"St Lawrence of Google"
mcho writes "The Economist has a story about Google's co-founder, Larry Page, who " always wanted to change the world". The article attempts to make an arguement about the company's true intentions, amid all the rumors about potential Google products. "Google is already working on a massive and global computing grid. Eventually, says Mr Saffo, 'they're trying to build the machine that will pass the Turing test' -- in other words, an artificial intelligence that can pass as a human in written conversations. Wisely or not, Google wants to be a new sort of deus ex machina.""
We regulars at slashdot have found seven questions that will cause every computer taking the Turing test to fail:
1. Will it run Linux?
2. Why isn't there a law protecting us from [insert gripe here]?
3. When will Duke Nukem Forever be released and will it support Copland?
4. How can I enhance my sex organ's size?
5. How can I write a DRM scheme that can't be broken?
6. How can I protect my PIN number when I send it over AIM messenger to use at the ATM machine?
and the hardest question asked on slashdot:
7. ??? (usually followed by "Profit!")
Poor Larry is just spinning his wheels...
GoogleNet == SkyNet!
--
Society has traditionally always tried to find scapegoats for its problems. Well, here I am.
"There's no way we'll let Google own the Deus ex machina market space! I'll f***ing kill those guys!" {sound of chair striking Bateman print}
Rich And Stupid is not so bad as Working For Rich And Stupid.
Too late. Ann Coulter has already achieved that.
OK, guys, I'm off with some mates for a long round trip of the Sol System in deep hibernation until this all blows over. I've got three spare seats, if anyone's interested.
the minds at google have entered the same phase tesla's mind did post-ac power defeating edison's dc power
that is, trying to transmit electricity in the atmosphere and building a death ray
your basic mad scientist megalomania
google to announce the sharks with frickin' laser beams project in 3... 2... 1...
intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
is that to build a truly self-aware computing grid, the LAST thing you want is for it to be distributed over the entire globe. The amount of data a system has to integrate to reach self-awareness is massive, and the further apart the nodes are the more latency you'll have. Once the system is up and running, then maybe you'd want to spread it apart to protect against natural disasters, but in the development stage you'd only be handicapping yourself needlessly. The writer's conclusion is based on an understanding of science that doesn't seem to reach past the Terminator 3 level.
Slashdot needs a "-1, Wrong" moderation option.
The Urban Hippie
Of the three definitions, I would say only 2 or 3 would make sense in the context that the phrase is used. So, the ultimate goal of the company is to have Google pop up unexpectedly and resolve conflicts in an artificial and contrived manner.
Sorta like Clippy. *ducks*
my pet machine