Slashdot Mirror


Suse Linux Founder Exits Novell

csplinter writes write to tell us that SuSE Linux founder Hubert Mantel has resigned from Novell stating "Too late for me. I just decided to leave Suse/Novell. This is no longer the company I founded 13 years ago." Novell confirmed his resignation but had little else to say on the topic. From the article: "Mantel's departure also comes less than a week after Novell announced a major restructuring that would result in 600 layoffs. It's unclear if Mantel's resignation is related to the restructuring."

34 of 245 comments (clear)

  1. "Too Late"? by adavies42 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    What is the "too late for me" in reference to? TFA give no clue.

    --
    Media that can be recorded and distributed can be recorded and distributed.
    -kfg
    1. Re:"Too Late"? by ElGuapoGolf · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'm not sure what the "too late" comment means, but I think he takes a shot at some of the ximian folks later on when he suggests a maintainer for the SuSE kernel could be found from somewhere in the Ximian group.

      Ouch. I mean, given the bloated (but usable) mess that is Evolution, would you want those guys maintaining your distribution's kernel?

      I think he's right, SuSE isn't the same company anymore. Kubuntu, here I come.

  2. Re:13 years for what by Amouth · · Score: 3, Funny

    they have solutions???? damn i wish some of the places i go that have novell would look into that.. all i see is something you install and nothing works.. it isn't that it is broken .. it's just does nothing.. nothing at all..

    --
    '...if only "Jumping to a Conclusion" was an event in the Olympics.'
  3. Novell moves to GNOME; SuSE founder resigns? by Srdjant · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Could Hubert Mantel have quit due to Novell making SuSE a GNOME-centred distro instead of keeping it a KDE-centred one?

    Novell standardise on GNOME: http://linux.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/11/05/ 1620206&tid=223&tid=106

    1. Re:Novell moves to GNOME; SuSE founder resigns? by civilizedINTENSITY · · Score: 4, Interesting
      The comment about finding a kernel maintainer was likewise interesting:
      "I have been the maintainer of the Suse kernel for more than a decade now," Mantel wrote. "I'm very confident the Novell management will find a competent successor very quickly. After all, there are lots of extremely skilled people over there in the Ximian division."
      It is enough to make one wonder if there is a power struggle, or at least the perception of one, arising from differences of opinion between the SuSE and Ximian groups. SuSE's technical excellence is perhaps not so appreciated as some feel it should be? How important is mono?
    2. Re:Novell moves to GNOME; SuSE founder resigns? by oever · · Score: 3, Informative

      You are suggesting the GPL software cannot be for profit software. Also, if you want to keep your code private, using the GPL version of Qt is fine. Only if you publish a program under a different license that the GPL do you have to pay the license.

      This should be no problem, since KDE is compatible with this requirement. Any software Novell might want to add would probably be GPL anyway, because that's the most common license for Linux distros.

      Only if Novell wanted to develop a closed source program would the Qt license be a problem. But even then, it would be easy to use a different library if the license fee, (which is not that hight compared to dev. wages) was too much.

      --
      DNA is the ultimate spaghetti code.
    3. Re:Novell moves to GNOME; SuSE founder resigns? by Arandir · · Score: 4, Insightful

      To me, that sounds like subtle (or not so subtle) sarcasm. Perhaps Mantel heard the phrase "lots of extremely skilled people over there in the Ximian division" used one too many times as an excuse by his bosses, that he simply used it back at them.

      After all, if you have a division of perfect people down the hall, why not let them work on the kernel? Even if they're applications people with absolutely no kernel experience, how hard can it be for perfect people who have all the answers?

      --
      A Government Is a Body of People, Usually Notably Ungoverned
    4. Re:Novell moves to GNOME; SuSE founder resigns? by Jason+Earl · · Score: 3, Informative

      It's not that Novell can't afford the price of a few development licenses, but rather it is that Novell can't afford to put another company between itself and customers that want to develop for Novell's desktop. Imagine the following discussion between a Novell salesman and a potential development partner.

      Novell salesman: "You want to develop software for the Novell Linux Desktop? Ok, well go talk to some tiny company in the Netherlands," (yes, I know that the company is actually Norwegian, I am making a point), "they own a critical piece of our development toolkit."

      Development Partner: "Let me get this straight. You want me to develop software using an oddball development framework written in C++, and you don't even own the framework."

      Novell salesman: "That's correct, on the plus side if you skip our fancy KDE libraries you can run your software on Windows too. Of course, QT-only applications also don't take advantage of some of the nice features of Windows, but if the cell phone industry ever comes out with a useful Linux-based cell phone you could probably port to that as well."

      Development Partner: "I think that I am going to talk to Red Hat now."

      Any way you slice it the fact that Novell doesn't own QT is problematic for Novell's use of KDE. Throw in the fact that most of the applications that Novell wants to sell as part of the Novell Linux desktop are either Gnome applications or allied with Gnome, and the fact that with Mono Novell can point Microsoft developers to a "way out" while still reusing their C# code and its no wonder that KDE is getting the short end of the stick at Novell. KDE is getting the short end of the stick from all of the big Linux players. IBM based SWT on GTK for the exact same reasons, and Firefox is based on GTK as well.

  4. Time to Fork Suse by Bruha · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Novell promised big things for Suse 10. Claiming it was a Windows Killer. I find it no better or worse than the last version of Suse 9.

    What Novell is doing here is creating a platform for Ximian and the only way to get any distro to accept Ximian was to buy Suse. This apparently has proven true with Hubert's comments that Ximian had lots of talented people.

  5. who is it unclear to? by frovingslosh · · Score: 4, Funny
    It's unclear if Mantel's resignation is related to the restructuring.

    Who is it unclear to? And what are they smoking?

    --
    I'm an American. I love this country and the freedoms that we used to have.
  6. Especially... by alamandrax · · Score: 5, Funny

    When we took away his stapler. That just pissed him off.

    --
    'tis but a scratch.
  7. My Bet by Crimsane · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If I had to make a wager as to why he left, I would bet someone close to him got layed off and he put his own job on the line to defend them.

    I was sad to hear suse layed of This dude who was doing lots of xforms stuff for FF.

    But of course Novell has been doing lots of good for a while now, all the time losing money, so I couldn't be too critcal.

  8. Re:13 years for what by krgallagher · · Score: 5, Interesting
    "I love Suse. It's my favorite distro by far."

    Same here. I really do not understand staements like "This is no longer the company I founded 13 years ago." Of course it isn't. It is Novel. Novel is an old corporation with a well known corporate culture. Mantel knew that when he sold the company. If he had any illusions, he was just deluding himself. I think the most telling quote in the article is "I'm very confident the Novell management will find a competent successor very quickly. After all, there are lots of extremely skilled people over there in the Ximian division." Sounds to me like corporate infighting and Mantel lost.

    --

    Insert Generic Sig Here:

  9. Probably not a big deal by Jherek+Carnelian · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This departure is probably no big deal. Every single "amicable" corporation acquisition that I have ever seen worked out the same way. The founders of the acquired company stay on board in order to help assure a smooth merger. But after about a year or so, they almost always take off for new projects. I suspect that sticking around until now was a contractual obligation on his part as part of selling the company.

    These guys tend to be of two types - "startup" guys who don't think it is fun to run an established business, or a "control types" who aren't satisifed unless they are running the whole show. Either way, when they sell the company, they are no longer in the position that most appeals to them so they move on as soon as they can.

    So, I wouldn't take this event too seriously, he's probably had short-timer's disease for the last six months anyway.

  10. Re:13 years for what by Reducer2001 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Perhaps you meant to say that administrators who have Novell solutions in place don't have anything to do? My company has NetWare servers for file/print/auth/e-mail/Internet proxy/etc. in place. Our servers have uptimes in the 100's of days (our best record was 438 days until the mobo died) and require almost no upkeep. Not to mention that I don't have to worry too much about nasty viruses coming in. Oh, and our NetWare servers have a bash prompt that I can use, as well as running several OSS programs (Apache, PHP, MySQL).

    --
    When you get to hell -- tell 'em Itchy sent ya!
  11. Yet another Novell failure by stryemer · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Someone should put a stop to Novell. SuSE may be the next in a long line of great products (Corel, WordPerfect, etc) that Novell flushes down the toilet. It's really too bad because from my experience with SuSE was better than RedHat and Windows. Hey Novell management, fire yourselves!

    --
    -Stryemer

    We are the music makers,
    and we are the dreamers of the dream.
  12. Restructure... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    / Sorry, SuSE's restructuring supposed   \
    | that chamaleon got fired. Get used to  |
    | me: the more efficient, featureful     |
    \ allmighty and POSIX compliant Clippy!  /
            \     ____
             \   / __ \
              \  O|  |O|
                 ||  | |
                 ||  | |
                 ||    |
                  |___/

  13. So why no KDE?? by questro · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Is this guy leaving because KDE is being dropped? I really like SuSE and have been using it for a while. KDE is a big part of that. I like the polish. Is there some license issue that's driving the KDE issue? What gives? I hate to go switching distros AGAIN! This is why I stopped using RedHat/Fedora.

    1. Re:So why no KDE?? by cloudmaster · · Score: 4, Funny

      I like the Polish too, but I'm not sure what they have to do with KDE in SuSE. Maybe if you were telling a lightbulb replacing joke it would be relevent that you like the Polish, but not here.

      I'm gonna have to drive by the Weinerschnizel on the way home now, and get a Polish sandwich. Or maybe just some mini corn dogs. Yeah, I think I'll get mini corn dogs. I like the corn dogs *and* the Polish.

    2. Re:So why no KDE?? by billybob2 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Is there some license issue that's driving the KDE issue?

      KDE is built on QT, a C++ framework released under the GNU General Public License (GPL), a free software license that has strong copyleft (forced sharing) protections meant to ensure that derivative code stays free.

      Some corporations are raising hell against QT and KDE because the corporations want to make proprietary, non-free, closed-source software on the QT framework without compensating the makers of QT. Of course, those same corporations don't have to pay anything if their applications are free and open source. In this way, QT is actually encouraging companies to give back to the community, something beneficial for users as a whole.

      Debunking KDE Myths does a good job disproving the FUD against KDE and QT.

  14. Re:13 years for what by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Yes, especially since kernel development is not exactly Ximians forte. This is probably a clash between company cultures. German engineers believe that quality matters while american managers know that playing golf with executives is more important.

  15. Seems like flamebait and troll, but maybe not... by porkThreeWays · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Since Novell has taken over, they've open sourced a lot of suse. Yast is now open source. The basic suse linux distribution is now freely available immediatly (there used to be a wait time and ftp only installs). Maybe there have been massive internal changes that aren't aparent to the public, but it seems to me they've become more open lately. The quality of Suse offerings have become better as well. I tried suse a few years ago and wasn't terribly impressed. Lately however, I've been inclined to use it on my desktop and some servers.

    --
    If an officer ever threatens to taze you, say you have a pacemaker.
  16. Not Unexpected. Next Stop Bankruptcy by segedunum · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Well, some of us could have told him that as soon as Novell took over Suse. Novell has a terrible track record of making anything work.

    The warning signs were there when Richard Seibt and a few others left some time ago, as well as other Novell employees who didn't even come from Suse like Alan Nugent. And despite the positive spin some people in the company have tried to make of this for their own ends, there's no denying that a lot of people from different parts of the company have been layed off. Yes, even a lot of Gnome oriented people have gone, which means that Novell has no resources and people whatsoever to carry out all of those desktop plans some people say they're doing. They're going to need to spend even more money just to tread water and maintain everything. Looks like there's some truth to Kurt Pfeifle's article, and Mantel's swipe that they should be able to find someone talented to replace him as a kernel developer from Ximian is telling.

    Novell may end up with no Gnome or KDE at all, or even worse, no Linux. People talk about KDE and Gnome a lot, but the fact is that Novell haven't even moved to Linux - that's where the real problems are. Open Enterprise Server is a bastardised Linux OS with Netware running on top of it. What customer wants that and what's the point?! No one judging from the people not buying it and going Red Hat instead. Unless this new COO really does understand his market, the technology and what's required we're seeing Novell go bust right here. Judging from this he's got the basic concepts of how to make people redundant badly wrong. Get that wrong, throw in the towel because it's not worth the effort. You need the right people on your side, not to alienate them.

    1. Re:Not Unexpected. Next Stop Bankruptcy by deviator · · Score: 3, Informative

      Hi. No, you're slightly incorrect about OES -
      I have always been a huge fan of Novell's software; it tends to be stellar stuff. But they have never been able to market their way out of a paper bag since Microsoft decimated Netware back in the NT 4.0 days. Still, products like GroupWise and eDirectory (NDS) have no _real_ technical equivalents in the market.

      OES is not "Netware on top of Linux" - it's actually a collection of java-tomcat (web-based) services that previously ran on Netware that now also run on Linux. Things like iPrint, eDirectory, iFolder, iManage, NSS, etc. You can run these enterprise-value-added services on Netware 6.5 or on SuSE Enterprise Server 9. The management tools are the same for both platforms. It all works quite well--and they've had rave reviews, actually. Once again, their software is stunning - but their marketing sucks.

      I have been playing with OES here - and really, really like what I see. Imagine being able to deploy SuSE 9 across a large enterprise and having _real_ tools to manage them all! That's the promise of what Novell can deliver - but again, the message has somehow been completely lost on the appropriate people.

      I doubt they will declare bankruptcy - Novell has come back from the dead many, many times in the last decade (just like Apple!) But they definitely have some serious challenges to deal with in the coming months, as their traditional Netware revenue base has all but dried up.

  17. The Conversations by mpapet · · Score: 3, Funny

    The guy probably heard a few of these lines before throwing in the towel.

    1. Bring that point up at the next meeting.
    2. Check with person X to okay Y.
    3. Find out when person Z's subordinate has the time to do that task.
    4. I know you preferred Option A but the company is doing Option B.
    5. Fill out that form and give it to accounting and wait 30 days to get reimbursed.
    7. The Board has decided to go a diffferent direction.
    8. Let me run that by person A before doing anything.
    9. Send me an email about it to remind me....

    There's a bunch more probably much funnier too. Join in and add a few!

    --
    http://www.maxineudall.com/2010/02/should-economists-be-sued-for-malpractice.html
    1. Re:The Conversations by The+Monster · · Score: 3, Funny

      10. I think we need to establish a committee to deal with that.
      11. Is this initiative compatible with our Mission Statement?
      12. Can we proactively leverage vertical syergies to deliver five-nines reliability?
      13. We need a subcommittee to work on that aspect of your plan.
      14. Now that you've written all that code, we're changing the design specs on you.
      15. ...again.
      16. If there's such a thing as a sub-subcommittee, we'll be needing one of those.
      17. We need a cross-departmental task force to get a wider perspective on things.
      18. The task force needs to divide itself into committees along departmental lines.
      19. We need to make everything top priority!
      20. ???
      21. PROFIT!

      --

      [100% ISO 646 Compliant]
      SVM, ERGO MONSTRO.

  18. fork it? by towsonu2003 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    someone better fork (open)suse as soon as possible before it dies with novell...

  19. all I have to say is... by DarkProphet · · Score: 4, Funny

    So long and thanks for all the SuSE!

    (Apologies to both NOFX and the late Douglas Adams)

    --
    What could possibly hurt the security of the American people more than giving our own government the ability to hide its
  20. Proof? by alandd · · Score: 3, Interesting

    How do you know "What Novell is doing here is creating a platform for Ximian and the only way to get any distro to accept Ximian was to buy Suse." ??

    And by what stretch of logic is the above "proven true" by "Hubert's comments that Ximian had lots of talented people." ???

  21. Wish him well by FishandChips · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Perhaps it isn't very important why Hubert Mantell has left SuSE, only that he has. Much more important is a big vote of thanks to someone whose dedication and hard work have done an immense amount for SuSE and most likely for anyone who uses Linux (at lot of them will have started out with SuSE). He helped found the company, after all. Here's wishing him all the very best in life and whatever he decides to do next. Sometime soon, Novell's loss will be our gain.

    --
    Las qué passoun
    tournoun pas maï
  22. Re:Sour Grapes by WindBourne · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Or he is bright enough to realize that competing head on with redhat and indirectly with Sun is a mistake?

    At this point, how is Suse different from Redhat? I recently switched to Suse (from Mandrake due to their lousy QC). At the last job, I was coding on Redhat. I was loving Suse until the gnome/kde announcement. At this point, I am telling ppl if they want a Gnome distro to do redhat, and am back to looking for a good kde distro.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  23. Re:13 years for what by Amouth · · Score: 4, Funny

    oh i have seen plenty of good set up netware servers.. my personal favorite is

    http://www.theregister.co.uk/2001/04/12/missing_no vell_server_discovered_after/

    (a friend of mine was an admin up there when it happened.)

    on the other hand.. i have seen horridly setup stuff.. and the client computers always having issues.. my favorite is watching network packets and seeing printer discovery packets from a school network in greensboro in a school network in wilmington..

    --
    '...if only "Jumping to a Conclusion" was an event in the Olympics.'
  24. Re:13 years for what by ScriptedReplay · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Same here. I really do not understand staements like "This is no longer the company I founded 13 years ago." Of course it isn't. It is Novel.

    This is SuSE's *founder* that you're talking about. Meaning he had a *vision* for his company which, from his quote, just isn't there anymore.

    Sounds to me like corporate infighting and Mantel lost.

    Of course it does - and that's probably what it is, too. The question is, however, *what did he lost to*? Now, if you look at the quote more closely, he's saying 'those smart guys from Ximian will pick up on kernel maintenance in no time' - which is of course untrue (at least the 'no time' part, although I suspect whoever will end up in his place will most likely *not* be coming from the desktop division) and to me it sounds like a veiled accusation that the Ximian guys pushed agendas in areas they had little clue about. Maybe I'm reading too much into this, but it does not sound that implausible in the light of recent evolutions at Novell that 'loud' was preferred to 'clueful'

  25. Re:13 years for what by Zemran · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It was probably 'those smart guys at Ximian' that advised Novell to drop KDE. Many users, me amongst them, who have stayed with SuSE for years will now look elsewhere and I should think that Mantel is aware of this since he was there when the last 'should we drop KDE' debate was held and it was decided that it was best to keep KDE as a lot of users prefer it.

    --
    I love stacking my barbecues in the shed at the end of summer - you can't beat a bit of grill on grill action.