Slashdot Mirror


Building PCs - How do you Choose Your Components?

ATP asks: "It's been a few years since I built my current system by ordering parts from the cheapest vendors I could find. Everything went smoothly with very little research, and my system is still running great today. I'm now looking into building another desktop system, but I've become quickly overwhelmed by how complex components have become. In particular, motherboard/CPU compatibility are confusing (think: single/dual, socket 478/604/754/939/939pciExpress/940/LGA775, OS compatibility, memory types, etc). Is there a guide to the not-so-novice PC guru somewhere that would help me catch up on the developments in the last couple years?"

106 comments

  1. How do I chose? by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 2, Funny

    I spew alpha-numeric soup, much like the story submission, until the salesman faints!

  2. In Soviet Russia... by I'm+not+a+script,+da · · Score: 0, Funny

    ...the components choose you!

  3. i have a bigger problem ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    It's been a few years since I got my current girlfriend by being totally drunken in the cheapest bar in town. Everything went smoothly with very little research, and my girlfriend is still running great today. I'm now looking into getting another girlfriend, but I've become quickly overwhelmed by how complex components have become. In particular, hair and boobs are confusing (think: black, brown, red, blonde hair - big, small, puffy, silicon boobs etc). Is there a guide to the not-so-novice slashdot reader somewhere that would help me catch up on the developments in the last couple years?

    1. Re:i have a bigger problem ... by mrs+dogbreath · · Score: 2, Funny

      Try the gay bars, no more girl problems!

    2. Re:i have a bigger problem ... by dascandy · · Score: 2, Funny

      There's a kernel of truth in this reaction.

      Try the apple stores. No more home-built computer problems.

    3. Re:i have a bigger problem ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That doubles the problem. Not only do you have the hair issues, but then you have to consider male/female, camp or macho, oral or anal...

    4. Re:i have a bigger problem ... by dghcasp · · Score: 1
      You're asking the wrong people.

      Be satisfied and gloat that you have a girlfriend.

  4. Check out some "pros" by slasher999 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Check out what some of the big guns are doing. I'd start by visiting Intel's site. Even if you aren't an Intel fan, there is a ton of info on CPU's, memory, chipsets, etc. available at the site. Also check out what companies like Alienware are doing. They build for a "niche" market primarily - a high end niche market. Again, plenty of info. CNet and Toms' Hardware are good places to look, as are (or were last time I was there) the forums over at Directron.

    1. Re:Check out some "pros" by muhgcee · · Score: 0

      Alienware sucks. Their "Aurora ALX" has a base price of $4,819.00, comes with NVidia 6800GT video cards (as opposed to 7800GTX 512MB), only 1GB of RAM (2GB max), no DVD burner, no keyboard, mouse, or monitor, and it doesn't ship until December 26. How the hell do they justify that price?

    2. Re:Check out some "pros" by CommanderData · · Score: 2, Informative

      I agree that Aurora ALX system is WAY overpriced, it was only an FX 55 CPU too. Your best bet with Alienware is to configure one yourself. I started with the Aurora 7500 and squeezed in an FX 57, 2GB of RAM, a 500GB hard drive, 2 x 7800GTX 512MB in SLI config, 2 DVD burners, keyboard and mouse for a hair over $4500 and a ship date of 11/28. That's $300 cheaper than the far inferior ALX system... Still expensive (those 7800GTX 512MB cards are $700 EACH!), but you get just about the best machine money can buy in this case. Also, still no monitor, but hey most of us /.ers have those already.

      No, I don't work for Alienware. I have bought a system from them though (for significantly less than either pricetag above), and was very impressed with the machine's performance and their attention to detail.

      --
      Urge to post... fading... fading... RISING!... fading... fading... gone.
  5. tomshardware.com by kwerle · · Score: 4, Informative

    Isn't that what http://tomshardware.com/ is [supposed to be]?

    1. Re:tomshardware.com by harrkev · · Score: 5, Informative

      I second this opinion. But here is the strategy that I would use:

      1) Pick your processor company. Are you am AMD or an Intel guy? I tend to prefer AMD myself, but you have to make up your own mind..

      2) Choose your socket. This should be an easy one. For each company, you have a budget and a premium socket. This should be an easy choice -- just look at your budget. Over $1000 = premium. Under $500 or so, go budget. In between, you will have to decide. Once this is nailed down, choose a processor based on your budget.

      3) Chipset selection. You might have a couple of choices here, depending on which processor you choose. To me, a couple of percentage points on a benchmark is not worth much. I look for such things as the interfaces supported (some value mobos do not have firewire, for example). Do you want to run two vid cards (for the rich only)? How many SATA ports will you need. If you are a Linux type of guy, will your chipset be supported by your OS? This is probably the hardest choice to make.

      4) Mobo selection. Once you know which chipset you want, then you have to choose a manufacturer. Everybody has favorites here. My only advice is to choose a larger manufacturer. Look at the review web sties to get an idea for the stability of the board (this is a big deal). Note that a long warranty is REALLY nice to have.

      5) RAM is easy. All you have to really decide is how much. Get budget RAM from one of the big names (OCZ, for example). Do not get premium RAM. Buy budget RAM and use the difference to upgrade to a faster processor or vid card. Premium RAM is for people who have unlimited budgets and already have top-of-the-line everything else. 1GB is a nice number. If you are on a tighe budget, go 512M, but no lower!

      6) Vid card. This is another personal preference thing. Choose ATI or nVidia. I chose nVidia because of Linux support. If you are not a Linux type of guy, then either one will work. Here is where the hardware review sites really become valuable.

      7) Hard drives. If you are in the mainstream price range, you have several choices. There is a little difference between different manufacturers as far as speed goes, but I still think that it would be hard to get a bad hard drive. Just make sure that it is large enough. If you have the money to go for NCQ (and your mobo supports it), then do it.

      9) Case. This one is a matter of personal preference. Even a cheap case will work great, as long as it has enough cooling capability. Paying more for smooth internal edges is nice, but if you build it once and then do not open it up, sharp edges can be lived with for the cost savings.

      10) Power supply. DO NOT SKIMP HERE. Always go for a good name brand with enough watts. I chose Antec. There are others out there with a good reputation.

      11) Optical drives. There are so many good choices here, it is hard to go wrong. Even the worst drives are good. But there are a few favorites that keep coming up. Benq and NEC make good DVD burners.

      Some more general advice. If you are a gamer, skimp a little on the processor to get a good vid card. If you are a code monkey, get the best processor that you can afford.

      --
      "-1 Troll" is the apparently the same as "-1 I disagree with you."
    2. Re:tomshardware.com by (trb001) · · Score: 3, Informative

      Tom's is great if you want to comparison shop, but if you're not interested in reading performance charts and umpteen comparisons, I usually head over to Arstechnica's system guide, where they have the God Box, Hot Rod and Budget Box systems. I've built two systems based off their recommendations, and all the parts they've recommended that I've used have been great.

      --trb

    3. Re:tomshardware.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      there are similar types of high-end/midrange/low-end example systems with component descriptions at www.sharkyextreme.com (and doubtless lots of other sites too).

    4. Re:tomshardware.com by jokrswild · · Score: 2, Informative

      I'd have to say that Watts is not the most important thing in power supplies. The amount of Amps it can deliver on each rail is more important:
      http://shsc.info/PowerSupplyGuide/

    5. Re:tomshardware.com by harrkev · · Score: 1

      While what you say is correct, you have to look at it in a different way...

      Watts = voltage x current, so more wattage = more current.

      Manufacturers can play games with these numbers, but if you stick to quality manufacturers (Antec being my favorite), they do not play games. So the watts is a decent "rule of thumb" measurement.

      --
      "-1 Troll" is the apparently the same as "-1 I disagree with you."
    6. Re:tomshardware.com by Telastyn · · Score: 1

      And don't forget cooling!

      Modern processors, memory, viedo cards... they all are much more powerful, and with that comes a proportional amount of heat. ~10 years ago you could get away with a fan or two in the back. Now you're likely going to need ~3-4 in the back, a good one in the power supply, big ones on the CPU(s) and video card.

      A good system is useless if it hits a heat shutdown [or worse] 5 mins after booting.

  6. Well by Now.Imperfect · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I don't have much advice other than go AMD, its easier to find compatible parts.

    1. Re:Well by Grab · · Score: 2, Informative

      Too true.

      I built an AMD setup about 4-5 years back. My CPU is an 800MHz Duron, old Socket A. Until a couple of months ago, AMD were still selling CPUs that would fit old Socket A. During that time, the number of different Intel sockets used has been well into the teens. Your chances of getting a replacement Intel CPU should your old one fail? Close to zero. Your chances of getting a better fan for an older Intel CPU if you get tired of the noise? Close to zero. Both of these, it's "replace-the-mobo" time, at a cost of an extra hundred quid on top of whatever the CPU cost.

      So for me, it's AMD all the way, and it'll continue to be unless AMD completely lose the plot at some point in the future.

      Grab.

  7. Narrow Down at the Start by MBCook · · Score: 4, Informative
    It sounds like you are just going out and looking for good deals then seeing what fits with that. I'm not surprised that you are running into such a problem. My suggestion would be to figure this stuff out up front as much as possible.

    The first thing you need to decide is things like do you want a little computer (like a Shuttle) or something special (dual-cpu SLI) etc. The odder your request, the more your field is automatically narrowed down. The rest of this will apply, but I"ll assume you just want a normal (probably 1, maybe 2 CPU) board without SLI.

    Start with the big one. Do you want Intel or AMD? I would go with AMD at this moment, but the choice is yours. So now that you know that, you eliminate a large chunk of stuff. So lets say you want AMD (same basic things for Intel).

    Do you want dual processor (NOT CORE, PROCESSOR). If you want multiple sockets (dual rules, but you could get the same benefit with a dual core these days). If you do, that will severely limit your chipset choices and motherboard choices (because most dual-cpu boards are designed for servers). So by reading articles on the CPU you want, you can find out which chipsets support it. Make sure to future-proof. Even if you don't want a dual-core Athlon 64 today, get a chipset that would support it. This will cut down your chipset choices further.

    Then look up the chipsets (with reviews of those). These will let you see the features to find something you'd really like that would narrow things down (say SLI as only a few chipsets support that). That way you can find the chipset you want (or at least a list of those you DON'T want).

    Now you know your processor type, and a chipset (or small list). Now if want SLI then based on your graphics brand many of these decisions are made for you. With this information you can go out looking various motherboard manufacturers' sites looking for boards that have what you want (or close to it). From here you read reviews and narrow things down.

    I've stopped following all this stuff closely as I moved to laptops and then Mac (neither of which can you build your own). I'd say the most important thing would be the processor right now. You need to decide how much you want this system. Because while there are always new revisions coming out every few months, we are about to see some big changes. Intel is going to release their new chips (Yonah?) based on the Pentium M for the desktop. AMD will be moving to a new socket soon to enable them to use DDR2. So you may want to wait. On the other hand, the new Intel processor might not be enough for you wait, and you may see DDR as just fine (because when they first hit the street, the new CPUs and boards will be expensive and might not be worth it to you).

    You've got homework to do, but if you just go looking at motherboards for features you like and try to decide the other factors (SLI, CPU, memory, etc) based on that you can be easily overwhelmed at one manufacturer's site.

    I hope this helps. This is the process that I went through every time I built a computer, but like I said I used to keep up with this stuff much more than it sounds like you do (I'm now where you seem to be: I know some general stuff but I'd need a bunch of research before even starting to look at parts to buy).

    --
    Comment forecast: Bits of genius surrounded by a sea of mediocrity.
    1. Re:Narrow Down at the Start by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Multiple CPU sockets gives an upgrade path, I don't see it as relevant to even a high-end desktop now that multicore CPUs are available.

    2. Re:Narrow Down at the Start by Bios_Hakr · · Score: 4, Informative

      I second the AMD path. Right now, the 3500+ is the best price/perf for single cores. The X2-3800+ is probably the best for dual cores. If you want to spend more money, then go for it. Single core Venice chips are the best right now; really low power and heat for the performance they give.

      Next, pick some RAM. You either want DDR or DDR2. There isn't a big performance gain for DDR2 right now, but that could change in the next 6 months. Get either Kingston or Corsair. If you overclock, look for high speed and low timings. If you don't overclock, get HyperX or XMS memory rated for the 3200 (DDR-400) range.

      The MoBo is the heart of your system. To not get PCI-X would be a crime. Grab a board from a reputable company. I like ASUS for stability and MSI or Abit for overclocking and options. Look for sound and Gig-E built in. Get SATA RAID if you swing that way. Even if you don't plan on using RAID, SATA RAID is a standard on most of the nicer boards.

      SLI may or may not be a gimick. I think it is. If you don't plan on buying two top-of-the-line GPUs right now, then, chances are you never will.

      Look at the MSI Neo4 Platinum for PCI-X and the Neo2 Platinum if you just have to have AGP.

      Really, and Socket 939 board with a Nforce4 chipset will do fine.

      If you get a dual core chip, make sure you have a way to flash the BIOS before you install the chip. 90% of the boards out there will not boot out of the box with a dual core chip.

      If you are a gamer, grab one of the GF7800 cards. Between the GT and GTX boards, you should be able to fit one in your budget.

      If you aren't a gamer, look at some special needs. Do you need TV-In? Do you want to do TV-Out? Dual monitors? I picked up a PVR-250 for TV-In and my GF 6600GT does a fine job on dual monitors and will even do Composite/Component/S-Video out to my HDTV with no problems.

      On-board sound is fine for 90% of the applications out there. If you game, look at getting some USB headphones. They will have a DAC in the headset and will provide nice, clear sound.

      I have a Plantronics USB headset. I also do a lot of Flight Sims. I use the headset to pipe the voice comms from TeamSpeak and then let my external speakers take care of the in-game sounds. It's a real nice setup.

      Spend some time looking for a nice case. A good case will last through several computers. Maybe look for something BTX/ATX compatible.

      Get a gig of memory. 2 gigs is probably overkill.

      Get two hard drives. A Raptor for C:\ and a big drive for storage. Get SATA if you can.

      Get a good combo CD/DVD-R/RW. SATA is probably overkill, but will keep the insides clean.

      Get a nice, big power supply. At least 400 watts; maybe 500. Look for something with a 120mm fan. It'll be quieter than those with 80mm fans.

      As for fans, you'll need at least one fan for the case. If you chose wisely, the case will accept a 120mm fan right in front of the hard drive cage. The power supply fan can take care of the exaust in most cases.

      When you put the thing together, throw in the RAM, CPU and Heatsink, and video card. After that, boot it to make sure it POSTs.

      From there, install your CD/DVD drive and throw in a Memtest86+ CD. Boot and let it run the test for 12 to 24 hours. If you have no errors, boot off a Knoppix DVD and make sure the sound card, NICs, and video card work fine. Play some 3D games in Knoppix just to verify there are no problems.

      After that, install your main hard drive and reboot into Knoppix. Format the drive and run a FSCK to test the disk. After that, delete all the partitions and then you can install the OS of your choice.

      If you use WinXP, look at using something like NLite to slipstream SP2, all the hotfixes, and the latest drivers for your MoBo.

      Good luck.

      --
      I'd rather you do it wrong, than for me to have to do it at all.
    3. Re:Narrow Down at the Start by Yenya · · Score: 3, Informative

      Make sure to future-proof. Even if you don't want a dual-core Athlon 64 today, get a chipset that would support it. This will cut down your chipset choices further.

      Thinking about the possible future upgrades is, from my past experience, not worth the money. I have never ever upgraded just the CPU (even on high-end servers[*]). By the time you decide that the present CPU is too slow the new CPUs will use better memory interfaces, which means at least the memory upgrade as well, but the new memory interface usually means the new mainboard infrastructure or new CPU socket. Remember that the memory bandwidth and latency are the main bottlenecks of the current computers - upgrading just the CPU does not solve it.

      That said, there is nothing wrong with dual-core support on the chipset per se. Just don't expect you would ever use it as an upgrade path. Instead try to think about the applications this computer will run. Last time I have checked, the prices of (for example) Opteron 254 (2.8 GHz single core) was similar to the price of Opteron 270 (2.0 GHz dual core). If your load can be parallelized (HTTP serving, spam filtering, some databases, etc.), you will benefit from the additional CPU core, even though both cores are running at the lower frequency. If you have a highly serialized load (workstation?), the higher frequency of the (single) CPU will probably be better.

      [*] Well, many years ago we did a CPU upgrade of the SGI Challenge. However, the price of the upgrade was almost the same as the price of the new server.

      --
      -Yenya
      --
      While Linux is larger than Emacs, at least Linux has the excuse that it has to be. --Linus
    4. Re:Narrow Down at the Start by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Look at the MSI Neo4 Platinum for PCI-X and the Neo2 Platinum if you just have to have AGP.

      Warning: Probably just a bad batch, but my Neo2 Platinum failed after a BIOS upgrade. I checked their official forum site and many people suffered the same. I returned the board and bought an Asus nForce 4. No problems so far.

    5. Re:Narrow Down at the Start by cowbutt · · Score: 1
      Make sure to future-proof. Even if you don't want a dual-core Athlon 64 today, get a chipset that would support it. This will cut down your chipset choices further.

      Thinking about the possible future upgrades is, from my past experience, not worth the money. I have never ever upgraded just the CPU (even on high-end servers[*]). By the time you decide that the present CPU is too slow the new CPUs will use better memory interfaces, which means at least the memory upgrade as well, but the new memory interface usually means the new mainboard infrastructure or new CPU socket.

      Sometimes it works out, sometimes it doesn't. For example, I have an Asus P2B (i440BX-based) that I bought in August 1998 with a PII-266 which has since been upgraded to a Celeron 500, and subsequently a PIII 450 (when I found a pull for 5GBP at a fair). I avoided the problem with memory upgrades by buying PC100 memory at the outset as it was only a few GBP more, and avoided problems with dodgy budget PC66 memory which was doing the rounds back then (I just use Crucial now, but still buy the fastest memory a board can use, even if the CPU won't use it at full speed).

      OTOH, my most recent boards (Gigabyte GA-8PE667 Ultras - i845PE-based) were supposed to be able to take CPUs with upto 18x667MHz=12GHz clockspeeds, but in actual fact, the fastest they can take is 3.06GHz Northwoods, which aren't really a cost-effective upgrade from the P4 2.40Bs I have right now. If I'd waited a while, though, I could have picked up i865PE-based boards that could take CPUs with 800MHz FSB, such as Prescott (which is still only marginally useful, but at least it is an upgrade in some circumstances).

    6. Re:Narrow Down at the Start by nmos · · Score: 1

      Thinking about the possible future upgrades is, from my past experience, not worth the money.

      I mostly agree however it depends a bit on where on the price/performance curve you are. At the higher end of the curve future upgrades means "stuff that's not available now at any price" and in that case you're 100% correct. At the lower end future upgrades may just mean "stuff that's available now but too expensive". In that case it might make sense to buy, for example, the cheapest socket 939 cpu you can get and plan to upgrade to much faster one in a year or so.

  8. I Don't by rueger · · Score: 2, Interesting

    After years of building and maintaining my own systems I finally tried a new direction and bought a new Powerbook. Aside from some problems specific to transferring things like e-mail files over to the Mac, (all the gory glory is on my blog) and of course oddities like the lack of a right mouse button and backspace key, it has been pretty painless.

    I guess that I just don't have the patience anymore to try and wrangle motherboards, CPUs, hard drives, peripherals, and Windows into a happy coexistence.

    I wanted something that I could just plug in and run.

    We'll see if I guessed right.

    1. Re:I Don't by superjerk · · Score: 3, Informative

      I had the same problem with my new iBook when i first got it. Turns out, Fn-Delete does backspace and Sidetrack (http://www.ragingmenace.com/software/sidetrack/) will help with the right click issue.

    2. Re:I Don't by MBCook · · Score: 2, Informative
      I agree with this. I own a Mac now and I love it.

      That said, are you sure you want to build your own PC? I built my own for years but finally got tired of it. At a certain point I decided the time wasn't worth it, and I wanted to be able to call the manufacturer if something went wrong and say "fix it".

      I bought a laptop (Dell) and never regretted that I didn't build another computer. When things happened, I could call dell about it instead of searching forms on the internet to try to diagnose whatever odd thing might happen. When the capacitors on my motherboard died, I had no one to turn to. It took me forever to figure out what it was, and then I had to contact the motherboard manufacturer and get it fixed at my own cost then rebuild it myself and it was all a huge hassle that I didn't have time for at the time. I would have loved to call up Dell and say "fix it" (which I have done for a motherboard problem in a very old dell years ago) and have them come over and fix it fast.

      I later switched to the Mac which has been even more hassle free than with my Dell laptop (which was very nice).

      Building your own computer is nice and if you want something very special you practically have to (when I did it I wanted a dually rig which were only available pre-built in servers at the time). But if you are just building it to say "I built it" and you have done it before, you may want to skip it. It often isn't worth it any more. When you can buy a very nice Dell for $300 or less, many of the arguments for building your own are gone.

      Don't get me wrong. I'm glad I built my own. I wish more people would for the experience and understanding. But if you have done it, you should think long and hard about if this is what you want for the next few years or if you want something that is manufacturer supported. I don't know how old you are or how long you have been building computers, but at a certain point you'll probably begin to think like me and my post's parent.

      You may see me build a special little weird box in a few years to play with, but for an every day computer, I'll buy one.

      --
      Comment forecast: Bits of genius surrounded by a sea of mediocrity.
    3. Re:I Don't by eyeball · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The previous two posters in this thread (at least visible to my threshold) mentioned that they switched to Mac. I'm getting close to doing the opposite.

      About 3 years ago I built my own PCs, then switched to Macs. I've been using the same 1ghz Powerbook for two and a half years, and it still feels zippier than my 2ghz work machine that has to run Windows for Outlook.

      Recently someone gave me a hand-me-down 2ghz P4 Prescott bare-bones system, with Twinview-capable NVidia card. I loaded it up with Ubuntu and started using it as a developer workstation, and I can't believe how well it works (despite the fact that I just learned I didn't enabled HT).

      I'm still addicted to my Mac OSX, mainly the consistency of user interface things like keyboard shortcuts and copy/paste. Gnome and KDE is getting better by the minute, approaching the usability OSX. I can see myself switching back in the near future.

      Things I'll miss in OSX:
      - UI Consistency
      - Application integration (i.e.: mail and address book)
      - Quartz speed
      - Subtle GUI elements (i.e.: slightly darker shadows for the foreground window)
      - Constant Fonts
      - WoW
      - Adium, iTunes, iCal, Photoshop (I *hate* Gimp)

      Things I'm looking forward to in Linux:
      - Faster system for cheaper price
      - Using my old OSX-unsupported hardware (Hauppauge TV card, USB radio receiver, scanner)

      --

      _______
      2B1ASK1
    4. Re:I Don't by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you mean "Hyperthreading" when you say "HT", it's not available on processors less than 2.8 GHz.

    5. Re:I Don't by bhima · · Score: 1
      Interesting...

      I've got an old G4 Cube & a Dual 2.5 G5 PowerMac. Moving the applications that I run more or less constantly to the Cube has pretty much removed the word "wait" from my computing experience. The only thing I find myself waiting on is when I am assemble extremely large panoramic photos and this is never more than many seconds and certainly not more than a couple of minutes. GCC, for the small applications I write, is so fast it's vitually instantaneous. Also interesting is several of the things you'll miss fall in my "refuse to be parted from" category, most notably application integration, and a few apps Photoshop CS2 and soon Aperture (judging from the workshop I just attended). I do have one you didn't mention my Wacom Tablet which apparently doesn't have good drivers for Linux. So long as Microsoft continues to have the issues with privacy, stability, & security and Linux continues to require advanced manual configuration I will never go back to them.

      Since switching I have found that I upgrade my computers about 1/3 as frequently... which leads to an interesting thought... it's one thing to exchange a CPU module like I did in the G4 Cube, it is quite another to do so on a computer with a liquid cooling circuit and a radiator. Also now that Apple has switched to Intel I'm tempted to build one of those X86 for OS X white boxes I've read about and pirate the OS just to spite them but we'll see towards the end of 2007 when I'm due for an update...

      --
      Nothing in the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity.
    6. Re:I Don't by BushCheney08 · · Score: 1

      Mod up! These two tips solve a lot of common gripes. Although, I always thought the Delete key acted as backspace, and fn-Del was forward delete...

      --
      Be a real patriot: Question authority. Think for yourself. Formulate your own conclusions.
    7. Re:I Don't by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 2, Informative

      If you're using a Powerbook, the Control key gives you access to all the traditional "right click" functions. I generally don't need it when I'm using my iBook, but it gets used extensively when I run Office v.X.

    8. Re:I Don't by el_womble · · Score: 1

      I know what you mean. I was awe struck by Ubuntu. I've got a powerbook, and a iMac G5 both of which I adore, but there is something hypnotic about Linux that keeps drawing me back. As a middle ground I've built a dirt cheap P3 system with Debian that I ssh -YC into which works great as a J2EE test bed, CVS repository, mail server, bittorrent etc, but its too slow for desktop use. However, the next time I've got a bit of spare cash for hardware it'll be a Linux box that I invest in rather than a Mac.

      Don't get me wrong, I still think OS X is the best OS out there, it's a fantastic balance of power and ease of use, but I'm now finding that I use LaTeX, vi, eclipse more than MS Office and XTools and I genuinely enjoy getting my hands dirty in code changes so I'd really struggle to justify paying the apple tax next time I upgrade.

      --
      Scared of flying, pointy things snce 1979!
  9. Build Your Own is So Passe by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I used to buld my systems from loose parts, and had fun doing it. Now though I find I like to save some time buy going to an ala cart shop like Monarch Computer. Using them I can pick out the system components I want and let them assemble/test the system. Monarch does a good job putting together a list of options and is pretty helpful with suggestions. It's much better than buying some off the shelf thing without knowing what is in it plus you get some help picking out a good combination of stuff.

    1. Re:Build Your Own is So Passe by jmorris42 · · Score: 1

      > Now though I find I like to save some time buy going to an ala cart shop like Monarch
      > Computer.

      Impressive. They have a pretty wide selection of components available. However they were about two hundred above what I recently ordered the parts for and build in an hour or so. If I had to build a hundred boxes on a one time basis I'd consider them. More than that or if I were likely to do it repeatedly I'd hire a couple of college students.

      The problem is like every other similar vendor, their selection is very limited and their level of customization choices is small. For example, for my comparison I had to manually factor in the third HDD my build had. I wanted a basic PATA drive to boot from and a SATA RAID1 for the important data, they only allow two drives and charge extra for calling it a RAID1 even if you have it shipped sans OS. Another minor nit, they force you to buy a Windows DVD player program if you pick an OEM drive, even if you pick no OS.

      --
      Democrat delenda est
    2. Re:Build Your Own is So Passe by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 1

      The nice thing about ala carte vendors is that if you don't like their options on a particular build, just leave them out. If you don't lie the hard drive options, no big deal, order them seperately.

  10. Some Helpful Sites by TripMaster+Monkey · · Score: 2, Informative
    --
    ____

    ~ |rip/\/\aster /\/\onkey

  11. start with the processor by max+born · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I get my stuff from price watch.

    First I find the processor I want, then I get the system board, memory, HD, DVD, case, keyboard, monitor, etc.. Having saved by building it myself, I like to splurge on a nice case, aluminium or fish tank cases are nice.

    1. Re:start with the processor by vbrtrmn · · Score: 3, Informative

      I used to shop through pricewatch, until I dealt with the skeeziest dealers on the planet, that made me stop for good. I think I had three really really really bad experiences with their sh*tty dealers, no more.

      I stick with the high-quality vendors such as:
      NewEgg.com - ZipZoomFly.com - MonarchComputer.com - ClubIT.com

      To find the cream-of-the-crop vendors, use: ResellerRatings.com

      Also check out the Hot Deals sections of forums (read the FAQ, before you post!)
      www.hardforum.com
      forums.anandtech.com

      --
      it's a sig, wtf?
  12. duh by StuffMaster · · Score: 0

    Simple: get what's new and cost-effective and popular.

    CPU:Athlon 64 3200 or better

    Motherboard: Socket 939, dual-channel DDR RAM (single channel if too costly), PCI-Express, gigabit LAN (future proofing). Chipset:I'd say Nforce4, but that's the one thing I'm behind on.

    RAM: DDR 400 (PC3200) or better with a name brand (name brand gets you more reliability and overclocking)

    Video card: Nvidia Geforce 6600GT (or 6800GS if you want lots of performance....ohhhh I wish I had one...). Alternitavely, you can go lower if you're not into games that much. I'm still using an overclocked Geforce 4200 for new games because I have no money, and it works ok.

  13. Here's my guide. by BKX · · Score: 2, Informative

    First, choose a mobo/cpu combo.

    Second, buy compatible RAM. (The mobo determines what you need to buy.) Get at least 1GB. Always get your RAM such that you will have two (or four) identical DIMMs. Get the fastest RAM that your mobo can handle. Use the manufacturer's website to determine that. For most AMD systems, this will PC3200 DDR SDRAM. For most (new) Intel mobos, this will be some type of DDR2. DDR2 and DDR have nothing to do with dual-channel memory. That is about whether you have two (or four) identical DIMMs plugged into a dual-channel mobo, in the right slots (one of each color, on most mobos).

    Third, grab a hard drive. Look for perfomance rather than just size. Go with 7200RPM at a minimum. SATA is a plus. Make sure the cahce is good and large. 8MB minimum, 16MB is better. If you get 10000RPM or higher, you'll need an HD cooler, though it's a good thing for the slower HDs as well. Don't buy the cooler with the HD, though; you'll find them cheaper elsewhere usually.

    Forth, the CD/DVD drive. Get what you'll need. Go with Plextor or Yamaha if you want it good.

    Fifth, the power supply(PSU). I only put this fifth because its such a no-brainer, not because it's not important. Get a GOOD PSU with a medium to high wattage. I recommend an Akasa 460W at a minimum and Akasa 650W if you want the best. DO NOT SPEND LESS THAN $60 ON A PSU. DO NOT USE A PSU WITH THAT CAME WITH A CASE. Seriously. Those cheap 450W PSUs you see out there for $20 suck balls. Even if they can handle the wattage your system requires (doubtful as most have inflated stats), they won't be able to handle it well. Bad power is worse than no power, much worse. Bad power WILL cause your system to be very unstable for no apparent reason. If you have that computer with every individual piece of hardware working fine but you still get random crashes and instabilities, its the PSU. Trust me, the PSU is the most important part of your system. If you cheap out, you will be making your system suck donkey for no good reason. Get a good a PSU. If in doubt about what's good, go to Hexus.net. They had a huge roundup of PSUs that they reviewed. Trust them if you don't trust me. But seriously, I can't stress this enough, the PSU is the absolute most important part of your computer purchase and you should NEVER even think of using a shitty, cheapass one. No matter what.

    Sixth, the graphics card. This is important. Think about what you want to do and then decide what you want. Use reviews to get a good idea of what's good. Just make sure you get the AGP version if you bought an AGP mobo and the PCI-E version if you got a PCI-E mobo. One will always be more expensive than the other but which one is a crapshoot. For games, Geforce 6800GT or ATI Radeon X800 are minimums. 256MB graphics RAM is also a minimum.

    Seventh, the least important aspect of the computer other than the monitor, keyboard, mouse and speakers: the case. When you buy a case, you only need to worry about a few things. First, don't get one with a PSU built-in (unless you plan on throwing it away or selling it to someone less informed); those PSUs invariably suck. Second, make sure that it can handle full-ATX if you bought a full-ATX mobo. Otherwise, its all about looks.

    Eighth, fans. Buy some fans to keep your system cool. You don't need to worry so much about the processor fan; the ones that come with them are usually fine. But you do need to get some case fans; probably 3 or 4, at least two. Just make sure that you have more (or the same as) fans pointing inside your case than fans pointing out. It helps keep dust down and keeps your system cooler. Be sure that the fans are placed so that air flows from the front to back; your PSU's fan will push air out of the back of your computer too.

    Ninth, the rest. These are the least important. Get whatever monitor you can afford. Get the cheapest keyboard that your willing to have on your desk. Get an IR mouse (don't bother with ball mice; they aren't any cheaper). Speakers are a matter of preference. Games

    1. Re:Here's my guide. by jacobdp · · Score: 2, Informative

      When choosing a power supply, get a good-quality one, but don't go overboard with the wattage.

      My system:
      Athlon64 3500+, overclocked (currently 2.4ghz, probably going to push it more)
      GeForce 7800GT
      2gb OCZ Platinum RAM
      MSI K8N Neo4 Platinum
      1x Samsung Spinpoint 120gb hard drive
      1x NEC ND-3540A DVD burner
      Seasonic S12-380 power supply (380 watt, obviously)

      Just for fun, I stuck an ammeter on the power input. At full load, running Quake 4, with the overclocked CPU and high-end video card, the whole thing draws... 1.5 amps.

      Yes, 1.5 amps. 180 watts. I absolutely agree that a quality power supply is important, but don't waste your money.

    2. Re:Here's my guide. by BKX · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I just did. I got about 1.6A. Thats with a Geforce 6800GT and P4-2.8GHz Prescott. Comparable everything else. With an Akasa 460W PSU. That doesn't surprise me in the least. I was more warning about quality anyway. A lot of those cheap "450W" PSUs can't handle more than 200W and when they're putting out that much, the power quality is ridiculous. Of course, I tested my home system as drawing 3.5A last year. I was burning two DVDs and four CDs at once. It was on an Athlon 3000+ with 1GB RAM, a Chaintech mobo, 4 CD-burners, two DVD-burners, 4 HDs, a GeForce 2 (I don't play games on that system, so a 2 is fine), a tape backup and a floppy drive. I power it with an Akasa 650W PSU. (I just happen to like Akasa. There are a buch of other good brands too) So, for most people, even 460W may be overkill, but for people like me who like using their outdated hardware just because they can, it may not even be enough.

      The only reason I say don't spend less than $60 is that at lower prices, crappy PSUs will find their way into the mix at ridiculous prices. And they usually seem like good deals. But by $60, the crappy ones are pretty much weeded out. What's $20 anymore anyway, if it means you're getting something worthwhile?

    3. Re:Here's my guide. by meringuoid · · Score: 2, Insightful
      These are the least important. Get whatever monitor you can afford. Get the cheapest keyboard that your willing to have on your desk.

      Otherwise good advice, but this is awful. Do NOT skimp on the monitor. Right now you're not playing Halflife 2, you're reading /. That's something that will work exactly the same with any CPU, video card, hard disk, whatever. Hell, I could dig up my old P90 from 1995, set up a lightweight distro, and Slashdot would work just as well as it does on the latest-n-greatest. The component of your computer that you are using 100% of the time, whether gaming or surfing or working, no matter what the task may be, is the monitor.

      Get a decent monitor. Your eyes will thank you for it.

      The keyboard - again, a component that's ALWAYS in play. Cheap keyboards are horrible. Have you seen how much geeks are willing to pay for antique IBM keyboards from back when they made them well? If you spend a lot of time using your keyboard, and if you post to /. you probably do, then getting hold of a decent quality one will make a world of difference.

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
    4. Re:Here's my guide. by Billosaur · · Score: 1
      The keyboard - again, a component that's ALWAYS in play. Cheap keyboards are horrible. Have you seen how much geeks are willing to pay for antique IBM keyboards from back when they made them well? If you spend a lot of time using your keyboard, and if you post to /. you probably do, then getting hold of a decent quality one will make a world of difference.

      Ah yes... the melodious clackety-clack of IBM keys, with their smooth but firm response. You knew you were typing with those bad boys. And more importantly, it made Moria more exciting.

      --
      GetOuttaMySpace - The Anti-Social Network
  14. look for value by Eil · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I was in the same boat not too long ago... it took me a few days to get back up to speed, but my method was basically to hit up Wikipedia for the terms and technologies I knew nothing about, shopped around taking notes on what was available, and then finally read reviews on the specific items that I was considering. Eventually those items with the best value got my buy.

    Here's a hint on how to get the best value when buying certain kinds of components and money is not an overriding factor. When narrowing down your search for that one component, you'll reach a point where you've found a line of processors, memory, or hard disks that have the features you want. The only difference among your choices is speed or size. The price increases with those numbers, but almost never linearly. Graph speed/size vs price of any current processor model to see what I mean.

    At the lower left, you'll see the line rise steadily and then about midway through it starts to rise more rapidly. At any point above that rise, you're paying significantly more money at each increment for only moderate or even insignificant performance gains. The sweet spot for value is right before that rise.

  15. The Simple accurate way by RingDev · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Head to Tom's Hardware or other high end review site. Look for their killer rig review from 6 months ago/1 generation off. Buy those parts and assemble. You'll have a next to top end machine at a fraction of the cost with a parts list that has been fully pounded out by the pro's.

    -Rick

    --
    "Most people in the U.S. wouldn't know they live in a tyrannical state if it walked up and grabbed their junk." - MyFirs
    1. Re:The Simple accurate way by dcapel · · Score: 1

      Head to Dell.com or some other high end retail site. Look for their killer rig review. Buy that, add input devices and accessories, and assemble. You'll have a next to top end machine at an (improper) fraction of the cost with a parts list that has been fully pounded out by the pro's.

      --
      DYWYPI?
    2. Re:The Simple accurate way by RingDev · · Score: 1

      A fraction of the cost of what? The idea is to be cheaper than Dell. Who want's to blow $2000(Dell) on a computer that can be built for $800(NewEgg)?

      -Rick

      --
      "Most people in the U.S. wouldn't know they live in a tyrannical state if it walked up and grabbed their junk." - MyFirs
    3. Re:The Simple accurate way by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 1

      "Who want's to blow $2000(Dell) on a computer that can be built for $800(NewEgg)?"

      Let's be freaking realistic here. An $800 system from Newegg is probably closer to a $1,000 Dell system, and I'm probably being *very* generous with that premium. When you're buying from Dell, you're also paying for assembly and tech support. Personally, I like to build my own and would never buy a desktop system from Dell.

    4. Re:The Simple accurate way by RingDev · · Score: 1

      Building from scratch? Maybe. But most of us are building replacement computers. We already have a monitor, keyboard, mouse, speakers, and likely all the hard drive space we need.For $800 you could get a $250 graphics card, a $250 proc, and have $100 for case, mobo and memory each. Just for fun, I threw one together: XION case w/ 450w power supply: $65 Biostart nForce4 mobo: $78 AMD Anthlon 64+ 3800: $282 Corsair 1gig value select DDR400: $85 Gigabyte Dual GForce 6800 (SLI on 1 card): $220 Supply your own IDE/SATA hard drive, monitor, keyboard and mouse and you have a 1 off generation machine for $730 (well under $800 even w/ shipping). For $1600 you can get a XPS600 which is a slightly slower (intel 3g) machine with similar memory(2x512), a slightly slower graphics card (gForce 6800). But it comes with a hard drive (160g), a 17" monitor, Windows XP, and generic speakers. Are those extra's worth $800+? Drop $100 on some nice speakers and a copy of XP OEM at new egg and you still have $600 to drop on a monitor. $600 will get you a much nicer 19-20" monitor that will make the dell special look like crap. -Rick -Rick

      --
      "Most people in the U.S. wouldn't know they live in a tyrannical state if it walked up and grabbed their junk." - MyFirs
  16. The Short Answer by kallisti777 · · Score: 4, Informative
    You wanted a short and up to date guide? Ars Technica has what you're looking for.

    Three other points I would add:

    1. All the praise of Tom's Hardware Guide is absolutely true.

    2. Analog sources can be good... flip through a few Computer Shopper magazines and the Consumer Reports Buyer's Guide before making significant purchases.

    3. Before you spend a dime, run the numbers and figure out whether or not building it yourself is really worth it. Is there a config you want that Dell doesn't offer? How does price compare to an off-the-shelf solution? Would you prefer a single point of contact for repair issues or are you comfortable dealing with multiple vendors? Depending on what you need it to do, a DIY solution might very well be better, faster, and cheaper... just check first.

    Also, just in case, this is solely my opinion and not necessarily the opinion of my employer.

    --
    Vanya's Law: "In any culture without irony, fart jokes will be the highest form of humor."
    1. Re:The Short Answer by Otter · · Score: 1

      Caveat: I built one of the Ars rigs for my first homemade and it worked out great. I have, though, seen warnings that they don't actually build those setups, and that some of their recommendations have contained conflicts of the sort the submitter is trying to avoid.

    2. Re:The Short Answer by Soruk · · Score: 1

      I can't say for certain with Dell, but if you have absolutely no intention of running Windows on the machine, don't bother with a box-shifter who will preinstall Windows and charge you the Microsoft Tax.

      Of course, if you are going to use it with Windows, then by all means, it's cheaper to get Windows that way than to buy a retail box.

      --
      -- Soruk
    3. Re:The Short Answer by YaRness · · Score: 1

      Is there a config you want that Dell doesn't offer?

      I'd like my configuration to be easily upgradeable: as in no bloody hands working in the case, no 140$ 200W PSU, no propietary motherboard, no 6 dozen things to uninstall after a reload, etc.

      It's a valid point I suppose: you only save money if you are building a high-end machine, and then you only save if you don't screw it up the first time by jamming RAM in backwards or damaging the CPU. But I think for most DIYers the money part, for this particular type of project, is only a small consideration.

    4. Re:The Short Answer by BushCheney08 · · Score: 1

      Is there a config you want that Dell doesn't offer?

      Something to mention if you do end up looking at Dell or HP or any of the prebuilt companies out there. If you find a machine that they have that looks like it might be what you want, dig around the service area of their site for the User Guide or Service Manual. Basically, something that will lay out in detail exactly what chipsets and components are used. These typically go into more details than the specs page, and usually include mobo layout diagrams and whatnot, too. This could save you some headaches down the road when you decide you want to upgrade something.

      --
      Be a real patriot: Question authority. Think for yourself. Formulate your own conclusions.
    5. Re:The Short Answer by llefler · · Score: 1

      I'd like my configuration to be easily upgradeable: as in no bloody hands working in the case, no 140$ 200W PSU, no propietary motherboard, no 6 dozen things to uninstall after a reload, etc.

      Seriously, if you want a box that is friendly to work on, you should at least find a Dell you can open and look at. I have seen some nice cases over the years; Compaq Proliant 800s are nice to work in, I have a huge Antec tower for my dual Athlon, but my 400SCs that I bought from Dell are some of the nicest cases I've worked on. No tools required to open them, no thumbscrews to mess with. Cables are tied up nice and neat and the drives are on rails. I haven't checked, but the motherboards are supposed to be standard Intels. I can tell you it's a breeze to add memory. Probably the only drawback is you would have to go to Dell for power supplies. But I have one that has been running 24x7 for two years with no problems. If it makes it to next fall before I see a major failure, I'll just replace the whole box anyway. I don't feel like I'm invested in the machine and need to do upgrades to extend it's life.

      Granted, the current 430SC isn't the deal (for use as a workstation) the 400SC was. All I had to do was spend $300 on the box, then bought a bunch of RAM and a new video card.

      Another nice thing is the Dell is quiet enough I recently moved one to the living room. The Antec competes with the Compaqs on noise. IE. with either of them you'll be happier with them in another room.

      --
      It is amazing what you can accomplish if you do not care who gets the credit. -- Harry Truman
    6. Re:The Short Answer by MythoBeast · · Score: 1

      From what I understand, the boxes that they suggest are often the boxes that they already have on their desk. I've built at least eight systems from five different Ars Technica specifications. I'll sometimes build a frankestein between the Hot Rod and the Budget Box because that gives me the price point that I'm looking for. I have yet to build a system to their specifications that hasn't worked flawlessly.

      A few tips on how to vary from their specs. Pick a processor between the Hotrod or Budgetbox, and then get the motherboard to match. Shifting processor speeds is pretty easy, but always check the motherboard specs before cranking that up or down. If they don't put the latest and greatest processor in their Hotrod, there's generally a good reason. If you want a different memory configuration, visit a few of the memory vendor's sites and find out what THEY suggest for that specific motherboard. Incompatible memory sticks are pretty common.

      Beyond that it's pretty tough to get something that's incompatible. Video cards have changed a lot, so make sure your motherboard has the right slots. Don't buy a raid-rated hard drive if you're only going to have one of them. That kind of thing.

      And, most importantly, remember to assemble everything with the proper static protection. I've watched friends waste thousands trying to assemble a system, and regularly frying the whole thing because of the rug in their assembly room.

      --
      Wake up - the future is arriving faster than you think.
    7. Re:The Short Answer by YaRness · · Score: 1

      Would you consider suggesting to a guy who drives around a hand-built classic car to just replace the whole thing with a Corolla once it breaks down?

      I don't feel like I'm invested in the machine and need to do upgrades to extend it's life.

      I don't feel like I need to replace the entire box without a specific reason. Just the case (full tower antec, I forget which model right this second) could last me 5-10 years unless I feel a pressing need to get a smaller one.

      I guess the real point is this: would you tell a guy who hand-built a classic car, and uses it as a grocery-getter, to replace it with a Corolla when it breaks down? You could, but he'd probably ignore you. I don't care how good Dell's computers get, I'd still rather build my own.

    8. Re:The Short Answer by llefler · · Score: 1

      Would you consider suggesting to a guy who drives around a hand-built classic car to just replace the whole thing with a Corolla once it breaks down?

      Oh goody, Slashdot analogies. Unfortunately, the only similarity is 'hand-built'. If you're truly 'building' a classic car, you are using parts that are decades old. That do the same job as current parts, try that with a computer. My '67 326ci Pontiac Firebird could use the same fuel as my '02 4.3l, albeit with a fuel additive. And unlike my computers will appreciate over the years. Ok, you meant built, not restored, so lets look at psuedo-classic cars, like a Cobra kit car. Again, whether you use current parts or recycled parts, that car will still perform it's tasks 10 years from now, as long as we have fuel to put in it. And possibly appreciate in value too.

      Another reasons these analogies don't work. Computers have a time limited life, regardless of whether you use them or not. If I built a brand new computer and put it in a box for 25 years, it's doubtful that it would have any value at all. Yet my '80 pinball machines would be worth ~$5000 each if they were New-In-Box. Much more than their original price, and actually, more than a New machine would cost now.

      It's just a fact of life, computers are disposable.

      I don't feel like I need to replace the entire box without a specific reason. Just the case (full tower antec, I forget which model right this second) could last me 5-10 years unless I feel a pressing need to get a smaller one.

      My Antec is nice, and I paid around $150 for it with a power supply, but I doubt I'll put another motherboard in it. I no longer feel the need for huge workstation cases. If I built another server I'd put it in a rack (I actually have a rack server I built, but never turned on. It needs to have the traces of the motherboard filed so they can't touch the case) Whether or not the case is good for 10 years will probably depend on availability of power supplies. We're probably about due for a new style of power connectors, if they haven't changed already for the 64bit CPUs.

      I don't care how good Dell's computers get, I'd still rather build my own.

      And here is the real problem that you have. You're still in the 'build your own' phase. Once upon a time it was cheaper to do that. It no longer is. Now it's a means to get a specifically configured machine, which generally means bleeding edge high performance parts. And most of us don't need them. The requirements for the latest FPS gaming rig is way over the top for what most of us need.

      That gets us down to what the rest of us look for; a good performing machine at a reasonable price. My current PC is about a year old. I paid $500 total for it, including 512m RAM and a mid range NVidia. Out of the 3 Dells that I own, I have called tech support 1 time. My first one had a suicidal LG CD Rom, and when Mandrake did it's CDRW test it died. It was replaced by Dell. I also have a 2 year old dual proc AMD that I build from parts. Everybody's favorite vendor, NewEgg, sent me a bad Tyan MB that smoked CPUs. Rather than ship everything back to them like I should have, I did the troubleshooting myself. As a result I had hassles with them about getting the defective parts replaced. I have extra equipment laying around that I bought for troubleshooting (IE. the MB/CPU in that almost complete rack server). I spent $1000 for the machine plus those extras. It took 3 months to get everything fixed and refunded. And the Dell has been a more reliable and quieter machine.

      You guys go ahead and build your machines. I'll spend 1/2 the money now and in 3 years I'll spend the other half. Oh, and in case you want to discount my abilities to build machines, I built my own for over a decade. As well as those for family and friends. Several of those friends went on to jobs as PC technicians/consultants based on skills they developed working with me. Two of my dual proc boxes I built, two are Compaq Proliants that I got from eBay and upgraded to dual. I built machines, successfully, long enough to get burnt out of the process. I have the Seagate, WD, Maxtor, IBM HD war stories. Now it's about the $$$$ and home built generally loses for the average user.

      --
      It is amazing what you can accomplish if you do not care who gets the credit. -- Harry Truman
    9. Re:The Short Answer by YaRness · · Score: 1

      ah that's what i get for not previewing :/

  17. Start at the high-level: what architecture? by NOPteron · · Score: 4, Interesting

    IF one knows that one wants a machine that will run "new" release programs in 3 years, that means AMD64, rather than 32-bit
    ( compatibility-problems, as-in programs simply not running, have been found on the Intel implimentation of x86_64 )

    That cuts down the field greatly.

    THEN, one looks at whether the thing is guaranteed to be wordprocessing-only
    ( or equivalent non-taxing, ie NO multimedia-rendering or vid-conferencing, ferinstance ),
    and one can sanely go with single-channel-RAM ( socket 754 ),
    rather-than dual-channel-RAM ( socket-939 or socket-940 )

    THEN once looks at what kind of expandibility one may need, later. . .
    Video-card?
    No-longer does AGP count ( they aren't making top-end ones anymore, and soon won't be making middle-of-the-road ones, either! ),
    so one requires PCIe ( PCI-Express ) 16x on the motherboard.

    Does one want to be forced to find a firewire-card to add-in later? or does one want everything built-in?

    Does one want the ability to add-in PCIe add-in cards for, say, high-end-audio, or for video-capture, or for ANYTHING?

    one needs PCIe slots, then, too ( PCI is going the way of the dodo )

    All in all, the one mobo I know-of, that at-the-moment covers it ( including a 4x PCIe slot, for later! ),
    is by MSI http://www.msicomputer.com/index2.asp

    Unfortunately, it's got a fan on the chipset,
    so it's an on-when-one-uses-it cheap workstation-board,
    rather-than an always-on everything-server-board
    ( fans die after however many running-hours they happen to survive )

    http://www.msicomputer.com/product/p_spec.asp?mode l=K8N_Neo4_Platinum&class=mb

    Abit's got one that is missing the PCIe 4x slot, but that has no chipset-fan, called the
    Abit AN8 Ultra
    http://www.abit-usa.com/products/mb/techspec.php?c ategories=1&model=278

    Right, that's the mobo, howabout the CPU?
    syncronous-with-the-RAM is a good rule

    IF the mobo can deal-with PC3200 RAM ( these 2 can ), then that means the RAM's communicating-speed is 400MHz ( rather-than, say, 333MHz )
    Since there isn't any valid thing as 1/3 of a wait-cycle ( it's either 0 or it's 1, with computers ), I want the CPU's actual physical speed to be a multiple of that, like say 2000MHz.
    That gets the speed, so what choices are there?
    cheap, and I wasn't able to get-one, is the
    SDA3400DIO28W Sempron 3400+ Socket 939 ( the "3400+" is the approximate equivalent in Intel-speed, known-as its "rating" )
    More expensive, and having more on-chip cache-memory, is the
    2.0 GHz 939-pin Athlon 64 3200+
    Ultimate capability would-be the X2 chip ( 2 Athlon64 cores in one chip, so when one program is swamping one core, the system still responds )
    http://www.amd.com/us-en/Processors/ProductInforma tion/0,,30_118_9485_13041%5E13076,00.html
    shows that cheapest multiple-of-400MHz X2 chip is the "3800+" and the highest-end is 2.4GHz "4800+"
    Hit http://www.pricewatch.com/ to discover what sane-prices are for the things, but be sitting-down when you see the highest-end ones. . .

    Case? Aluminum. That keeps hard-drives cooler ( whole case acts like a nice-big heatsink ).
    Make decorations for it using pipecleaners & a hot-melt-glue gun, if you want. . . : )

    Video-card?
    IF you want quiet, go for ATI rather-than NVidia ( fan-speed, I'm talking about, here ),
    and if you want cheap, grab some X300 or something,
    the higher-end cards the X800 XL is a very good bu

    --
    IPTables enhancement Fail2Ban bans cracker-login's
    1. Re:Start at the high-level: what architecture? by Makoss · · Score: 1

      I've got to disagree with you with regard to CRT vs. LCD. I limit the discussion to those as they are what are available on the market now.

      Which display to get should be decided on it's primary task. If you care most about gaming, get a nice CRT. If you care most about anything else (with the exception I suppose fo very accurate color work) get a LCD.

      I'm sitting in front of a 21" Trinitron CRT, and a 20" Dell 2000fp LCD. I run my IDE across the full expanse of both, the LCD is far easier to look at then the CRT is. However I do all of my gaming on the CRT as in that case the LCD is clearly inferior.

      Get what is appropriate for the tasks you will use it for.

      --
      Building a better backup.
      Zettabyte Storage
    2. Re:Start at the high-level: what architecture? by llefler · · Score: 1

      IF one knows that one wants a machine that will run "new" release programs in 3 years, that means AMD64, rather than 32-bit
      ( compatibility-problems, as-in programs simply not running, have been found on the Intel implimentation of x86_64 )

      That cuts down the field greatly.


      It also cuts down the cash in your wallet greatly. Really, who cares what will run new release programs in 3 years. You're going to want a new machine by then anyway. Buy what it takes to run what you do now and the foreseeable future. Make sure it can take a small number of upgrades in the areas where you might push it's limits.

      Don't build yourself a moneypit. If you aren't going to use the capacity now, the only thing you gain is bragging rights. And if I was inclined to brag, I'd rather brag about my bank account than my PC.

      IF you're going to connect your machine to highspeed, then please make certain that your surge-suppressor is between your network-port of your machine, and the wall your highspeed connection comes-in through.

      If you're going broadband, make sure you have a router. I don't know that a spike can't happen through cable or DSL, but in 7 years I've never seen it happen and your provider has much more expensive equipment than you do, so I would expect plenty of isolation. An oversize UPS would be a better use of the money.

      --
      It is amazing what you can accomplish if you do not care who gets the credit. -- Harry Truman
    3. Re:Start at the high-level: what architecture? by NOPteron · · Score: 1

      Geeks churn, most normal-people don't.
      ( this referring to the frequency of replacing one's machines )

      That the OPer is totally out-of-the-loop on modern sockets etc. indicates that they AREN'T going to replace the machine every 2 years,
      therefore their making this machine an investment rather than a 2-year-lease-equivalent
      ( transposed from cars, where people are rationaller, to computers where people aren't ),
      seems sane.

      The OP began with "It's been a few years since I built my current system by. . .",
      and I trusted that to be fact, not deliberately-manufactured red-herring, is all. . .
      -shrug-

      Sometimes "penny wise, and pound-foolish"
      is true.
      ( translation for non-Brits: "cents-wise, dollars-stupid" )

      Also, the OP didn't ask to tell them what was right for them ( and I didn't attempt to assume that ),
      it asked if there was a guide, so I showed 'em how one person makes such choices, as an instance-of-guide,
      and pointed out a couple of good, and trustworthy, information-sites, fully expecting others to give contradictory information,
      so the OPer could then make-up their own mind more-informedly. . .

      Others' total-reliance on Toms Hardware makes me shudder, as ThePabster's bias
      ( apparently induced by love of their bigger advertisers ) I gave-up arguing-with years-ago. . .
      ( remember Van Smith's site? the one that abused pay-by-the-byte netters by its force-refresh? but that cut through distortive BS with an integrity that was really worth fighting-for? they, IIRC, and others, cut through that fundamental-bias to show its distortion ). . .

      "I don't know that a spike can't happen through cable or DSL, but in 7 years I've never seen it happen and your provider has much more expensive equipment than you do, so I would expect plenty of isolation. An oversize UPS would be a better use of the money."

      Lightning Happens.
      Lightning means wires between Your Home(tm) and Elsewhere(tm) pick-up energy.
      Energy goes somewhere.
      IF that somewhere happens to involve your computer, it's likely killed or damaged, unless protected.
      ( notice that MOST comuter-users only complain about malware when they are no-longer able to USE their computer due to it!
      protection/proactive-defense ISN'T normal, so I'm trying to recommend action that gets committed protecting their machine, see )

      It doesn't matter how well the other-end of the wire is protected, if
      the easiest-path for the electricity to discharge is through your machine.
      ( and the energy in the nearest-mile finds that your-machine is the short-cut )

      An oversize UPS is an investment I wish all computer-users made, but I'm trying to be realistic:
      it's better to have protection against having one's machine killed than to have none.
      OPer, GET a line-interactive UPS, and rely-on-it.
      If you live among a power-nasty grid, then get a Zero Surge to protect ALL your expensive electronics, simply because they're the only ones who don't rely-on fade-in-use MOVs.
      Allied Electronics sells 'em ( as do others, check http://froogle.google.com/ )

      It is even-better to protect one's data from corruption or loss
      ( therefore both line-interactive UPS -- power-sags are the bigger data-loss means than are outright blackouts --
      and backups are necessary if one REQUIRES one's work ), but I'm not holding my breath for that among normals. . .
      I didn't bother recommending a DVD-RW burner, but that'd be a requirement if backups are needing to be archival, too
      ( just concerning meself with the core stuff, since that seemed to b

      --
      IPTables enhancement Fail2Ban bans cracker-login's
    4. Re:Start at the high-level: what architecture? by llefler · · Score: 1

      Geeks churn, most normal-people don't.
      ( this referring to the frequency of replacing one's machines )


      Well, I just replied to another message comparing home built PCs to classic cars, so I won't go into all the falacies again. Briefly, most of the suggestions here are for bleeding edge equipment that someone who waits 'several years' between upgrades doesn't need. Putting in an AMD64 is not a cost effective solution because it extend life to dollars ratio doesn't work. It's about $175 for the cheapest MB/CPU combo. And he's certainly not a gamer with a machine that old, so a $50 video card is going to be sufficient, which means PCI is as acceptable as PCIe, and would probably make for a cheaper motherboard.

      The suggestions from the home built crew here are going to put the cost of the machine well over $1000. My upgraded Dell was around $500 (and no MS tax). A year ago I bought a 2.8g P4 with 512m and NVidia video. If he wants to built from scratch, that fine. But there are affordable alternatives out there that don't require memorizing acronyms and hardware compatibilities. And came with a year of support from Dell Business. I'll replace it after three years, my mom would get a decade (or more) of use out of it. But the most demanding thing her system does it remain compatible with AOL.

      An oversize UPS is an investment I wish all computer-users made, but I'm trying to be realistic:

      Recommending a budget UPS is better than recommending surge suppressors. A surge suppressor will not protect you from brownouts. And they are more dangerous, and more common, than dangerous spikes. Where you're recommending a $75 surge suppressor (and in reality, they'll end up with a $10 Belkin), I recommend a $60 UPS like the APC BE500R.

      I still don't think phone lines or cable are a big surge risk. I had my $700 USR Couriers on my BBS for a decade with no problem. If there had been a surge the Courier's optical isolation would have saved my PC, but would have died in the process. Thankfully, never happened. I've been on RoadRunner for about 7 years with no problems. My sister lost some equipment during an ice storm, but it's not apparent whether it was caused by a power spike on the cable (power lines falling on cable lines) or simply spikes/brownouts on the AC. And by installing a router, not only are you protecting yourself from the real danger of the Internet, it will most likely take any spike that made it past the the ISP's premise equipment. (remember, many own the equipment on both ends of the circuit. And a lightning strike on their line would take out a whole neighborhood of cable modems)

      --
      It is amazing what you can accomplish if you do not care who gets the credit. -- Harry Truman
    5. Re:Start at the high-level: what architecture? by NOPteron · · Score: 1

      BTW, the guy who is:

      a) asserting that my telling the OP to get a good surge-suppresor means they are going to get a worthless one, therefore
      b) I should have recommended a cheap UPS to protect them against brownouts. . . isn't getting that
      c) cheap UPSes don't protect against brownouts/sags, only line-interactive and double-conversion ones do. AND
      d) if they wouldn't get a good surge-suppressor, what in hell makes me think they're going to get a real UPS, anyways?

      I was wrong to not-think of the UPS.

      Period.

      But, if you're going to get one, get a line-interactive one, for your system's sake.

      Quite simply, every investment you make is an investment in your capability
      Safe a few dollars on the tools, but then your work-capability is harmed. . . better-for-you??
      Not.

      Corps Business: The 30 Management Principles of the US Marines says it better than I do, but if you figure the marines are wrong, when they die when they err, well-and-good, but then we differ in understanding non-reconcilably, and that's fine, of course. . .

      That "Amazon Registry" link of mine isn't for me, it's for you people:
      you can click on the books and read others' reviews of 'em, and choose your-own-self how you feel about the meanings in 'em.

      The Marines Managemnet-Principles book by David H. Freedman that I recommend to most everyone is on that list, so you can get your sense-of-it through there, and
      no, no-one can buy me anything though that list: I've got no address on it to prevent that. . .
      Cheers, people

      : )
      --
      IPTables enhancement Fail2Ban bans cracker-login's
  18. narrow down to AMD and Nvidia by Somegeek · · Score: 2, Informative

    Note: highly personal opinions are to follow, but they are the result of building lots of my own computers and fixing way more for other people. Use this list as a guideline to get you started and narrow down from there.

    First, processors. Intel highly overcharged everyone for years until AMD starting giving them some competition. For that reason alone I buy AMD CPUs exclusively - but they just happen to be the best in most every category currently anyway. Get a 64bit dual core processor, let price decide which one. Get the retail version with a fan and a better warranty.

    Motherboard - narrow down by chipset first looking for stability in the drivers etc. Forums can help you a lot here. My advice is go with a motherboard with an Nvidia chipset - they seem to have less bugs and better drivers than VIA. Besides I will be recommending an Nvidia video card and that just helps on the compatibility front. If you are going all new then get a motherboard with PCIe video card slots instead of AGP. Don't get SLI (dual video cards) unless you are really into games and want to spend a lot of money on this.

    Next go find a good vendor, (newegg.com), that's as important as any thing else. Check them out on resellerratings.com - look at their satisfaction ratings from when people need to do returns; (newegg.com) that will tell you the most. Or just go to newegg.com. They are the best general vendor out there (newegg.com) with the best customer service, but a little bit pricey because of it. (newegg.com) :)

    From that vendor get the list of motherboards that meet the goals above, and research those boards on the forums (pcper.com) and find one that people are not having trouble with. Don't worry about the absolute fastest performance, the difference between brands is usually negligible. Asus motherboards are usually a safe bet.

    Video card - get the best Nvidia card your budget will allow. Don't even think about ATI. Buggy cards, buggy drivers, have been that way for years. ATI's idea of adding stability to their drivers is to add a utility that auto-restarts them when they crash. Make sure that the type of video card matches the video card slot on the motherboard - AGP vs. PCIe.

    Memory - get name brand - Corsair, Crucial or Kingston all make me happy.

    HD - get Western Digital (one with a 5 year warranty) or Seagate - you can check storagereview.com for specifics.

    Don't get a cheap power supply - either buy one separately or get a good name brand case with a power supply - antech etc. There are some good power supply reviews around.

    Get nice interface items - keyboard, mouse, speakers, monitor. Those items really control how you interact with your computer and are usually overlooked. Go to circuit city or something and try different ones, find out what you like. Personally I go for the Microsoft Natural Pro keyboards and 5 button laser mouse.

    DVD drives, Plextor.is usually a safe bet.

    That's it!

    --
    And as you tread the halls of sanity, You feel so glad to be, Unable to go beyond. I have a message, From another time..
    1. Re:narrow down to AMD and Nvidia by Brandybuck · · Score: 1

      Intel highly overcharged everyone for years until AMD starting giving them some competition. For that reason alone I buy AMD CPUs exclusively

      So because Intel didn't have any competition for a few years, you've decided to punish them? I don't get it. They weren't a "monopoly" because you still had other compatible chips, but they all sucked. So what we're they supposed to do? Keep a very low price in the hopes that they would eventually get some competition so they could raise it?

      --
      Don't blame me, I didn't vote for either of them!
    2. Re:narrow down to AMD and Nvidia by JimmehAH · · Score: 1

      motherboard with an Nvidia chipset - they seem to have less bugs and better drivers than VIA
      Not in my experience. My old SiS motherboard was more stable than this nForce4 Ultra. I get paging errors and total system lockups when I have any cards in the PCI slots (so far tried it with a TV tuner and an Audigy) and if I turn on the built in firewall my downloads are corrupted and I sometimes lose whole chunks of web pages.
      I'm not the only one with these problems.
      Search for paging error nforce4
      Search for nforce4 corruption

  19. A couple guides will help orient you by petard · · Score: 3, Informative

    As someone else has mentioned, the ars system guides are excellent. They build several different types of system and explain the trade-offs they make very nicely.

    I also happen to really like Dan Bernstein's advice, especially for a good *BSD desktop box. Like Ars, Dan does an excellent job explaining why he chose what he did.

    The ars guides are usually almost current. DJB's is not as current. But look at them for the explanations, even if you want newer components. You can apply their advice to the in depth discussions of particular components you'll find at places like Tom's, HardOCP, AnandTech, etc.

    --
    .sig: file not found
    1. Re:A couple guides will help orient you by Homology · · Score: 1
      For a "tech" site it was peculiar to read so many posts hell-bent on using the newest available stuff, but not considering availability of drivers (assuming they use *BSD/Linux) nor the stabilty issues due to brand new hardware. It was funny to read posters bashing hardware manufacturers for bad hardware when it's at revision 0.000000001 Omega 1. Wait a few months, and most issues gets ironed out.

      Of course, don't follow the above advice, or I'll have to deal with bad hardware as well ;-)

  20. Yes by MerlynEmrys67 · · Score: 1
    See Dell

    Really, it is easier, cheaper, unless you want AMD - then you are on your own

    --
    I have mod points and I am not afraid to use them
    1. Re:Yes by Fritzed · · Score: 1

      Really, it is easier, cheaper, unless you want AMD - then you are on your own

      Yes it's cheaper and easier, but don't ever plan on upgrading it. They go out of their way to make it difficult by providing as much as possible onboard and as few pci slots as possible. This changes a little bit if you look at their really high-end systems, but then you lose pretty much all of the cost savings. Not to mention, that even on the high-end systems they go as cheap as they can on a lot of little details like power supplies, cooling devices, and internal connectors in general.

      If you do decide to go the prebuilt route, you can probably do a lot better than dell anyway

      -> Fritz

      --
      Spooooon!!!!!
  21. Two easy steps to an affordable home built PC by Cainjustcain · · Score: 2, Insightful

    First, find the newest, greatest component. Second, buy the one that came before it.

  22. Catching Up by HunterZ · · Score: 4, Informative

    You really just have be willing to dive in and soak it all up. Search for FAQs and read forums - there are probably some general and specific guides that are useful, and there are helpful, knowledgeable people out there.

    Another good thing to do is to read articles and reviews on tech sites and window-shop on online stores that sell pre-built rigs to get an idea of what kinds of components are being put in various computers these days. Then, shop around to see what deals are out there and be sure to read reviews of specific components. Most importantly, SEARCH FORUMS (via Google) to see if people have problems with a given component -- I can't stress this enough! My friends and I have been both bitten by buying a compnent without researching it first, and saved by reading people's complaints about it before buying.

    Finally, if you have money don't be afraid to just dive in and buy a bunch of parts. If you're really lost, you're best of getting them from a local parts retailer so you can exchange out anything you accidentally buy that turns out to be incompatible with the rest of your parts.

    If you can't afford to screw up, I'd recommend finding a online store that lets you build a custom system from parts on their site. They usually make sure you can only pick combos that will work, and the price will be better than a totally shrinkwrapped system from a major retailer. You can also then swap out parts in the system as you learn more.

    Either way you go, you'll need to keep at it for a few years before you really know your stuff. Eventually you'll have preferences for brands and price ranges on everything, a list of regular sites and/or stores to get parts from, and hangouts for news, reviews and discussion of components and issues with them.

    Building systems for friends and family (as long as you're willing to do follow up support) is also a good way to figure out what's good and what isn't without wasting your own money >:D

    Here are some personal recommendations based on a decade or two of experience (ramble alert!):
    - Stay away from VIA for motherboard chipsets if you decide to build an AMD-based system. They're better these days, but I've been burned repeatedly over the last half dozen years. In fact, stay away from everyone but Intel or nVidia; nVidia is now my mobo chipset manufacturer of choice, despite dumping the awesome SoundStorm chipset from their newer mobo chipsets (good thing there are DDL PCI cards out now, but Realtek onboard sound is respectable too these days)
    - You get what you pay for with power supplies (up to a point of course). Don't buy that $25 550 Watt power supply because it'll probably blow out in 6 months or the first time it hits anything near 550 Watts - whichever comes first.
    - newegg.com is an awesome online parts retailer. If you're into modding, xoxide.com and directron.com are worth a look, but beware of overpriced items.
    - Don't believe anything that store clerks/sales reps tell you. If you're looking at something in a retail store, go home and research it first and then go back and buy it if you're still interested. Note that you can usually get better deals online, but local retailers are good in a pinch if you need something right away.
    - For those in the Puget Sound area: Fry's is the bomb, and CompuCare is decent. PC Club is so-so. Stay away from CompUSA unless you're really desperate! And never, EVER buy anything computer-related at OfficeWhatever/Staples unless it's printer or scanner related - they're overpriced on everything.
    - Netgear makes excellent network hardware, although I'm in love with the WRT54G/GS (but not the current on-the-shelf versions, which have been neutered) wireless routers due to their ability to run homebrew Linux-based firmware.
    - 64-bit CPUs and PCI Express motherboards & video cards are now worth buying. I plan to upgrade from my 32-bit, AGP 8x system early next year at the latest.
    - nVidia and ATI are neck-and-neck in the video card business right now. Stay away from All-In-Wonde

    --
    Arguing about vi versus Emacs is like arguing whether it's better to make fire by rubbing sticks or banging rocks.
    1. Re:Catching Up by HunterZ · · Score: 4, Informative

      Forgot to mention that pricewatch.com is a good site for figuring out what the going rate is for various components. I've noticed that there's a somewhat exponential curve in price versus value, and when looking at a range of similar components I try to pick the one that's just before the area of the price curve that starts shooting up really fast.

      It's better to resist the temptation to buy the very top-of-the-line, cutting-edge components; if you don't you'll end up having to deal with more quirks (due to early revision hardware) and will have to wait longer to upgrade, meaning that the parts will be more obsolete by the time you upgrade than more modest ones would have been with a sooner upgrade.

      --
      Arguing about vi versus Emacs is like arguing whether it's better to make fire by rubbing sticks or banging rocks.
    2. Re:Catching Up by Joe123456 · · Score: 0

      http://www.tigerdirect.com/ is a good place and thay have TigerDirect Retail Outlet Stores! http://www.tigerdirect.com/retailstores/index.asp

  23. Yeah by photon317 · · Score: 1


    Here's a clue if you don't want to think for yourself:

    1) Athlon64 architecture rules, just dump Intel.
    2) Better yet, wait for their new socket design to appear early next year or so, since the current Athlon64 socket interface is about to die, and the new has twice the memory speed.
    3) When you see the new Athlon64's come out, look at the price curve of the various speed offerings in the new socket. Pick the one somewhere in the middle just before the price goes skyrocketing upwards - that one's probably your best overall price/performance ratio, and you'll never know the difference from the fast one unless you break out the artificial benchmarks.
    4) When you see the new Athlon64's come out, it'll say what the name of the new socket is (I'd tell you now, but you'll just get confused and forget). Buy a motherboard with that socket, they'll all be about the same. Preferably from a manufacturer like Asus or Abit.
    5) Buy as much RAM as you can afford, of the fastest speed supported by the motherboard above, up to say 2GB tops. Buy it as an evenly matched pair of two sticks. Getting 2GB instead of 1GB is probably worth more than getting the lowest CAS latency, so just ignore that factor. Buy ECC RAM too - it's slightly slower, but it's so much less headache when you know for sure whether your RAM is the issue without running a 32 hour memory test every time you suspect something.
    6) Buy your graphics card from the same company as the motherboard above. Buy the latest most expensive NVidia, and it will last you through your next couple of motherboard/cpu upgrades. It should be the same graphics interface as the board above (which would be PCI-Express x16).
    7) If you put in any plexiglass or glowing neon shit in your case, I'll come to your house and shoot you.

    --
    11*43+456^2
  24. Do you live in Toronto? by Deliveranc3 · · Score: 1

    You want a working system that allows you to customize a good starting point and you want it to be built around the latest tech?

    Check this out http://filtechcomputer.com/Product/syspack.asp?nSy sPackID=1032 Been drueling over it, they'll build and test it for you. Remember it's in $CND so it's basically about $830 U.S and the X2 3800 would be 340 on it's own.

    I might consider upgrading to a DVD burner and swapping out the Vid card but they'll let you do that.

  25. Pick to suit your needs first. by WoTG · · Score: 1

    It all becomes a lot simpler if you decide what you actually use your computer for.

    If it's games, then you will need PCI-Express, preferably 2 slots. If it's office / web stuff, then buy whatever is cheap but quality - speed really isn't a factor so save a few bucks by avoiding top end CPUs/GPUs/RAM (don't skimp on the HD, keyboard, mouse, or monitor though). If you want a PC for a home theatre setting, then noise level is crucial and size is very important - nowadays, that's generally AMD territory, since Intel's chips typically use 2x as much power. Etc.

  26. Before you go with Dell... by unitron · · Score: 1
    You sound like you might be someone who decides to open up the case and upgrade in a few years. Before you go with Dell, Google for "Dell ATX" and decide whether you really want to trust them or not.

    Oh, also, search for "Sony DRM" and see how you feel about rewarding them with your money.

    Finally, insist on a 10 year warranty on all capacitors.

    --

    I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

  27. Generally... by Shads · · Score: 2, Informative

    ... the tomshardware forums are great for specing a system togeather with feedback about the components.

    I'd highly suggest an
    AMD 3500+ on an ASUS A8N-SLI 32X Deluxe Motherboard.

    This gives you pretty good options for the future-- processor upgrades from single core to duel core, single video card to duel video card, plenty of pci slots, sata, usb, firewire, etc.

    I've been extremely happy with my older a8n-sli.

    --
    Shadus
  28. go PCIe not PCI-X by mzs · · Score: 4, Informative

    PCI-X is just a faster PCI, it is a dead end. PCIe (PCI express) is where the future is. It is a new serial interface.

  29. Consider buying prebuilt by davidwr · · Score: 1

    If you like builing your own for fun or so you know exactly what's in it then by all means do so.

    If you are doing it to save money then consider prebuilt systems.

    My last few systems were all prebuilt. All were on sale. Yes, I added stuff to them within a month of buying them but I still saved money.

    Big advantages to prebuilt:
    You KNOW the configuration boots straight off, barring a DOA part.
    You have a warranty on the whole unit - no finger-pointing if the parts "work" individually but not together.
    If you buy it from a store, they probably have a 30-day DOA warranty.
    If you need Wind-blows Home Edition you probably get it for $50 over the price of a similarly-spec'd system with no OS.

    I wouldn't be surprised to see a low-end Linux box for under $100 this Friday at the big-box stores. Ditto a $199 Wind-blows box.

    Oh to echo what someone else said:
    Do NOT skimp on the power supply. For that matter, make sure you have adequate cooling. No need for water-cooling just make sure your CPU and other components does cook. That includes the drives.

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
  30. Find a reputable dealer by Stavr0 · · Score: 1
    I just bought a few days ago, (AMD64/ASUS A8N-SLI). I chose the configuration that was closest to what I specced out from Ars, TomsHardware etc.. The *only* change I did was to add a 2nd SATA in Mirror config and better speakers.

    Buying a complete system gets you

    • A properly assembled and configured system
    • Components proven to be mutually compatible
    • Burn-in and tested before delivery
    In my case the first MB they put in was faulty, so they changed it and reran the burn-in. Had to wait an extra two days. Far from annoying me, it reassured me that the store is serious about quality assurance. *cough* blatant *cough* plug *cough* pccyber.com *cough*

    Choose your computer dealer like you would any other store, past service experience, recommendation by peers, reviews from credible sources, and if you're really paranoid, getting their record from the government consumer protection department (BBB,CPB,OPC ...)

  31. Drivers. by latroM · · Score: 1

    If there isn't a Free driver available I won't buy it. That excludes some of the hardware but I can still manage.

    1. Re:Drivers. by nmos · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If there isn't a Free driver available I won't buy it. That excludes some of the hardware but I can still manage.

      Agreed, even as a purely practical matter having free drivers available tends to improve your odds of being able to use it with some future/different OS/kernel. Most geeks (at least the kind that build their own systems) tend to have more than one computer and often pass systems/components down to others and try out different OSs. In general hardware with Free drivers tends to use standard interfaces that are likely supported by almost any OS.

      I'm not discounting the value in sending the message to hardware makers that open drivers/specs are important but just saying that there are real world practical advantages as well.

  32. How I make my decisions... by linkdead · · Score: 1

    Given, I am not a bargain PC shopper, but this can be applied there as well.

    Motherboard: This is where I make little compromise. It MUST have the best chipset, and have that chipset implemented properly. The chipset is usually the one point where you can lose most of your performance anymore, so be picky...you can cut corners elsewhere. Remember to pick your CPU make first (P4/Athlon), so keep that in mind. Also note AGP is going away, so now may be a good time to embrace PCI-Express

    RAM: generic will do, so long as it can run at the speeds you intend to run it at. I reccomend two 512mb modules myself.

    CPU: you can cut corners here if you wish, by buying a slower CPU, or a value end chip like a celeron...for desktop apps, it's hard to not have enough power anymore...for games, most of them still only require 2ghz chips to play.

    vidcard: buy based on what you do on your PC...for non-3d applications, look for a fast RAMDAC on your videocard. AGP is on the downturn, so don't expect any new AGP cards showing up for very much longer, PCI-express is replacing it. I'd say get a PCI-e videocard since they cost about the same, and in some cases are actually cheaper. For gaming apps, either a single 6800GT or if your motherboard has SLI, dual 6600GTs (actually faster than the single 6800, at around the same price).

    Power supply: very few actually put out what they claim in actual usage, so if buying a cheap PSU, buy it "big". It's only going to eat as much power as you need to run your rig, so no harm in getting a larger PSU than needed.

    Case: Think airflow....modern components require large amounts of cool air to run well. Don't go for 80bajillion fans unless you really like the looks or sounds of a giant fan-box, instead look for well-placed large fans, which are usually quieter than having tons of 80mm fans.

    For what it's worth: my baby...soon to be upgraded to an athlon 64 PCI-e SLI setup (whenever I get the freaking money...):

    athlon xp 3200+ 400fsb
    DFI NF-II Ultra 400a "lan-party" motherboard (rev a)
    2 x 1gb "super flower" ddr 400 memory
    Sapphire Radeon X800XTpe
    Antec Neopower 480w PSU
    Samsung 200GB PATA hard disk
    Toshiba 4x DVD+-RW
    Lian-li PC-7x case (why mess with what already works ;) )

    It's pretty much a overall solid rig, with exception to the hdd, psu, and vidcard, is pretty outdated for high-end gaming though.

  33. RAM is important! by J.+T.+MacLeod · · Score: 1

    I disagree with your suggestion to get budget RAM.

    While it's not necessary to get overly-expensive RAM as most overclockers would want, some one building their own system should be looking to a quality name-brand for their RAM.

    Any time you have a system malfunction due to bad RAM, it's usually hard to diagnose and incredibly frustrating. The best RAM maintenance is preventive.

    The reason name brand RAM is important is due to the origins of budget RAM: Most budget sellers get their RAM from batches that didn't meet the specs of the original manufacturers.

    You don't want to trust your system to that. Buy Micron (Crucial), Viking, or Kingston.

    1. Re:RAM is important! by harrkev · · Score: 1
      If you would re-read my comment, you would see this:

      Get budget RAM from one of the big names (OCZ, for example)

      So, what you are saying is that you agree with me completely. ;)
      --
      "-1 Troll" is the apparently the same as "-1 I disagree with you."
  34. I've built 3 systems, and it gets easier with time by tom8658 · · Score: 1

    The first system I built was an Athlon64 3400+ Clawhammer with a gig of RAM. I've not had a problem with it to this day. The second was a 3200+ Venice core, and the third was a Sempron64 budget computer. The two Athlon systems were around $1200-1300 and are still VERY respectable gaming machines. The budget Sempron64 obsolutely flies on the desktop, and it will play most games, although graphics heavy FPS give it problems because it uses integrated video.

    Some important things I've learned along the way:

    • CPU: Don't buy Intel right now. Please. P4's and Xeons get their asses handed to them in everything but video rendering by Athlon64's, and people still insist on buying them. If you want Intel, wait for the new desktop cores to come out next year, or buy an Asus Socket 478 board, a Socket 479 adapter, and Pentium M. The high end Sonoma cores beat the P4's quite handily in almost every task. There was a /. post a while back to this effect. The high end chips, the 760 and 765 even beat out some Athlon FX's in benchmarks. On the low end, Sempron64's are amazing. Most of the power of an Athlon64 for $70-90.
    • Motherboard: Asus, Abit, MSI. Go with a big name brand board. For Athlons, the K8T890 series was good this past summer. Make sure Athlon boards support PC3200 DDR-RAM. This is the most important component in your whole system, resist the urge to save $10-20 on the motherboard, you'll pay for it for the whole life of your computer.
    • RAM: DDR for Athlons, DDR2 for Intels. DDR2 is more expensive. If your budget is tight, go with 2x256mb if the board supports dual channel, 1x512mb if not. Otherwise, get at least 2x512mb, 2x1gb is ideal. Needless to say, this is a dual channel configuration. If your board doesn't support dual channel, go back and reread the part about motherboards. There is no reason not to have dual channel unless the budget is tight. You should be budgetting a computer within your means, not trying to build an awesome gaming rig with offbrand hardware.
    • Video Card: For a budget machine, plan to use onboard video. If you can afford it, buy a cheap geforce card and free up some system memory. On an expensive machine, you're buying top of the line anyway, which right now is the Geforce 7800. In between, the Geforce 6800's are extremely good buys right now, as I write this there is a PCIe 6800 with 256mb of RAM for about $200 on newegg. If you are a hardcore ATi fan, wait for the $150-$250 x1600's. On paper these look really good, most of the power of a x1800 without the premium top-of-the-line price. Though the geforce cards beat the ATI cards right now, ATI doesn't usually get their sh*t together for a couple driver revisions, and the M5 chips look really promising.
    • HDD: On a budget: 7200rpm IDE, or sata150 if the board supports it. If not, it won't make that big of a difference. Otherwise: go SATA. Get a Raptor or Seagate 10K rpm drive for the operating system and games, and a big 7200rpm for your pirated media and porn. If it's really good porn, consider a RAID array. It's hard to tell what makes a bigger difference, drive speed, NCQ, or data transfer rate. Look at average seek times and latencies. For 7200rpm drives, there are alot more options: get a SATA2 drive with NCQ if you can swing it. SATA150 is alright, but SATA2 is twice is fast, and most of the drives have NCQ. Don't buy Maxtor anything, Western Digital is alright, I've had good experiences with Western Digital and Hitachi, though.
    • Optical drive(s): A 16x DVD+/-RW costs about $40. Buy Plextor or Nec or Sony, its not that much more expensive ($5-10).
    • Floppy: you need one if you're installing windows on a SATA drive. It costs $10.
    • Case: I love Lian-Li. I love Full Towers. Don't buy one with a Power supply, do buy one with lots of fan mounts, you don't have to fill them all. You case isn't that important, as long as you don't buy dirt cheap all plastic ones. I love aluminum, but its a bit expensive. As long as it has enough room
  35. I stand corrected by J.+T.+MacLeod · · Score: 1

    Sorry about that.

    I need more sleep. I promise, I do norally read the comments I reply to. :)

  36. Yeah, its confusing ain't it by TheSkepticalOptimist · · Score: 2, Insightful

    That last full revamp of my computer I did was about 3 years ago and I am itching to get a new system. But looking at ALL the processor choices as well as video cards and motherboards can be a little staggering.

    The bottom line is, don't worry too much about price, and start to focus on particular brands.

    If your last computer ran smoothly for a number of years, then stick with the brands you are familiar with. They probably won't fail you again with your new computer.

    Sure, some other brand might offer a super deal on a seemingly sweet piece of hardware, but generally the cheaper the component and the more off-mainstream the company, the worse the product is. Why risk buying something that claims better features for less money when you are familiar with a brand that offered you years of quality.

    So, once you decide what brands you like and find reliable, then decide what CPU you want.

    I recommmend AMD, period. Any 939pin Athlon 64 will give you ample performance in an easy to afford package with an upgrade path that should last a few more years. Don't worry about the dual cores, they are new, underperforming and still a novelty for desktop workstations. See TomsHardware.com ultimate CPU guide to realize just how underwhelming the dual cores are.

    Next time to get a motherboard that suits your needs, it may be trying, but weeding out first those motherboards with dual or quad SLI solutions or can connect to 16+ hard drives with RAID X is a good way to weed out wasting money on features your never going to use. You will find that whatever brand your looking at usually has a few good and reasonably priced motherboards that don't have superflous bells and whistels. Asus is still a top notch motherboard maker and offer both premium and price conscious models.

    For video cards, nVidia, period. ATI still can't make good drivers, I upgraded to a mid-range x700 for sh*ts and giggles after using an nVidia Geforce 4400ti for years and found my system suddenly unstable, crash prone, and underperforming. Most games I played with the new card was only about 10% faster then the nVidia card that was 2 generations behind. I quickly returned the ATI card, and I won't look back. Again, don't get caught up in the hype surrounding different brands of products, if you find a product that works well for you, and offers years of stable performance, the keep with that brand.

    From there, your talking about ram and hard drives, any will do really. If your going for a high performance system, then you might care what the timings are on RAM, but for general systems where price is a concern, any Generic ram that fits in your motherboard will work, there are only a few makers of the actual chips that go on RAM anyways. Same with a hard drive, maxtor, seagate, western digital, may will tell you tale of horror about one or the other, but hard drives have become commodities that are easy to make and generally more reliable as the years go on.

    The bottom line is, don't fear the industry. It is easy to fall behind and loose perspective on what is the latest and the greatest, but reading any hardware site like anandtech.com or tomshardware.com will quickly get you up-to-date on which products are hot and which are not and you will get a better idea of what to upgrade to if you spend a little time reading some review sites.

    Lastely, if it still seems too daunting, get a Dell. Don't laugh, but after a certain age you don't care about finding the right component X to fit with component Y, getting a preconfigured PC means your going to get a decent system with the support and warranty that makes it a brainless decision in a box that arrives are your doorstep.

    --
    I haven't thought of anything clever to put here, but then again most of you haven't either.
  37. Huh? by woolio · · Score: 1

    What is this talk about buying pre-made motherboards???

    Real geeks build their computers with a PCB board and a soldering iron!

  38. heat by plonk420 · · Score: 1

    even Tom's, which some geeks claim leans towards Intel, brought a smile to my face in their description of AMD and how well they deal with heat...

    November 2004 saw AMD move into the 90 nm age, nine months after Intel did. AMD unveiled a new and very impressive CPU, codenamed Winchester (D0), which was only available in the low-cost market segment. As such, the core made its way into the Athlon 64 3000+, 3200+ and 3500+ models. The technology it was based on was anything but low-cost, though: we would have loved to see the looks on the faces of Intel's engineers when they measured the power consumption of AMD's 90nm CPUs and realized that even under full load, this unimposing CPU draws a mere 31.4 W. This means AMD was able to reduce the power consumption by about 44% clock for clock. Further measurements taken on a specially-modified motherboard in our Munich lab showed an idle power consumption of only 11.1 W.

    But the best was yet to come. When the Cool & Quiet feature was activated and the frequency dropped to 800 MHz, the CPU contented itself with incredible 3.2 W. The Winchester was followed by the Venice stepping, which added SSE3 support to the Athlon 64 and lowered the power consumption even further.


    source "tom's 'the mother of all cpu charts' part 2" nov 2005

    they also made me happy when i saw they benchmarked video encoding with XviD :)

  39. tomshardware.com-cooling hard drives. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Funny how everyone forgets to cool the hard drives. If you're fortunate, your case design allows for big diameter* cooling fans around the hard drive cage. Otherwise you have to mount a cooling solution (heatsinks, fans) to the hard drives. I would also go for SATA not just for the performance improvement, but the cabling makes cooling easier. Antecs with cable managment help as well by using ONLY the cables needed (and they're braided to boot). Keeping the case neat isn't just for asthetics, but helps the air move around easier.

    *The bigger diameter fans can turn slower while moving the same amount of air, being quieter in the process.

  40. Not that hard... by joto · · Score: 1
    • "Silent" case, with room for extensions, easy access to things inside, and some USB-ports on the frontside. (Ignore cooling, all modern cases have adequate cooling for non-overclockers). There are plenty of good budget aluminium cases.
    • "Silent" overpowered powersupply with connectors that fit your motherboard. (Many hardware-failures come from faulty powersupplies, so get one with a bit more power than you need).
    • Motherboard with 939 socket, PCI-Express 16x (not AGP), a recent chipset (higher numbers are generally newer), and onboard gigabit ethernet. SLI is a marketing ploy (unless you are a fanatically rabid gamer with far too much money).
    • Athlon64 CPU in the lower-medium price-range (but consider going dual-core, in which case you should choose the lower-medium price-range of dualcore CPUs). The more expensive ones are not cost-effective unless you have very special needs...
    • Lot's of RAM (>= 1GB), as swapping to disk is too slow these days. (Choose moderately cheap DIMMs, from a known manufacturer). (It's better to buy large DIMMs right away, because nobody wants your small DIMMs if you choose to upgrade later (and there are only four slots)
    • Huge (>=200GB) S-ATA HD (possibly two, but don't use RAID, it's a hassle, and rarely noticeably faster. One disk for apps, and one for data works just as well). Fast disks might be worth it. Noise is also a factor, but if you worry that much about it, maybe you should invest in a watercooling system as well...
    • Cheap DVD burner (they're all good enough)
    • Graphic card in lower-medium price-range (unless you're a rabid gamer). nVidia works well enough on linux (there are no modern graphic cards with free drivers for linux).
    • Cheap soundcard or onboard sound (unless you're a musician) (Make sure it works with linux, the alsa project homepage has a compatibility page)
    • Flatscreen(s) with size according to budget. Large resolution is nice. Be aware of dead pixels, most manufacturers will not take them back if just "a few" pixels are dead.
    • Wireless mouse and keyboard. Microsoft actually makes some good ones.
    • Despite rumours to the contrary, a floppy is occationally useful, and it's dirt cheap.
    • Choose round cables for the inside. It's just so much nicer.

    I've assumed you want an AMD CPU (AMD is best for general-purpose use, Intel is only better for specially hand-tuned code using SSE extensions (common in videoediting, some commercial soft-synths, etc...)).

    In general, avoid features you have no need for now, and don't need in the future. Less features == higher reliability. Don't buy stuff that's suspiciously cheap (there's probably a reason for that). Don't buy stuff that's suspiciously expensive either (it's for enthusiasts and is not worth it).

  41. Or you could go Hybrid by Glonoinha · · Score: 1

    Just a thought, you could also go hybrid - start with a nice low end Dell desktop like their Dimension 5150, baseline it out to use it as a barebones and add the good stuff like so :

    Intel P4 HyperThreaded 3.0GHz base system with a full Gig of memory, a 160G hard drive and a 16x DVD (dual layer) burner and an Audigy 2 for about $900 shipped - including a 19" LCD and a legit license for XP.

    Toss the crap video card it came with and drop in the Gigabyte Dual GF 6800 SLI card you have for $220 and you are looking at a complete system for about $1,100, including a 19" LCD, DVD burner, and licensed OS - and all the 'building' you have to do is drop in a video card. Already got a nice monitor? EBay or Craigslist the 193FP for $250 and this entire system cost you about $850 top to bottom, 100% complete and 100% as fast / powerful as the system you described - or keep the display and you are looking at a rightous rig very strongly in the $1,150 range all inclusive.

    After adding a hard drive, 19" LCD monitor, DVD burner, and operating system (all from NewEgg) to your $800 system I'm coming in somewhere in the $1,250~$1,300 range - pretty much exactly the same, if not a little more expensive than the Dell + video card solution.

    Lets at least compare oranges to oranges here. Hand building your box can be a very rewarding experience, but the days of handbuilding a system and saving $1,000 off the cost of a Dell are long over.

    --
    Glonoinha the MebiByte Slayer
  42. Re:tomshardware.com -- hard drive selection by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Additional hard drive notes:

    (1) Warranty!! Don't buy a drive with a 1 yr warranty. 3 to 5 years is acceptible.

    (2) Cache. More is better. Most budget drives offer 2mb of cache, but several models come with 8mb or more and are reasonably priced.

    As for price, I've found the best $/Gb ratio is around $100 (+/- some). Unless you NEED the extra space you'd get by spending $300 on a drive, check prices online (eg Newegg) and sales/rebates available at your local storefront retailer (eg BestBuy).

  43. Re:Flashing the BIOS before installing the CPU? by markhb · · Score: 1

    An honest question: how exactly would one flash the BIOS before installing the CPU on the board? Do you need a separate EEPROM burner or something?

    --
    Save Maine's economy: write stuff down. All comments are exclusively my own, not my employer.