Slashdot Mirror


Next-Gen Consoles -The Strategy Thus Far

tyko writes "CoolTechZone.com takes a look at all three consoles from Microsoft, Sony and Nintendo and presents a nice overview of the strategies behind the products. From the article: 'Now that Microsoft has put its weight firmly behind HD-DVD, it seems obvious that Xbox 360 will have HD-DVD support. If recent rumors are anything to go by, Xbox 360 will not have support for HD-DVD games at launch because it won't ship with the needed HD-DVD drive. Whether or not the support will come later as an optional accessory is not clear either. Needless to say, this has added more confusion to the product that is due for launch in just two weeks.'"

45 comments

  1. Great article...but... by nmaster64 · · Score: 5, Funny

    He kind of lost credibility when he started talking about how Nintendo might be developing a visor or something for the Revolution. I think he took Miyamoto's recent comments about how games shouldn't be restricted by TVs a bit to serious. The controller is Revolutionary enough, Nintendo's not gonna go so far out as to get rid of TVs...yet...

    Can't wait for my Nintendo Holodeck though...

    1. Re:Great article...but... by Delphiki · · Score: 1
      I didn't think much of this article. The author seemed fairly biased against Microsoft and for Nintendo. Like the visor thing you mentioned. And how things are disorganized with the Xbox 360 and we don't understand what accessories are going to be in the package. I was pretty clear on the list of accessories and have been since they announced the two SKUs. And we don't know whether HD-DVD games will be supported later on? Yes we do. They won't be supported. Microsoft has already said so. Also, he says that Sony's strategy is a great strategy. Except that they'll be hurt big time if the 360 succedes. Either the assumption is that the 360 will fail, or Sony's strategy isn't that great.

      Oh well, it wasn't too terrible of an article, but it doesn't offer much unless you haven't been following the situation at all.

      --

      Feel free to mod me "-1 - Angry Jerk".

    2. Re:Great article...but... by Mitaphane · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I don't know where that visor idea came from(the author making shit up is my guess), but it's completely ludricrous. First off, it would probably cost more than the console itself. Nintendo's strategy with the GC, and I imagine the Revolution, is going to focus on the games not expensive cutting edge hardware(head visors aren't cheap). Second, something that big would definitely be shown off with the preview of the controller if it was a big part of Nintendo's strategy. Third, after the Virtual Boy's failure would a head visor be something that Nintendo would want to repeat? Lastly, remember all that hype about VR in the mid 90's? Remember how nothing became of it? There's a reason that happened.

      Overall this "article" was disappointing. All it was is a lot of speculation(very obvious after reading the visor idea) spread over too many individual webpages(7 pages with very little text on each page) with a few details that Sony/MS/Nintendo have already announced with the showing of their consoles.

    3. Re:Great article...but... by Rod+Beauvex · · Score: 0

      *snores and wakes up* Huh.....what...? An article not biased against Nintendo? When did this happen? Don't tell me I'm going to have to RTFA....

    4. Re:Great article...but... by Soybean47 · · Score: 1

      To be fair, I think Nintendo is likely to be the first console maker to exploit VR-type technology, if/when the technology gets up to snuff. It's just not there yet. You point out that the Virtual Boy didn't go so well... neither did the Power Glove, but they're bringing back that idea now that the technology has improved. The lesson to be learned from Virtual Boy isn't, "3d visors are a bad idea," it's, "3d visors with poor framerates and red wireframe graphics are a bad idea."

      But yeah. A visor on the Revolution seems highly implausible. Maybe a couple of console generations from now, but not yet.

  2. HD-DVD by Gaima · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I suspect that even with Microsofts weight behind HD-DVD, if they don't ship the 360 with a HD-DVD drive, it will fail.
    History has shown that big add-on packs don't sell, so it's fair to assume that Microsoft will never be able to garner enough market share of HD-DVD capable 360s to make any difference to the market Sony will have of Blu-Ray players.

    1. Re:HD-DVD by grumbel · · Score: 1

      ACK, HD-DVD as a add-on would fail, on the other side it shouldn't hurt if Microsoft added HD-DVD support in later XBox360s, of course it would be unusable for games since not all XBox360s would have it, but as a added bonus for XBox-as-MediaCenter it might be quite nice.

    2. Re:HD-DVD by dummyname12 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Microsoft has already said that even if an HD-DVD upgrade comes for the XBOX 360, game's will not be shipped using the format. This would alienate all the players who didn't shell out for one of the upgrades. The HD-DVD drive would be used as an option to watch HD-DVD movies only.

      The author should have done a little research.

      In fact, in my simple Google search for "Microsoft XBOX 360 HD-DVD Support" the front page came up with an article confirming this.

      Seriously, "journalists"... research is not that hard. I'll give you a hint: you can't spell 'research' without 'search'.

    3. Re:HD-DVD by jchenx · · Score: 1

      True, if MS does decide to ship an HD-DVD add-on, it probably won't do very well, given the history of all past console add-ons. However, I'd find it hard to believe that the lack of HD-DVD right off the bat will cause the 360 to fail.

      Unlike the previous console generation, you don't have any media available in the next gen format. It'll still be a few years before we see any mass adoption of Blu-Ray or HD-DVD (especially considering many folks, like myself, will be waiting to see which format wins out in the end). By the time we do know which format is the most popular and gets close to mass-market adoption, it'll probably be time for the NEXT console generation.

      --
      -- jchenx
  3. Nintendo Revolution by dolphin558 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The article is correct in that Nintendo is left out of most discussions over the next generation of consoles. I am most excited about Nintendo's console of the three coming out. Why? The games!!

    1. Re:Nintendo Revolution by Delphiki · · Score: 1

      Funny, that's the same reason why the Revolution is the one I'm the least excited about.

      --

      Feel free to mod me "-1 - Angry Jerk".

    2. Re:Nintendo Revolution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Well, it's really a tradeoff. Nintendo is into putting out innovative games, while Sony and Microsoft's offerings seem to be obsessed with putting out the same titles with 3 new weapons and slightly better graphics.

      I'm not trying to imply that there's anything particularly wrong with that (heck, I'd go as far as to say that this business model makes sense in this day and age). Even Nintendo finds formulas and uses them time and time again (Mario Party, Wario Ware, Zelda series). But for those of us who can't tell the difference between Madden 2005 and Madden 2006 (or Halo and Halo 2), I think Nintendo's ideas are very exciting.

    3. Re:Nintendo Revolution by cowscows · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Well, one problem right now is that Nintendo has told us basically nothing about the Revolution's game line up. That makes it hard for some people to get excited about it. On the other hand, many of us have reasonably active imaginations, and when we combine what we know about the new controller with a bunch of franchises that we've grown up with, we can understand a lot of potential and get pumped up about that. Sadly, many individuals choose to only utilize screenshots, E3 demos, and marketing hype to influence their expectations. I'm afraid that that crowd will constantly be under-whelmed by Nintendo, and probably miss out on some excellent games.

      --

      One time I threw a brick at a duck.

    4. Re:Nintendo Revolution by Delphiki · · Score: 1

      Are you really so arrogant to think that anyone who isn't excited about the Revolution is only lacking in said excitement because they lack as much imagination as you? Yeesh.

      --

      Feel free to mod me "-1 - Angry Jerk".

    5. Re:Nintendo Revolution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Another Metroid/Mario/MarioKart/donkey kong/zelda/mario party/ whatever is not really innovative.

      Nintendo carries the same line of EA titles that are released on an annual basis with only minor upgrades, but I suppose it is alright for them to do that while Sony and MS are terrible for it?

      2 iterations of a game like halo is hardly obessesed with putting out the same titles with 3 new weapons,

      how about that least relase of mario kart which sucked hard. it was the worst mario kart title so far.

      If you can't tell the difference between these games in the first place I think that maybe you need to pay a little closer attention, there are differences and they are discernable.

    6. Re:Nintendo Revolution by cowscows · · Score: 1

      No, they don't need as much imagination as me, they just need some imagination period. If you're a gamer and you're not fascinated by the possibilities of the Revolution controller, then there's something wrong with you. I'm not bouncing off the walls with anticipation or anything, but I fail to see what either of the other two consoles are offering beyond more of the same at higher prices.

      --

      One time I threw a brick at a duck.

    7. Re:Nintendo Revolution by Rydia · · Score: 1

      No, you see, he said "games," not "same generic genre-representative game repackaged ad infinitum."

    8. Re:Nintendo Revolution by Delphiki · · Score: 1
      I guess there's something wrong with me then. But that's perfectly okay with me. I bought the GameCube and think it was the biggest waste of money I've ever purchased in terms of video games. I could never find any games for it that were worth playing for more than a few days tops. I have absolutely no faith in Nintendo's ability to make good games after the GameCube. Wind Waker was okay but got boring before I finished. Same with Metroid Prime and Pikmin, and others.

      And I don't see anything appealing about the new controller. I keep hearing ideas like that you could wield it like a sword, or use it for a fps, or whatever, none of which seems interesting to me.

      Personally, I think if you can't get excited about the 360 and Xbox Live then there's something wrong with you. Xbox Live Arcade is brilliant and could be a stage for some great independent games. The different social interactions and online games that are possible on Xbox Live are really exciting to me. Waving my arm around to control my character is not exciting to me.

      --

      Feel free to mod me "-1 - Angry Jerk".

    9. Re:Nintendo Revolution by brkello · · Score: 1

      As a gamer, I am actually pretty wary of the controller. It is dramatically different. Sure, that could be good. But it also could back fire on them. I LIKE the current controllers for games. If I want something gimmicky like bongos or dance pads, I can buy those for games that support them. Having a remote control for games that typically require a lot of buttons could make it so that whole genres won't be included on the game cube. Maybe they will make some new genres, but then those games can not translate on to other platforms because they will be too dependant on the controller. That will drive business away. It's like this...there is sort of a standard right now for controllers. When everyone follows the standard to a certain degree, everyone is happy because games can be ported for all. If one just goes their own way, that is going to hurt third party development. Nintendo will just be isolating themselves more and more. I don't think they are going to die....they are a healthy company focused on profits. But I think they could lose more marketshare again. This is a big risk for them, though. I like Nintendo and want them to do well. But sometimes...revolutions are squahsed flat.

      --
      Support a great indie game: http://www.abaddon360.com
    10. Re:Nintendo Revolution by eboot · · Score: 1

      Have you played xbox live as it is now? It's full of whiny snot nosed children with bad mouths, attitudes and no sense of humour. I hope for your sake you arent one of them. It's almost as if something about the system attracts these irritating brats to the xbox, maybe its the game lineup, maybe its the marketing but whatever it is it makes xbox live unbearable... Now Im not really on Nintendo's side with this one either, I foresee all sorts of potential problems with their marketing etc but my experience of social interactions on Halo 2 are 'TAKE THAT NOOOBZPAWNZGAYORZ!!!!!!'. This hardly gets me excited about their next offering...

      And BTW I bought an xbox and had exactly the same experiance you did with the lack of games i.e if you dont like FPS or Sports then the xbox is a dull system indeed. I guess different consoles are for different people.

      --
      Two tears in a bucket. Motherfuck it.
  4. Poorly researched article by EvilDonut · · Score: 4, Interesting

    There is no clarity in regards to accessories that will come bundled with the package, and the optional accessories that you can purchase.

    However, there are going to be two versions of the console retailing at $299 and $399, respectively. The $299 will be the base model and will come with a wired controller and perhaps a 20GB hard disk drive.


    The $299 version (also known as the Core Package) will perhaps come with a hard drive? What sort of weird speculation is that? The contents of the Core and Premium packages were announced over a month ago, the info is available on Xbox.com, and it's pretty damn clear at this point that the Core version will absolutely NOT come with a hard drive. It doesn't get anymore clear than that.

    1. Re:Poorly researched article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, this article lost all credibility when it started saying that all sorts of confirmed information "may or may not be coming". "Maybe the $299 360 will have a hard drive" - a valid statement, if it was made last July. "It is unsure whether the Revolution remote will have force feedback" - except for the fact that Iwata said that the remote will have force feedback *when it was first shown*.
      Again, this article would have been great, had it been written 3-6 months ago. Coming when it is, though, it was poor at best.

  5. Amazin.. by daveruiz · · Score: 1

    It seems like the author had a deadline to post an article, and just went around and collected a bunch of things we already know and a bunch of speculations that we keep hearing over and over again and just submitted that. Thats all it takes to post on a "tech" site now I guess.

  6. Why is this even on Slashdot? by jchenx · · Score: 4, Informative

    As many have already noted, this article is horribly written. It looks like the guy has done little to no research. It's more of an opinion/blog piece than anything else. Here's my "favorite" quote:

    Sony PlayStation 3: Sony's PS3 is definitely keeping everyone guessing in regards to the launch date. The fact that it will not be simultaneously launched with the Xbox 360 is pretty much certain.

    Gee, I was still holding out that Sony was gonna surprise everyone and announce a Holiday '05 ship date! Oh darn.

    Okay, it's fine for a small site like CoolTechZone (which has amazingly not been slashdotted yet) to have poorly written articles like this. Whatever. But does it really merit being posted here? There are certainly better topics to be discussing.

    --
    -- jchenx
  7. Re:Some chance for karma... by -kertrats- · · Score: 1

    1. Depends on how much you intend to play it. How much is your time worth to you? It's not looking like there will be anything but a trickle of major games for the first 6 months to a year, so unless something specific catches your eye (specifically, probably Perfect Dark Zero for FPS fans, Oblivion for RPG fans, or Ninety-Nine Nights for action fans), I'd wait until it drops in price. 2. You'll in all likelihood be required to have the hard drive for a lot of features in games; patches, prettier graphics, maybe some extras. However, the biggest issue is that you need a hard drive of some sort to save your games-cartridges can save directly to themselves, DVDs not so much. You can get a 64 MB memory card for $40, or a 20 GB (roughly 300 times the size) hard drive for the extra $100 in upgrading from Core to the real version. You will absolutely need one of these options, and the cost-efficient option is clearly the $400 Xbox (it also comes with the DVD remote to allow you to double the machine as a DVD player (normally $30), and some other extras) 3. $60 for any major titles, with variations for bargain games; expect to pay $60 per game. 4. Probably not right after christmas, but expect it in June to compete with the launch of the Playstation 3.

    --
    The Braying and Neighing of Barnyard Animals Follows.
  8. Re:Some chance for karma... by -kertrats- · · Score: 1

    1. Depends on how much you intend to play it. How much is your time worth to you? It's not looking like there will be anything but a trickle of major games for the first 6 months to a year, so unless something specific catches your eye (specifically, probably Perfect Dark Zero for FPS fans, Oblivion for RPG fans, or Ninety-Nine Nights for action fans), I'd wait until it drops in price.

    2. You'll in all likelihood be required to have the hard drive for a lot of features in games; patches, prettier graphics, maybe some extras. However, the biggest issue is that you need a hard drive of some sort to save your games-cartridges can save directly to themselves, DVDs not so much. You can get a 64 MB memory card for $40, or a 20 GB (roughly 300 times the size) hard drive for the extra $100 in upgrading from Core to the real version. You will absolutely need one of these options, and the cost-efficient option is clearly the $400 Xbox (it also comes with the DVD remote to allow you to double the machine as a DVD player (normally $30), and some other extras)

    3. $60 for any major titles, with variations for bargain games; expect to pay $60 per game.

    4. Probably not right after christmas, but expect it in June to compete with the launch of the Playstation 3.

    5. Remember to preview!

    --
    The Braying and Neighing of Barnyard Animals Follows.
  9. Re:Some chance for karma... by Toloran · · Score: 1

    1. Depends on what kind of games you play. The XBox gennerally had above average FPS games, average mmorpgs, and below average "party" games (DDR, easy to play fighters, etc). The PS2 has above average RPGs (not just Final Fantasy), below average FPS games, and average to above average party games (mainly just DDR). The game cube has below average FPS, average RPGs, and middle to above average party games (more in quantity then quality although Super Smash Brothers Melee is the king of party games).

    Note: That was generally speaking, Its not to say they each have great games of each but certain systems tend to have more.

    The next gen systems will probably follow suit. XBox 360 will have Perfect Dark: Zero and Halo 3 (you can count on it) for FPS. PS3 will have the remake of Final Fantasy 7 for RPGs. The revolution will have Super Smash Brothers Revolution for Party games.

    2) Basically, it is pointless to NOT get an XBox 360 with HDD. The HDD is used to save games. If you can't save games, you can't keep all your unlocked stuff in FPS and fighter games, and you can't save in your RPG type games.

    3) Most systems have games that run in the 35-55 dollar range.

    4) Maybe not right after christmas but it will drop in at least the 6 months after release.

    --
    Speaking is NOT communication
  10. Re:Some chance for karma... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1. If you haven't owned a console since the Super Nes, then I would say you are far better off getting a PS2/Gamecube/Xbox right now. For $299 you can get any one of them plus many games (for example the PS2 has a ton of excellent titles now priced at $20).

    2. Hard drive used for custom soundtracks, downloadable content, speeding up loading times (except for the first which is actually much longer...). Although I don't think many developers will bother with the last one for the 360 since the HDD is not standard anymore.

    3. Most are $50 right now, unless you are talking Canadian $, then they're $60. They will be US$60 next gen (which is another good reason to get a present-gen console since the games will be cheaper).

    4. Not a chance. If you believe some people, MS has already stopped production of the Xbox, and the hardware is too costly (especially the hard drive) to make it any cheaper.

  11. The CoolTechZone article is barely literate by Andy_R · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ...and laughably inaccurate. Did you know The Xbox 360 has a Cell processor?

    CoolTechZone couldn't even link the pages together properly (pages 2 and 3 are identical). The speculation on the Revolution is the sort of thing I'd expect from a 5-year-old... It might have virtual reality goggles and force feedback on the wireless controller (Newton's third law anyone?). Yes, and you might get a pullitzer prize!

    I particularly liked the comment on graphics "nobody can really comment on the actual performance between the two", which was of course followed by several comments on the actual performance between the two.

    The Xbox's remote control is "so you don't have to get up every time you want to change something." - such journalistic insight!

    "it seems obvious that Xbox 360 will have HD-DVD support". Obvious unless you actually read any reliable source, or think for more than a moment about the fact that it's shipping in 2 weeks and HD-DVD isn't, presumably?

    "Sony's strategy is to wait". Ahh - and there was I thinking they might actually be finishing development, gearing up for mass production, fabricating chips and writing games, etc!

    "...if the Xbox 360 takes off, Sony will be positively behind" - well at least they are not negatively behind, eh?

    "As far as pure specifications are concerned, the situation is exactly reversed" - umm, sorry, you've lost me there!

    "Nintendo's idea of targeting to the younger demographics aren't particularly exciting" - where's a grammar Nazi when you need one?

    "Remember Mario? It's a trademark character for Nintendo, if you will,..." or just a competent subeditor?

    "Nintendo plans to get rid of the traditional wired (or not) game pads and wants to make them more interactive. This will put you in the middle of the game with your movements controlling those of the game characters." Making things more interactive by getting rid of them? Crafty!

    "The absolute novelty of the experience will probably carry all of the new titles that Nintendo will come out with." Is English this guy's first language?

    "Doom III is an FPS game" no, it's a FPS game. Write it out 100 times in detention, boy!

    "What about other realism inducing effects?" What indeed!

    "That's unclear at the moment, and it's something that we'll have to wait and see." what both unclear AND we'll have to wait and see. Wow, that's like, twice as unknown then, right, dude?

    --
    A pizza of radius z and thickness a has a volume of pi z z a
    1. Re:The CoolTechZone article is barely literate by Yoyoson · · Score: 1
      Did you know The Xbox 360 has a Cell processor?
      Actually, according to the table in that article, it has 3!
    2. Re:The CoolTechZone article is barely literate by Ahnteis · · Score: 1

      "Doom III is an FPS game" no, it's a FPS game. Write it out 100 times in detention, boy!

      Actually, a/an is determined by the sound of the following word.

      In this case, it's eff pee ess, not "fwps". Therefore, an FPS is correct.

    3. Re:The CoolTechZone article is barely literate by Quattro+Vezina · · Score: 4, Funny

      "Doom III is an FPS game" no, it's a FPS game. Write it out 100 times in detention, boy!

      Learn English before you start correcting others. It's "an FPS". Say it out loud: "an eff pee ess".

      --
      I support the Center for Consumer Freedom
    4. Re:The CoolTechZone article is barely literate by Andy_R · · Score: 1, Funny

      "A First Person Shooter, A First Person Shooter, A First Person Shooter."

      --
      A pizza of radius z and thickness a has a volume of pi z z a
    5. Re:The CoolTechZone article is barely literate by Spaceman+Spiff+II · · Score: 1

      Ouch, you got trolled for that? Really, I think either is appropriate (Google "a fps" and "an fps" and the results aren't radically different), but I think the guy above you was just joking -- heh, not being "insightful". Anyway, perhaps he shouldn't have abbreviated it anyway.

      --
      I understand that life's not fair, just why is it never unfair in my favor?
    6. Re:The CoolTechZone article is barely literate by Quattro+Vezina · · Score: 1

      If they wanted to say "first person shooter", they would have said "first person shooter". They made a deliberate decision to say FPS instead.

      Moron.

      --
      I support the Center for Consumer Freedom
    7. Re:The CoolTechZone article is barely literate by Zixia · · Score: 1

      It is either 'an FPS', or 'a First-Person Shooter'.

      Abbreviations are assumed in written English to be pronounced letter by letter, unless they are acronyms that have become fully accepted as words, like 'laser' or 'NATO'.

      TFA was correct in writing 'an FPS'.

    8. Re:The CoolTechZone article is barely literate by fwitness · · Score: 1

      Thank you for reminding people that some acronyms are now words, like laser and radar. I would also like to eliminate lazer from the dictionary of America. Thanks.

      --
      -- I have fans? Wow.
  12. Re:Some chance for karma... by cowscows · · Score: 1

    If you haven't been involved in the past generation of consoles, it's getting to be a good time to check it out. Forget spending your money on a 360 and trying to pick out the couple of good games out of the launch titles. Instead, get a plain ol' Xbox, and you'll have a huge library of games available right away. And the best part, it'll all be dirt cheap compared to the 360 stuff. There's plenty of great stuff for the PS2 and the Gamecube as well.

    I just got an Xbox about a year ago, and I had a few years of games to pick from. If I haven't played it before, it's new to me, regardless of the release date or how many sequels have already been released. All the consoles have a $20 best sellers category, you can't go wrong with that.

    --

    One time I threw a brick at a duck.

  13. Re:Some chance for karma... by superpulpsicle · · Score: 1

    I got a giant list of PS2 games lined up to buy this holiday from the bargin bin and Greatest hits collection.

  14. The Revolution's Games?? by DeadScreenSky · · Score: 1

    What games?

    --
    There is no excellent beauty that hath not some strangeness in the proportion. -- Francis Bacon
    1. Re:The Revolution's Games?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Confirmed: Mario, Zelda, Super Smash Brothers Onlnie, Metriod Prime 3, Animal Crossing, Final Fantasy Crystal Chronicals, an untitled Kojima Productions games (the people who made MGS).

  15. Re:Some chance for karma... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1) No, at the moment games are looking like a minor upgrade. Once developers get used to the hardware, and if you have a HD-TV, it might be worth it later. If you haven't played for a while I'd advise waiting for a Revolution as it'll have all the old games you remember, will be cheaper and looks damn good fun to boot.

    2) The harddrive is mainly for storing media and backwards compatibility. MS have said to developers not to count on it being there so most will ignore it for vital game functions. However some big RPG has already said they'll use it.

    3) Games seem to be about the same price as always but there's rumblings that bigger dev teams will drive up costs, it's not been seen yet, but most games were being developed for the last gen anyway.

    4) Yes, always happens, been burnt far too many times on console launch price to get another in the "launch window".

  16. Re:Some chance for karma... by Prophet+of+Nixon · · Score: 1

    Hey,

    This isn't a direct answer, exactly, but if you're looking for a good console, for not too much money, then just avoid the new crap altogether. You didn't miss anything between the SNES and roughly 1999 (with the exception of Symphony of the Night and R-Type Delta), and there's some great stuff on the current/last generation of consoles:

    Dreamcast:
    Cannon Spike
    Mars Matrix
    Zero Gunner 2 (have to find an image online, wasn't released in US)
    Rez (see Zero Gunner 2)
    Dead or Alive 2
    Soul Calibur
    GigaWing
    Crazy Taxi 1/2
    Jet Set Radio
    Maken X

    PS2:
    Symphony of the Night (PS1 game)
    Gradius III & IV
    Gradius V
    R-Type Final
    R-Type Delta (PS1 game, you probably can't find this, but if you ever see it and have a PS2, grab it)
    Silpheed
    Zone of the Enders 1/2
    Neo Contra (if you liked the overhead levels in Contra: The Alien Wars (SNES) you will absolutely love this, its an awesome game)
    Capcom Classics Collection (old stuff, but 1942, 1943, and 1943 Kai with remixed music are worth it)
    Soul Calibur 2/3
    Virtua Fighter 4 Evolution
    Front Mission 4
    Culdcept
    Champions of Norrath 1/2
    Katamari Damacy

    Xbox:
    Oddworld Stranger's Wrath (the only single player FPS really worth playing)
    Halo (if you like multiplayer with 4 people in one room)
    Halo 2 (if you want to mess with online multiplayer, the maps suck for 4 person games though)
    Timesplitters: Future Perfect (another great 4 person FPS)
    Dead or Alive: Ultimate (gorgeous remake of 2 with online play and tweaked movelist/block methods)
    Hunter the Reckoning: Redeemer
    Gunvalkyrie (awesome shooter from Sega, controls have a steep learning curve, but is really neat, has great music too)
    Panzer Dragoon Orta (lock-on rail shooter, similar to Rez but not as cool)
    Otogi 1/2
    Phantom Crash (the sequel to this is Steel Lancer Arena International on PS2, but I haven't played it)
    Gauntlet: Dark Legacy (the best of all versions of it)
    Crimson Skies
    MechAssualt (never played 2, but 1 is pretty cool)

    Can't speak for the Gamecube because I've never messed with one, and I've probably ommitted some stuff, but all of those are great games, and all of them should be easily obtainable for $15-$30 (maybe not the Dreamcast ones, I haven't gone looking since it stopped production). If you get a PS2 or XBox, be sure to grab an s-video cable for it, it makes a right noticable difference. Dreamcast can output VGA if you can find a converter box.

    Pick one, get some games, and (maybe) by the time you're tired of it, the new consoles will have some games backing them up.

  17. Re:Some chance for karma... by Prophet+of+Nixon · · Score: 1

    Well, I did neglect at least one awesome game: You must play Beyond Good & Evil (PS2 or Xbox).