Slashdot Mirror


Stardust to Return January 15

accessdeniednsp writes "Seven years ago, the Stardust probe was sent to intercept Comet Wild 2, gather dust particles, and return to Earth. Stardust is scheduled to touch down in a Utah desert on January 15. From the article: 'Our mission is called Stardust, in part because we believe some of the particles in the comet will, in fact, be older than the sun,' said Don Brownlee of the University of Washington, the principal investigator of the mission."

10 of 144 comments (clear)

  1. Here's hoping this one doesn't...... by DoraLives · · Score: 4, Interesting

    land like the last one.

    --
    Is it fascism yet?
    1. Re:Here's hoping this one doesn't...... by cyclone96 · · Score: 5, Informative

      No kidding...especially since they were built by the same contractor (Lockheed Martin Denver).

      The failure of Genesis was tied to a badly designed placement of deceleration sensors, a design flaw which Stardust is apparently free from (but I'm sure there will still be some serious hand-wringing on the 15th).

      More details here.

      --
      Worst...sig...ever!
  2. Re:I know this is silly... by grasshoppa · · Score: 4, Funny

    The radiation from this capsule will transform anything near it..to..oh god, they're already here! SPACE ROBOTS!

    "GO STAND BY SOME STAIRS"

    --
    Mod me down with all of your hatred and your journey towards the dark side will be complete!
  3. Re:I know this is silly... by heli0 · · Score: 5, Informative
    Probably not any more dangerous than the multiple tons of extraterrestrial debris that rains down on us every day.

    http://curious.astro.cornell.edu/question.php?numb er=470

    A study done in 1996 (looking at the number of meteorites found in deserts over time) calculated that for objects in the 10 gram to 1 kilogram size range, 2900-7300 kilograms per year hit Earth.

    They also estimate between 36 and 166 meteorites larger than 10 grams fall to Earth per million square kilometers per year. Over the whole surface area of Earth, that translates to 18,000 to 84,000 meteorites bigger than 10 grams per year.
    --
    Whenever the offence inspires less horror than the punishment, the rigour of penal law is obliged to give way...
  4. Very Important For Our Future by cyberjessy · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Comets Crashing into our small planet is one of our biggest long term threats. The samples will go a long way in being able to identify their composition and look at means to destroy them in future.

    Although the likelyhood of asteroids hitting the earth are higher, comets are special in that they give very little warning before they hit. Maybe a few years, while asteroids can be predicted much earlier. A large comet hitting the earth, will likely be an ELE (Extinction Level Event), destroying most life and all humans.

    To me, this is something that we doing for sustaining human life. I don't care about the money spent, or the small chance of bringing in viruses, which they may have already considered.

    --
    Life is just a conviction.
  5. There's always room for Aerogello by AndroidCat · · Score: 4, Interesting
    This probe used Aerogel for catching comet dust. It looks like bad-assed Blueberry Jello with a Cherenkov glow!

    I can't believe I didn't get on either of the name list microchips on this probe. Poot!

    --
    One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  6. Re:I know this is silly... by Nyeerrmm · · Score: 5, Informative

    NASA/JPL requirements for an earth entry vehicle thats returning any kind of sample are very strict. They require that there be less than a 10^-6 chance of a particle larger than 2 nanometers entering the earth atmosphere.

    Those NASA administrators read Crichton too.

  7. Re:I know this is silly... by Temporal · · Score: 4, Informative

    You're absolutely right. Your suggestion is silly.

    A life form which evolved to survive on the surface of a comet has zero chance of being successful inside the human body. In order for a life form to evolve to be effective in an environment, it must have exposure to that environment. The viruses which already plague us here on Earth have spent billions of years evolving specifically to attack the other life forms already present on Earth.

    Of course, this argument is strongly rooted in evolution. As some other posters have pointed out, if you believe in intelligent design, you might disagree. But then, real-life observations and evidence are overwhelmingly consistent with evolution, not intelligent design, so I think we're safe.

  8. Brownlee Rocks! by ChuckleBug · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I was student of Don Brownlee at the University of Washington, and I think he's about the most decent and caring professor I've ever had. Even when I was an undergrad, I could go to his office and he'd just talk about his work for what seemed like hours, even to a lowly undergrad. I'm not saying this to name-drop -- I want people to know what a cool person he is. If anyone deserves success, it's Dr. Brownlee. Truly one of the good guys in science. He's one of those rare professors who managed to make himself famous (the guy has an asteroid named after him) while remaining humble and committed to helping his students learn. We need more scientists like him.

  9. Re:Utah? by Ranger · · Score: 4, Funny

    -1 Flaimbait? Wow! Mormons, sure are sensitive. At least I didn't say: My Xenu! It's full of Scientologists!

    --
    "You'll get nothing, and you'll like it!"