Slashdot Mirror
Air Force Builds Quiet Mach 6 Wind Tunnel
An anonymous reader writes "To help design 'scramjets' -- vehicles that'll travel thousands of miles per hour as they leave the atmosphere and zip around the globe -- the U.S. Air Force has just funded a wind tunnel that operates quietly at Mach 6. To get a quiet flow, the throat of the Mach 6 nozzle must be polished to a near-perfect mirror finish, eliminating roughness that would trip the flow."
Wikipedia on Scramjets. AC to avoid karma whoring..
Can anybody with the right background tell me whether that's the case?
Initially I thought, wow! they will be able to test new aeroplanes in real conditions! No more depending on computer simulations of air flow. That's groundbreaking. But my realistic wife said: 'no way, thwy will not put REAL planes there'. So I checked in TFA:
The pipe is only 18 inches in diameter
So long, and thanks for the fish.
#
#\ @ ? Colonize Mars
#
neat scramjet pictures here.
The theory of relativity doesn't work right in Arkansas.
We undergrads are the guineapigs of science, the people who do the things no one else wants to... all in exchange for $20. And we LIKE IT!
I do not want to live near the (military) airport where that thing will take off.
The scramjet engine only starts to work at speeds above Mach 5. Average takeoff speed for a regular plane is about 150mph.
The theory of relativity doesn't work right in Arkansas.
Grad student 1: This job sucks.
Grad student 2 (turning on wind tunnel): No, it blows!
Thank you, I'll be here all day.
Even if it didn't kill you, you'd certainly be exhausted.
One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
It said in the article that having these surfaces would greatly reduce the amount of heat that an aircraft recieves when returning to the atmosphere. And I was thinking, does that mean that one small tear could rip the aircraft apart, like the Columbia? It seems like it might be more beneficial to build craft that don't rip up like the space shuttle did, than craft that are even lighter.
At Mach 6, yes. But if the thing is turned on when the undergrad is inside, the air doesn't just suddenly jump to Mach 6 - no, it accelerates, and that takes time. It takes an especially long time if the pipe is clogged by a human body.
What will happen is that the undergrad will get an overpressure against her feet or head, likely strong enough to eject her from the pipe. The pressure itself is unlikely to kill her, but injuries sustained when thrown out of the pipe might.
Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.
proper lockout/tagout procedures would involve the person doing the work personally putting a padlock on the circuit breaker (in the off position), one to which the only key is in the posession of the person working inside the device, along with a tag stating who he is, what he's working on, and when he expects to be done, after which he would personally test that the equipment is not capable of powering on before climbing inside.
Removing a fuse is no more effective then turning off the switch if some idiot comes along and puts it back together (the same idiot who first tried the switch and found it didn't work) always LOCK it out.
ok... so there's always some moron with bolt-cutters... but I'd love to see him claim THAT was an accident when he goes to trial...
Executives at Gillette have announced the Mach 7 in response to Purdue's Mach 6 wind tunnel. "We simply cannot be outdone on Mach numbers."
When asked what the commercial for the Mach 7 will feature, the unnammed executive replied, "jet fighters, women, racecars, women, missiles, women, bullets...it will be more spectacular than watching the entire French airforce crash into a fireworks factory."
Please help metamoderate.
This tunnel works in a fashion opposite most wind tunnels. Instead of pressurizing one end, they create a vacuum at the other. That means they only get a run time of 8 seconds, but they use computers to get all the data they need in that short of a time frame.
So, yeah, it really does suck.
tasks(723) drafts(105) languages(484) examples(29106)
Here is an example of a line of commercials that Holiday Inn Express did. The best one is a guy who saves a nuclear power plant from a three mile island style nuclear disaster.
There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
Yep.
Current test models use standard rocket boosters to get speed and altitude.
http://michaelsmith.id.au
Remember, it's not a job, it's an indenture.
Do you see the sig? Do you have it in your sights? Why yes, Miss Moneypenny...
The reason that dimples work for a golf ball is exactly the same reason they would be counter productive for the wind tunnel. Basically the dimples induce a turbulent flow around the golf ball, which reduces the flow seperation at the rear of the ball as compared to that resulting from laminar flow over a smooth ball. By reducing the size of the flow separation region, the pressure drag on the ball is significantly reduced, allowing the ball to travel farther. Now in the case of the wind tunnel turbulent flow along the walls would generate noise that would interfere with the experiments, so they want as smooth a surface as possible to minimize turbulence at the tunnel walls, thereby minimizing the background noise.
I read and thought "A million bucks? Is that all?" then I read it was 18" in diameter. Oh well.
As I recall, there are already some very high power and large wind tunnels at the NASA Ames research center in Mountain View California. http://windtunnels.arc.nasa.gov/. For those of you that live in Silicon Valley, I'm sure you are all familiar with the gigantic wind tunnel that is large enouph to handle a complete mid-sized airliner.
No, something needed to be done, the valve that stuck open needed to be closed. They were incorrectly acting because the system was not responding as they expected based on their inputs. Btw TMI pisses me off. People whine about the dangers of nuclear power, yet TMI which was about the worst possible scenario for a US nuclear power plant released less radiation than a MUCH smaller coal plant would in a year.
There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
Turbo-Props (propeller driven by jet like turbine power) is good up to a few hundred mph. Then the tips of the prop start going supersonic and cavitating. Highest efficiency
Turbo-Fan (same turbo jet power like a turbo-prop, but with an enclosed fan rather than a prop. Most of thrust still comes from the air driven by the fan. think 747) is capable of working in a faster regime up to somewhere near sonic speed (~780mph). Used for most commercial aviation because it is still fairly efficient, but faster than turboprop.
Turbo-Jet (same turbo jet power as turbo-prop, but little or no "bypass" air. The main purpose of the intake fan is now to pressurize air at intake for combustion with jet fuel. Thrust comes from) can provide substantial power at high velocites. TurboJets are the big muscular loud as hell engines used on fighter planes. They are several times less efficient than the TurboFans used in commercial airliners, but they produce many times more thrust and can run well in super-sonic regimes. More power + less efficiency = burns lots of fuel. Fighters can chew through thousands of gallons of jet fuel each hour just cruising. Temperature (melting point of metal) is a huge limit to the perf of these engines. Afterburners burn even more fuel in a way that isn't as temperature constrained, but is even less efficient. Modern fighters can burn through their fuel in something like a half hour of combat.
RAMjets work by using a constriction at the intake (rather than a fan) to pressurize the air. RAMjets don't work at low speeds, and are better designed to operate at a single design point. They typically run in the low mach numbers, although to operate, the intake air must be slowed to subsonic speeds. They are fast and efficient, but not very flexible. Typically used on missiles (due to their tendancy to operate in a single regime).
SCRAMjets are the same basic idea as a RAMjet, but the intake air remains supersonic.
Rockets do not burn any atmospheric O2 at all. For this reason, they operate equally well (or poor) at all speeds and air densities, providing a consistent predictable thrust. Due to the need to carry O2 around (which is far heavier than most of the fuels), their efficiency is appalling when compared to air-breathing engines. The uber-efficient space shuttle engines (2H2 + O2 -> 2H2O) have a specific impulse of ~440s. Solid rockets are more like ~200s. Kerosene rockets are in between. Air-breathing engines are in the thousands.