Cube Privacy Via Gibberish
fury88 writes "CNN is running a story on a new device created by Herman Miller to help with lack of privacy in the cube life. It's apparently a device that will spit out gibberish when you are talking on the phone. You record a few words as instructed by the device and when you are having conversations that may be private, it will spit out sounds that sound like a clone of yourself all talking at once. Frankly I have to think this would be annoying after awhile. As if dealing with your project manager sitting next to you wasn't enough, now you get to hear several versions of your Project Manager talking at once. Talk about insanity!"
"Did you get the memo about the TPS Reports?"
I can imagine them all saying that by default.
Almost everyone has a cell phone. When I need privacy at work, I just walk out of the building and talk on my cell. Scrambling my voice would be annoying to me and to my coworkers.
I saw this on Good Morning America six months ago. This is definitely old news!
I want this thing now!
Viable Slashdot alternatives: https://pipedot.org/ and http://soylentnews.org/
This idea has been around for years; it's why many banks and governments offices that deal with the public play musak over a speaker system. It's not for the listening pleasure; it's to make it hard to overhear other customers private conversations.
Indeed, another dupe.
Could they make a portable one for people's cell phones? There are some calls that I'd rather not hear even half of. (As Ren and Stimpy would put it, "Repugnant, yet strangely compelling".)
One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
In other news...
;-)
boa13 writes "There's a new device to help with lack of contents on your web site. It's apparently a device that will spit out dupes when you don't have time to properly read the stories submitted by your users. You post a story once and when you're running short of stuff to publish, it will spit out a rehash that sounds like it's new and fresh, but is actually quite stale, so that casual users will not notice that you don't do a proper job of moderating submitted stories. Frankly I have to think this would be annoying after awhile. As if dealing with improperly written and biased stories wasn't enough, now you get to research the linked articles to discover if it's that old AP story rehashed one more time. Talk about insanity!"
Ahh, yes, $400 is the magic price point -- the price people will pay to try obscure their meaningless conversations. If you're job is so important that it requires privacy like this, they'll probably have put you in an office by now anyways.
Be a real patriot: Question authority. Think for yourself. Formulate your own conclusions.
so couldn't there be speakers that cancel incoming and outgoing noise planted at the edge of cubicles to make a field of silence?
I'm not sure it's feasible, but it'd be a cool idea.
Pick up your mobile phone and go to a quiet corner.
.. ... ... would have a mechanic check it out. You never know when a car starts making funny noises - you might end up with an expensive to fix problem.
Actually do this anytime your talking on your mobile, confidential/private call or not, that way nobody will notice when you actually DO go out to talk privately
Also mastering the art of smoothly changing subjects when somebody walks in is very usefull:
You (on the phone): Tell me what you're wearing
She: I have my black silk negligee on
You: If i was there i would pull the straps, slowly let it fall down and then
*somebody walks in*
You:
I can imagine a device which translates Slashdot articles into spoken word, but I'm afraid my boss would notice if it talked about the same subject again and again and again and...
Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
We already have white-noise generators in the ceiling of my dept, a call centre for a major corporate communications company. They do a nice job of dampening office echo, and creating a nice background noise that's also ideal for falling asleep to.
Other departments sound so quiet after this one. I prefer it.
To add a feature, any time you do math, it starts yelling out random numbers too add security:
8! 23! 42! 5432!
Saskboy's blog is good. 9 out of 10 dentists agree.
Let me get this right - if you play two conversations from the same person, people listening in will not be able to make head or tail of it?
All you would need to do is see the lips of the person talking and your brain would do the rest for you...
Wellybog
http://www.wellybog.com
I can imagine the PHB being convinced by Wally to use it--when talking on speakerphone.
One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
... a dupe. Although TFA back then called the device an "Electronic Silencer" it seems to be the same product.
It's apparently a device that will spit out gibberish when you are talking on the phone.
Wait a sec, so you're saying that this magical device will spit meaningless gibberish completely free of intellectual content, designed to drown out anyone making any sense of what I'm actually saying?
What's the big advance? Isn't that what managers are for?
You could use this device for when your talking to your mother inlaw. Just set it going and walk away, half of them wouldn't know the difference!
"I'm going to f***ing bury that guy, I have done it before, and I will do it again. I'm going to f***ing kill Google"
From TFA:
The effect is strange, though not as annoying as one would think.
Not so annoying, really? I'm somewhat skeptical...
Clone #1 : That sounds like a crazy idea.
Clone #2 : And that's $395!
Clone #3 : Isn't that old news?
Clone #4 : Geeeez...
Clone #2 : And that's $395!
Clone #4 : Geeeez...
Clone #3 : Isn't that old news?
Clone #1 : That sounds like a crazy idea.
Clone #3 : Isn't that old news?
Clone #4 : Geeeez...
The problem with Slashdot memes is that YOU INSENSITIVE CLOD!
If you need and want privacy, and it's work related, you should probably set up a meeting in a place where you have some privacy. Or use email or instant messaging if that will suffice. Encrypted if necessary. If it's just some family business you don't want spreading around the office, take a little trip away from your cube. If it's taking up too much time and you're worried that your boss won't like you spending so much time from your cube, then maybe you should take a day off to get your private business in order.
Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
The idea behind it isn't to stop people from listening in on private conversations, but rather to put people in a suitable mood. The latter tends to mean "willing to shop" in department stores, which I would guess is the main use of it.
Personally, I hate the idea behind this. Either it doesn't work, in which case it is annoying as hell, or it does work, in which case it's, if not unethical at least provocative (to me, YMMV).
But what I hate even more is that a lot of public places thought that playing "mood music" was a generally good idea without any other thought behind it. Stop polluting my ears now, please!
Also, Muzak has a website that is even more annoying than their sound pollution. Use at your own risk. (No, I won't provide a link. I hate them.)
I worked on a team with a bunch of Indian programmers, and they used to call the build team in Mumbi a lot. The conversations basically went likt this:
Aapko achaa lagaa?
Usse mat Sql Server chuuo.
Tumhein chhot lag Visual Studio sakti hai.
Sone kaa samay ho stored procedure gayaa hai.
Hum humeshaa tumhaaraa parivaar rahenge out of memory exception.
Hum tumhein kabhei nahin email chodenge sourde safe.
Kyaa tumhein tatti karni hai?
Tumhein kahaan dard ho breakpoint rahaa hai?
We never really new if it was business related or id they were just chatting with their mates and throwing in a bit of tech lingo here and there.
Offtopic, Inflammatory, Inappropriate, Illegal, or Offensive comments might be moderated up.
Imagine initializing this thing with offensive language.
If you really hate them so much don't you think the best revenge would be to post their link on /. ? :)
But then my sympathy for people that expect the "right" to make or accept personal calls at work in the first place is somewhere in the vicinity of zero anyways.
If the conversation is work-related and still needs to be private, then one has a perfectly legitimate reason to have access to a telephone in a more private area than one's cubicle anyways. If the conversation isn't work related, one just has to bite the bullet and accept the fact that there is no reason why they should be afforded the luxury of increased privacy for such an activity. If they _REALLY_ need increased privacy for a personal call, they can ask their boss to see if he'll allow it. If personal calls are infrequent enough and the reason is legitimate, even if not work-related, they may permit it anyways.
File under 'M' for 'Manic ranting'
A lot of work on Babble was done by Appled Minds for Herman Miller. Here's a Wired article that describes the project:
t w=wn_tophead_1
1 585,a9-c407-n350,00.html
http://wired.com/news/20050621_appliedminds.html?
Here's Herman Miller's press release for the device:
http://www.hermanmiller.com/CDA/SSA/News/Story/0,
--Pat