Slashdot Mirror


Futuremark 3DMark06 Released

jmke writes "Futuremark has released their latest graphics card evaluation software. The 2006 version features all the latest technologies and will stress even the most expensive video cards. From the announcement: 'Continuing forward in the development of advanced game performance benchmarks, Futuremark announced today the release and immediate availability of 3DMark06. A more comprehensive and unrestricted benchmark than previous versions, 3DMark06 includes an array of 3D graphics, CPU and 3D feature tests for overall performance measurement of current and future PC gaming systems.' Futuremark is offering a free download of the software with limited capability while offering an advanced edition for a price. PC Perspectives also has a nice overview of some of the features available."

10 of 136 comments (clear)

  1. Stuff that matters? by KerberosKing · · Score: 4, Insightful

    OK, I check the framerates posted at Tom's or other hardware review sites as much as the next guy, but to me an article on slashdot about a new 3D benchmark program is about as exciting as one on a new type of screwdriver. This stuff should just work, and if it were not for the non-stop planned obsolence of video-cards where the obsurdly expensive card you bought three months ago is now obsolete.

  2. Time for a driver redesign.. by StikyPad · · Score: 4, Funny

    DAMN IT!

    -ATI

  3. Graphics cards or networking/disk subsystem? by Tackhead · · Score: 5, Funny
    Boldly going where fools fear to tread, Futuremark announced today the release and immediate availability of 3DMark06 by means of a front-page article on Slashdot.

    Weighing in at a suicidal 575 megabyates, 3DMark06 expands benchmarking from beyond the graphics subsystem to include an array of hard drives, CPU and server failover tests for overall performance measurement of current and future web serving systems when the ever-loving fuck being Slashdotted out of them.

  4. 3dmark by FadedTimes · · Score: 4, Informative

    In my opnion 3dmark scores should not be considered in hardware reviews. I have seen video cards get low 3dmark scores, yet play all the latest games out of the box with out problems with speed. I take actual game benchmarks more in to consideration.

  5. Re:On the Subject of Slashdot Article Purchasing by StikyPad · · Score: 4, Funny

    a site of Linux, FreeBSD, and OS X users?

    Are you (incorrectly) implying that most visitors don't use Windows (they do), or that the Linux, FreeBSD, and OS X users are so fragile and delicate that we must avoid discussing anything that runs outside of these environments?

    Or are you just trolling?

  6. Re:On the Subject of Slashdot Article Purchasing by snuf23 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Where on Slashdot does it say "only for Linux, FreeBSD and OS X" users?
    I believe the "news for nerds" allows for coverage of gaming, as many nerds play computer and video games. The biggest computer game platform is Windows. This benchmark is to show how video cards perform under current Windows gaming technologies (i.e. DirectX).
    Oh and by the way, since you seem to have a problem with closed source... how does OS X fit in? Sure Darwin is open source, but OS X is not just Darwin and is just as proprietary as Windows. Indeed with a Mac, Apple ultimately controls both the hardware and software. So this fits into the open source geek mentality exactly how?

    --
    Sometimes my arms bend back.
  7. Re:Ugh...Overclocking by mo^ · · Score: 4, Insightful
    In reality the reason they overclock IS to be able to say they overclocked it.


    Isn't this just a definition of one or another form of geek?? More power to them I say. I just sit on my lame ass and mess with in-game settings until it looks right. The oc'ers you talk about are at least doing justice to the game medium by viewing it in the best possible light.

    Your argument could be carried to any engineering extreme and indeed most sports and past-times
    --
    bah!*@%!
  8. I wonder... by Aggrajag · · Score: 4, Funny

    If my GeForce FX 5500 will break the 1 FPS barrier with this one :)

  9. Video cards and penises by doofusclam · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I had a bit of an emergency at work today - we're doing a demonstration tomorrow and the VIVO (Video In/Video Out) graphics card on one of our demo setups died, so we had to go to a local store and buy *anything* that matched this spec:

    ATI (cos we didn't want to rewrite some of our code)
    PCI Express
    VIVO

    So we got stung for ~£200 for an ATI X800 variant. Which I don't mind, but it came in the biggest-ass box you've ever seen. The cover had some rendered image of a woman with enormous tits and the heatpipe had the manufacturers name stamped in it, as if the thing had been carried down by Moses straight from /dev/deity

    Why can't somebody just do a nice card with *stable* 2d and nice video acceleration under Linux, with 3d acceleration as good as you can get without pumping out loads of heat or having a fan? Matrox are nice for 2D but you couldn't ever play the occasional 3D game on them. Why does every card have to be marketed to the sort of kid who has neons underneath their car?