Slashdot Mirror


Kazaa Blocks Australian Users

afaik_ianal writes "The Sydney Morning herald is reporting that Kazaa is blocking Australian downloads of their client, just a day after the deadline passed for implementing keyword filters. According to the article, Shaman networks were still working on installing the filters yesterday."

39 of 145 comments (clear)

  1. It's kind of funny... by Corsican+Upstart · · Score: 5, Funny

    It's kind of funny.. they're based in Australia, and they can serve everyone but citizens of their own country...

    1. Re:It's kind of funny... by kocsonya · · Score: 5, Insightful

      > It's kind of funny.. they're based in Australia, and they can serve
      > everyone but citizens of their own country...

      What's new? The government in Canberra has been doing it for ages...

    2. Re:It's kind of funny... by NoGuffCheck · · Score: 5, Informative

      While Sharman Networks is based in Australia here is the company structure:

      Sharman Networks was registered in Vanuatu in January 2002 as a private company that markets and owns Kazaa.
      Kazaa includes Kazaa Media Desktop, kazaa.com and kazza.n et.
      Sharman Networks has nil authorised capital and two ordinary issued shares.
      The shareholders are two companies: Global Nominees and Credit Facilities Limited.
      The beneficial owne rs are Vanuatu International Trust Company Ltd as a trustee for the Sharman Trust.
      Sharman License Holdings is 100 per cent owned by Sharman Networks, and the beneficial owner is Sharman Trust.
      Worldwide Nominees is the director of Sharman Networks and Sharman License Holdings.
      Worldwide Nominees is owned by Global Nominees and Credit Facilities Limited. The director is Geoffrey Gee and Regent Limited. Geoffrey Gee is a Vanuatu-based solicitor.
      The beneficial owner is Trustees International Limited as trustee for Golden Sands Trust.
      Global Nominees is a Vanuatuan company, the beneficial owners of which are the partners of Vanuatu accounting firm, BDO.
      Credit Facilities Limited, which is one of the nominal shareholders of the shares in Sharman Networks, is similarly a BDO company.
      Lindsay Barrett is a partner of BDO in Vanuatu. He's also director of Vanuatu International Trust Company, VITCO.
      VITCO is the trustee of the Sharman Trust and owner of the whole of the issued capital of Sharman Networks Limited.
      The nominated eligible beneficiaries as defined in the trust deed are the International Red Cross.
      The International Red Cross claims to have never been contacted about this. Nikki Hemming is listed as "director" of VITCO, which is the beneficial shareholder of the Sharman companies located in Vanuatu.
      Sharman operates in Australia via LEF Interactive.
      LEF is an Australian registered private proprietary limited company. Sole director is Nicola Anne Hemming, whose only property asset has been sold to Sharman accountant John Simon Myer.
      LEF has paid up capital of $1.00.
      If you can set up this sort of company structure and understand it, you deserve to live in a multi million dollar mansion.


      Now I cant remember what your question was but I hope my answer clears it up for you...

      --
      serenity now!
    3. Re:It's kind of funny... by zsau · · Score: 2, Funny

      My guess is the OP is either confused about our federal structure ... we have parliaments in many cities (Sydney, Melbourne, Brisbane, Adelaide, Perth and Hobart; two in Canberra and one in Darwin). Of course, these cities are all capitals of the jurisdictions(?) for which the parliaments exist (New South Wales, Victoria, Queensland, South Australia, Western Australia and Tasmania; the Commonwealth and the ACT and the Northern Territory, respectively). I would've thought that happened by definition, mind. (It never clicked before now that there must be *two* Parliaments in Canberra—thank Christ I don't live there!)

      Alternatively, it could be a bad attempt at a joke: everyone knows the capital of Australia is Sydney.

      --
      Look out!
  2. So. by Data+Link+Layer · · Score: 5, Funny

    Looks like those 14 people are going to have to find another method to all their copyright infringed material from.

    1. Re:So. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      G'day, mateGreetings, friend. I would like to download some files. I am based in Austr... uh... ia. Yes.

  3. LATE BREAKING NEWS by irc.goatse.cx+troll · · Score: 4, Funny

    NEWSFLASH: Kazaa is still around.

    people still use that?

    --
    Pain lasts, kid. Its how you know you're alive. Sometimes I think this growing up thing is just pain management-TheMaxx
    1. Re:LATE BREAKING NEWS by Leroy_Brown242 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I said the exact same thing.

      Myself, I couldn't see myself trusting any company or application like this. Seems like every time I have to fix someone's computer, it's because of shit they got from kazaa or whatever.

      On the other hand, people keep smoking.

  4. Re:That's okay by mattjb0010 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Just like America has nothing but Britney spears and Gigli. Serious, how does such an ignorant troll get modded "insightful"?

  5. Re:why listen? by aussie_a · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Why are they voluntarily blocking downloads? It's not like there's a Great Firewall of Australia to block them, and they're not based in Au

    From Wikipedia:
    Consumer Empowerment responded by selling the Kazaa application to a complicated mesh of offshore companies, primarily Sharman Networks, headquartered in Australia

    So actually, yes they are based in the AU. So yes, they kinda do have to follow rulings made by Australian courts.

  6. Re:That's okay by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 3, Funny
    Serious, how does such an ignorant troll get modded "insightful"?

    This IS slashdot after all.

  7. Re:That's okay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    You Australians are pretty uppity for being down under.

  8. Can anyone tell me by NoGuffCheck · · Score: 3, Interesting

    What is stopping Sharman Networks from closing down and starting up under a different company and name. I would think that brand has almost zero good-will when it comes to p2p clients... why bother jumping through hoops when it seams like they could start again at very low cost and have **AA begin their whole lawsuit process again (at great expense of both time and money).

    --
    serenity now!
  9. Irrelevant by bwd · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Kazaa has been relegated to the trash-heap of the net with the advent of bittorrent and registration-only bittorrent trackers. They went the same direction of Napster, because they were litigated into nonexistence.

    Decentralization is key to survival now if you want to avoid litigation on the infrastructure.

    1. Re:Irrelevant by Ravatar · · Score: 2, Informative

      Ever heard of dht and trackerless torrents?

      And besides, the open source has nothing to do with it. The open protocol is what will keep BT alive, if anything.

  10. Bit misleading? by NewsWatcher · · Score: 3, Informative

    I thought the story headline was slightly misleading. People in Australia with KaZaa can still use the service, they are just trying to block new users downloading the software. Bit pointless really given any number of other P2P applications will turn up versions of KaZaa or KaZaalite.

    --
    If the pattern goes 9am, 10am, 11am, why isn't noon 12am?
  11. Time vs Money by Bifurcati · · Score: 4, Insightful
    These days, I don't (er, and never have) download music from filesharing networks - sites like AllOfMP3.com, where I can download music for 6-10 cents a song means that it is far easier for me to get on there, find the album I want, choose the exact encoding I want and get the album fast and conveniently. Plus, I know for certain that it's a good quality encoding, that it's actually the right file, and that I can get all of the album. (Provided, of course, that the album's actually on there!)

    Ultimately, the death of pirating shareware is going to be governed by the pricepoint more than anything else. Sure, free is always cheaper, but if you can get the music at the right price (and I certainly think allofmp3.com has got it!) then that's going to be a major player.

    (And yes, I know there are questions about the legality of the service. But so far it's stood up the legal challenges presented, and it's got to be "more" legal than filesharing, right? :) Not that that matters twojots to the RIAA I guess :)

    1. Re:Time vs Money by StikyPad · · Score: 2, Insightful

      As a wise man once said, "The reports of piracy's death have been greatly exaggerated." Or maybe it was an insane man. Nevertheless..

      I don't think there will ever be such a thing as the death of filesharing, licit or otherwise. I agree, however, that extremely low price points and faster-to-market than pirates (which seems rarely the case) will wipe out the bulk of illicit filesharing. Further, I think publishing companies stand to make even more money through bulk than they do right now. If we could download a song for 5 cents, we'd probably download 20 songs for a dollar instead of just 1 song. The lower profit per song would be offset by the number of songs downloaded, and more music for the dollar means more artists stand to reach an audience, which in turn fuels demand. That's good for the artists, the audience, and the recording companies.

  12. Nobody will care by Mancat · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Kazaa was good in its day, but offers little to no anonymity, and is completely infiltrated by RIAA/MPAA/*. So, if you want to go to jail, go ahead and use Kazaa to download your copyrighted material.

    That being said, few people are still using it. Nobody will care. Those that do care, can now move on to a better client/network.

    --
    hello dear sirs my name is jamesh i are india (bihar) can u guide me install red had linux 9?
  13. Re:Irrelevant -- reasons for trash heap by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Kazaa has been relegated to the trash-heap of the net with the advent of bittorrent and registration-only bittorrent trackers.

    Kazaa has been relegated to the trash-heap of the net because it's laden with spyware, has an ineffective hashing system that has allowed it to become more polluted by OverPeer and its ilk than any other P2P system (in excess of 50% of the files on KaZaA are damaged, in excess of 90% for some very new releases), hasn't been updated in 3 years, and gathers more lawsuits of users than all other P2P systems combined.

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
  14. Re:Shaman or Sharman by richdun · · Score: 4, Funny

    Meh, damn shaman are overpowered anyhow.

  15. My install log by Freaky+Spook · · Score: 2, Funny

    [2:10]I just tried to install this Kazaa program but this anoyng MS Anti-Spyware doesn't like me installing it.

    [2:15]Ok Iv disabled anti-spyware and I am installing it again.

    [2:20]Just finished insntalling #ddffh@4(*(&^#*&%*&%^&^%76#$*7$%[CARRIER DISCONNECTED]

  16. Re:Where to find single mp3s? by freakybob · · Score: 2, Informative

    Limewire is another p2p service which is pretty good. The more popular songs are corrupted, and I don't know how RIAA'd it is, but it's an ok kazaa substitute for now. Also, with bittorrent you can download a torrent for an entire album which has your song in it, and using the Azureus bittorrent client you can go into the separate files and highlight everything but your desired song, right-click->priority->Do Not Download.

  17. "More" legal? by Nerdposeur · · Score: 2, Insightful

    And yes, I know there are questions about the legality of the service. But so far it's stood up the legal challenges presented, and it's got to be "more" legal than filesharing, right?

    Not necessarily. According to an IP trace, that site is based in Russia. They're selling songs for a fraction of the going rate here, and if they don't have an agreement with the labels, they probably aren't paying the labels anything for it. (I don't know that for a fact.)

    *IF* these guys have stolen the music and are selling it illegally, then paying them is ethically worse than not paying at all - not only are the copyright owners screwed, but you feel justified in screwing them and are supporting their (unfair) competition.

    Yeah, you can gripe about the price of music, but supply and demand says that if it's too expensive, you shouldn't buy it. Buy indie stuff for cheap, or listen to the radio, but don't think that as long as you pay someone for your Gorillaz mp3, it's ok.

    And yes, as you can see by my sig, I do have a bias. :)

    1. Re:"More" legal? by Bifurcati · · Score: 4, Interesting
      As best I understand it, they pay the Russian music body a licensing fee, and as far as Russian law goes, they've satisfied all the requirements necessary to distribute music. The grey area is whether they have the right to sell it to us folk over the seas. If it were CDs, then there's no law against importing a CD, but the internet is a different kettle of fish - it's quite unclear what their legal obligations are. They're probably not in the spirit of the law, but seem to be within the letter. The RIAA tried to get them shut down, but failed; it remains to be seen what course of action they take.

      As for the paying/not paying thing, artists (of major lables) get virtually zip from CD sales; I figure at least this way, the albums I buy are making it to the Top 10 on this site, which then encourages more people to buy them, etc, which ultimately results in more listeners and hopefully bigger sales at concerts, where they make their real money. Of course, this doesn't work out so well for the Labels (and hence the sustainability of the current industry model) but that's all for the better we might start to see some shake up.

      Anyway, I rarely buy new music - it's mainly jazz I'm after, and the occasional soundtrack.

    2. Re:"More" legal? by geminidomino · · Score: 4, Insightful

      not only are the copyright owners screwed, but you feel justified in screwing them and are supporting their (unfair) competition.

      Whereas if you pay iTunes for it, you're supporting THIER mafia-like tactics.

      Thank the gods for cdbaby.com :)

    3. Re:"More" legal? by mcubed · · Score: 2, Informative

      The grey area is whether they have the right to sell it to us folk over the seas. If it were CDs, then there's no law against importing a CD

      You can't legally import a CD for resale in the U.S. if the exclusive U.S. distribution rights to that CD have been purchased by/granted to a company. Same goes for books. If, say, a record label in Brazil (or Belgium or Belize, etc.) makes a deal with a record label in the U.S., giving the latter U.S. distribution rights, then it would not be legal for a U.S. store to import the Brazilian label's CDs for sale in its shop(s). The store would have to offer the U.S. label's editions of the CD, even if it could obtain and sell the Brazilian discs less expensively than the U.S. discs.

      It's a different story if the Brazilian CD is not otherwise available in the U.S. -- then the record store can import to its heart's content. Many specialty stores (especially specialty bookstores) do just that -- what makes them unique and valuable to their customers is that they don't offer *just* the stuff you could find at Borders or Amazon.com, but also stuff you can't easily obtain elsewhere or might not otherwise be aware of.

      I suspect, in the case of allofmp3s.com, the area is not terribly gray -- unless there is some loophole that allows them to sell to U.S. customers.

      Michael

      --
      "No live organism can continue for long to exist sanely under conditions of absolute reality;..."
    4. Re:"More" legal? by mcrbids · · Score: 4, Informative

      You can't legally import a CD for resale in the U.S. if the exclusive U.S. distribution rights to that CD have been purchased by/granted to a company.

      That's correct - except that AllofMP3 isn't importing anything. They're exporting from Russia. Importing anything into the USA requires a legal entity here, in the States!

      I can legally buy something from a mail-order catalog from Brazil and have them ship it directly to my house, if I desire it, for personal use. They aren't breaking any laws, and neither am I.

      So, AllofMP3 isn't importing anything at all, they're selling items over the Internet to whomever wants to buy it under Russian law, apparently in full compliance with the letter of Russian law. What's more, US copyright law specifically allows imports of copyrighted materials from oversees when purchased for personal use, when such materials are sold in compliance with the foreign jurisdiction, even when foreign laws conflict with US law!

      IANAL, but it seems pretty bullet-resistant to me. And, it's damned convenient...

      --
      I have no problem with your religion until you decide it's reason to deprive others of the truth.
  18. Find another way to get Kazaa by GeeksHaveFeelings · · Score: 2, Funny

    So they'll use another P2P software to get Kazaa now?

  19. It's also an improvement by rolypolyman · · Score: 4, Funny

    On the announcement, Telstra said it would proceed with shutdown of several OC-48 backbones as spyware traffic falls.

  20. Re:It really ISN'T FUNNY by Stupendoussteve · · Score: 2, Informative

    Uh... Kazaa not spyware ridden? Since when?

  21. Oblig by Pneuma+ROCKS · · Score: 4, Funny

    As if half a dozen of voices suddenly cried out in terror, and were suddenly silenced.

    --
    Favorite quote: "
  22. P2P Profit Model Changing by burningion · · Score: 4, Insightful
    With all the litigations coming from the music and movie industry, it just doesn't make sense for a company to try to own the P2P software.

    Instead, companies should develope and release the software for free, into the wild, and create a profitable market using the network itself. It's time for a really creative person to figure out how to release a lasting P2P client/network and make a profit from it in a really untraditional way.

    Like utilising all the traffic to build models for what people are searching for. Selling the information to marketers. Letting people sell content through P2P networks, whatever. I'm not the one to create the next fix for P2P, but it is out there, and I'll be the first one to use it.

  23. Re:How Exactly Does This Work? by LordLucless · · Score: 3, Informative

    Kazaa is centralized; all Kazaa queries go through the Kazaa network. So no, the original inventors of the FTP protocol aren't going to be busted - unless they coincidentally happen to be running an illegal warez FTP.

    That's what's happening with Sharman. They're not being busted for creating a client that other people use illegally, they're being told to implement blocks on certain traffic that passes through their network. They didn't do the blocks, so instead they pulled access from Australia in order to comply.

    --
    Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean there isn't an invisible demon about to eat your face
  24. Re:Where to find single mp3s? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    You can use Bittorrent for individual songs as well. Most Bittorrent clients these days allow you to view the files within the torrent itself, and either rank them in priority, or choose to not download them at all.



    So, all you have to do is find a .torrent of the album that the song you want is from, open the .torrent, and set all the files to not download, except for the one(s) that you want. Of course, this won't work if the .torrent contains a .zip, .rar, or another archive file with the songs inside.



  25. Multichoice test by skingers6894 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    When all current filesharing systems have been hunted down and destroyed the users of those systems will flock to:

    a) CD Stores
    b) The next, better, faster, more anonymous filesharing system

    What do you think?

  26. Re:That's okay by femto · · Score: 2, Funny

    Down under? A popular misconception. Hold on a sec, just gotta feed my kangaroo and get the dropbear of the kid...

  27. Re:Probably for the best.. by EuroChild · · Score: 2, Informative

    Yeah, it's modded flamebait, but it's also funny. Anyway - some clarification on that statement for future reference. Not all of Australia's states were convict settlements, just most of them. South Australia (Adelaide) was settled by law abiding citizens in 1836 and not by convicts. However, I'm not sure if we currently have access to the Kazaa network or not...

    --
    Does this make my brain look big?
  28. Ka-what? by Havenwar · · Score: 2, Funny

    You know, I must say, presently Kazaa is the best filesharing protocol in the world! At least for us overweight hairy horny sweaty geeks living in mothers basement. Whatever I search for, I get more pr0n for my ever growing collection! Sure, a few broken files, but it is quantity that matters, not quality!

    Of course... in reality I long since moved out of mothers basement, she died, and so did Kazaa. I'm still overweight, hairy, horny and sweaty, but nowadays I use the ed2k and bittorrent protocols for filetranfers instead. These days I only get the good pr0n.