Slashdot Mirror


Born with Couch Potato Genes?

An anonymous reader writes "Science Daily is reporting on an experiment that suggests that an individual's activity level shows a genetic basis. From the article: 'Research conducted by scientists at the Oregon National Primate Research Center at Oregon Health & Science University reveals that a person's level of activity is likely an intrinsic property of that individual. [...] Overall, these findings suggest that it is likely to take a significant conscious effort to change one's level of physical activity and override one's intrinsic inclination to be active or inactive. To state it more plainly, if you're a couch potato, suddenly becoming active may be harder than you think,'"

8 of 357 comments (clear)

  1. Dangerous game by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    How soon before we can blame everything we do on genetics?

    1. Re:Dangerous game by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      How soon before we can blame everything we do on genetics?

      Presumably very long, afterall lots of people are just gonna sit on their ass and do nothing to help the "blame DNA first" crowd.

  2. Bah! Effort... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    To state it more plainly, if you're a couch potato, suddenly becoming active may be harder than you think,'"
    Insensitive clods! It's already hard enough to reach for the remote control!

  3. Naturally by elronxenu · · Score: 5, Insightful
    It seems obvious that if a person is habitually lazy or idle that it would take more of an effort to break out of that than, say, a person who typically had a high activity level but was forced to be idle by sickness.

    The article summary looks wrong. I don't see anything in TFA itself which indicates that laziness is a result of some genetic factor. All they say is that it's intrinsic to the individual - being a rhesus monkey in this case - that a given individual displays similar activity levels in both a stimulating and a non-stimulating environment.

  4. No, not really. by Nirvelli · · Score: 5, Funny

    "...if you're a couch potato, suddenly becoming active may be harder than you think"

    No, I've always thought it would be too hard. Why do you think I'm still a couch potato?

  5. Ouch... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny
    To state it more plainly, if you're a couch potato, suddenly becoming active may be harder than you think

    How much harder than impossible can you get? :(

  6. I always knew by wannabgeek · · Score: 5, Funny

    it is my parents' fault that I'm such a lazy bum. Now I can fwd this link to them.

    --
    I'm much more funny, interesting and insightful than the moderators think
  7. Thermodynamics trumps Genes any day by EmagGeek · · Score: 5, Informative

    I know lots of Fat people... how can I not? I am an American. I am surrounded by fat people all the time. Hell, I used to BE a fat person, but after losing 70 lbs and becoming the poster-boy for weight loss, I've discovered that it all comes down to one thing:

    If you consume fewer calories than you expend, you will lose weight. PERIOD. Of course, there are many ways to go about doing this, and the only sustainable way is to exercise to maintain muscle mass.

    The whole idea behind long-term weight loss is to increase your Basal Metabolic Rate (BMR) by increasing your muscle mass, while at the same time decreasing your caloric intake to below your BMR. That's all it takes. The rate at which you lose weight will be proportional to the delta between your Daily Caloric Intake and your BMR - on average.

    One pound of fat contains approximately 3600 calories. So, for example, you consume 200 fewer calories per day than you expend on average, you'll lose one pound of fat every 18 days. Of course, fat is not the only thing you can lose, so weight loss will vary somewhat.

    Also, exercise adds to your daily caloric expenditure, which can accelerate weight loss significantly. One might expend 1800 calories by riding a bike 50 miles at a high rate of speed, or expend 800 calories by running 6 miles, or expend 400 calories shoveling snow for an hour.

    In any case, what it all boils down to is being aware of the simple fact that you have to get your energy from somewhere, and if you do not get enough energy from the food you eat, your body will turn to its fat stores. It doesn't matter what excuse a fat person uses, whether that be, "It's my glands," or "It's my genes," or whatever. Thermodynamics is LAW, and excuses cannot break it.