Slashdot Mirror


Miss Digital World 2005

dnix writes "With the slogan: "Don't hate me because I'm digital" this year we have a nice new Top Digital Model, called Mi, from Shinichi Yoshimoto. She is a nice cybernetic geisha who was chosen from 15 finalists from Italy, Germany, Spain, Pakistan, Iran, Usa, Chile, India, Australia, Brasil and Mexico."

16 of 308 comments (clear)

  1. Mamegal should win by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Look at well the pubic bulge was modeled... I bet the modeler had to actually construct the vulva, and then put clothes on it, to generate this effect.

  2. 2005 winners??? by technoextreme · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This website includes the winners of the 2005 website which were announced on December 10. Unless slashdot posted a dupe within the last four days then I'd seriously doubt it. Then again Digg probably had it first (sarcasm).

    --
    Ooo man the floppy drive is broken. No wait. The computer is just upside down.
  3. The future by squoozer · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I can see it now. The human race slowly becoming extinct because everyone would rather hump a perfect digital partner in VR than interact with a real person. Perhaps we will have developed technology to the point where we can make babies in a tank though.

    Funny thing is though, I know several guys that are probably never going to get a partner let alone have children simply because they have set their sights way to high. They want a perfect woman or nothing. In two cases it is perfect looks that they require and in another it's the perfect little obedient house wife (that last guy makes me cringe everytime we talk). I can't help feeling that there are a lot of guys out there that have lost touch with reality due to constantly having "beautiful" women displayed to them.

    --
    I used to have a better sig but it broke.
    1. Re:The future by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Also, I want to clarify what I mean by "value system". Not having a family doesn't mean you don't have values. It just means what you place a different value on having a family, or in other words importance. Some people value family as the most important thing you can do in this life; your reason for being here. This describes my values. However, there are many people who value a career, freedom to spend and live how they wish, and their free time. Not wrong, just different. This is what I mean about value system and I think more people are putting less emphasis on family then there has been in the past. Thus, the reason for why I think affording has nothing to do with it.

    2. Re:The future by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      Tell your Catholic friends to embrace contraception and they can have sex every day. And honestly, which is more "natural"? It really is subjective. It seems much more natural to me to have sex when it is desired rather than dictated by a calendar. Using a fertility monitor seems more like exploiting a loophole in church doctrine to me.

  4. Yes, but. by headkase · · Score: 3, Insightful

    We're speaking English.

    --
    Shh.
    1. Re:Yes, but. by CaymanIslandCarpedie · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And as a fellow arogant English speaker, I must say I don't like your spelling of headkase. I've decided your name should be spelled HeadCase. How you think your own name should be spelled is irrelevant! I've decided you are now HeadCase.

      --
      "reality has a well-known liberal bias" - Steven Colbert
  5. I must be missing the cybergene by Quirk · · Score: 5, Insightful
    I got to check them all out before it was /.ed.

    I like chicks alot. Been married, lived with a few others, like long term relationships. The thing is I don't get the uber smooth, cyber skinned, tricked out, fantasy girls, or, the equally poreless, celluloid supermodels. The first time I seriously came undone in the face of transcendent physical beauty was the first time I saw my first real girlfriend fresh out of the shower sans makeup.

    I guess I'm just a regular guy that likes real regular chicks with attractive little flaws.

    I'll take the time I've here and now cause obviously I'm not suited to the tailored, gene spliced and diced perfect world to come.

    --
    "Academicians are more likely to share each other's toothbrush than each other's nomenclature."
    Cohen
  6. Alienation City by JumpingBull · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I don't quite how to say this, but in a world of retouched, airbrushed, p0rn enhanced body mods, this seems a natural progression.

    I think I shall change careers to be an undertaker. drug-lord or psychologist; I see an increase in suicide and despair as people try to conform to an unrealistic/unobtainable model of perfection.

    All three should continue to be major growth industies, and are lucrative investments for the future

    --
    This is progress?
  7. Re:Only way by portforward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Wow dude, that is pretty messed up. It is hard to see if you are joking or not, (this being slashdot and all) but even if you were joking, you sound pretty angry about something. I strongly recommend marraige counseling, especially if you have kids. Comitted human relationships are much more important than computers, jobs, video games, school, anything.

  8. Priorities by 0311 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    When I finished school in 2000 (while working full time) we already had two children. And a house. No, I didn't make mega-bucks (still don't and we have 4 children and a much nicer home) but we were very careful with our money and still are. I don't have gadgets (unless you count the XBox, which doubles as our DVD player), my computer is older than my first born (and cobbled together with parts I bought from a wholesaler) and I drive an old car with a lot of miles on it. I bring my lunch from home and we don't eat out much, maybe once every 8 weeks. We rent movies instead of going to the movie theatre. I don't have a lot of spending money, about $15 every two weeks. And yet, I wouldn't trade any amount of money or so-called social freedom for my family. Oh, and by the way, no one I have ever met or heard of was ready for children before they came. They kind of grow on you and you cannot get that kind of practice any other way. Some responsibilities cannot be prepared for until after the weight of them has already settled onto your shoulders and having children is one of those responsibilities.

    Poverty is not a poor financial statement. It is a state of mind. I remember an old Appalachian woman being asked what she would do if she got some money. This was in the last few years that she was interviewed. She lived in a one room shack without indoor plumbing, out in the sticks. She said, "Well, I suppose I would give it to the poor." If you must have loads of spending money and lots of cool stuff in order for you to think of yourself as not poverty stricken, well, you don't really want children, do you? It's about your priorities.

    Well, I do carry on, don't I? Point is, if you want to take on the responsibilities of children, don't wait until you are ready, because you never will be until you have them in your life.

    1. Re:Priorities by mudbogger · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I don't have a lot of spending money, about $15 every two weeks. And yet, I wouldn't trade any amount of money or so-called social freedom for my family.

      Hate to say it but this is probably the opinion you would expect from someone who had children before they were ready. The point is, it is not a question of trading your actual family it is just a question of waiting a little longer until you start the family so you can be more comfortable and buy your lunch every now and then. That said you deserve credit for your resolve and optimism.

  9. Re:Only way by metternich · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I question whether this stereotype is true. Most nerdy slashdot-reading guys I know, (myself included,) are either married or have girlfriends.

    --
    Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored.
  10. Re:Only way by Easy2RememberNick · · Score: 3, Insightful

    A real woman can be in her twenties yet look like much younger than her age, even 16! I've met women like that.

      There would be no way to age a digital woman, since she/it isn't real it doesn't have an age. Not all twenty year old women look the same, people age differently.

      People of Asian origin tend to look younger to someone from European descent. If the digital woman was an Asian woman of 20 I'm sure it's possible she could look younger compared to a 20 year old European woman.

      Then you could get into the debate over body hair and how the lack of it makes someone look younger, pre-pubescent. Add that too an already young looking woman and you pretty much have an image of a very young girl but technically she is 20 years old.

      Other than making the digital woman ugly on purpose there's no way around this.

      I'm sure the porn websites will be the first to push the envelope on this one.

  11. Re:Only way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Actually, I have a GF as well (12 years today IIRC)

    Dude, 12 years? Grow a pair, muster up some commitment, and marry the babe. I'm surprised she hasn't dumped your ass if you've been GF/BF for over a decade!

    Unless you mean she's 12 years old, in which case I'd recommend waiting about 6 more years for that.

  12. Sorry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    It looks like there are two (not mutually exclusive) possibilities here:

    #1 You married a loser.
    #2 She married a loser.

    As far as proof goes:
    We have one witness for #1.
    All of /. can see the evidence for #2.