Slashdot Mirror
Hubble finds Mass of White Dwarf
Chris Bradshaw writes "The mass of the nearest white dwarf star to Earth has been measured accurately for the first time. from the article: 'Sirius B is just 12,000 km (7,500 miles) in diameter, similar to Earth, but its mass is 98% that of the Sun. Studying Sirius B has been difficult because of the bright light coming from its neighbour Sirius A, the "Dog Star." The results, published in the Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, come from astronomers using the Hubble Space Telescope.'"
additionally, more can be found on the white dwarfs in general Here.
I'm not fat, just big boned...
Mass of RED Dwarf
http://washingtontimes.com/upi-breaking/20050420-1 25927-9641r.htm
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karma_whoring
Although NASA (or the US goverment, it is all politics) does not want to fund Hubble anymore, the telescope proves that it is valuable every time again. Astronomers just need more time with the equipment to take more readings of an object so that they can catch the details. Is it an idea that a commercial company adopts the Hubble telescope and rents the time on the telescope out again to different agencies around the globe? The price for the adoption could be the operational cost of keeping Hubble in orbit in working order.
My wife's sketchblog Blob[p]: Gastrono-me
not mentioned in the article, at http://columbia.thefreedictionary.com/Sirius
Selected excerpt:
"Sirius A is about twice the size of the sun and about 20 times as luminous. It is also one of the nearest stars, lying at a distance of 8.7 light-years, so that it has been studied extensively. From an analysis of its motions, F. W. Bessel concluded (1844) that it had an unseen companion, which was later (1862) confirmed by observation. The companion, Sirius B, is a white-dwarf star and has also been the object of considerable study because it is the first white dwarf whose spectrum was found to exhibit a gravitational red shift, as predicted by the General Theory of Relativity."
The upper limit, known as the Chandrasekhar limit, for a white dwarf is 1.4 solar masses (more or less).
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anonymous_Coward
Perhaps the Mod thought the parent post was suggesting that "the advanced Siriusian aliens were planning to hit the Earth with Sirius B. Obviously the Siriusians are an advanced corporate culture, and are intent on "downsizing" their system, cutting their aging former stars loose, in an attempt to get lean and (very) mean, and to eliminate possible future competition from other evolving corporatized systems."
Do they really vary in density that much?
Yes. White dwarfs vary in density a whole lot; degenerate gases behave quite oddly. If you add matter to a white dwarf, it actually gets a little smaller. The limit is about 1.4 solar masses, at which point the white dwarf collapses to form a neutron star.
Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
Right idea, wrong mechanism.
A white dwarf is not supported by thermal pressure, or by nuclear fusion; it is supported by degeneracy pressure between electrons, a consequence of the exclusion principle in quantum mechanics that forbids two electrons from occupying the same quantum state.
1.4 solar masses is correctly given as the critical point at which gravity prevails over the internal pressure; at this point, the star switches from degeneracy pressure between electrons to degeneracy pressure between neutrons, in the process dropping considerably more than the weight of the Sun from the size of the Earth to something more like the size of Belgium, through an enormously strong gravitational field. This releases an awful lot of energy, and is the main power source for such a supernova.
There's another type of supernova which is driven by fusion, but that's more typical of accretion systems in which the infalling matter has heated the white dwarf sufficiently to reignite fusion processes; then the fusion reaction is an uncontrolled runaway and can wholly disrupt the star.
Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
The BBC article cited in the main post has no mention of the redshift associated with this whitedrawf. It just says "The mass calculations are based on how the star's light is distorted by its neighbour's intense gravitational field." This New Scientist article reporting on the same news does mention redshift - I like redshift: http://www.newscientist.com/article.ns?id=dn8460&f eedId=space_rss20
Other info on redshit can be found here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Redshift
Perhaps this is some cleverly disguised viral marketing to promote Howard Stern's move to satellite radio?
White Dwarf needs food badly.
Cheesy Movie Night
I think Neutron stars are around 20km diameter (size of a small city), quite a bit smaller than Belgium. Plus, they often spin very quickly due to the conservation of angular momentum (think of the ice skaters spinning with arms stretched compared to closed thing).
Or "Caucasian vertically challenged person"
Detectig and studying non-luminous objects like Buffy is a lot harder than luminous ones like Sirius B.
This releases an awful lot of energy, and is the main power source for such a supernova.
What type of supernova? Simply collapsing to a neutron star doesn't *cause* a supernova, although a neutron star can be a supernova remnant.
It sounds like you're saying that if you have a white dwarf sitting there, and it accretes mass from some other source, like a binary companion, when its mass grows to be greater than the C-limit, it collapses into a neutron star, and that the energy released in the collapse generates a supernova.
That's not the case. If you have a white dwarf sitting there, and it accretes enough mass to go over that limit, then basically what happens is that carbon begins to fuse. It happens everywhere, throughout the star, and you wind up with a carbon detonation supernova, a Type 1a supernova. It's not the energy of gravitational collapse which blows the star apart, it's the new fusion reactions.
No, white dwarfs do become fusion-powered supernovae, not gravity-powered. IAAA (I am an astrophysicist.)
A white dwarf becomes a Type Ia supernova when, at around 1.4 solar masses, the pressure at the center reaches the point where it can burn by fusion the carbon-nitrogen-oxygen left over from previous rounds of burning. This leads to a fusion-driven explosion that gets no net energy from gravitational collapse, leading to an expanding gas cloud that is largely hot iron-group elements.
There is another class of supernova that is gravitationally driven. Core collapse supernovae are produced when a massive star (>8 solar masses, last I heard) has burned 1.4 solar masses at its center to iron. (The 1.4 solar mass value is semi-coincidental with that in the previous paragraph, based on similar but not identical physics.) This is a gravity-powered supernova that blows the outer parts of the core away, leaving a neutron star or black hole where the core was.
There is no way for a white dwarf to become a core collapse supernova, the fusion kicks in and blows it apart before that happens.
The Dogon, a tribe in West Africa, are believed to be of Egyptian descent. After living in Libya for a time, they settled in Mali, West Africa, bringing with them astronomy legends dating from before 3200 BCE. In the late 1940s, four of their priests told two French anthropologists of a secret Dogon myths about the star Sirius (8.6 light years from the earth). The priests said that Sirius had a companion star that was invisible to the human eye. They also stated that the star moved in a 50-year elliptical orbit around Sirius, that it was small and incredibly heavy, and that it rotated on its axis.
All these things happen to be true. But what makes this so remarkable is that the companion star of Sirius, called Sirius B, was first photographed in 1970. While people began to suspect its existence around 1844, it was not seen through a telescope until 1862 -- and even then its great density was not known or understood until the early decades of the twentieth century. The Dogon beliefs, on the other hand, were supposedly thousands of years old.
http://www.dreamscape.com/morgana/thalass2.htm
Health Insurance Quotes
You are right that the gravitational binding energy of a white dwarf is comparable to the fusion energy of its combustion from carbon to iron. However, comparable doesn't mean equal and if you work it out, the fusion energy dominates. The gravitational energy is negative, so it reduces the amount of available energy for the supernova (i.e. the ejecta are moving more slowly because it has to climb out of its own gravity well), but it is still energetically favorable to go from a dense chunk of carbon to an expanding diffuse cloud of iron.