    1. Re:WTF? by Blu-Ray · · Score: 1

      you've forgotten to mention the golfer :)

    2. Re:WTF? by flyingsquid · · Score: 2, Funny
      So the requirements are ... what? It certainly isn't "distinguished service" anymore.

      What do you expect him to do? Awarding medals to people who've done the nation a real service will just show what a poor job Bush has done serving the country.

      He hasn't caught Osama, he's used false pretenses to launch us into a war in Iraq with no end in sight and turned that country into a breeding ground for terrorists, he screwed up royally on Katrina by appointing incompetent cronies, and he's created a massive budget deficit.

      Instead, Bush gave medals last year to George "Slam Dunk" Tenet, and L. Paul Bremer, the guy who implemented de-Baathification and the disbanding of the Iraqi Army, two of the worst moves of the occupation. Trying to rebrand miserable failure as success. This year, the theme seems to be giving medals to celebrities, perhaps in hopes of distracting the nation from its real problems, problems which he's created.

    3. Re:WTF? by pipingguy · · Score: 1


      This is a PR event. American heroes are now TV personalities that the masses can relate to because they have already seen them on MTV. And emote.

      People that die in terrorist attacks are given hero status. Anybody that dies in the line of duty is assigned hero status.

      Popular culture tells us that firefighters and policemen "put their lives on the line every day", so they are necessarily heroes. That is nonsense. They do what they do, and they do not consider themselves as heroes, we pay them to do what they do.

      What they do is admirable, noble and worthy of great respect, but until a fireman or cop puts his/her life in danger to save someone else they are not heroes.

    4. Re:WTF? by Bogtha · · Score: 4, Insightful

      George Orwell referred to misuse of words like this as "swindles and perversions":

      Many political words are similarly abused. The word Fascism has now no meaning except in so far as it signifies "something not desirable." The words democracy, socialism, freedom, patriotic, realistic, justice have each of them several different meanings which cannot be reconciled with one another. In the case of a word like democracy, not only is there no agreed definition, but the attempt to make one is resisted from all sides. It is almost universally felt that when we call a country democratic we are praising it: consequently the defenders of every kind of regime claim that it is a democracy, and fear that they might have to stop using that word if it were tied down to any one meaning. Words of this kind are often used in a consciously dishonest way. That is, the person who uses them has his own private definition, but allows his hearer to think he means something quite different. Statements like Marshal Petain was a true patriot, The Soviet press is the freest in the world, The Catholic Church is opposed to persecution, are almost always made with intent to deceive.

      -- Politics and the English Language

      Throwing words like "democracy" and "freedom" around as generic terms of praise is not just poor English, it actively clouds peoples thinking and is often deceitful.

      --
      Bogtha Bogtha Bogtha
  12. I'm confused by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 5, Funny

    the nation's highest civil award." Vinton Cerf and Robert Kahn -- for their design of "the software code used to transmit data over the Internet"

    Shouldn't it have been Al Gore?

    --
    "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
    1. Re:I'm confused by turgid · · Score: 1

      Shouldn't it have been Al Gore?

      Uncle Jessie, for services to moonshine production.

    2. Re:I'm confused by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shouldn't this joke be dead by now? Its been many years. Let it go.

    3. Re:I'm confused by Chapter80 · · Score: 1
      Tough to say who deserves it more for contributions to computing and the internet.... Vint Surf or Al-Gor-ithm.

      Let's compromise and give it to the Jenni-cam girl. What was her name again?

    4. Re:I'm confused by phritz · · Score: 1

      Ahh ... the most successful reupublican talking point ever. A hilarious, utterly pervasive fabrication. Slashdot needs a Snopes filter to weed out these idiots.

    5. Re:I'm confused by shanen · · Score: 0, Flamebait
      Was that supposed to be a joke? If so, it wasn't funny. It's just a very tired old lie. If you think it was a joke, you should include an emoticon signifying "This is a joke, but I'm not a moron and I know it isn't funny." In addition, you should register for a sense of humor transplant.

      If it wasn't a joke, then you mush be a mindless Bushevik of some stripe, and I have a favor to ask of you. Please designate me as your foe. That will make it much more convenient to ignore your futher blatherings. If you wish to make it mutual, then you can adjust your own settings to reduce the visibility of your foes.

      --
      Freedom = (Meaningful - Coerced) Choice != (Speech | Beer^2), and sad sock puppets' bad mods avail them naught.
    6. Re:I'm confused by millennial · · Score: 1

      When did this ever have anything to do with the Republicans?

      --
      I am scientifically inaccurate.
  13. Internets by mabu · · Score: 2, Funny

    Shouldn't those guys get more than one medal? One for each of the internets?

  14. And if they'd patented it.... by rdean400 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    we'd still have a bunch of proprietary network islands floating in a sea of mediocrity.

    1. Re:And if they'd patented it.... by LaughingCoder · · Score: 1

      No, more likely they would be wealthy from licensing their patents. Either that or companies would have ignored the patents and gone ahead with products, forcing them to spend everything they had in a desperate and likely unsuccessful attempt to defend their patent rights.

      --
      The more you regulate a company, the worse its products become.
    2. Re:And if they'd patented it.... by Burz · · Score: 1

      Either that, or we would all be islands floating in a sea of AOL. ;-)

      Seriously, its interesting how promoting standards as "the greatest common denominator" actually works to everyone's advantage. Even AOL wouldn't have grown to the extent it did, if it weren't an easy way to "get onto the Internet".

      Come to think of it, how many people bought Windows systems (or any computer) for the first time because they were easily bundled with Netscape and Trumpet Winsock?

  15. Political Opportunism ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Is the reason they are being awarded the medal now a political publicity stunt connected with the ongoing row over who should control the Internet in the future i.e. George Bush saying to the public "Look, we invented it, we should control it !" ?

  16. Vinton Cerf and DARPA? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You mean TCP/IP wasn't developed and patented by a private company that invested billions in R&D?

  17. They should turn down the medals. by CyricZ · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It would be very noble of them to turn down the medals. Instead they should request that the money that would have been spent on the medals themselves, and any additional monetary award, be used towards the formation of an annual Nobel Prize-style award. The recipient could be an individual who has made a major contribution to computer networking.

    Everybody in the field knows (or should know) that they are amongst the Gods of the Internet. Their fame has peaked. That is why it would be very sportsmanlike of them to help highlight the achievements of others in their field.

    --
    Cyric Zndovzny at your service.
    1. Re:They should turn down the medals. by s20451 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Firstly, there is nothing wrong with them accepting the prize money, or getting other money from sponsors, and establishing such awards themselves. Alfred Nobel was just a prviate Swedish citizen. For that matter there is nothing preventing you or I from doing the same.

      Secondly, unless the money spent is in the neighborhood of $20 million (not likely), there would be no hope of setting up an annuity equivalent to a Nobel prize (which are worth about $1 million each).

      Thirdly, rejecting a prize is insulting and generally doesn't make people willing to hear your suggestions as to how the money should be otherwise spent.

      --
      Toronto-area transit rider? Rate your ride.
    2. Re:They should turn down the medals. by schon · · Score: 1

      rejecting a prize is insulting

      Thank you, Captain Obvious.

      and generally doesn't make people willing to hear your suggestions as to how the money should be otherwise spent.

      And? The point isn't that the people giving the money will listen, it's that the people who *aren't* giving the money will listen. And they do.

    3. Re:They should turn down the medals. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, you who aren't honored in this way think you should be able to tell them how to respond to their selection to receive these honors. Check your ego at the door please.

    4. Re:They should turn down the medals. by CyricZ · · Score: 0

      They wouldn't be rejecting the prize. They'd be putting the prize to a far better use. Money spent on a medal that'll sit on some bookshelf or mantle is wasted. Money spent to promote innovation is not wasted.

      --
      Cyric Zndovzny at your service.
    5. Re:They should turn down the medals. by shanen · · Score: 0, Flamebait
      Yes, but not for that silly non-reason. Dubya has been the most anti-scientific president in a long time. Probably of all of them, but certainly the greatest enemy of science of any president I know about. He's only giving these cheap awards as another cheap political move to pretend he supports science while he continues to cut the budget for real research and real education and push for pseudo-science like "intelligent design".

      Rejecting these medals would at least blow the cheap gesture back in his face, and it's barely possible the embarrassment would do some good. Perhaps Dubya can borrow a few billion more from the Chinese to support some real science?

      That's a joke, son. Laugh.

      --
      Freedom = (Meaningful - Coerced) Choice != (Speech | Beer^2), and sad sock puppets' bad mods avail them naught.
    6. Re:They should turn down the medals. by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 1

      > And? The point isn't that the people giving the money will listen, it's that the
      > people who *aren't* giving the money will listen. And they do.

      And when they don't give money, they'll won't give it to places where it'll do the most good! Good thinking!

  18. Jack Nicklaus? by Evro · · Score: 5, Informative
    * Muhammad Ali. The three-time heavyweight boxing champion, who lives in Berrien Springs, Mich., successfully defended the title 19 times and was a gold medalist at the 1960 Olympic Games.

    * Carol Burnett. The actress and comedian debuted on Broadway in 1959 and starred for more than a decade on "The Carol Burnett Show."

    * Vinton Cerf and Robert Kahn. They designed the software code used to transmit data over the Internet.

    * Robert Conquest. The historian is known for his work on Soviet history, politics, and foreign policy. More than 35 years after its publication, his book, "The Great Terror: Stalin's Purge of the Thirties," remains one of the most influential studies of Soviet history.

    * Aretha Franklin. The singer has nearly two dozen No. 1 singles and has won numerous awards. The Detroit native was the first woman to be inducted into the Rock 'n Roll Hall of Fame.

    * Alan Greenspan. He has been chairman of the Federal Reserve for the past 18 years.

    * Andy Griffith. The actor first achieved national acclaim in the 1950s for his standup comedy routines. He went on to star in television shows such as "The Andy Griffith Show" and "Matlock" and numerous Broadway productions and films.

    * Paul Harvey. The radio personality's broadcasts started airing nationally in 1951.

    * Sonny Montgomery. A veterans' supporter during his 30 years as a member of the House of Representatives. The Montgomery GI Bill helped make education affordable for millions of veterans.

    * Gen. Richard Myers. He recently retired as chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.

    * Jack Nicklaus. The golfer won 18 major tournaments as a professional and more than 70 PGA Tour events.

    * Frank Robinson. The current manager of the Washington Nationals, Robinson won most valuable player awards in both the American and National leagues. He broke the color barrier for managers, becoming the first black manager in Major League Baseball in 1975.

    * Paul Rusesabagina. The hotelier's life was the subject of the movie "Hotel Rwanda," which depicted his courage and compassion in sheltering people at the hotel he managed during the 1994 Rwandan genocide.


    Jack Nicklaus? How is playing golf now worthy of a "Freedom" medal? Sounds like a pretty worthless medal.
    --
    rooooar
    1. Re:Jack Nicklaus? by pipingguy · · Score: 1


      Muhammad Ali -No
      Carol Burnett -No
      Vinton Cerf and Robert Kahn -Yes
      Robert Conquest -Yes
      Aretha Franklin -No
      Alan Greenspan -Maybe
      Andy Griffith -No
      Paul Harvey - No
      Sonny Montgomery -Yes
      Richard Myers -Maybe
      Jack Nicklaus -No.
      Frank Robinson -No
      Paul Rusesabagina -Probably

    2. Re:Jack Nicklaus? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I agree - giving the award to Jack Nicklaus really demeans the achievements of more worthy recipients like Andy Griffith.

    3. Re:Jack Nicklaus? by Surt · · Score: 1

      Here's a hint: all of these people have a secret CIA employment record in common. This medal is the only way such lifelong undercover agents can be publicly recognized for their heroic efforts against our country's enemies. Notice how all of them spent significant amounts of time travelling all over the world.

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    4. Re:Jack Nicklaus? by Mishra100 · · Score: 1

      Yes Muhammad Ali deserves a medal of freedom. He publicly fought for Muslim rights and showed the United States that he will succeed. Which he did! He fought for freedom and defended it with great stride. Of course he deserves the Medal of Freedom. http://www.courier-journal.com/apps/pbcs.dll/artic le?AID=/20051104/NEWS0104/511040426 "Muhammad Ali was one of the greatest athletes of all time and an inspirational figure to millions of people around the world," said White House spokeswoman Christie Parell.

    5. Re:Jack Nicklaus? by Keaster · · Score: 1

      I see none of you leave your terminals to ever experience the other real world.

      Thats some Sad Sh1t

    6. Re:Jack Nicklaus? by Surt · · Score: 1

      Some of us live in places where going outside means exposure to temperatures a good distance below zero right now, so we make some effort not to do it too much. Wastes a lot of energy and all if you unseal your door. Can get very pricey. Much better to stay indoors and enjoy some good reading.

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
  19. You're not really at "war". by CyricZ · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Sure it is. Remember, the wars you guys are involved in are taking place on the other side of the world from you! You know, in Iraq and Afghanistan.

    Things are very peaceful for you, since you're isolated away from all of the fighting itself. No warring is actually taking place in the United States.

    --
    Cyric Zndovzny at your service.
    1. Re:You're not really at "war". by slavemowgli · · Score: 1

      No fighting took place in the USA during World War 2, either, though - at least not in the mainland.

      --
      quidquid latine dictum sit altum videtur.
    2. Re:You're not really at "war". by Surt · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      On the other hand, the war on drugs is taking lives at a greater rate here in the US than the Iraq and Afghanistan conflicts put together.

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    3. Re:You're not really at "war". by CyricZ · · Score: 1, Informative

      Indeed. The US was almost completely unharmed by WWII. That's why they became the superpower that they are today.

      Structurally, Europe, Russia and Asia were devastated. The loss of American life in the WWII is estimated at approximately 0.42 million or so. Meanwhile, you have the Soviets losing 23 million. Germany lost around 7.5 million. For every 1000 people, the US lost about 3, the Soviets 136, and the Germans 107. On the Asian front, Japan lost about 2.6 million people, or approximately 33 for every 1000 of their population.

      When compared to what other nations suffered in WWII, the US received a minor pinprick.

      --
      Cyric Zndovzny at your service.
    4. Re:You're not really at "war". by Lisandro · · Score: 1

      Kinda reminds me of Roger Waters' "The bravery of being out of range"...

    5. Re:You're not really at "war". by operagost · · Score: 1

      No warring has happened since Islamic fundamentalists killed thosands of people on September 11, 2001 because we brought the war to them. I suppose we are supposed to invite them over so they can kill thousands more in suicide attacks?

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
  20. Yes you are by Mark_in_Brazil · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Shouldn't it have been Al Gore?
    Cerf and Kahn think so.
    --
    "It is nice to know that the computer understands the problem. But I would like to understand it too." --Eugene Wigner
  21. Transmitting Data Over Teh Internets???? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So will they get their Medal of Freedom BEFORE or AFTER they are locked away in a East European Gulag???

    1. Re:Transmitting Data Over Teh Internets???? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know, you really might want to start getting your hard news from some other place.

      Web sites devoted to screeching, psychotic hippie conspiracy theories might be entertaining, but they often lead to looking like a dumbass in the long run.

      Not that this will stop you from repeating the Big Lie from now until the end of time, of course.

  22. In other news... by sdo1 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    API - Washington, DC. The FBI and local authorities today arrested Vinton Cerf and Robert Kahn at the behest of the MPAA and RIAA. "Their design of the software code used to transmit data over the Internet has cost the entertainment industry hundreds of billions of dollars in annual losses." said MPAA president Dan Glickman. "These two thugs deserve what's coming to them in prison." added RIAA president Cary Sherman. Meanwhile, Sherman and Glickman, working with congressional leaders, have drafted a bill to add "design of internet software" to the list of federal crimes eligible for the death penalty. "The crimes of Al Gore will not go unpunished." said Republican House leader Tom DeLay. "He invented this internet thing and it's destroying our way of life."

    --
    --- What parts of "shall make no law", "shall not be infringed", and "shall not be violated" don't you understand?
    1. Re:In other news... by commo1 · · Score: 2, Funny

      If this were true... couldn't you see the collective heads of the MPAA and the RIAA shouting "KAHN!!!!!" while an overhead shot of their offices cuts higher and higher.....

  23. What about Jon Postel? by merc · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Yes, he has passed away but he could have been given the award posthumously.

    --
    It's true no man is an island, but if you take a bunch of dead guys and tie 'em together, they make a good raft.
    1. Re:What about Jon Postel? by CyricZ · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      I don't think that a man as truly great as he was would really give a damn about a politically-charged bullshit medal such as this.

      --
      Cyric Zndovzny at your service.
  24. If Bush gave me a medal... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...I'd wipe my ass with it and hand it back to him.

    1. Re:If Bush gave me a medal... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean you don't wipe after you finish up on the toilet?

      Wow, you Bush-bashers really are that dumb, aren't you?

  25. mod parent up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    +2 hilarious, -1 chilling

    1. Re:mod parent up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      = +1 chillarious

  26. Very good points by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 1

    While Cerf is deserving of an award, its value is (IMO) diminished due to the number of people Bush has given it to. He's been basically giving them out like candy (and publicizing it) over the past two years, I'm getting the impression he's given out more than many of his predecessors combined. I hear about this medal in the media all the time now, it was never publicized much with previous presidents in recent history.

    And as another poster said, while Cerf deserves the award for past accomplishments, he should have been given the award long ago. Cerf receiving the award now amounts to a kiss-up bribe from Bush to get Cerf's support for continued US control of the DNS system.

    --
    retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
    1. Re:Very good points by mi · · Score: 1
      while Cerf deserves the award for past accomplishments, he should have been given the award long ago.
      During which presidency?
      --
      In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    2. Re:Very good points by daraf · · Score: 1

      The number of these medals GWB has presented seems to be about consistent with Clinton: http://www.senate.gov/pagelayout/reference/two_col umn_table/Presidential_Medal_of_Freedom_Recipients .htm

  27. Why it's newsworthy by slizz · · Score: 1

    This is newsworthy because it appears on the Google blog, which seems to be the main source of Slashdot news these days.

  28. Thank god for speechwriters... by jpellino · · Score: 2, Funny

    Bush's original draft read "that whole deal used to transmogrify data over teh Interweb"

    --
    "Win treats sysadmins better than users. Mac treats users better than sysadmins. Linux treats everyone like sysadmins."
  29. Irony? by Drasil · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The man at the head of the world's largest heirarchical power structure gives out "Freedom" medals.

  30. "You're doing a heck of a job, Bobbie, Vintie..." by sakusha · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The Medal of Freedom is generally considered the Kiss of Death to any career. But consider that Cerf was already awarded the National Medal of Technology by Bill Clinton in 1997. At least Cerf and Kahn got the Turing Award, which came with a $100k cash prize.

  31. People's Choice by DumbSwede · · Score: 1

    Yeah, gotta agree. Seems more like the Medal of People's Choice.
    Maybe there should be a whole awards show for something like this.

  32. If you don't find this 'Newsworthy'... by Mulletproof · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "This is newsworthy?"

    Well let's see, these people only helped create a system that has not only impacted millions of people worldwide, but changed the nature of information dissemination and business commerce for you, your kids and their kids. You tell me if this is news worthy. On second thought, let me tell you. It's nothing short of revolutionary. Then you go about discrediting an example of another award, as if it somehow makes this any less newsworthy or deserving of recognition when it really has nothing to do with anything.

    Yeah, some people will find the shit in anything if it's labelled Microsoft, Bush or [insertyourfavoritenamebrandehere], regardless of how deserving it is.. I thought we marked crap like this 'trolls'...

    --
    You need a FREE iPod Nano
  33. Not enough money by everphilski · · Score: 1

    Given an 10% rate of return on investment, no overhead costs, 3% inflation rate, you could give out two prizes per year with a value of **seven percent** of whatever Vint and Robert are getting (which is a token amount, iirc). Not to mention there are overhead costs and inflation is a moving target.

    Besides, who are you to tell these two men what to do? I mean seriously, what credentials do you possibly have to think you can tell these two "gods" as you say what to do? please...

    -everphilski-

  34. What, not Al Gore? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He invented the internet ...

  35. Mod parent troll by kmmatthews · · Score: 1

    It's a joke because of the other people who get one, too. Actors? Golfers?

    --
    feh. stuff.
  36. Well, the real question is... by msormune · · Score: 2, Funny

    Is it better than the Amulet of Yendor? What are the stat raises with one of these?

    1. Re:Well, the real question is... by weston · · Score: 1

      Dude. Anything would be better than the amulet of yendor. It makes you hungry faster, sucks out your engergy, causes you to mysteriously be sucked down several levels of hell as you try to climb out, and in return, all you get is some mild clairvoyance.

    2. Re:Well, the real question is... by msormune · · Score: 1

      Hmm... I haven't played Nethack for some years. I guess this is the kind of general knowledge that a slashdot reader would and almost should know. I better get back in Nethack shape... this is almost embarassing.

  37. And they say...... by 8127972 · · Score: 1

    ......That Bush doesn't have a brain. I think this proves all of the naysayers wrong. Cheney must have had to stay up all night to come up with this.

    --
    This is my opinion. To make sure you don't steal it, it's covered by the DMCA.
  38. It's the Juice? by Grendel+Drago · · Score: 1

    You forgot to mention how the Mossad spirited away all the Jews who would have been in those towers on 9/11. And how the Jews were pre-warned about the London bombings.

    Or, in shorthand, "jews did 911 lol".

    --
    Laws do not persuade just because they threaten. --Seneca
  39. A Political Statement by Steve+B · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Bush is underscoring the US position: we built it; you furriners who want to control it can go install a CAT5 cable where the sun don't shine.

    --
    /. If the government wants us to respect the law, it should set a better example.
    1. Re:A Political Statement by Tetard · · Score: 1

      So, let me guess... If (and that's theoretical - http://www.uh.edu/engines/epi1098.htm) an American had invented the phone, the US should have retained control of telephony ? I mean, there's a number of infrastructures that have been created, not all of them are american, and the country the inventions originated from didn't retain control. Oh wait, come to think of it, it looks like decent transport was invented in Europe, and we obviously retained control of it, considering the state of US railways. Ah well, maybe you do have point.

  40. From the well DUD Department... by Spock+the+Baptist · · Score: 1

    An excellent post.

    Statements that are manifestly obvious:

    I'm in favor of good. I'm in favor of truth. I'm in favor of that which is noble.

    I'm against evil, wickedness, sin, and nastiness.

    The business of business is business.

    What I wish most for is WORLD PEACE, and a non-polluting, safe, reliable, cheap, compact, widely available, and infinite source of energy for humanity. (Have I forgotten anything?)

    --
    "Oh drat these computers, they're so naughty and so complex, I could pinch them." --Marvin the Martian
  41. You're an anti-american piece of shit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Simply because you don't have any answers, you fucking scumbag. Hell, you haven't lifted a finger to help with anything. You have actively conspired to make things worse. We should fucking execute you, if we had any balls.

    Go to France, cocksucking piece of shit.

    1. Re:You're an anti-american piece of shit by Kymermosst · · Score: 1

      Simply because you don't have any answers, you fucking scumbag. Hell, you haven't lifted a finger to help with anything. You have actively conspired to make things worse. We should fucking execute you, if we had any balls.

      Go to France, cocksucking piece of shit.


      Yeah, that really showed him!

      Seriously, if you disagree, you might actually try and be a little civil and defend your point of view with legitimate arguments.

      Instead, you've simply been written off as another 'duped' red-state hick who somehow manages to post on Slashdot, even if you have valid reasons for believing the way you do. Congratulations.

      --
      "Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives" should be a convenience store, not a government agency.
    2. Re:You're an anti-american piece of shit by Anonymous+Luddite · · Score: 1

      >> Go to France, cocksucking piece of shit.

      You do know the "war of independence" involved a little French help don't you?

    3. Re:You're an anti-american piece of shit by Daniel+Dvorkin · · Score: 1

      And you're an anonymous coward. Wow, I'm impressed.

      Simply because you don't have any answers, you fucking scumbag. Hell, you haven't lifted a finger to help with anything. You have actively conspired to make things worse. We should fucking execute you, if we had any balls.

      Wow. America, land of the free, the City on the Hill, life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, a more perfect union, of the people, by the people, for the people -- but apparently in your vision of America, we execute people because you don't like their politics. Excuse me, but are we talking about the same place?

      Go to France, cocksucking piece of shit.

      I think you, AC, would have fit juuust fiiine into France once upon a time ... say, fifty-some years ago. The Vichy government was made of people exactly like you. Cowards, sneaks, thieves in the night, who wanted nothing more than to appease their masters.

      --
      The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
    4. Re:You're an anti-american piece of shit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We don't execute people for their beliefs, but it's one thing to believe things. There is nothing more sacred than the right to believe. But when you actively bad mouth the President in a time of conflict against evil, you are giving aid to the terrorists, and thus, you are a traitor to the American people.

      America isn't racist like France. We are a country dedicated to certain ideals. God, Freedom, Apple Pie, Puppies, and so on. If you are disloyal to those ideals, you are not American, but at best some kind of shit-ass Canadian, or even a French-Canadian. And if you actively dismantle freedom by voting Democratic, then you don't deserve freedom.

      You have been trolled. Hope this helps. Have a nice day.

  42. AGREED, mod parent TROLL by cataclyst · · Score: 1

    And remind me, what did these two bozos contribute to the "greater good" lately that makes them deserving of what was once a hallowed honor. Sorry, not gonna buy it. I'm against kneejerk Bush or Mr. Softee bashing, but when it's merited, gimme my $Hi+ kicking boots and I'll join right in.

    I guess it comes down to the fact that there's enough crap to hold against Mr. Softee, and definately Bush, that we shouldn't resort to the kneejerk attacks. It weakens our case for the many times we do have a reasonable gripe.

    like now

    My $0.02

    --
    E = m * c^(Hammer)
  43. MOD PARENT FUNNY by NorwBlue · · Score: 1
    God i hate republicans with mod points.

    (im starting to getting used to them not having humor)

  44. Naw by sheldon · · Score: 1

    That's only been true under the Bush administration, after he awarded the Medal of Freedom to the architects of the Iraq war.

  45. Bah by sheldon · · Score: 1

    The term is not red-state hick.

    It's 'wacko'... At least according to the Republican operatives implicated in the Abramhoff scandal.

    Page 119, of this document... http://indian.senate.gov/2005hrgs/110205hrg/110205 exhibits.pdf

  46. Re:allow me to get this joke out of the way first. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > KHAAAAAAAN.....yea someone was gonna say it, it may as well be me.

    Must add missing drama:

    *quivering*...*jaw clenched*...*eyes bulging*...KHAAAAAAAN......!!!!

    There now. Better.

  47. Vint Cerf Worked for Spewspew.net by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Vint did nothing to stop the flood of spam that comes from Uunets spamming customers. Even after Spamhaus tried to educate him on the problem, he chose to do nothing. Vint could have cleaned up the internet spam problem at any time, but he didn't. I wonder how much of the millions that spammers pay mci goes to Vint?

  48. Stupid name for the award... by Goonie · · Score: 2, Informative

    Look, if you're going to have awards specifically for people who contributed to Freedom, use the word "Freedom" in the award. But Jack Nicklaus was a professional golfer who went on to career in designing golf courses. He's contributed precisely zero to "freedom" (IIRC, he refused to play in South Africa in the 1970's when the sporting boycotts began to be enforced. That was the right thing to do, but hardly exceptional).

    Rename the damn award the "Presidential Medal of Achievement" or "Presidential Medal of Service", and then it won't be so incongruous to give it to golfers.

    I do have to wonder about giving the highest civilian award to Nicklaus, whatever it's called. He was a great golfer, sure. But he was very, very well renumerated for that, and won all manner of sporting awards. Did he do something exceptional beyond that to improve the lives of Americans in any way? I don't think so. But, hey, it's your country, and my own is hardly pure as snow on this kind of thing... The easiest way to become Australian of the Year is to captain the Australian cricket team...

    --

    Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from a rigged demo
    --Andy Finkel (J. Klass?)
  49. George Walker Bush gets the fate of Adof Hitler by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    George Walker Bush deserves the same fate as Adof Hitler ... Death by suiside!

    Such an ignomineous death is befeting GWB; afterall he masterbates each night
    at the thougt that he as only killed 2000 or so worthless US niggers in Iraq
    and Afganastan. What a bum wast, GWB tells Babs at the dinner table in the
    White House and then calls out to "Boy" to bring him some more chitlen.

    Toodles!

  50. I get it by vandan · · Score: 1

    Dubya presenting a medal of freedom.

    It's like Bill Gates presenting a medal of competition, or Mary Magdeline presenting a medal of promiscuity.

    Why couldn't Dubya give a medal to some of the thousands of fallen US soldiers that died executing his illegal war of aggression? Of course I don't expect it to go to anyone who works at Guantanimo Bay or anything, but what exactly do you have to do to get one of these freedom chimes again?

    1. Re:I get it by /dev/trash · · Score: 1

      Um. Get a CLUE.

    2. Re:I get it by vandan · · Score: 1

      I will now respond to all your valid points:

  51. Oh, wrong tinfoil hattery. by Grendel+Drago · · Score: 1

    My bad. Tinfoil hatters like yourself frequently blame the Jews.

    --
    Laws do not persuade just because they threaten. --Seneca
    1. Re:Oh, wrong tinfoil hattery. by CyricZ · · Score: 1

      You're the only one accusing the Jewish people of doing anything wrong. I'm not sure why you hate them so much.

      --
      Cyric Zndovzny at your service.
  52. Shouldn't Jacques Chirac get the medal? by kalirion · · Score: 1

    He is the President of Freedom after all.

    1. Re:Shouldn't Jacques Chirac get the medal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Come on, people. An Al Gore quip got "5, Funny" and this was overlooked? I'll never understand Slashdot moderation.

  53. Re:allow me to get this joke out of the way first. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0