Slashdot Mirror


Robot Receptionist with an Attitude

techno-vampire writes "Carnegie Mellon University is experimenting with a robot receptionist with a personality. The article on NPR tells about the receptionist, named Tank. Tank lives in a computer, with a Frankenstein-like face showing on the monitor. He responds to typed-in questions, including personal ones, with a rather curious personality courtesy of the Drama Department. Among other things, he doesn't seem to like his boss, Dr. Reid Simmons, very much. If asked, Tank will tell you he's also worked at NASA, and failed as a satellite robot. A job at the CIA was also a bust. Dr. Simmons explains that they're trying to make it easier for people to interact with robots, and upgrades are planned."

31 of 117 comments (clear)

  1. In the near future... by Red+Samurai · · Score: 4, Funny

    We'll all have robots pissing in our coffee...

    1. Re:In the near future... by dpiven · · Score: 2, Funny

      Last place I worked, the coffee already looked and tasted like used machine oil, so I don't think too many people would notice the difference.

  2. Great! by jacobcaz · · Score: 5, Funny

    Our receptionist is already surly and a bit gruff, we can replace her with "Tank" and dramatically increase our gruffness-to-customer ratio! We'll also be able to irritate our customers 24x7 instead of the normal 8x5 we currently get out of our receptionist!

  3. Don't plug it into any other computers... by Beolach · · Score: 2, Funny

    ... or else they'll commit suicide.

    --
    Join moola.com, play games to earn money.
  4. now with... by PoPRawkZ · · Score: 5, Funny

    Now with genuine people personality! I'm so depressed.

    --
    peace,
    -Grokent
  5. Not that different from previous roboceptionist by Agelmar · · Score: 4, Informative

    This is really not that new. Before the current roboceptionist, we had Valerie. I really can't tell the difference between the two - when they first installed Tank, I thought it was a Halloween joke. (He looks somewhat like Frankenstein on the monitor). There is a different face and a different voice, but it seems the same. If you ask "Will it rain tomorrow" he will either not understand your question, or give you the current weather. Trying to find out tomorrow's weather is still rather difficult. Yes, it is an interesting experiment, and yes, it can give directions (rather clearly) to various locations on campus, but it's not at the point where secretaries need to worry about losing their jobs (yet).

    1. Re:Not that different from previous roboceptionist by Iriel · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I went to school at The Art Instititute of Pittsburgh (just a short bus ride away) and had done a few internship projects at CMU. I'd seen Valerie, and while I understand that this is about the advancement of robotics, AI and such, there was another fundamental flaw with it. (Please keep in mind, I'm not knocking it, this is just one gripe):

      The animations from the head could have used a serious visit from someone skilled in 3D animation. If we're talking about creating an experience like that of dealing with an actual receptionist, the visuals of the roboceptionist need to look a little more advanced than pre-Lawnmowerman. I reiterate: the idea and execution had many aspects that were very interesting about how it worked, but when trying to create a robot that functions like a person (in limited scope), it would be nice to see equal attention paid to the 'human' side of it as the robotic instead of looking like something from an 80's sci-fi movie.

      --
      Perfecting Discordia
      www.stevenvansickle.com
  6. Starship Titanic, anyone? by Hosiah · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Flash to the adventure game of a few year's back, "Starship Titanic"? Based on Douglas Adams' work and the game had voices from members of the Monty Python troop portraying various robots and creatures. I never solved all the way through it without the cheat book, but the game environment finds one talking to the bots just to see what outrageous thing they'll say next. Just don't put this kind of thing in any kind of mission-critical function...

    1. Re:Starship Titanic, anyone? by seldrick · · Score: 3, Funny

      Just don't put this kind of thing in any kind of mission-critical function... No kidding. This great "productivity saver" is going to cost a fortune before it saves a dime. Everyone in the office will be neglecting their work to queue up to play with the secretary. I've worked at offices like that, but she was a flirty, hot 19 -year old instead of a box with a Frankenstein face. At least Tank won't need maternity leave.

    2. Re:Starship Titanic, anyone? by BushCheney08 · · Score: 2, Funny

      I've worked at offices like that, but she was a flirty, hot 19 -year old instead of a box with a Frankenstein face.

      I think most of us have worked at places with both types of girls working the reception desk. : p

      --
      Be a real patriot: Question authority. Think for yourself. Formulate your own conclusions.
    3. Re:Starship Titanic, anyone? by operagost · · Score: 2, Funny

      Anything would be an improvement over a Barbra Streisand fan.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
  7. Hmm.... by killeena · · Score: 2, Funny

    Combine this robot and the female android, and it could even be programmed to be the CEOs mistress!

    --
    Freedom would be not to choose between black and white but to abjure such prescribed choices. -Theodor Adorno
  8. WHY THE HELL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Every time there's a slashdot article on robots, we can't get 50 posts into it without someone talking about fucking a female robot!?!?

    1. Re:WHY THE HELL by Skye16 · · Score: 3, Informative

      I'd do it. Think of the stories you could tell later in life!

      Everyone bones a fat girl at least once. Why? Most of it is because they're having a bit of a dry run and they're getting desperate, but a lot of it is for the stories they tell their buddies afterwards. "My hand slid between her rolls, and I was all 'fuckin' 'ell, give me that back!, but she didn't, and it just kept going in further and further until I was elbow deep, standing on her stomach and yanking, hoping against hope that I wouldn't have to gnaw my arm off at the shoulder-bicep region before her flab consumed my very soul", followed up with "So, she starts going crazy, screaming '01111001 01100101 01110011 00101100 00100000 01111001 01100101 01110011 00101100 00100000 01100110 01110101 01100011 01101011 00100000 01101101 01100101 00100000 01101000 01100001 01110010 01100100 01100101 01110010 00101100 00100000 01100110 01110101 01100011 01101011 00100000 01101101 01100101 00100000 01101000 01100001 01110010 01100100 01100101 01110010 00100001 00100000 01110011 01110100 01101001 01100011 01101011 00100000 01101001 01110100 00100000 01101001 01101110 00100000 01101101 01111001 00100000 01110101 01110011 01100010 00100000 01110000 01101111 01110010 01110100 00100001', but at this point, her sata cable had fallen off her cd drive and was just flapping around everywhere and really freaked me the fuck out, so I stopped, gathered my things, and ran for it.".

      I never said they'd be good stories, exactly. But still worth noting!

  9. Wakamaru by digitaldc · · Score: 4, Informative

    http://news.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/n ews/2005/12/26/wrobot26.xml

    Wakamaru is a bit friendlier than tank and acts as a security guard.

    --
    He who knows best knows how little he knows. - Thomas Jefferson
  10. Do we really need one? by Antony-Kyre · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Yeah, great idea. Create a robot to deal with customer service, one of the real jobs that shouldn't be replaced by robots. Replace the menial jobs that don't matter with robots, i.e. McJobs.

    1. Re:Do we really need one? by hey! · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I don't think the idea is to make an economically viable receptionist. Otherwise they'd have suck with Valerie. It's research.

      The idea of a social robot is interesting for several reasons. First is that our behavior and thinking is a lot more determined by those around us than we think. Also, to be successful, you have to make the robot operate "intelligently" in as many real situations as possible, as opposed to a constrained problem like chess or block world. Placing it in a public place like this and gathering data on its interactions also gives an interesting opportunit for incremental improvement. You'd expect the robot to succeed in a few cases, fail miserably in the vast number of cases, and in a very small number cases fail after showing some initial promise. This last category represents a kind of technological frontier that can be explored.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    2. Re:Do we really need one? by vertinox · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yeah, great idea. Create a robot to deal with customer service, one of the real jobs that shouldn't be replaced by robots. Replace the menial jobs that don't matter with robots, i.e. McJobs.

      Actually you couldn't be more wrong. Most customer service skills are outsourced to foreign countries as it is. Replacing those jobs wouldn't affect our market that much. (trust me... my old call center with an unnamed major ISP layed everyone off right after I quit and outsourced to India... I do still tech support over the phone, but if I got replaced with a robot it wouldn't bother me that much since most of the people that are in CS or TS phone support hate their jobs anyways and spend most of the day browsing monster.com at work)

      Secondly, a Robot would put up with shit that human would not. Screaming... Cursing... All that stuff that customers do without retorting or walking off the job. Hell it would have an "American accent" and have better english skills than you or I.

      However the trick is to fool the customer into believing the person is an uber happy person willing to give them their proverbial first born which means the thing will have to pass a turing test... ...which means not any time soon.

      --
      "I am the king of the Romans, and am superior to rules of grammar!"
      -Sigismund, Holy Roman Emperor (1368-1437)
  11. Re:ok, but... by ActionJesus · · Score: 2, Funny

    This is slashdot. Fark is that way ---->

  12. Speech synth still lacking by AndroidCat · · Score: 5, Interesting
    If you RTFA, there's a link "Listen" with audio of the NPR piece. I'm surprised that they're using a speech synth that sounds like it's at least ten years behind the times, as? well? as? sounding? like? every? word? is? a? kvestion?? The Lernout & Hauspie TruVoice engine that MS gives away with SAPI4/Agent is arguably better, and that's 1998 tech from a dead company. (L&H, not MS.)

    A good speech synth would add a lot to Tank's personality. (On the other hand, I have 1980s tech card that would sound awful but very robo-retro.)

    --
    One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  13. Re:Still no cure for cancer... by AndroidCat · · Score: 2, Funny

    Yes, but not too long ago, they were trying to fit a lifetime of human experience into a few MB of disk space. Soon we'll be trying to fit months of human experience into TB of disk space! We're making progress! :)

    --
    One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  14. Always the first question to greet you by Provocateur · · Score: 2, Funny

    (Thanks to David Spade)

    'And you are...?'
     

    --
    WARNING: Smartphones have side effects--most of them undocumented.
  15. Re:Have you seen this robot? by hey! · · Score: 2, Funny

    What did happen to Valerie?

    Perhaps she's in chroot() jail.

    --
    Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  16. The opposite! Please replace CS desks urgently by Morgaine · · Score: 3, Insightful

    >> Create a robot to deal with customer service, one of the real jobs that shouldn't be replaced by robots.

    Your experience of Customer Service departments clearly does not match my own. The following memory will live with me forever:

    Me: Here, I'll demonstrate your service fault to you. Please telnet to your site on port 80 first.

    Verisign Customer Service: What is telnet?

    This kind of CS problem is actually not very surprising. The front desk Customer Service staff for any large business have to be the cheapest of the cheap because manpower doesn't scale and is a collosal business expense. It follows that the people are often rather poorly skilled, perhaps given only a few days training in which they learn by rote rather than acquire real understanding.

    So bring on the expert system AIs for Customer Service quickly please!! This is the ideal application.

    --
    "The question of whether machines can think is no more interesting than [] whether submarines can swim" - Dijkstra
  17. Not really all that impressive... by Improv · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Just like Valerie (the previous persona they gave to the dalek-like roboceptionist), there's nothing particularly impressive that goes into it - mix the eliza software with a few queries that can produce canned answers and the (admittedly useful) ability to look up weather around the world and find where people's offices are, and you have this thing. The public face is nothing impressive -- anyone who has seen what the Final Fantasy movies will find the graphics on this thing ridiculously primitive -- Valerie's face looked like it was generated on the fly in the age of PentiumII/200, and Tank's face is the same but less attractive. I suppose that's not the point though -- the project is intended to study human/avatar interaction, and a number of people do seem to enjoy playing with the system.

    --
    For every problem, there is at least one solution that is simple, neat, and wrong.
  18. Re:Humanity: Obsolete by AndroidCat · · Score: 2, Funny

    I don't know if Parry would be happy working there.

    --
    One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  19. Re:Ehm, why? by vertinox · · Score: 2, Funny

    But who the fuck cares about a computer with a history?

    Hello Dave, would you like to see home made videos of my previous owner and his 70 year old wife? Let me show you all his browser history of old love sites he would browse. What are you doing Dave?! Why are you trying to format my hard drive!

    --
    "I am the king of the Romans, and am superior to rules of grammar!"
    -Sigismund, Holy Roman Emperor (1368-1437)
  20. Re:telling us fleshies apart from robots by StalinsNotDead · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Which would you prefer: 1) A flower for your sweetheart, 2) A puppy, or 3) A Large properly formatted data file?

    --
    Thanks to the internet, we can now all die alone together! -SomeWoman
  21. Attitude is everything by blastard · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I think the point here is that the computer does not have the Stepford Wife annoyingly pleasant attitude that the usual computer assistants have.

    Back in the early '80s my fellow students and I wrote computer based quizzing software for our classes. We played around with different responses to wrong answers. Contrary to what educational software companies were putting out, our programs would occasionally razz you for a wrong answer. Care to guess which ones the students used more often?

    There is only so much a person can take of a caring and supportive computer before it gets really annoying.

    BTW, I also wrote a rudimentary hash algorithm to weed out obscene names, without having to code those very names into the program. And yes, it could be defeated by inserting 1 or 0 in place of L or I and O.

  22. Re:The opposite! Please replace CS desks urgently by Geoffreyerffoeg · · Score: 2, Interesting

    So bring on the expert system AIs for Customer Service quickly please!!

    He said expert systems. He didn't say replace customer service with text-to-speech ELIZAs. Give that guy a rough idea of how HTTP is supposed to work in training (which can be as simple as "client says GET webpage.html, server either says 200 OK and prints the page, or says 404 Not Found and prints an error page"), and when the customer says "telnet to your server", he can easily pull up a description of what Telnet is, an AI-influenced description of what he would need it for (by tracking the conversation): e.g., he'd need to know what port 80 means, but probably not what local echo means. Once he's connected, the system shows what the web page is supposed to return. If the customer says it's something different, the expert system has a link to the appropriate RFC, which he can check and either refute the customer or file a real problem report.

    Most front-line customer service workers would never encounter telnet in their life. So we can't make knowing it a job requirement - but they have to know telnet if they're ever asked. So we give them an AI that they can use to learn stuff on the spot. It's a lot more helpful than making up stories or transferring calls all the time.

  23. A classic question by mangu · · Score: 2, Informative
    a short question that would allow us to keep robots out of a building yet let humans through


    That's the Turing test. It's best done by asking something out of context. For instance, when talking about music ask: "did the car where you learned to drive have an automatic transmission?". A robot would need to have a very large set of information about human experiences to be able to answer a random question like this. One effort to develop such a system is the Cyc project.