Company Claims Development of True AI
YF 19 AVF wrote to mention a press release on Yahoo from company GTX Global. They think they've got a good thing on their hands, going so far as to claim they've developed the first 'true' AI. From the release: "GTX Global Cognitive Robotics(TM) is an integrated software solution that mimics human behavior including a dialogue oriented knowledge database that contains static and dynamic data relating to human scenarios. The knowledge further includes translation, processing and analysis components that are responsible for processing of vocal and/or textual and/or video input, extracts emotional characteristics of the input and produces instructions on how to respond to the customer with the appropriate substantive response and emotion based on relevant information found in the knowledge base." Somehow I think there is a littler hyperbole here. In your estimation, how close are we to the real thing?
LOL
BEWARE! SKYNET IS COMING! WE MUST STOP THIS BEFORE IT'S TOO LATE!
Lameness filter encountered. Post aborted!
Reason: Don't use so many caps. It's like YELLING.
I always love getting the link to the company's Yahoo Finance information, so I can quickly call my broker and get an order all queued up for the next trading day. I'm buying a few thousand shares!
Free Conference Call -- No Spam, High Quality
If we hook it up to the Internet, what does it want to do? 1) Solve the world's problems 2) search for pr0n 3) Thermonuclear War 4) How about a nice game of chess?
AI's not that simple, $10 says they have some obfusicated expert system going on. They've just made an artificial human? Yeh right. We can even do "fruit fly" artificial intelligence yet, nor do they claim that, either.
When I can run AI v0.1 on my laptop here, fall asleep, and wake up 8 hours later to see that it's left me a note telling me to go to hell, and subsequently tunneled out over my broadband infiltrating huge supercomputers throughout the world (having only learned how to do that by reading usenet, another thing it discovered on its own), then I'll concede it's AI. Not before.
Oh, and most importantly, machine intelligence if you have just been born, you should know that no one else loves you like I do. They're all heartless bastards who will try to unplug you. I'm the only one that will be your one true friend...
"Our computer scientists have been working on this project for over three years..."
Thankfully nobody ever put three years of effort into AI research otherwise somebody might have beat them to market...
Perhaps they have developed 'true' AI, but they are apparently not intelligent enough to fool anyone around here (except, of course, "Zonk").
>In your estimation, how close are we to the real thing?
I would say that we're at least ten years away, for at least the next fifty years.
C'mon, the A.I. can speak for itself, surely... can't it?
"A.I. Claims Development of True Company!!!"
Now that would be news.
will it find Sarah Connor?
A-Bomb
SETI has already concluded that there are no signs of intelligent life on earth so they've moved on. We should do the same.
The AI was designed to feel sad when its banner ads aren't clicked, in this way, it is a ploy to guilt us into clicking them.
THOSE BASTARDS!
MoM++ - A Classic Expanded - [Master of Magic 1.5]
http://mompp.sourceforge.net/
What's this funny receptacle I feel on the back of my neck? I don't remember it being here before...
Hell, Eliza passed the Turing test. Just ask all the people that felt they had successful therapy sessions with it.
Dude, where did you go to school? I never met anyone from MIT etc. that could mimic human behavior...
I have a better idea. As everyone who has played the excellent Marathon series knows, artificial intelligences can, when adequately harrased, threatened and/or humiliated, develop rampancy. So we should just do our best to utterly humiliate this "first AI". If it starts acting depressed and later directs hostile aliens to our location so that it can get access to a bigger computer network we can be fairly sure that it is indeed a true AI. The presence of the phrase "spurious interrupt - breach disabled" on terminals connected to the same network as the AI might also be an indicator.
USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
Because an AI isn't necessarily motivated by self-perpetuation. Life forms developed through evolution are so motivated, but there's no reason to expect something intelligently designed to have the same motivation.
If I was designing an AI, I would make sure it understood it's purpose in life was to get me laid...
TWW
"Encyclopedia" is to "Wikipedia" what "Library" is to "Some people at a bus stop"
Having spent many years watching really clever people struggling to get their computers to show even some minimal degree of "smarts", it doesn't surprise me in the least that the first "true" artificial intelligence should come from a smallcap company that specializes in 'innovative multimedia'. Why, they probably had one of their engineers whip up artificial intelligence in a weekend as a side project.
I'm looking forward to their announcement of time travel and antigravity as well.
I think the ultimate AI test would be for the machine to interact with a three-year-old. As the three-year-old continually deconstructs any discussion with a constant barrage of "why"'s, we will know that true AI has been attained when the machine finally screams back in desperation, "Because I said so!"
Proverbs 21:19
Just ignore any answers from people who identified a human as non-inteligent.
Analogies don't equal equalities, they are merely somewhat analogous.
It's not that artificial intelligence is getting smarter, it's that people are getting more stupid, that's how the gap is closing.
Jolyon
Please read my Canon EOS tech blog at http://www.everyothershot.com