Slashdot Mirror


U of Michigan creates first Quantum Microchip

zigziggityzoo writes "According to this article, The University of Michigan has created the first Quantum Microchip, which could eventually lead to the first instance of Quantum Computing ever." The bad news? We won't be seeing any notebooks or handhelds with quantum chips in the near future.

28 of 321 comments (clear)

  1. Measurement by Bob+Gelumph · · Score: 4, Funny

    It is not a first post until someone reads it as a first post

    --
    I'm gonna need a spec.
  2. Quantum? by MoxCamel · · Score: 4, Funny
    Oh boy.

    Mox

    1. Re:Quantum? by drinkypoo · · Score: 2, Funny

      Quantum? I hardly know 'em!

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  3. Very nice, but imagine... by KanSer · · Score: 2, Funny

    Imagine a beowulf cluster of these bady boys!

    (Had to, sorry.)

    --
    • MOD PARENT UP by Anonymous Coward Wednesday April 20, @4:20
  4. The Bad News by ackthpt · · Score: 5, Funny

    The bad news? We won't be seeing any notebooks or handhelds with quantum chips in the near future.

    Yeah, right. Let me introduce myself, my name is Richard and I am Vice Peon, Assistant to the High Junior Acolyte In Charge of Dustbins of the Holy Order of 8th Day Advanced Micro Devicers. Once we were few in numbers, our faith challenged at every turn by the Church of Intel. Scoffed at, most cruelly as rank copyists without an innovation to our name. After years of wandering the wilderness between iterations our faith was rewarded most gloriously! Speak not of Quantum Notbooks and Handhelds being a thing of dreams, for we know the mighty AMD will deliver.

    You'll see, you just watch! Ya betcha! Wrist devices, wearable quantum rings. Any second now. Yeah...

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  5. What would Neil say? by slashbob22 · · Score: 5, Funny

    That's one small chip for man, one Quantum leap for mankind.

    --
    Proof by very large bribes. QED.
    1. Re:What would Neil say? by Flunitrazepam · · Score: 3, Funny

      putting right posts that once went wrong, and hoping that the next post..... will be..... the first post

      --
      1) Your analysis is based on bad assumptions so your result is way off. 2) You're a sick bastard for fucking a horse.
  6. There might be a small problem by suitepotato · · Score: 5, Funny

    as you might be able to know where the computer is but not what it is doing or what it is doing but not where it is at the same time...

    --
    If my grammar and spelling are off, I am [distracted/tired/careless] (take your pick)
    1. Re:There might be a small problem by skiddy · · Score: 5, Funny

      I think I have a quantum girlfriend :(

    2. Re:There might be a small problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      I think I have a quantum girlfriend :(
      The rest of slashdot thinks you have an imaginary girlfriend.

    3. Re:There might be a small problem by blues_shuffle · · Score: 2, Funny

      You know she's leaving, but you don't know where she is?

  7. Quantum Pairs by DigiShaman · · Score: 5, Funny

    Expect this story to be dupped again. This time, it will be the fault of their new CPU, not Slashdot.

    Finally, a dupe excuse for Slashdot!

    --
    Life is not for the lazy.
    1. Re:Quantum Pairs by saifatlast · · Score: 1, Funny

      Expect this story to be dupped again. This time, it will be the fault of their new CPU, not Slashdot.

      Finally, a dupe excuse for Slashdot!


      No, I think that just means we'll be seeing this one 4 times.

      Ziiinnngg!!!!

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't regist
  8. ah, but with quantum computing by geekoid · · Score: 4, Funny

    the dupe could be the first story!

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  9. Obviously designed for windows by hurfy · · Score: 4, Funny

    "For example, an up-spin can represent a one, or a down-spin can represent a zero -- or the qubit can occupy both states simultaneously"

    This way windows can be working and not working at the same time.

    oh, wait.....

  10. But surely... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    that means when they know what speed it's running, they won't know where it is?

    (Yeah, bit rubbish, sorry)

  11. Huh? by nEoN+nOoDlE · · Score: 2, Funny

    No fair! You've changed the outcome by measuring it!

    --
    Don't trust a bull's horn, a doberman's tooth, a runaway horse or me.
  12. Schrodinger's computer by Belseth · · Score: 4, Funny

    If it runs Windows does that mean it can be both in a crashed state and an uncrashed state?

    1. Re:Schrodinger's computer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      It can run linux and macos and windows at the same time.

    2. Re:Schrodinger's computer by jakupovic · · Score: 4, Funny

      Dude have you thought about replacing yourself, I mean 4 computers can't be wrong

      just a thought

      --
      You always point your finger at the bad guy, but what if the bad guy points his finger at you?
    3. Re:Schrodinger's computer by ToxicBanjo · · Score: 2, Funny

      New marketing slogan for the year 2020 -


      "Windows Celesta 2020 - 100% Secure and Stable !!

      By using new and improved quantum hardware interfaces, QuantumSoft (formily MicroSoft) have engineered the absolute finest example of "Non Viewership". By never opening the box to see if the cat is dead QuantumSoft can say with 100% certainty that Windows Celesta 2020 will never crash and never be compromised."

      Fine print at the bottom -

      Void to those who actually determine the quantum state of Windows Celesta 2020 at anytime.

      --
      There are only 10 kinds of people in the world. Those that understand binary and those that don't.
  13. Should be just in time... by optkk · · Score: 3, Funny

    for the next Duke Nukem Forever.

  14. Re:No DOOM? by Roguelazer · · Score: 2, Funny

    "I think there is a quantum world market for maybe five computers."

  15. Re:But will it run Linux? by hedwards · · Score: 2, Funny

    Keep in mind a 64 bit processor can address 17 billion gig of ram. I think that should be "Gub." 1 billion bytes is a gigabyte, but 2^30 bytes is more properly referred to as a gubibyte; and last time I checked ram was measured in base 2 rather than the easier to remember SI units. If they choose to use the indeterminate spin as a "2" they may need to add a third prefix for base 3. He, He, He. This is still news for nerds, right?

  16. in a related story by adrianmonk · · Score: 3, Funny

    In a related story, after being told that U Mich now has quantum microchips working, Steve Jobs was heard saying, "Crap! FUCK! We just finished switching to Intel chips, and now THIS happens?! Now we're going to have to, I mean this will make us, I mean... DAMMIT! DAMN. IT. Stupid fucking processors -- we should've just stayed with m68k. I mean, what's the point?"

  17. Not fast enough by redNuht · · Score: 2, Funny

    quantum systems will be much more efficient at rock-solid cryptography and mass database searches than running the latest version of Doom.

    Not even quantum computing is fast enough for Doom 3, eh?

  18. old news by le+duf · · Score: 2, Funny

    What's the big deal? Q*berts have been sround since 1982!

  19. Re:Am I missing something? by ceoyoyo · · Score: 2, Funny

    No, but REMEMBERING your high school chemistry is a 'good solid science background.' Also very rare.