Slashdot Mirror


Sony Music CD's Contain Mac DRM Software Too

brjndr writes "A MacInTouch poster has found that certain Sony CD's also contain a smaller extra partition for 'enhanced' content. Running one of the applications found within this partition installs kernel extensions containing DRM software by SunnComm. In Sony's defense you're told what is being installed within a EULA which pops up when the program is loaded. Thankfully we all read our EULAs completely."

55 of 399 comments (clear)

  1. Think different... by Space+cowboy · · Score: 5, Interesting

    [See my journal entry for my previous comments on this]

    To summarise: it's impossible to protect against truly clueless users without severely inconveniencing everyone else, but Mac OS X at least lets you know something dodgy is going on (a request for administration rights, just to play a CD, say what ? No *other* CD's needed that!) I guess it helps to have gorms, though...

    THM: It's a difference in attitude. It *does* make a difference.

    Simon

    --
    Physicists get Hadrons!
    1. Re:Think different... by Andrew+Tanenbaum · · Score: 3, Insightful

      After a short while, typing in your password becomes as much of an unconscious acticity as pressing "OK" on a dialog box. I think we need blinking lights, horns, mandatory timers, and permission from your sysadmin before you can do anything stupid.

    2. Re:Think different... by Space+cowboy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Maybe there ought to be a question when you set up your mac - "rate yourself on a scale of 1-10 on how good you are with computers, and we'll adjust the system alerts accordingly"...

      I'm not *so* sure about the after-a-while thing though - I'm struggling to remember any time I had to type in the sysadmin password when I wasn't installing software. If I equate that action with installing stuff, and all I've done is put a CD in to play the damn thing, I'd be pretty curious as to why... Maybe that's just cynical old me, though...

      Simon

      --
      Physicists get Hadrons!
    3. Re:Think different... by npietraniec · · Score: 5, Informative

      If you use a mac, you'll find that you type in your password far less than you might think you would. I don't do it that often, I don't think I'm that desensitized... I don't do it that often on my linux boxes either. My roommate however tried to set up a non-admin account on his windows computer and found it impossible to get any work done without changing over to admin all the time... Worse yet, things would fail mysteriously without any inidication of what the problem was "why can't I delete my documents on my external harddrive?!?!" He was just complaining about that today.

    4. Re:Think different... by SnowZero · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Maybe there ought to be a question when you set up your mac - "rate yourself on a scale of 1-10 on how good you are with computers, and we'll adjust the system alerts accordingly"...

      You'd have to make it more of a quiz. After all, there's a lot of people that think they know everything but who really don't have a clue (Go to your local computer shop if you don't believe me). It could be pretty funny:

      (1) what does RAM stand for?
      (2) what is 0xF?
      ...

    5. Re:Think different... by ryanr · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'm struggling to remember any time I had to type in the sysadmin password when I wasn't installing software.

      That's the problem. Clueless mac user is probably expecting to be installing software about then. The CD told them they need a player to see the dancing pigs, for example.

    6. Re:Think different... by ReformedExCon · · Score: 5, Funny

      2) is obviously a fat little squirrel. I like to draw squirrels a little thinner: 1xf

      --
      Jesus saved me from my past. He can save you as well.
    7. Re:Think different... by Nermal6693 · · Score: 3, Funny

      I don't know what's funnier: Your post, or that it's moderated Informative.

    8. Re:Think different... by josephdrivein · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "rate yourself on a scale of 1-10 on how good you are with computers, and we'll adjust the system alerts accordingly"...

      Think what a hell would become the customer support: everytime something happens the system may respond to the user in 10 different ways.

      And if a user logs into another mac (at Internet café, library, university etc..), she well have to know if it's configured for dummies or super-geeks or whatever. I may even add that as she gets used to her mac she will want to try to step to the next level, but the user has to learn again how the system behaves.
      And so on.

      It has been proposed more than once, but I doubt it will be ever implemented, as it is a usability nightmare.

    9. Re:Think different... by tm2b · · Score: 4, Informative

      No, it doesn't.

      You are not often challenged for your password in Mac OS X. The default installation location is /Applications, which is mode 775 (meaning users can create items in the directory, but not alter files owned by someone else, including root). Most installs you simply drag an item into the Applications folder.

      If something's asking you for your password and isn't (a) your security manager wanting to fetch your keychain for a website, or (b) something that should be installing drivers, be very worried and don't type your password until you understand exactly what it's doing. My mother has to type her password so infrequently on Mac OS X that she can never remember what it is.

      Even Microsoft Office is a drag-and-drop-to-install application (as well as being a drag), ferchrisakes.

      (and mods, please mod parent down for using Andrew Tanenbaum's name).

      --
      "It is our blasphemy which has made us great, and will sustain us, and which the gods secretly admire in us." - Zelazny
    10. Re:Think different... by Jezza · · Score: 4, Interesting

      This is very true - very little Windows software can cope like this, now Windows Vista (aka Longhorn) will work like this by default, so I expect LOTS of software to fail for this reason alone. Hopefully once everything get updated for Vista we can run our XP boxes in this mode too (which will be much better.

      Someone was saying that you get so used to typing your admin password on OS X that you just do it as a reflex - that hasn't been my experience. This simple change represents a great improvement over Windows XP.

      In the case of the Sony DRM I think it quite likely that Mac OS X users will find the request for their admin password "odd" - and hopefully a significant number would refuse to give it.

      Of course some will as we all tend to trust "big names", maybe that's the real lesson here - Sony can be as evil/stupid as anyone else. And if you can't trust Sony, who can you trust?

    11. Re:Think different... by @madeus · · Score: 5, Insightful

      That's the problem. Clueless mac user is probably expecting to be installing software about then. The CD told them they need a player to see the dancing pigs, for example.

      You don't need to authenticate to install applications on Mac OS X. Installing applications - like Microsoft Office - involves just dragging the application (or the folder it's in) from the CD into the Applications folder on your hard disk. Even things like Real One Player and Windows Media Player work this way.

      When you do actually get a dialog, Mac OS X also tells you what permissions are being requested on the password dialog (e.g. full admin access, or just permission to modify a specific system setting, etc) as well as which application is requesting the permission. In reality, most of the time people see a dialog in Mac OS X which requires authentication, it's because of an interaction with the OS itself (such as changing a system setting) that the user has just performed.

      If a users sees an Application (including plugins) requesting this sort of permission that should really ring alarm bells. Only things like new drivers (e.g. for that new camera you just bought) should be asking for things like that.

      It's fair to say here is room for some improvement in the dialog in that it should better reflect this (perhaps rasing a more severe looking alert when it's anything other than the OS or bundled Application requesting any sort of privileged access, which explains something along the lines of the previous sentence).

      On the subject, it could do with some means of forgery protection (things like an embedded image in the window have been suggested) so that you can better trust it's an authentic authentication dialog. If your paranoid.

      Technically Windows allows for roughly this sort of behaviour too (that is, you should never need admin permissions to install a regular application) but the large number of badly written installers - combined with the lack of a K.I.S.S. approach in the OS - seem to have conspired to make admin level access madatory for even the most mundane tasks.

      I bet if vendors (and I include both Apple and Microsoft in that) implimented privilage dialogs that were scary and intimidating enough to users (perhaps with a default action of 'deny') 3rd party application developers wouldn't ask for them unless they really needed those permissions.

    12. Re:Think different... by onlyjoking · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Exactly. Doze software often won't work unless run from an Admin account. I recently installed a Belkin wireless card for a client and it wouldn't work when the user accounts were set to Limited User. Changed to Admin and everything ran fine. Another machine with Limited User accounts gave popup error messages at login generated by a USB webcam. Switched the account to Admin and all was fine. It's ****ing madness. You have software developers who seem not to be aware of the basic architecture of the platform they develop for.

    13. Re:Think different... by rcs1000 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      So: let me get this straight, you modded the grand parent down. Then you posted a comment. Which automatically removes the moderation.

      Are you feeling OK today? Would you like someone else to help you to moderate?

      (Not me, of course, as by posting I prevent myself from moderating...)

      --
      --- My dad's political betting
    14. Re:Think different... by arminw · · Score: 3, Interesting

      .....After a short while, typing in your password becomes as much of an unconscious acticity as pressing "OK".....

      That's why most users around here don't KNOW the admin password. When we set up brand new Macs for others, we always make at least two accounts. One for administration and the others for everyday normal users. Users who must be given the admin password are admonished NEVER to give that password unless they are expecting to be asked for it when installing or upgrading software. So far, none of them has been hit with any shady programming because of this. Unlike our Windows users, the Mac users can do everything they need to without even knowing the admin password.

      This should work in most homes, where the parents are the only one who know the master password. That way the kids can't so easily mess up the whole computer. ALL games even work just fine without the master password, once they are properly set up.

      --
      All theory is gray
    15. Re:Think different... by zeugma-amp · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Jezza, this is not intended to be a personal slam on you. It's more of a general comment.

      This is very true - very little Windows software can cope like this, now Windows Vista (aka Longhorn) will work like this by default, so I expect LOTS of software to fail for this reason alone. Hopefully once everything get updated for Vista we can run our XP boxes in this mode too (which will be much better.

      Hope seems to spring eternal in the MS windows world. I've been hearing people say essentially the same thing since NT3.5. It hasn't happened yet, and unfortunately I don't believe it's going to happen with "vista" either. I just want to know how long people are going to fall for this "the next version will fix everything" line we constantly hear from microsoft apologists.

      I have nothing but Linux running in my household (1 desktop and 3 laptops). Sometimes my wife is annoyed that she can't do something right out of the box that windows lets you do, but Linux does not. This especially true of permissions issues. What she doesn't realize is that many times, what she'd wanted to do wouldn't have been possible for a user under windows either, but since she's never not been administrator on windows, she doesn't realize it.

      My point is, it is going to be really hard for windows users to change their ways from having administrative rights (and all the horrible pitfalls that entails), to just being a user even if more of the software actually supports user mode correctly.

      --
      This is an ex-parrot!
    16. Re:Think different... by vertinox · · Score: 3, Informative

      You don't need to authenticate to install applications on Mac OS X. Installing applications - like Microsoft Office - involves just dragging the application (or the folder it's in) from the CD into the Applications folder on your hard disk. Even things like Real One Player and Windows Media Player work this way.

      I would also like to point out that even when you are dragging and droping apps into the Apps folder it will prompt you once to say "You are about to run (application name) for the first time. Are you sure you want to do this?" which is a pretty good fail safe for programs that are trying to run silently.

      --
      "I am the king of the Romans, and am superior to rules of grammar!"
      -Sigismund, Holy Roman Emperor (1368-1437)
    17. Re:Think different... by @madeus · · Score: 3, Informative

      iTunes patches seem to bring up the permission box every time :P

      Yeah, Mail and Safari patches do the same, I assume it keeps track of the Applications filename / it's location / MD5 of the binary / etc. which is why it requires confirmation the first time you run the new version of the application (so that someone - or some software - can't switch the legitimate application with a trojan copy).

      Good Thing(TM), even if the iTunes patches are a little too frequent. ;-)

  2. Why yes, I give my admin password out on request! by jx100 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I think the fact that it asks for your password on install should throw up *some* sort of red flag. And tosses in a rather easy way to get past the DRM.

  3. Well one clear warning sign... by radicalskeptic · · Score: 4, Insightful

    According to the comments on the linked page, you have to type in your name/password after agreeing to the EULA. This is really non-standard and hopefully will set off alarms in people's heads when they wonder why they have to do that (OS X doesn't ask for your password often). But something tells me most users will just go ahead and give the app free reign anyway. Not that I blame them, you'd expect to be able to trust Sony, a freaking huge "legitimate" corporation for Pete's sake.

    --
    WARNING: If accidentally read, induce vomiting.
  4. daft... by Phil246 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    are sony that determined to bury themselves?
    Surely, they realise that its only going to create a backlash against DRM if they continue this nonsense?

    1. Re:daft... by dorkygeek · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Joe Desktop doesn't care and simply installs whatever malware is needed to listen to the cd.

      --
      Windows is like decaf - it tastes like the real thing, but it won't get you through the day.
  5. bondage by heatdeath · · Score: 4, Funny

    Man, actually buying online music is starting to look more and more like S&M. I can hardly wait 'till they come out with CDs that come with shackles that have to be worn while listening to the CD.

    --
    I'm sorry. The number you have reached is imaginary. Please rotate your phone 90 degrees and try again.
    1. Re:bondage by Mistshadow2k4 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Hey! Even we aren't that cruel. Bondage is fun, this crap isn't. Leave us kinksters out of this, please.

      --
      I dream of a better world... one in which chickens can cross roads without their motives being questioned.
  6. Re:Why yes, I give my admin password out on reques by RzUpAnmsCwrds · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Why yes, I give my admin password out on request!

    You would be amazed at what most users will do for music, porn, wallpapers, or screensavers.

    Mac OS isn't immune to this kind of crapola - at least not for the average user.

  7. Jesus by KingVance · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Boy it seems like sony is just running around pissing everybody off...

    Well, I for one pledge to no longer purchase any sony products. Nor will I buy online music from sony, purchase any games, or watch any sony movies until they stop being overbearing assholes with their stuff.

  8. Illustrates why... by rsborg · · Score: 5, Insightful
    the basic OSX security of "Administrator == sudo rights" as opposed to the Windows approach of "Administrator == anything goes" really does make a difference. In the windows portion, Sony just ignores the user and installs all sorts of crap (using autorun)... but on the Mac side, they have to play nice, or the user will not be "convinced" to enter their password to install the software.

    Who knows how evil the DRM is, once the install is made, but jeebus... talk about an issue of trust (just for the installer)!

    --
    Make sure everyone's vote counts: Verified Voting
  9. Even more thankfully by Have+Blue · · Score: 4, Informative

    Autorun is turned off by default on Macs, and there's never a good reason to turn it on. There's no way this could interfere with the usual insert/launch iTunes/click Rip method most people use.

    1. Re:Even more thankfully by eobanb · · Score: 4, Informative

      Actually, there IS no autorun on Mac OS X.

      --

      Take off every sig. For great justice.

  10. At least this means one good thing... by fitchmicah · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This is a sign that Mac OS X has a large enough userbase for Sony to worry about Mac users stealing music.

  11. Re:Why yes, I give my admin password out on reques by MichaelSmith · · Score: 5, Funny
    should throw up *some* sort of red flag

    A client of mine once got an email instructing telling her that a virus had been installed on her system. She was to immediately locate a file (I think it was COMMAND.COM) and delete it, which would remove the hazard.

    She forwarded it on to me (just in case I needed it, you see) and then sent me a second email because the person who sent her the message had trashed their system, and she thought I was about to do same.

    When it comes to stupidity among users, I will believe anything

  12. Re:Make a fortune by gcatullus · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Reasonable, yes, but legally workable not really, at least according to Sony. The sony eula says you must destroy any and all fair use copies of the music you possess, if you are no longer in possession of the actual cd. What a concept, your car gets robbed, you get cds stolen and then SONY makes you delete any copies you may have. I'd love to see it in court.

  13. Throwing out the baby with the bath water by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    So, in effect, your computer is at less risk if you download Sony published music from peer to peer networks than if you try to play your Sony CD on your computer. Where's the value proposition?

  14. Re:Admin Privileges by Bananatree3 · · Score: 5, Insightful
    YOU may not even consider such an idea, but not everyone is so tech-savvy. Think of all the Joe users out there...

    Joe user: What's this I see? I have to enter my password to play a music CD? Oh no biggy, its just a music CD. What harm could it do?

    That is my concern. The average user sees it comes from Sony, a "trustable" company, and doesn't give it a second thought. A very lethal combo
  15. autorun by minus_273 · · Score: 4, Informative

    the summary fails to mention that OSX has no autorun. There is no way it can install something behind your back like windows does.

    --
    The war with islam is a war on the beast
    The war on terror is a war for peace
  16. With luck by jd · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It will not only bury Sony, but also the DMCA (which actually prohibits you from de-installing the DRM code or even detecting that it's there) and will possibly cripple the credibility of the RIAA, who have been the main driving-force for DRM and the DMCA.

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
  17. EULA by speeDDemon+(nw) · · Score: 3, Informative

    We may not all read our EULA's. However I have found the following software EULAlyzer really handy in highlighting important items in the EULA.

    Its not a substitute for truelly reading the whole EULA, however I find it good at helping me and my customers identify 'dodgy' software.

  18. McCarthyism doesn't sound so bad now... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Why not find the names of the individual programmers who coded these rootkits, and make sure they're unable to ever get a job ever again? It was perfectly reasonable to keep Communist sympathizers out of Hollywood and government when Senator McCarthy went on his crusade -- why not keep DRM sympathizers out of the programming industry? Treat them like shit, refuse to hire them anywhere, and make them unable to ever afford food and shelter ever again without humiliating welfare subsidies.

    Of course, criminals will always hire criminals; a thief will always have a chance at getting hired by the Mafia, so I don't expect this will completely work. Computer companies that have overgrown beyond their event horizon of personal responsibility such as Sony and Microsoft will always be a haven for crooks and guttersnipes. But every responsible company still around should outright refuse to hire anyone who's ever knowingly developed anything related to DRM; conduct background checks on every potential employee's employment history and slam the door in the face of any DRM sympathizer looking for a job.

  19. Linux port? by SnowZero · · Score: 4, Funny

    When can we expect Linux support? I'd like to think that Linux is big enough now to demand proper support from Sony, just like Windows and OSX.

  20. Memories... by way2trivial · · Score: 3, Funny

    Oh christ, you just reminded me of something-- a great recollection....

    My original //e had some lame-ass program to "meet the machine", it had routines to deal with typists who cheated by using l's for ones s and o's for zeros... if you did this, it went into this little diatrabe about how "to a computer, a 0 and an o are very different things"
      Snort...

    --
    every day http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random
    1. Re:Memories... by cvdwl · · Score: 5, Interesting
      My original //e had some lame-ass program to "meet the machine", it had routines to deal with typists who cheated by using l's for ones s and o's for zeros...
      Cheated, hell! My first ... TYPEWRITER (yes, mechanical, yes, really, no power cord... no "correction paper", either) ... didn't have a "1" or "0" key, it expected you to use l and O. I remember being confused by this the very first time I tried to type on it.

      I'd really like to get my hands on one of those now. I sort of miss slapping it upside the carriage every time you were finishing a line. And a typo at the end of a page REALLY hurt.

      --
      ... grumble, grumble, grumble, mutter, mutter, Millenium... Hand... Shrimp, I tol' 'em, I tol' 'em.
  21. Re:Oh thank God... by tm2b · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Ummm..."Ha ha, it doesn't affect us!" At least, none of us who don't type in the administrator password without understanding why we're doing it.

    Ha ha, only serious. Seriously, this isn't an "any computer" issue. This is an issue with the only "modern" OS that have been specifically engineered to run arbitrary binaries with privileges without challenging the user. It's isn't a matter of Mac OS X or Linux (or VMS or Solaris or SunOS or VM/CMS) being better, it's a matter of Windows being worse .

    This isn't even a matter of Windows' original design, as Dave Cutler's original security model was solid and included a good separation of privileges away from the desktop user, drawing on the last half a century of computing experience. This is a matter of Microsoft Management specifically and intentionally deciding to screw you. They will say it was necessary to make a desktop OS usable by novices - Mac OS X does give the lie to such horseshit (and that is the only place Mac OS X specifically figures in this topic).

    Yes, Sony deserves a lot of the blame. But Microsoft deserves just as much. You can start to "fight this stupidity" by not using Windows.

    --
    "It is our blasphemy which has made us great, and will sustain us, and which the gods secretly admire in us." - Zelazny
  22. Re:Oh thank God... by dreamer-of-rules · · Score: 4, Informative

    Because of OS X default security, even when running as the administrator, you still need to click to run the program, then type in your password. Deceptive, but not really secretive or automatic, thanks to the default Mac security.

    In Windows, you just insert the CD. Maybe into someone else's system when their back is turned. Windows OS trusts external content much more than the user sitting at the desk. "Do me", it says.

    Unfortunately, people are still stupid enough to follow these ludicrous steps. Remember the teddy bear "virus" in Windows? Consisted only of an email, the instructions to delete a standard Windows exe file, and a directive to resend the email to all of your friends.

    PS. Join us... you know you want to. ;)

    --
    Everyone is entitled to his own opinions, but not his own facts.
  23. Re:Oh thank God... by darkitecture · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Yeah, Sony definitely wants to support all the 30+ platforms outthere.

    See, it's that sort of naivete that I'm talking about. If Sony put all their information through their Supercalculamotron 4000(TM) and somehow came to the conclusion that it would be in their own interests to invest millions upon millions on fundamentally flawed DRM methods using dubious moral standards, what makes you think that they won't suddenly wake up one morning and think, "Holy shit! Linux users are getting a free lunch! Let's fuck them over somehow! Get First4Internet on the phone, I'm sure they'll be able to come up with something!" If that happened, then the very best you could expect would be a putrid aborted foetus of a DRM clusterfuck. Heaven forbid that a company like First4Internet actually do the job right. Knowing their competency, they'd just manage to send your mp3s to /dev/null or something.

    Obviously *nix is a much more difficult problem for them to deal with... but you're just asking for it by sitting around lazily thinking it could never happen to you.

  24. Sony just lost ~5000 euros by Ripper · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I just renewed my living-room home-entertainment system for almost 5000 euros. The two finalists were a all Sony set vs. Panasonic + Harman Kardon + Infinity. Guess which finalist got my money after reading up on the Sony DRM scheme... Yep, I'm a happy Panasonic+HK+Infinty owner. Added a One-for-All remote and the functionality is pretty much the same as using a complete set from the same vendor.

    And this was definitely the last time I even consider Sony. Forget the new Playstation, if I have to choose from the two bad options M$ vs. Sony my money goes to M$ in this case.

    As big a fan as I am of the Van Zant brothers, I just can't think of buying the album after all this. Luckily it was available without DRM somewhere else. It's a shame for the artists though, they didn't get thei $0.50 or whatever they make per sold CD.

    I know my 5000 doesn't bankrupt Sony but if more of us start voting with our wallets maybe they will realize they can't keep on shafting customers every chance they get.

  25. At first, it seemed like a bad idea... by bennomatic · · Score: 5, Interesting
    ...but maybe Apple's right on the money with their "tamper-resistant software." Forget about hackers and pirates; I don't want $ony taking over my machine.

    It may sound paranoid, but once they start messing with the kernel, you really don't know what they're going to do...

    --
    The CB App. What's your 20?
  26. I love how they lie by dtd33inc · · Score: 3, Interesting

    "November 8, 2005 - This Service Pack removes the cloaking technology component that has been recently discussed in a number of articles published regarding the XCP Technology used on SONY BMG content protected CDs. This component is not malicious and does not compromise security. However to alleviate any concerns that users may have about the program posing potential security vulnerabilities, this update has been released to enable users to remove this component from their computers. Please note, Service Pack 2a is a maintenance release designed to reduce the file size of Service Pack 2. It includes all previous fixes found in Service Pack 1 and Service Pack 2."

    http://cp.sonybmg.com/xcp/english/updates.html

    HMM it does not compromise security? It installs a root kit, then it lets people hide a trojan on your computer. Who needs sony anyway, I have my game cube and X-box.
  27. Re:That's the last Sony CD I ever buy by SnprBoB86 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Citibank (I think) has a credit card mask generator. You can generate a credit card number for use online and then you tell the credit card company the spending and number of transations limits. You get a safe, one time use credit card number.

    --
    http://brandonbloom.name
  28. what if the moviefile is flawed? by freaker_TuC · · Score: 3, Insightful


    What if that movie file is flawed?

    The Windows OS only opens a autorun file too; which is linked to a executable; but the principles are just the same, only the practical side is much more exploitable in Windows with its flawed autorun system...

    --
    --- I am known for the ones who want to find me on the net. Is that a privacy risk or a privilege? One might wonder..
  29. Re:Oh thank God... by MalachiConstant · · Score: 3, Informative
    That's the most articulate explaination I've heard of this. Thanks.

    I spend most of my time on a Mac (at work) but have a PC at home. If I had the money for a new computer I'd buy a Mac, but everytime I think of ditching my PC altogether I have to stop and think...

    well, I won't be able to play most of the games I bought anymore...and there's an application or two that's Windows only that I need occasionally...

    It pisses me off because I don't want to use Windows. I guess I could live without the old games, but there have been many times where I think, well, at least I can just open that in windows and re-save it.

    The best situation I can see is that OS X and/or Linux gets enough market share so that it's common for certain businesses/people to have a PC for occasional compatibility purposes only, which will lead to Mac/Linux converters that will eliminate the need for a PC, so that 100% Mac/Linux shops will have to be a consideration at least.

    If I may go on a tangent here...

    I used to work at a pre-press company (my title was "Mac Operator" which I always thought would be a cool 80's rap name. I'd change it to "Mac O" in the 90's [a la P. Diddy], then to "MOpe" around 2003). Anyway, we had one WinNT machine we kept around for the clients who were too low-scale to realize that all print work was done on Macs.

    Any Windows job was a guaranteed pain-in-the-ass, mostly for compatibility reasons, but also because WinNT was stupid about networking and printing issues. It always seemed stupid to me that, while we printed to million dollar imagesetters and had clients like the Dell computer catalog, we had to keep this red-deaded stepchiled to run a Windows version of Quark (or for the real low-rent clients who submitted Windows Pagemaker files).

    I'm a video editor now, and I still get annoyed when someone wants a non-Quicktime movie file. Some of the blame surely lies with Apple who won't even let you import an MP3 into Final Cut Pro unless you convert it into a Quicktime file first, but for the most part Apple tries to be universal, whereas Microsoft's attitude is "Fuck everyone else. If you're not using .avis and Word .docs you can go screw yourself."

    Thank god that blu-ray won out so we don't have do deal with even more forced-incompatibility issues. I just want shit to work. I'm not totally computer-illiterate (I know enough to install a new OS, or random expansion card, or hard drive. I've used Linux a bit on my personal computer), but when there's work to be done I don't want to have to use Google to search for the best way to convert a file or get a random piece of PC hardware to work on a Mac.

  30. As result of this Sony rootkit fiasco... by bluelarva · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Well.. Let see... I will NOT be buying the following:

    1. Sony music CD's
    2. Sony HD TV
    3. Sony Playstation 3 and games
    4. Sony Bluray DVD player
    5. Sony Ericson phones
    6. Sony VAIO laptop
    7. Sony DVD burner
    8. Sony digital camera
    9. Sony video recorder

    The only way Sony will regain my trust is if they were to:

    1. publically admit that what they did was wrong
    2. put a link on sony.com to a page explaining what exactly happened and provide software to uninstall the rootkit
    3. recall all CD's on the shelf containing rootkit DRM
    4. offer replacement CD's to all customers

  31. Affected Titles by bitkari · · Score: 4, Funny

    Trey Anastasio, Shine (Columbia)
    Celine Dion, On ne Change Pas (Epic)
    Neil Diamond, 12 Songs (Columbia)
    Our Lady Peace, Healthy in Paranoid Times (Columbia)
    Chris Botti, To Love Again (Columbia)
    Van Zant, Get Right with the Man (Columbia)
    Switchfoot, Nothing is Sound (Columbia)
    The Coral, The Invisible Invasion (Columbia)
    Acceptance, Phantoms (Columbia)
    Susie Suh, Susie Suh (Epic)
    Amerie, Touch (Columbia)
    Life of Agony, Broken Valley (Epic)
    Horace Silver Quintet, Silver's Blue (Epic Legacy)
    Gerry Mulligan, Jeru (Columbia Legacy)
    Dexter Gordon, Manhattan Symphonie (Columbia Legacy)
    The Bad Plus, Suspicious Activity (Columbia)
    The Dead 60s, The Dead 60s (Epic)
    Dion, The Essential Dion (Columbia Legacy)
    Natasha Bedingfield, Unwritten (Epic)
    Ricky Martin, Life (Columbia)

    from the eff

    Perhaps this DRM is your punishment for listening to Ricky Martin and Celine Dion?

  32. Microsoft does it better.... by sr180 · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Hows this..
    A mate installs a Windows XP OEM version onto a PC. Activates it and everything is sweet. A few days later his pc is stolen. So he buys a new PC, because he still has the Windows XP CD, the manual, the license and all the little stickers, he goes to install it on the new PC. It wont activate. He rings Microsoft. They refuse to activate the software since its been activated on another pc, and that violates the OEM license. They suggest he reports it to his insurance company as stolen and they can pay for a new license.

    So they encourage him to commit insurance fraud as the software has not been stolen, because he has all the software and the licenses to run it.

    --
    In Soviet Russia the insensitive clod is YOU!
  33. Simplify EULAs by mmeister · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The problem with these EULAs are that they are so verbose that any important facts are lost and I believe that is the intention.

    That is how these Spyware companies gain "permission" and certainly how Sony has gained "permission" to install anything they want. Most users aren't able to read a 5 page legal document squeezed into a tiny little box very effectively.

    We need to write our Congressmen and Senators and tell them that EULAs should be simplified, even standardized. I'd even suggest that some sort of color coding be required to indicate the severity of changes to be made. Unlike Homeland Security's approach, I suggest three simple colors: GREEN, YELLOW, RED (You might recognize these colors from your local STOPLIGHT).

    GREEN - This EULA just contains standard legal protections of the company for their software.
    YELLOW - This application will install some components to run at the same permission level as the user.
    RED - This application will install SYSTEM-LEVEL COMPONENTS.

    This may not be perfect, but the 10-pages of legal mumbo-jumbo is hard for even the paranoid to go through. For example, I installed several updates to my Mac OS X system (10.4.3, Java, Quicktime, iTunes, Airport) and EACH ONE contained an EULA that was extremely long.

    The current system is broken and, unfortunately, we need to change the law to fix it because I know that the large companies with their lawyers have no intention of fixing it.

  34. Mac OS X's malware resiliency put to the test by Durandal64 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This kind of thing really illustrates Mac OS X's malware resiliency. There is no CD auto-run, so there is no way for these extensions to even be installed without the user manually double-clicking on this Start.app thing. From there, the user has to enter his administrator password, assuming he's an administrator on the machine. Only then will this DRM software get installed. So I don't expect this to cause too much trouble.

    And even after that, it's not the gigantic pain in the ass to remove that the Windows stuff is. Removal is a simple matter of unloading the kernel extensions and deleting them with administrator privileges. For some reason, Windows seems to facilitate the development of software that installs silently and is utterly impossible to remove.

    This is why it's not just the popularity factor that keeps OS X malware-free. It's a solid design based around the idea of minimal automation and least privileges needed. Even if OS X was twice as popular, any malware would still have the same hurdles to jump through.