2005 Foot In Mouth Awards
jollyroger1210 writes "Wired is running a story on the 2005 Foot In Mouth Awards." From the article: "Tech execs say the darndest things. And so do shuffling presidents, and disgraced scientists, and Wikipedia fakers. It's time to relive 2005's biggest spoken gaffes."
I don't consider myself anti-slashdot, but must say that now with reddit I just skim slashdot as most of the interesting headlines already appeared on reddit long before slashdot.
From the article:
"I'm going to f***ing bury that guy, I have done it before, and I will do it again. I'm going to f***ing kill Google."
I have a hard time beliving that anyone would get offended by the real use of the word fuck:
"I'm going to fucking bury that guy, I have done it before, and I will do it again. I'm going to fucking kill Google."
So, please, prove me wrong and come forward if you would get offended if Wired prited "fuck" instead of "f***".
Seriously, why is printing "fuck" so difficult? I'm from Europe and I really can't understand you Americans.
Ah, it's not just me then. Good. Most of them seemed to be "Cool! I love this! Digg!!"
Slashdot comments are not by any stretch of the imagination uniformly good, but I have picked up an awful lot of information (or some combination of those words, at least) from comments over the years.
(Plus, I'm still not entirely sure how Digg's revolutionary system for readers voting on stories is different/better to kuro5hin's.)
(I'm not asking.)
Good going, Wired.</sarcasm> Now, how about some real journalism?
"A great democracy must be progressive or it will soon cease to be a great democracy." --Theodore Roosevelt
Negroponte is Italian for black 'ponte'.
There is no such thing as 'chocohol' or 'workahol'.