Slashdot Mirror


Firefox 1.5 Final Now Available

yootje writes "Firefox 1.5 is out, you can download it right here: Linux; Mac; Windows. You can find more info about it in the release notes. Highlights are: Automated update, drag and drop reordering for browser tabs, improvements to popup blocking, better accessibility and better support for Mac OS X. Don't forget to make full use of the mirrors." It's semi-official.

21 of 646 comments (clear)

  1. Oooh! Features! by adolfojp · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Drag and drop reordering of tabs? Like Opera version a "couple of them ago"? :-P

    Apart from the troll. Props to the firefox team. Keep up the good work!

    Adolfo

  2. Couldn't wait for the official releas? by carlmenezes · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Yeah, the download is available. But it hasn't been officially released yet. Come on people! Let's make the launch a nice event by downloading it then! I wanted to post the exact same thing but didn't because after so much hard work on the part of the Firefox Team, I don't mind waiting a few hours to make their release a huge success. And no, I'm not going to download it until it's officially announced. That's my little way of helping to recognize the official launch.

    --
    Find a job you like and you will never work a day in your life.
  3. Pretty sweet by Hao+Wu · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Still doesn't pass the Acid 2 Test.

    Does anyone know why Safari passes, but no other browsers? (Perhaps the Acid just love Apple?)

    --
    I suggest you read Slashdot
  4. 1.5 RC3 and Final are the same by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    If you already have Firefox 1.5 RC3 installed, don't bother with this. It's the exact same file, the md5 sums are even the same:

    d0cbbd5d8c47fe36ee8f26fb1255838c - Firefox Setup 1.5.exe
    d0cbbd5d8c47fe36ee8f26fb1255838c - Firefox Setup 1.5rc3.exe

  5. Drag and drop reordering bug by njchick · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The downside of "drag and drop reordering" is that accidental dragging of the current tab to the current page causes 100% CPU utilization for several seconds, the page is reloaded and the form entries are lost without a warning. Observed with Firefox 1.5 RC1 and RC2 on Linux.

  6. No it's not! by DrIdiot · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Um... guys...

    MozillaZine Forums
    Big red letters, you can't miss it: Firefox1.5 is not yet out

  7. new problems introduced by SuperBanana · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Highlights are: Automated update, drag and drop reordering for browser tabs, improvements to popup blocking, better accessibility and better support for Mac OS X

    Dark alley corners are:

    • Nightmarish cookie management. You can now search (which is nice), but you can't select more than one cookie at a time (the usual key modifiers do nothing). Hitting delete does nothing. I filed a bug about the selection thing and the answer was "oh well, next release, not going to make it for 1.5" Said bug was filed almost a month ago.
    • Select text in the URL-bar on the Macintosh. Hit the left arrow key, which should put you at the start of the block of text. But doen't- unlike the behavior in the text entry boxes on a webpage. WTF?
    • Every. Single. Time. You. Download. Something. You. Get. Asked. What. To. Do. Even. If. You. Checked. Do. This. Every. Time. ARRGGGGGGGG. Why can't it remember these preferences!?
    • Keyboard shortcuts randomly stop working. Command-W being the most obvious, as you go to close a tab or window...and nooooothing happens.
    • Plugin "security" is completely non-sensical. If I'm visiting a website of a plugin author, you're forced to navigate to the prefs panel and then go back and click the link again. Instead of blocking the installation of anything, why doesn't this do what IE does with DirectX controls and such, ie say "hey, this page WANTS to do this, SHOULD I let it?", with an option of "Yes please"? Instead we get "I blocked this. Just thought you'd like to know. Go here if you want to enable it." Especially since it encourages two very insecure things: a)permitting the entire hostname access b)permanently (since few users are likely to go BACK and DELETE the entry)

    That's all that I can think of right off the top of my head- but the cookie and URL bar problems are driving me nuts.

    1. Re:new problems introduced by starwed · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Regarding plugin security:s do The idea is that you do not want to let sites trick people into pushing yes. There have been several demonstrated attacks which do this: Having a game which requires quickly and repeatedly clicking a spot on the page, and then popping up the dialogue right underneath it is one. While this can be prevented by disabling the "yes" button for a small amount of time (as Firefox does with these dialogues anyway) I think they thought: "better safe than sorry."

    2. Re:new problems introduced by vitaflo · · Score: 3, Interesting

      That's all that I can think of right off the top of my head

      - The Reload button randomly disappearing on occasion.

      - When I switch from one app to FF by clicking on the FF window, if I click into a text area (like the one I'm typing in now) the text area does not have focus. This pains me to no end because if I copy something from another window and then click on the FF window, I have to basically click the textarea twice in order to copy the contents into it. Bah.

      Yeah, they have a ways to go with the OS X support.

  8. Re:Pop ups - use NoScript by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I use NoScript now -- basically a whitelist of what sites can and can't use javascript, flash or java. For me, it's solved the popup problem entirely.

  9. Re:Thank God... by MECC · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Actually, having one browser used universally everywhere, whether its FF, IE, Opera, etc., is more of a security threat. Diversity is the best time-tested defense against viruses as well as the best way to insure survival.

    Good example from nature: not long ago in a lab in VA, an airborn strain of Ebola was discovered killing off the lab monkeys. The virus was confirmed to be airborn, confirmed to be killing the monkeys, and confirmed to have infected humans working with the monkeys, and show to be spreading fast (as airborn viruses tend to be). Why didn't people die in vast numbers?

    Genetic diversity.

    The airborn strain of Ebola only killed one species of monkey.

    I hope IE never goes away, nor FF, nor Opera, nor Safari. Diversity (OS, browsers, etc) is the best defense.

    --
    "We are all geniuses when we dream"
    - E.M. Cioran
  10. Re:Mirrors? That's soooo 2002 by garrett714 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Seriously, why wouldn't they distribute it using a bit torrent?

    There are already torrents available for it, but thats not the real reason. Not everyone has bittorrent installed or knows how to use it, so until bittorrent becomes a more widely accepted protocol for downloading, methinks HTTP and FTP will be around for awhile.

  11. Re:Pop ups. by slashkitty · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Sorry, I'm just flustered by firefox today.

    I've even tried completely wiping out my config and seeing stuff w/ default settings. Uhg! I still get pops, but I also get those annoying plugin install notices (which, I've turned off)

    So, fresh install, fresh configs.. pops galore.

    --
    -- these are only opinions and they might not be mine.
  12. Re:Using it now.. by milimetric · · Score: 2, Interesting

    "Close tab returns to previous tab"

    aaaaaaah!!
    I hate that about opera. Good god, I really hope there's going to be something in there that allows you to turn that off. Btw, does anyone know how to turn that off in Opera? It's just so much nicer for browsing... you know, lots of pictures.

  13. Is the Memory Leak fixed yet? by noc007 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Have they fixed the memory leak yet? This is the biggest thing that's turned me off to FireFox. I reboot my computer about once every two months and in that time FireFox stays open. After a while I noticed FireFox is not properly releasing the memory it uses. 400MB of RAM was used above normal and FireFox was only claiming 120MB of it; closing down FireFox released all 400MBs of RAM. This is a normal thing and IMHO is not acceptible. FireFox's FAQ lists some 3rd party utility that keeps track of windows and tabs and restores them when the program is started up again. Another forum member suggested reducing the allowable cache size; this hasn't worked either.

    I was hoping this bug that's been around for a long time would have been resolved earlier on. I don't have a lot of motivation to try out this new version to see if it's been resolved.

  14. Re:ACID2, anyone? by Bacon+Bits · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Firefox is not slated to pass Acid2 until 3.0, last I heard.

    IE7 is also not slated to pass at RTM, although the developers claim it will soon afterwards.

    Acid2 is overrated, in any case. If you actually read the documentation on Acid2, it's a list of wants from web designers. A good target, but compared with security an usability is not on the top of the list for needs in the browsers of the future.

    --
    The road to tyranny has always been paved with claims of necessity.
  15. c'mon firefox! by spacemky · · Score: 2, Interesting


    I always dread upgrading FF. Half my extensions always break. Can't FF standardize on some kind of extension format that is forward compatible? Even IE doesn't break when upgrading.

    "The following components are not compatible with the new version of Firefox you have just installed:"

    FirecastFox 0.5.8
    Google Toolbar for Firefox 1.0.20051012
    Tab Clicking Options 0.4.1
    ieview 1.2.2
    Super DragAndGo 0.2.4
    Tabbrowser Preferences 1.1.1
    Noia 2.0 (eXtreme) 2.82
    Fasterfox 0.7.8
    User Agent Switcher 0.6.1

    They have been disabled until compatible versions are installed.

    To Firefox's credit, the only ones that were still broken after updating them all were Super DragAndGo, Tabbrowser preferences, and User Agent Switcher. Uggh.
    </rant>

    --
    640YB ought to be enough for anybody.
    1. Re:c'mon firefox! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      The really retarded thing is that most extensions are foward compatible, its just a text file packed with the .xpi package that can be edited to make the browser believe its compatible.

      Firefox should have an option to force compatibility without having to hack this shit up.

  16. Re:CPU and memory hogging bug in Firefox 1.5? by SacredNaCl · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I don't get massive CPU use, I get a big obnoxious grey bar at the bottom that cuts my display area for webpages by 1/3, and I can't get rid of the darn thing with any of the options it has. Apparently it doesn't like my dual display setup. Its buggy on either display, either graphics card. Of course, its still there when I disable the other display, so may just not like the graphics card period.

    I reverted back the previous version pretty quickly. This one isn't finished baking yet.

    --
    Freedom is merely privilege extended unless enjoyed by one and all.
  17. Re:SVG? by bensch128 · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Firefox 1.5RC3 supports SVG but barely.
    Animation isn't supported and most of the events (keyXXX)
    aren't supported.

    Needs a bit of work IMHO

    Cheersm
    Ben

  18. Re:CPU and memory hogging bug in Firefox 1.5? by Slashcrap · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'm getting this now, too. I _thought_ RC3 was stable, but I can't keep 1.5 up for more than 1/2 hour or so before it pins the CPU (winXP).

    Is this an attempt at a troll or are you just a yes man that likes agreeing with people? Maybe you're not aware that there is no difference between RC3 and 1.5 final. If you check the install files you will see that they even have the same MD5sum. So you didn't "upgrade" from RC3 to 1.5 at all and in light of that your comments on the relative stability of the two versions seem somewhat suspect.