Slashdot Mirror


PCWorld Dubs Firefox Best Product of 2005

Peaceful_Patriot writes "PCWorld's list of the 'Best Products of 2005' is out and Firefox tops the list. Also notables are GMail at number 2, Apple OS X, Tiger at number 3, Skype ranks in at 8 and Ubuntu at 26!" From their Firefox article: "Are you sick and tired of Internet Explorer? Have you grown weary of the constant vulnerabilities and patches? Do you scratch your head at sudden program lockups and crashes? Are you dismayed that Microsoft hasn't lifted a finger to improve or enhance IE since it buried Netscape's Navigator browser at the dawn of the century? Yeah, me too."

13 of 303 comments (clear)

  1. Wow, Dell! by matr0x_x · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I'm very surprised to sell Dell listed so many times. I mean, Firefox, Apple, Palm and a lot of the other top 10 were very predictable, but I'd never have guessed Dell. Poor Microsoft didn't even crack the top 100...

    --
    LINUX ONLINE POKER: Linux Poker
  2. PC World Product of the year 1995... by curmi · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...was OS/2. So don't get too cocky. :-)

    1. Re:PC World Product of the year 1995... by G27+Radio · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yeah, but it was actually a pretty good product.

  3. Old News by Saganaga · · Score: 4, Insightful
    From page 1 of the article:
    From the July 2005 issue of PC World magazine
    I thought it seemed funny that the review of Gmail said "check out Gmail the moment it launches", and that the Firefox review was from December 2004!
  4. Stuff that mattered. by teslatug · · Score: 4, Informative

    This was published in July. Is the story a dupe?

  5. Re:IE Really hasn't improved by DrEldarion · · Score: 4, Informative

    Try alt+d in IE for highlighting the address bar. Same key combo works in firefox as well.

  6. It certainly is by quokkapox · · Score: 4, Interesting

    If you're like me, and you have installed the SessionSaver extension, you will find that Firefox 1.5 is extremely stable on Windows XP, and you now have 50-odd tabs of pages you will read "someday soon, when I'm not on the net" saved up in other windows.

    I hope I am not the only victim of this scourge.

    --
    it's a blue bright blue Saturday hey hey
  7. Re:iPod at 78 and Rio at 13 and no Nano? by jonfelder · · Score: 5, Informative

    It could be that this story is a dupe and this article was written in July before the Nano was released. Also, it must be my imagination that an Apple product is #3.

    Naaaa...must be PC bias.

  8. Dupe by Doomstalk · · Score: 4, Informative

    Not only is this article from June, but it's been reported on before.

  9. My work here is done by theblackdeer · · Score: 5, Funny

    Mozilla Team: "Well guys, we got our goal. PC World #1 spot. Close the web site down; we're satisfied with a job well done."

  10. it just works. by jasonhamilton · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You're right, on the surface it looks like any other gnome based distro.

    However, if you install it on a bunch of diff laptops, then compare it to another linux distro, you'll quickly find that what makes Ubuntu so good is that there is a lot of polish underneath.

    Widescreen is detected and configured. Most wifi cards, auto mounting of external drives, sound card. Even special keyboard keys function on most systems I've installed it on.

    I think Ubuntu is headed in the right direction. What makes Windows so great for noobs is that they install it and then they click to get on teh interweb. No mess, no fuss. One shouldn't have to spend all day trying to get the damn OS configured.

    --
    SearchIRC - Now with live chat directory!
  11. Meet the new boss, same as the old boss? by roman_mir · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Have you grown weary of the constant vulnerabilities and patches? Do you scratch your head at sudden program lockups and crashes? - be careful, it is possible to say the same thing about FF now. I see FF crash very often now. Patches and vulnerabilities? FF has them too. It does look like FF gets the fixes much faster than IE though.

  12. No Competition = No Innovation by serutan · · Score: 4, Informative

    Are you dismayed that Microsoft hasn't lifted a finger to improve or enhance IE since it buried Netscape's Navigator browser at the dawn of the century?

    Some people would label that statement hollow cynicism. But in fact, a Microsoft manager told me straight out when IE 6 was about to be released that it wasn't really going to have any new features, because with Netscape pretty much dead there wasn't much point in developing IE anymore.

    Microsoft had already introduced XmlHttpRequest as an ActiveX object with IE5. They had all the pieces in place back then to promote the off-channel request technique and give it a nifty name like "AJAX." Web apps could have been 5 years ahead of where they are today, and MS would have had a huge head start instead of now scrambling to catch up with Google.