Slashdot Mirror


Swarming And Hopping Planetary Robots

An anonymous reader writes "Recently Dr. Penelope Boston (U. New Mexico) and Dr. Steven Dubowsky (MIT) discussed their NASA advances to develop 'hopping microbots' capable of exploring hazardous terrain, including underground caves and planetary extremes. 'We came up with the idea of many, many, tiny little spheres, about the size of tennis balls (slide show), that essentially hop, almost like Mexican jumping beans. They store up muscle energy, so to speak, and then they boink themselves off in various directions. That's how they move...They behave as a swarm [of 1000s]. They relate to each other using very simple rules, but that produces a great deal of flexibility in their collective behavior that enables them to meet the demands of unpredictable and hazardous terrain.' Test prototypes available in March will initially explore terrestrial lava tubes."

73 comments

  1. Aeon Flux? by tbcpp · · Score: 4, Funny

    Is it just me, or have these people been watching Aeon Flux a little to much? Haven't seen the movie, but the scene from the trailer of the hundreds of explosive balls running down the hall comes to mind.

    --
    Man is the lowest-cost, 150-pound, nonlinear, all-purpose computer system which can be mass-produced by unskilled labor.
    1. Re:Aeon Flux? by EntropyEngine · · Score: 0, Troll

      Is it just me, or did I offer this story up months ago, only to have it rejected?

    2. Re:Aeon Flux? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm almost certainly not the first, but...

      I for one welcome our new 'boinking tennis ball' masters.

  2. Boink.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Yet again, scientific progress goes "boink".

  3. Dangerous behavior by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If the robots are boinking themselves off, don't the run the risk of going blind?

    1. Re:Dangerous behavior by ScrewMaster · · Score: 2, Funny

      No, they run the risk of growing hair on their pa ... well, of becoming hairy balls, I guess.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
  4. Poor choice of words? by core+plexus · · Score: 4, Funny
    "...and then they boink themselves off..."

    Let the adolescent humor begin!

    Iceworms are real

    1. Re:Poor choice of words? by IvanTheViking · · Score: 2, Funny

      Excessive boinking may lead to device blindness.

    2. Re:Poor choice of words? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "...and then they boink themselves off..."

      Let the adolescent humor begin!


      Porn is always first...

    3. Re:Poor choice of words? by sourcery · · Score: 5, Funny

      Moral of the story: It takes balls to go cave exploring on alien worlds.

      --
      Cthulhu for President! Why settle for the lesser evil?
    4. Re:Poor choice of words? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We can not condone bouncing of the seventh variety!

    5. Re:Poor choice of words? by tolkienfan · · Score: 1

      Begin? Has it ever stopped?

  5. What would Heisenberg think? by nickgrieve · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I like this idea. Personally, I think that remote planetary rover designers often put the cart before the horse. We often send the robotic equivalent of (evolutionary speaking) contemporary insects out to explore planets, when perhaps we should look at methods employed by fungus, plants, one celled organisms for inspection for somewhat to more so reliable designs...

    As for Heisenburg,... I can see a lot of NASA guys sitting around the data feeds... "hrmm... it seems that the surface of venus is covered in 1000's of pock marks the size of tennis balls..." :-)

  6. I, ... (obligatory) by dorkygeek · · Score: 3, Funny
    ... for one, welcome our new jumping and boinking overlords.

    And hey, even better, they do in fact come in clusters! Now in only wonder if in Soviet Russia, swarms are boinking you!?

    --
    Windows is like decaf - it tastes like the real thing, but it won't get you through the day.
  7. oh noes by Phil246 · · Score: 1

    lets hope Galen can get there in time to take out the control centre then ;)

    (b5 - crusade , 1x10 reference for those who dont get it)

    1. Re:oh noes by m0nstr42 · · Score: 1
      ...take out the control centre...


      Actually, anime references aside, one of the beautiful things about swarm robotics is that in many cases there is decidedly not a central intelligence. Each unit acts on its own according to relatively simple rules and a relatively low amount of communication with neighbors. The result is often very robust and surprisingly versatile. We are actually taking a cue from biology here. Think of a school of fish... each individual fish having relatively limited "computing power" and "sensor information" yet the fish school in incredibly successful.
  8. Scientific Progress Goes 'Boink' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Redundant

    As Calvin and Hobbes once said, Scientific Progress Goes 'Boink'...

  9. To win a bet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Ten bucks says that this whole concept was invented just so some NASA scientist could win a bet that he could get the phrase "they boink themselves off" into an official press release :)

  10. Galactic boinking by HermanAB · · Score: 4, Funny

    At least, this one thing that Douglas Adams didn't think of.

    --
    Oh well, what the hell...
  11. balls roll down by tronicum · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I like the idea but if it just a swarm of balls, they might inspect a cave one time only. If like 1000 Balls hop arround and 200 explore a cave, they might all roll down into a big hole all together. They need some rover or insect like master that collects their sensor information. If they are the size of a tennis ball they can't store much energy and can not send their data for long distance.

    1. Re:balls roll down by bubulubugoth · · Score: 2, Interesting

      what about having a communitacion gateway?

      Swarm robots send that to the gateway, and the gateweay re-send the data...

      Any way, those robots must come out from something else :)

      --
      Â_Â
    2. Re:balls roll down by Jarnin · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Wouldn't rolling down into a big hole sort of be the point? I mean, if you want to explore a possible cave system, you're going to want to know where the cave leads, how far down it goes, how much area it covers, and so on. Seems like rolling and bouncing probes would be a good way to map a cave.

      I think a better means of transportation would be something like a dandelion seed; something that was light enough to have the wind pick it up and blow it around, but could anchor itself (grow roots) if an area proved to be worthy of more investigation.

    3. Re:balls roll down by Bemmu · · Score: 1

      I heard there was enough energy in one act of boinking to send a broadcast to Alpha Centauri and back.

    4. Re:balls roll down by David_Shultz · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Something leads me to believe that, seeing as though the researchers are considering sending these to investigate lava tubes, they will be considering a means by which the robots will be able to get out of the tubes...

      Having said that, I agree completely that there will certainly be the possibility of the robots getting stuck or damaged by different terrain or obstacles. However, this is something swarms are good at dealing with!

      First of all, having one bot getting stuck or damaged isn't catastrophic -the system continues functioning, just with slightly lower efficiency. Secondly, if a bot gets stuck, it could send out a danger signal to nearby bots. As a matter of fact, such a system is probably not even necessary,because chances are, the swarms will be designed with the following rule: steer clear of nearby bots. Why? To cover a wider area. (staying within sensor range of at least a few bots though). So by default, if one bot gets into a tough situation, the others avoid it. Of course, there will probably be a grouping rule as well -steer to maintain the same heading as the average of the group. We want these guys staying together and functioning as a whole unit.

      In any case, the point is this -swarms are BETTER at dealing with tough conditions than individual bots. Secondly, having a master bot defeats almost all purposes of having a swarm in the first place. It would be better to just design the swarm in such a way that they are able to gather themselves up at a meeting point when the time comes.

    5. Re:balls roll down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As individual bots only have a protion of the sensor package, I imagine that they DO want to stick to gether. Such that there is complete sensor data from each observation point.

    6. Re:balls roll down by Peter+La+Casse · · Score: 2, Insightful
      In any case, the point is this -swarms are BETTER at dealing with tough conditions than individual bots. Secondly, having a master bot defeats almost all purposes of having a swarm in the first place. It would be better to just design the swarm in such a way that they are able to gather themselves up at a meeting point when the time comes.

      While this is true, the best approach is likely to be one that combines the swarming and master bot approaches. During normal operations, individual bots maneuver independently, but when the situation warrants, the swarm coalesces into a master bot that can meet greater challenges.

      And I'll form the head!

    7. Re:balls roll down by David_Shultz · · Score: 1
      While this is true, the best approach is likely to be one that combines the swarming and master bot approaches. During normal operations, individual bots maneuver independently, but when the situation warrants, the swarm coalesces into a master bot that can meet greater challenges.

      I don't know if its the result of my own intellectual deficiencies, but I had a lot of trouble getting any meaningful content out of your post. What exactly is a "normal operation", versus a "greater challenge"? More importantly, how do the bots know "when the situation warrants" a change of strategy? Most important of all, what the heck does "coalesces into a master bot" mean? The whole point of a swarm is a bunch of bots functioning as an individual unit ;they already are a functional unit, and they can't combine any more than that -this isn't transformers!

      not to be too nit-picky, but after pointing out the ambiguity "normal operation"/"greater challenge"/"situation warrants", and absurdity "coalesces into master bot" your post contains nothing more than a baseless assertion of "the best approach":

      While this is true, the best approach is likely to be one that combines the swarming and master bot approaches. During [?], individual bots maneuver independently, but when [?], the swarm [?] that can [?].
    8. Re:balls roll down by Peter+La+Casse · · Score: 1
      I don't know if its the result of my own intellectual deficiencies, but I had a lot of trouble getting any meaningful content out of your post.

      The key to understanding my post is in the punch line:

      And I'll form the head!

      I make no claim about whether or not that constitutes meaningful content.

    9. Re:balls roll down by David_Shultz · · Score: 1

      haha okay so you were just joking. sorry about that. I guess I was thrown off by the rating of 3, 100% 'insightful'.

    10. Re:balls roll down by Peter+La+Casse · · Score: 1

      I was angling for "funny", but I've heard that some moderators use "insightful" instead of "funny" in order to reward karma.

  12. Hopping Microrobots? Pah! by Chaffar · · Score: 1

    If you want a sphere shaped information-gathering robot, look no further .

  13. Java tubes?? by surprise_audit · · Score: 1
    initially explore terrestrial lava tubes

    I must get more sleep. I would have sworn that said Java tubes. Exploring tubes of coffee?? Exploring tubes of a programming language?? Hrmm...

    1. Re:Java tubes?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I need sleep more than you do. I read your post and thought it said you thought the article said Jawa tubes. Exploring droid-sucking tubes on Sandcrawlers?

  14. Lexx carrots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I like the idea of carrot-shaped probes, as featured in Lexx. Let the bunnies do the hopping - carrots with legs are the way forward.

  15. if you don't understand this joke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it's the title of a Calvin&hobbes book

    1. Re:if you don't understand this joke by fossa · · Score: 1

      Or, more specifically, in Calvin's first attempt at making a duplicator out of his cardboard box, he climbs inside and convinces the dubious Hobbes to push the button by deriding him for wanting to hold back scientific progress; the button makes a "boink" sound prompting Hobbes to say "scientific progress goes boink?".

      Well, that about ruins the joke I think. Is there a Google book search equivalent for Calvin and Hobbes? Because there should be...

  16. What will they think? by mortong · · Score: 1

    Long after humankind is dead, some new race will explore the galaxy. This new race will find 1000s of small balls covering half the worlds they land on to explore and wonder, "What the f*ck?"

  17. But what if... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So what if we actually encounter aliens? This is not the best way to make first contact.

  18. Did they read the warnings in the instructions ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wasn't there a movie with Walter Koenig about this ?

        Later, when the Runaways hit the fan, they'll moan thet "no-one could have imagined it".

        Seen that movie already.

        Bye ol' planet. (*yawn*).

  19. Isn't the main issue how to power them? by putko · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Isn't the main issue how to power the balls? They'll need energy to hop around, make measurements and communicate.

    I don't think the ad hoc wireless network aspect of things is likely to be the hard part: if people can solve the power problems, Siemens, Sony, Panasonic, Toshiba and Philips will likely take care of the network/software part in the course of solving our more earthly problems.

    E.g. a security system built of these would seem to have wide appeal.

    --
    http://www.thebricktestament.com/the_law/when_to_s tone_your_children/dt21_18a.html
    1. Re:Isn't the main issue how to power them? by newpath4comVersion2 · · Score: 0
      You're right! The problem IS the power. Gee, sure hope all the big think tanks get on this problem IMMEDIATELY. Sony, Siemens, Panasonic, Lawrence Livermore, Sandia. We need to put out a call for as many more PEOPLE AS NECESSARY TO THROW AT SOLVING THE WORLD'S PROBLEMS (and the hopping bot's). What we really need is for someone to make a new Manhattan Energy Project for 2005 & solve all the problems in one fell swoop!

      D^amn it, Doesn't anybody have any bombs left? http://www.newpath4.com/millenialdawnpowerandlight secure21.htm .
      Isn't there someone out there who can fly a plane?
      http://tinyurl.com/7aaca .
      Someone who isn't afraid of the Weather?
      http://www.newpath4.com/WorldwideClimateEngineMsg. htm .

      Hhmmm. Looks like the Wizard, Woody of Oz is real. For more information check my Comment under the main article > http://www.astrobio.net/news/article1798.html .

      And trust the old weatherman before you trust the fresh guy out of college who is just learning the ropes eh? The "old dude" who has invented two new types of fusion -non nuclear fusion- that can power a home without combustible fuels... and no pollution by-products whatsoever. Hhmmm.

      Gee, that sounds like the answer we've been waiting for.
      End of global warming,
      end of escalating healthcare costs from pollution asthma, pollution emphysema, pollution chronic lung diseases,
      pollution made dead zones in the ocean and ozone layer,
      pollution DNA damage that is now proving to be trans-generational in the womb...
      weather aberrations from global warming such as hurricanes & tornadoes...
      crude oil peaking out before it kills us all...
      hybrid electric cars that electrocute the rescue people at an accident...

      rising mental illness rates from lowered oxygen content in our atmosphere because OUR ENGINES USE IT BETTER THAN OUR LUNGS leaving the rest of us brain damaged to one degree or another from oxygen deprivation esp in our cities.

      http://www.somethingawful.com/ does understand brain damage. Hhmmm. If I lessen the brain damage you all might lose 3/4 of your website traffic. Maybe you'll have to turn into real writers. Maybe you can use a reducing ray and be the brains in these new hopping bots of the Planet Mars. That would make a great story. You could call them something awful hopping bots (SAHB's). No need to send any royalties or thank-you fees; glad I could help you out in your moment of need.

      Someone has finished the Manhattan Energy Project?
      Saved lots of government-funded grant? >
      money by not throwing rebel hordes of people at the problem? >
      > http://www.newpath4.com/01manhattanproject20056789 fromnewpath410302005.htm .

      For those of you in a big hurry, no time to check the referenced Comments, I'll save you the trouble. An electronic waterwheel that uses a stream of metal balls to turn a bi-directional dual generator, striking the paddle wheel fins in a continuous cycle. The remaining 40% of Mankind that doesn't have electricity is about to get a big boost.

      The Millenial Dawn vaporgenerator can power a paired generator (or 2, or 3) that focuses force upward, overcoming Gravity. Our astronauts -accompanied by a select team of somethingawful writers recently laid off- can be vacationing on Earth's Moon by 2008 & Mars by 2010 once the News Media stops ignoring my new fusion engines.

      You can all be sipping margueritas at a comfy Microsoft PC control station while the hordes of little hopping slavebots do the exploring, Courtesy of Internet Al (Gore) without whom I wouldn't be able

    2. Re:Isn't the main issue how to power them? by chawly · · Score: 1

      And I, for one, welome our new powerfull balled overlords. And I'm very sorry, but I couldn't resist it.

      --
      How many beans make five, anyhow ? ... Charles Walmsley
  20. As long as... by JDevers · · Score: 1

    we don't make them self replicating and capable of lift-off. Among many galactic societies, that is considered the ultimate rudeness.

  21. beans? by Hugonz · · Score: 1, Interesting
    Mexican jumping beans.

    Which are completely unheard of in Mexico.

    1. Re:beans? by corpsiclex · · Score: 1

      That's because in Mexico they are known as brincadores.
      -- relevant wikipedia article

      --

      eBayDig 1s a typo saerch engien
  22. Killer Rabbit Balls by sikandril · · Score: 1

    [dramatic chord]
    ARTHUR:
            What?
    TIM:
            There he is!
    ARTHUR:
            Where?
    TIM:
            There!
    ARTHUR:
            What, behind the rabbit?
    TIM:
            It is the rabbit.
    ARTHUR:
            You silly sod!
    TIM:
            What?
    ARTHUR:
            You got us all worked up!
    TIM:
            Well, that's no ordinary rabbit!
    ARTHUR:
            Ohh.
    TIM:
            That's the most foul, cruel, and bad-tempered rodent you ever set eyes on!
    ROBIN:
            You tit! I soiled my armour I was so scared!
    TIM:
            Look, that rabbit's got a vicious streak a mile wide! It's a killer!

  23. Reminds me of the movie Twister by theurge14 · · Score: 1

    What were those probes called? Dorothy-1 and Dorothy-2 I think. They release all those metal tennis balls into the swirling vortex and they quickly get nifty graphs on their laptop computers.

  24. What is happening in Photo 43? by craXORjack · · Score: 1

    I don't believe the comment that they are torturing and killing the child. So what the heck are those giant swiss cheese balls doing?

    --
    Liberals call everyone Nazis yet they are the closest thing to it.
  25. not good by r00t · · Score: 1

    Breakage and disorientation are a given.

    If you want to move around on rough terrain, look at what the military uses. The recent 6-wheel rovers match of pretty well, with appropriate adjustments for running a motor without oxygen and diesel supplies of course.

    Hopping around is silly. In some places you might prefer a tracked vehicle. In some places you could use buoyancy like a submarine or blimp, perhaps like a sea glider if you can vary buoyancy enough. In some places you could use a jet (supplying oxidizer instead of fuel). In some places you might want to make a few small rocket-based flights. (fuel is heavy and bulky though)

    1. Re:not good by chawly · · Score: 1

      Could just stay home quietly, too. Maybe get boinked.

      --
      How many beans make five, anyhow ? ... Charles Walmsley
  26. Underground Caves by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    including underground caves


    As opposed to the aboveground caves? They are just caves, and by their nature, are underground. Yes, there are caves with water in them, and are properly termed water filled caves.
  27. It's been done, at Sandia by Animats · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Somebody at NASA didn't do their homework. Very similar spherical hopping robots were developed in 1997 at Sandia, with DARPA funding. They actually work; they're not just a proposed project with pretty pictures. "Where we want to go is Mars and the moon. With a hopper, you could go much farther from the lander. You could throw out a dozen of these to search in all directions."

    There's some interest in this as a new generation of land mine. Dump out a few hundred of these and they wait for a target, like a convoy, to come along. When they find a suitable target, the hopper that found it calls for backup, and the hoppers in the neighborhood swarm to attack the target.

    1. Re:It's been done, at Sandia by Peter+La+Casse · · Score: 1
      Somebody at NASA didn't do their homework. Very similar spherical hopping robots were developed in 1997 at Sandia, with DARPA funding. They actually work; they're not just a proposed project with pretty pictures.

      That effort suffers from a fatal flaw: it does not fund the proponents of the current effort. With enough funding, this new effort's proponents should be able to overcome this shortcoming.

    2. Re:It's been done, at Sandia by davidsyes · · Score: 1

      Talk about a fraggin' "gang bang"... Gives new meaning to the song "I love a man in a yoo-nee-form"... Soldiers better dress up as nurses in white skirts and spray red crosses on their vehicles...

      --
      Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
    3. Re:It's been done, at Sandia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That effort suffers from a fatal flaw: it does not fund the proponents of the current effort. With enough funding, this new effort's proponents should be able to overcome this shortcoming.

      Unless of course; someone at NASA did do their homework, saw the project mentioned by the grandparent, thought "hey this is a pretty good idea maybe and it can be used for more than just minefields," and are using the DARPA project's past successes (internally at least) when they pitch their idea.

      Nah, NO civil servant could be that competent. *roll eyes*

    4. Re:It's been done, at Sandia by Peter+La+Casse · · Score: 1
      That effort suffers from a fatal flaw: it does not fund the proponents of the current effort. With enough funding, this new effort's proponents should be able to overcome this shortcoming.

      Unless of course; someone at NASA did do their homework, saw the project mentioned by the grandparent, thought "hey this is a pretty good idea maybe and it can be used for more than just minefields," and are using the DARPA project's past successes (internally at least) when they pitch their idea.

      How is that not consistent with what I wrote?

      Nah, NO civil servant could be that competent. *roll eyes*

      Civil servants *can* be competent. It's simply unlikely, thanks to how the system is set up.

  28. DARPA has a similar product by chenjeru · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This reminds me of DARPA's self-healing minefield, where mines communicate with each other and 'hop' to fill any gaps in their net. DARPA's page here: http://www.darpa.mil/ato/programs/SHM/

    --
    Even if you're on the right track, you'll get run over if you just sit there. - Will Rogers
  29. Mod -1 Off Topic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    I'm sorry. Wouldn't this article been better off posted @ BoingBoing?

  30. Re:(obligatory) by iamjambon · · Score: 1

    Mmmmm .... delicious robot clusters.

  31. Dr. Penny Boston is at NMT, not UNM.. by retrosurf · · Score: 1

    UNM is University of New Mexico, in Albuquerque, with about
    30,000 students. New Mexico Tech (New Mexico Institute of
    Mining and Technology), also known as the New Mexico School of
    Mines, is a land grant mining school about 75 miles south of
    UNM, where truly crunchy geology and geophysics things happen.

    Dr. Boston was in a documentary on PBS, (Nova, October 2002).
    She seems to be riding a crest of research that is shaking up
    the science of cave formation, postulating that caves are
    created as a consequence of primarily biological activity,
    rather than primarily chemical activity.

  32. Robot Sex? by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 2, Funny

    "then they boink themselves...They relate to each other using very simple rules..."

    Sounds like human behavior to me.

    These things could pass the Turing Test.

    --
    Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
  33. Re:It's been done, at Sandia-- Sandia Press Releas by davidsyes · · Score: 1

    e...?

    Maybe somebody at Sandia was hopping, ummm, hoping to generate an offical press release:

    "Sandia to SandBlast Your Ass in Our New Minefield"...

    --
    Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
  34. Re:Robot Sex? No robots involved ! by chawly · · Score: 1

    I was going to ask if these things run Linux. I was going to : then I noticed that there were 2 inventors - 1 female and 1 male. Now I'm sure that we're talking human behaviour here. These 2 learnéd souls have in fact discovered how to make .... well, babies (the description of their behavior fits exactly). Have we discovered a "cruelty to children" issue here ? Will Doctor Penny be able to supply the demand by herself ? Have we discovered scientifically justified polygamy ? How does Doctor Steven feel about the projected use of his progeniture (lava tubes can get awful hot, after all) ? These (and many other) questions must be answered !

    --
    How many beans make five, anyhow ? ... Charles Walmsley
  35. Re:Mod -1 Off Topic - No, no - spelling mistake by chawly · · Score: 1

    Should hav been boink boink.

    --
    How many beans make five, anyhow ? ... Charles Walmsley
  36. Re:Underground Caves - missed the point by chawly · · Score: 1

    French slang gives another meaning for "cave" and these are to be found underground, aboveground, and some (though not many) have a pilot's licence.

    --
    How many beans make five, anyhow ? ... Charles Walmsley