Slashdot Mirror


Slashback: GPLv3, Firefly, iTunes

Slashback tonight brings some corrections, clarifications, and updates to previous Slashdot stories, including Stallman's comments on GPLv3, Firefly fans clinging to hope, sentence handed down in student felony webpage refresh case, GP2X GPL issues resolved, Korean cloning scientist may get to keep his patents, Apple changes their tune for iTunes ministore, and much more -- Read on for details.

Richard Stallman speaks on GPLv3 and patents. Elton J. Won writes "A public forum on the updated GPL was held at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Although Stallman solicited comments from forum attendees. he made clear that the GPL version 3 will not alter the license's basic stance on software patents. From the article: 'the GPL version 3 is explicitly meant to discourage litigation based on software patents. "This is not a placeholder. This is the text we currently plan to go with unless we're surprised by seeing a better idea," Stallman said.'" Relatedly RMS also recently expounded on some of these thoughts in an interview with PCPro.

Firefly fans refuse to go quietly into the night. CMGaretJax writes "The Browncoats, a fan group based around the hit cult TV show Firefly, and the more recent movie, Serenity, have set up a website for donations from people who want to see another season of Firefly. So far they have raised $840 dollars against an estimated cost of 1 million per episode. An admirable attempt, and one that will hopefully pick up steam, the show really is too pretty to die."

Student receives sentence for felony web-page charge. EMB Numbers writes to tell us that Michael Stone, the student who was recently charged with a felony for encouraging others to bog down a school server with web page refreshes, has cut a deal with the prosecutor for a lesser misdemeanor offense -- criminal mischief. Stone was given a suspended sentence of 60 days in jail along with 20 hours of community service. Although he declined to comment on camera Stone's mother stated that she appreciate all the support he received from the online community.

GP2X GPL issues resolved. gizmateer writes to tell us that after quite a bit of noise from the online community it appears that Gamepark has bowed to the pressure and will be releasing the source for the most recent version of the GP2X firmware. From the article: "Please stop posting to this board about GPL. Dignsys will post up the sources to the new firmware version 1.3.0 next week on http://source.gp2x.de. They intend to release it once the binaries to said firmware have been released."

Korean cloning scientist may get to keep his patents. Billosaur writes "According to an article on the New Scientist web site, disgraced Korean cloning researcher Hwang Woo-Suk may get to keep his patents for the process of creating embryonic stem cells via cloning human embryos. Already the UK patent office is looking into the validity of the patents in Europe. From the article: 'As long as an invention is not clearly contrary to scientific laws - like time travel - research has no bearing on the grant of a patent.'"

Apple changes their tune for iTunes mini store. jjbelsky writes "Apple has modified the iTunes MiniStore in response to the anger caused by its release of personal information. All users of iTunes, whether or not the music store is enabled, are now presented with a page informing them that when a song is selected 'information about that item is sent to Apple.' Users who do not click on the 'Turn on MiniStore' button will not have their privacy invaded."

Targets of RIAA lawsuit turn on i2hub operator. Doros writes "After being forced to fork over thousands of dollars to the RIAA, students want i2hub operator Wayne Chang to cover their losses. From the article: 'At least 42 students have been named as defendants in John Doe lawsuits filed by the recording industry. The industry trade group has offered to settle each case for $3,750, lawyers for the students said Tuesday. "Had the students known that they were exposing themselves to copyright infringement liability by using the i2hub service, they likely would not have used the service," the legal group wrote.'"

Adults exempt from Chinese online limits. Dotnaught writes "The Chinese government has yielded to pressure from adult online gamers and exempted them from its online gaming addiction policy. The rules, which went into effect last October, require that after five hours of consecutive play, players cease earning any virtual rewards such as experience points or beneficial items. To avail themselves of the exemption, some 26 million gamers will have to register their real names and identity card numbers with the authorities. The system hasn't proven particularly effective -- minors reportedly skirt the limits by logging onto different accounts or switching to another game after reaching the time limit."

Bill Thompson follows up Mac security remarks. Bralkein writes to tell us that in response to the overwhelming amount of feedback Bill Thompson received on his recent Mac security article, he has penned a response to his critics. In his reply, he admits that there were a few flaws in his article, and he acknowledges the high level of security provided by OS X's UNIX foundations. However, he stands by his assertion that the Mac cannot boast complete immunity to all security problems. As a Mac user himself, he still believes that the Mac community needs to remember that security is still an issue for them, too.

62 of 275 comments (clear)

  1. Except they're not.. by Idimmu+Xul · · Score: 4, Informative

    Firefly fans refuse to go quietly into the night. CMGaretJax writes "The Browncoats, a fan group based around the hit cult TV show Firefly, and the more recent movie, Serenity, have set up a website for donations from people who want to see another season of Firefly. So far they have raised $840 dollars against an estimated cost of 1 million per episode. An admirable attempt, and one that will hopefully pick up steam, the show really is too pretty to die."

    From the site: We are in the process of returning all donations received. We came up against insurmountable odds and legal issues launching our fund-raising drive

    A nice idea, and god I'd love a second series, but it was admitedly reaching for the stars, literally!

    --
    The problem with slashdot is that most of its users were bullied and stuffed into lockers as kids!
    1. Re:Except they're not.. by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Seems to me a way around the legal issues on this sort of thing would be to go to the network that owns the rights from the start- and say "When our website earns enough money, we will buy 20 minutes of advertising on your network for each episode you are able to produce". Then all the commercials could be stories about the donation process, with the web address to donate at...bet it would pay for itself after the first episode went on the air.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    2. Re:Except they're not.. by dR.fuZZo · · Score: 2, Funny

      They're returning the money? That's too bad. Sounds like they nearly had enough to get Shepherd Book to do a direct-to-internet 10 second PSA.

      --
      -- dR.fuZZo
    3. Re:Except they're not.. by andrew_mike · · Score: 3, Informative

      Serenity didn't make any money. In fact, including international box office sales, they just barely broke even. Most studio producers, therefore, would not agree that the best place to profit is making another movie. For the same price as Serenity, they could get almost 2 seasons of Firefly. This means more ad revenue, and more money when the show gets syndicated.

      Problem is, Fox still owns the TV rights (as I recall). For some unexplained reason, Fox loves sticking it to innovative shows. I don't think they'll give up the rights for cheap.

      However, according to the Browncoats website, the main reason the donation campaign was stopped was because they were afraid of possibly giving the producers NIH Syndrome by donating money to the cause.

      --
      Being a smartass is a much better thing than being the alternative.
    4. Re:Except they're not.. by HardCase · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm no rabid Firefly fan (honest!), but I did like the show and the movie. The movie looks like it broke even at the box office, but if you add DVD sales in, it surely must have done reasonably well - the DVD has been in the top 5 at Amazon since it was released. For that matter, the Firefly box set has been up there, too, which ought to make Fox happy.

      I'm not surprised that Fox stuck it to the show. It's not so much that the axe innovative shows as it is that they are locked into the short-term TV on the cheap program. Reality shows cost next to nothing and make a metric buttload of money. They're easy to promote. Firefly was an expensive show that didn't fit the Fox mold. It was easy to preempt because it was virtually unmarketable from Fox's point of view. But at some point, somebody at Fox is going to realize that having four or five shows to syndicate is a pretty slim library - I don't think that American Idol will do all that well in reruns.

      Firefly was here and gone before I ever heard about it. My first exposure was the movie, then I bought the TV DVDs. I vaguely remember hearing something about the show, but I always thought that it was a SciFi Network program - and I'm not that out of touch with my TV.

      -h-

    5. Re:Except they're not.. by Animats · · Score: 3, Funny
      was admitedly reaching for the stars, literally!

      That's what I told Carol Lynn in 1971, when she headed the campaign to bring back Star Trek. "It's over. Give it up. Let it go".

    6. Re:Except they're not.. by Robert+The+Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Has a box office movie every made any money. Granted at 25 Mil. it wasn't a big money maker but it wasn't a bomb either. It made a profit Hollywood has been cooking the books for years so that all movies either make no money or very little money. They move money around increasing cost to make zero profit on all most all movies.

      Robert

  2. Show Opportunity Costs by Noksagt · · Score: 4, Insightful
    So far they have raised $840 dollars against an estimated cost of 1 million per episode.
    $1M is relatively cheap for a network. They are more concerned about the opportunity costs. That is, they can get a lot more ad revenue from shows that people actually watch. Not to make any judgements of the show itself--I paid for my Serenity ticket on opening night--but no network is going to put on a show that is a ratings disaster just because it is free.

    Recall, also, the attempt to "Save Enterprise" the same way. The money was raised (much more than $840!) & it was still axed.
    1. Re:Show Opportunity Costs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Come on... Enterprise sucked. If it wasn't "Trek", it wouldn't even have had a second season... But I guess people watched it as some sort of "Trek fix", and hoping that it would eventually get somewhere (me included).

      As for Firefly, it was original and interesting, and it didn't even had a full season. So, if there ever was a show that deserved to be picked up for another run, that show is Firefly.

    2. Re:Show Opportunity Costs by AndroidCat · · Score: 5, Funny
      Couldn't we just threaten to blow a new crater in their little network?

      Oh wait, transport ship ain't got no guns on it...

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    3. Re:Show Opportunity Costs by br0ck · · Score: 2, Informative

      I'm not sure that you can map Amazon DVD sales rankings to any actual dollar amount, but Fireflyfans.net has tracked daily chart positions for the Firefly box-set and Serenity and both have been selling very well compared to movies with much better box office earnings.

  3. Firefly fans clinging to hope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Turns out that what they thought was hope was just a candle flame and they all died.

    1. Re:Firefly fans clinging to hope by Tackhead · · Score: 3, Funny
      > Firefly fans clinging to hope
      >
      > Turns out that what they thought was hope was just a candle flame and they all died.

      Not a candle flame. More like a leaf on the wind. *CHUNK*

  4. Think this... by shawnce · · Score: 3, Informative

    I think the following site sums up my opinion of iTunes mini store "issue"....

    iTunes MiniStore Is Now Opt-In

  5. Firefly - Get Pay Cable To Pick It Up by gbulmash · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Simple, pledge not money, but to subscribe to the pay cable service (Showtime, HBO) that picks up the series. If they can get 200,000 new subscribers, between the subscriber fees and the post-season DVD sales, that justifies a 13-episode order.

    - Greg

  6. So you can't patent a time machine in the UK by SIGFPE · · Score: 4, Funny

    That's a pity. If there's no money to be made from inventing a time machine I don't think I'll bother working on mine any more. I'll just get back to my perpetual moction machine then.

    --
    -- SIGFPE
    1. Re:So you can't patent a time machine in the UK by markana · · Score: 5, Funny

      Tell me about it. Got the patent in 2035, but it was later reversed on prior art. *Now* I've got to muck around in *this* era trying to establish prior-prior art.

      The system's seriously screwed up, I tell ya...

  7. Felony - misdemeanor - makes more sense by Roadkills-R-Us · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Good deal. This should never have been charged as a felony to begin with, but I agree he needed a reality slap. I haven't looked far enough into the case to have a strong opinion on the sentence, but 60 days, even suspended, sounds a little heavy. Then again, if there's more to it than I've caught from the news, maybe it's fine.

    1. Re:Felony - misdemeanor - makes more sense by porneL · · Score: 4, Funny

      refresh, refresh, refresh! (there's a counter on each page. Pity it's such a small number...)

      Are they going to hunt me down now?

    2. Re:Felony - misdemeanor - makes more sense by froschmann · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Hey, guys, I suggest you check out the student handbook hosted on the school site. If this kid gets a felony for refreshing, what happens when they get slashdotted? Here.

  8. Firefly - let it die in peace by Black+Parrot · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I loved the series, but was a bit disappointed with the movie. (Well done, but tried to wrap up / kill off too much stuff that should have been used to tittilate us for a couple of years.) In principle it could go on, but I can't see the magic ever being recaptured at this date.

    I wish Joss would give up on the dead horse and turn his attention to something new - on a different network.

    --
    Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    1. Re:Firefly - let it die in peace by sameeer · · Score: 3, Funny

      completely agreed.. the movie seemed to be made as a clean way to end off the series, and midway through the story they decided, no, we shouldn't end the movie/series this way, what if people will start paying for the series and we get $840 to continue the series.. I liked the series, but after the dissapointment of the movie, only reason I'd like to see more episodes is if they conclude the story (by killing of the rest of them would be a suggestion).. the magic, as u said, cannot be recaptured...

    2. Re:Firefly - let it die in peace by MindStalker · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I wish Joss would give up on the dead horse and turn his attention to something new - on a different network.

      From what I understand Joss explicily stated there WON'T be another season after the movie (though there was a small hint at a miniseries).

    3. Re:Firefly - let it die in peace by pavon · · Score: 2, Informative

      there is a time gap between the last episode, and the movie. Plenty of room for more.

      Only six months, and the comic books already covered some of that.

  9. The term is "Shiny" not "Pretty" by Dasein · · Score: 4, Funny

    Gorram it.

    --
    You are not a beautiful or unique snowflake -- but you could be if you got off your ass.
    1. Re:The term is "Shiny" not "Pretty" by YowzaTheYuzzum · · Score: 5, Informative

      "We're not gonna die. We can't die, Bendis. You know why? Because we are so very pretty. We are just too pretty for God to let us die."

    2. Re:The term is "Shiny" not "Pretty" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yep, and Mal didn't much like god after that... it was all part of explaining why Mal was like he was.

    3. Re:The term is "Shiny" not "Pretty" by AndroidCat · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yup! No faster way to kill off a non-key character short of slapping a red shirt on him and beaming him down with four regulars.

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  10. Why I like Apple by TimmyDee · · Score: 2

    Apple has modified the iTunes MiniStore in response to the anger caused by its release of personal information.

    This is why I like Apple. And it's also the difference between Apple and MS. Users matter.

    --
    Per Square Mile, a blog about density
    1. Re:Why I like Apple by cab15625 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Just as long as there are not griswalds involved apples are fine by me.

  11. Who gets the money?? by Freaky+Spook · · Score: 4, Insightful

    They may be able to raise 1 million, but if nothing eventuates out of it who gets the money??

    As much as I would love to see more firefly, I really don't want to put my money into reviving a tv show when I don't know where the money is going, i'd much prefer to increase my current donations to more needy causes like Oxfam.

    1. Re:Who gets the money?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Star Trek - they could use the money too.

    2. Re:Who gets the money?? by SEWilco · · Score: 3, Funny
      Star Trek - they could use the money too.

      Yeah, I hear that was a good show. Too bad it got canceled. Maybe we should write to Paramount or something.

    3. Re:Who gets the money?? by geminidomino · · Score: 3, Funny

      Someone tell me again why Trip had to die a senseless death?

      Ask Wash. </bitter>

  12. WoW? by Mr.+Flibble · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "The Chinese government has yielded to pressure from adult online gamers and exempted them from its online gaming addiction policy. The rules, which went into effect last October, require that after five hours of consecutive play, players cease earning any virtual rewards such as experience points or beneficial items. To avail themselves of the exemption, some 26 million gamers will have to register their real names and identity card numbers with the authorities. The system hasn't proven particularly effective -- minors reportedly skirt the limits by logging onto different accounts or switching to another game after reaching the time limit."

    And people were wondering why Chinese players prefer not to frequent Chinese servers. There were the recent (slashdot story) accusations of gold farming, which is possible. Or, the Chinese players of WoW perhaps want to circumvent this limit by playing on an outside server...

    Note, I don't know anything about WoW servers within China, and whether they acutally conform to this 5 hour limit or not, but then again, I don't play WoW on Chinese servers either.

    --
    Try to hack my 31337 firewall!
    1. Re:WoW? by JourneyExpertApe · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And people were wondering why Chinese players prefer not to frequent Chinese servers. There were the recent (slashdot story) accusations of gold farming, which is possible. Or, the Chinese players of WoW perhaps want to circumvent this limit by playing on an outside server...

      This makes me wonder if the Chinese government didn't have another motive in enforcing this limit. After all, it would interfere with "gold farming" businesses. Maybe they didn't like the idea and manufacutred this "gaming addiction" excuse as a cover-up.

      --
      If you can read this sig, you're too close.
  13. Re:Yay Showtime by Psykechan · · Score: 2, Funny

    If they ressurect both Firefly and Arrested Development then my subscription is pretty much a done deal.

    Well, as long as they keep them two seperate shows, that is...

  14. Free CDs! by VGPowerlord · · Score: 3, Insightful
    "Had the students known that they were exposing themselves to copyright infringement liability by using the i2hub service, they likely would not have used the service," the legal group wrote.'

    This isn't a hard concept to understand. Really, it isn't. If you're downloading music that you see on CDs in stores, for free, it's illegal.

    Blaming the i2hub's operators is a diversionary tactic. It's pretty obvious that they chose to connect to a file sharing network, and IANAL, but I'm pretty sure that shows intent on their part.

    --
    GLaDOS for President 2016! "Well here we are again. It's always such a pleasure." -- GLaDOS, 2011
    1. Re:Free CDs! by ZachPruckowski · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Founded by Wayne Chang in 2003 while he was a student at the University of Massachusetts-Amherst, the i2hub network linked students and others over the super-fast Internet2 network. In a letter to Chang dated Monday, attorneys with the Student Legal Services Office claimed i2hub placed ads on campus to deceive UMass students into believing the software was approved by the university. It's one of several reasons that the student-funded legal group says led its clients to believe they were authorized to use the software to trade copyrighted music and other files.

      Universities subsidize things. It isn't unreasonable from the perspective of someone familar with University sponsored events that a university could pay for the rights to do this, and then pay the fees associated with the music for you. I mean, colleges give free admittance to sports games, and subsidize concerts. It's all paid for by an "activities fee". So it is theoretically possible that they could legitimately fall for it. Obviously I'd have asked some one for more info as it sounds fishy, but the idea of colleges paying for your music through a fee you paid with your tuition isn't entirely left-field, just third base or so.

  15. Re:What's the deal with Firefly? by maelstrom · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It's a show that grows on you over time. I found the concept and the first episode pretty lame. Then I kept watching and fell in love with all the characters. I think this is probably why it had such a hard time picking up viewers. If you just randomly tuned in and saw one episode, it wouldn't be very interesting.

    --
    The more you know, the less you understand.
  16. Re:What's the deal with Firefly? by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It's not wrong to dislike something just because the groupthink says you should like it (prepare to be moderated into oblivion though, as this post probably will be).

    I thought it was pretty damn awful too.... but then I'm not American (it was clearly in the 'Western' style to appeal to am american audience).

    OTOH the TV execs seemed to agree with us as it was canned pretty quickly...
    can't have been getting any decent viewing figures.

  17. Profiting from a crime - Patents by PornMaster · · Score: 2, Insightful

    In thinking about patents resulting from illegal behavior (I don't know if what the Korean guy did was illegal -- possibly fraud if nothing else), it would be interesting for a gov't to issue the patent, but assign it to the public domain.

    That'd keep people from profiting from the illegal behavior, and also not allow someone else to come in and profit from it just because they're "clean".

  18. iTunes by CMiYC · · Score: 3, Interesting

    For what it is worth, I don't care if Apple is tracking what I am listening to. If it helps iTunes to recommend new music that I didn't know about, great (which it already has)! Should they have done things differently? Could they have? Sure. Whatever. I don't care! Its a fucking song.

    I'm amazed at how outranged people will get over one thing, but let another go into the night.

  19. What was that link again? by irrealitySquink · · Score: 2, Insightful
  20. Fuck Off by Yahweh+Doesn't+Exist · · Score: 4, Insightful

    >Users who do not click on the 'Turn on MiniStore' button will not have their privacy invaded.

    how the fuck is it an invasion of privacy?

    no personal data is collected or sent, or ever was. it's a feature that turns your library into iTMS links, basically just a tabbed version of the little arrows that have been there for ages. oh noes! hyperlinks and tabbed browsing! teh interweb is stealing my identity!

    and even though it was blown way out of proportion, Apple still responded quickly and as desired.

    1. Re:Fuck Off by R3d+M3rcury · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "no personal data is collected or sent, or ever was."

      Yay! Pat yourself on the back! You were right.

      The issue, though, was not about what evil things Apple might be doing. The issue was that you had no idea what Apple was doing. There was speculation--perhaps even informed speculation--but no actual word from Apple about this. Not even buried deep in the bowels of the license agreement.

      "how the fuck is it an invasion of privacy?"

      Remember that if the information had been stored--we now know it wasn't--information can always be subpoenaed.

      Here's an entertaining scenario: Several years ago, I remember reading about some kid who committed suicide. The parents attempted to sue the record companies and artists, I believe, for driving their kids to suicide. Imagine if there was a database somewhere that showed exactly what the kid had been listening to...

  21. a black sheep is still a sheep by Scrameustache · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It's not wrong to dislike something just because the groupthink says you should like it

    No, it just mean you're sooooooo much better than everyone! Since you don't like something because others like it, by rejecting something popular, you set yourself appart! You're special!

    --

    You can't take the sky from me...

    1. Re:a black sheep is still a sheep by commodoresloat · · Score: 2, Funny

      Well screw you both - I'm going to do what everyone else does, whatever's popular, just to set myself apart from those who are constantly trying to set themselves apart!

    2. Re:a black sheep is still a sheep by Babbster · · Score: 2, Interesting

      A and men. Slashdotters use phrases like "groupthink," "Joe Six-Pack" and the like, usually pretending that they aren't insulting people. Using the word "groupthink" in this context implies that people who like Firefly only feel that way because "everyone" on the Interweb says it's super cool.

      Me, I'm one of those oddities who liked the show from the first episode aired despite Fox showing episodes out of order. Then again, I also liked Friends which it seemed like every tool on the Interweb hammered constantly. So, I wonder where I would fit in with the supposed "groupthink" regarding television?

      It's all part of what has become a generally accepted mode of thinking by many who talk about entertainment on ye olden Interweb: "I thought [insert videogame/movie/music/etc. here] sucked, and anyone who liked it sucks."

  22. Re:What's the deal with Firefly? by lionheart1327 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It's the characters.

    After a while, you don't even care what they're doing or where they are, you care about them.

  23. Re:iTunes updates quicker than Windows? by Yahweh+Doesn't+Exist · · Score: 4, Funny

    yeah, I've already seen posts along the lines of "omg Apple updated iTunes without me knowing! spyware! hax! internet content changing without downloading an installer? that's unpossible!"

    I wish Apple had tried to patent the ministore, because then we'd have had a million posts about how it's the simplest and most obvious feature ever instead of the insane FUD.

  24. Re: What's the deal with Firefly? by Black+Parrot · · Score: 2, Funny

    > It's the characters. After a while, you don't even care what they're doing or where they are, you care about them.

    And their guns, which also have names!

    --
    Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
  25. Time Travel...? by dartarrow · · Score: 2, Informative

    'As long as an invention is not clearly contrary to scientific laws - like time travel - research has no bearing on the grant of a patent.'

    I think Einstein would say otherwise. http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/time/think.html and http://www.iit.edu/~bosabri/time.html

    --
    I love humanity, it is people I hate
  26. Re:General Public Lisence? by m50d · · Score: 2, Informative

    That's the name of the license.

    --
    I am trolling
  27. Re:General Public Lisence? by burndive · · Score: 3, Informative

    Really? Wow. I thought it was the Gnu Public Lisence.

    [goes to look it up on Wikipedia...]

    Well, this might explain it:

    "GNU General Public License (GNU GPL or simply GPL)"

    --
    ...because "hacker" sounds way sexier than "code drone."
  28. Re:What's the deal with Firefly? by Beryllium+Sphere(tm) · · Score: 3, Informative

    Vivid characterization, snappy, quotable, and witty dialog, a more human scale than many other shows, and a plausibly complex society as a background to the stories. If you're genuinely curious, try the TV episodes "Out of Gas" and "Serenity" and see whether it's more to your taste after you've been properly introduced to the crew. If you still don't like it, the answer to your question is "It's a matter of taste".

    If what you're after in sf tv is good old fashioned sense of wonder, well, this is a dry period for that.

  29. please DOS server = sedition ?? by Adult+film+producer · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Stone was given a suspended sentence of 60 days in jail along with 20 hours of community service. Although he declined to comment on camera Stone's mother stated that she appreciate all the support he received from the online community.

    oh ya, only 60 days in jail... that makes about as much sense as throwing a person 5 years in federal prison for growing their own marijuana. This country is done for, whoever has to mop up this mess has their work cut out for them.

  30. Oh, please by Overly+Critical+Guy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Users who do not click on the 'Turn on MiniStore' button will not have their privacy invaded

    It's just doing a WebObjects query for related albums. Jesus Christ, my privacy isn't being invaded over that. There's more information stored via the Google cookie, and where is the Slashdot outrage over that? That information has been confirmed to be stored indefinitely, along with your email in Gmail. Oh no, Slashdot is storing your IP in its weblogs! In fact, every server does!

    Non-issue, in my opinion.

    --
    "Sufferin' succotash."
    1. Re:Oh, please by labratuk · · Score: 2, Insightful
      It's just doing a WebObjects query for related albums.
      And in the process, telling them what you're listening to.
      There's more information stored via the Google cookie, and where is the Slashdot outrage over that? That information has been confirmed to be stored indefinitely, along with your email in Gmail. Oh no, Slashdot is storing your IP in its weblogs! In fact, every server does!
      That's completely different, because people expect that to happen. They're using the internet. People don't expect a music playing application to be internet connected (unless they explicitly choose to use the store).

      It becomes subversive (and annoying) when something which doesn't have a particular obvious need to connect to the internet does so and doesn't make the user aware of it or doesn't give them the choice to prevent it.
      --
      Malike Bamiyi wanted my assistance.
  31. Re:Yay Showtime by Browncoat · · Score: 5, Funny
    On the next..Arrested Development:

    GOB finds it difficult to gain re-entry in the Alliance when he performs his illusions in front of River, who immediately knows all of the tricks.

    Michael is mistaken for Mal, and has to fight a duel to defend Inara, who is being stalked by Carl Weathers.

    Tobias is jealous of Lindsay's attraction to a "real doctor" like Simon, and hatches a plan to win back his wife by going to Boston to renew his medical license. He gets on the wrong bus, heading toward Canada.

    Mal, mistaken for Michael, is arrested for another George Sr. crime, and escapes prison with the help of Jayne, using GOB's Segway as a getaway vehicle. They hit an inordinately fortified sand castle on the beach, and break it.

    GOB, devestated at the loss of his Segway, and no company funds to buy another, begins to drink heavily with Jayne. They visit George Sr. in prison, and the three sing "The Hero of Canton" and the two are escorted out by guards.

    Kaylee finds it difficult to fight off the affections of GOB after she fixes his Segway.

    River is arrested after the Bluth Company's Mr. BananaGrabber commercial triggers another "incident," this time in Klimpy's Family Style Restaurant.

    Wash buys the Bluth company jet back, and before GOB can take it to South America, he and Zoe fly off for a vacation. Unfortunately, Maeby is hiding in the bathroom, and is left there while the couple goes to their resort.

    Simon, misunderstanding Kaylee's behavior with GOB as flirting, embarks to seduce Lindsay to get revenge. He later realizes that Lindsay is the type of woman that his father would have wanted him to marry, and breaks up with her by saying, "I've made a huge mistake."

    George Michael is infatuated with River, but is slightly frightened of her after she looks at Ann and "fixes" her Bible in front of her parents.

    Pastor Veal, on a flight back to California from a conference, is mistaken for Wash, and is left in the cockpit to land a plane safely after both the pilot and co-pilot have panic attacks.

    Buster thinks Kaylee is the most beautiful woman he has ever seen, and tries to fight GOB and Simon for her affections. He looks online for doctorate programs, believing Kaylee is attracted to doctors, and mistakenly signs up to be a guest on the show of popular television counselor, Dr. Phil, after he submits what he believes to be an admissions essay answering the question "Do you have a family member you believe is living a double life?"

    Mr. Universe becomes a public relations agent for the Bluths, holding press conferences from his ion cloud (now relocated to the smog air of California), and using Lenore as a spokeswoman, launches a pro-Bluth campaign, with great success. When an interrupted video feed reveals Mr. Universe to be the real public relations agent, and Lenore revealed to be fake, the Jewish community celebrates, and they all hire Mr. Universe to be their consultant. Women across the country, relieved to see that Lenore has perfect makeup because the makeup is permanently on her skin, also hire Mr. Universe.

    George Sr. and Book discuss religion, and Book finds insight in George Sr.'s "Caged Wisdom" tapes.

    --
    "Curse your sudden, but inevitable betrayal!"
  32. Good on Apple! by Onan · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'm very fond of Apple, but I was incensed by the disregard for privacy that itunes 6.0.2 seemed to indicate. I used their feedback web form to convey my alarm, made some grumpy posts to their discussion forum, and generally tried to express to them that this was a serious transgression.

    Apparently they heard and reacted to me and the presumed lots of other people saying the same thing, and reacted in precisely the right way. I never much cared about the mini-store one way or the other, I was only bothered by the transmission of personal data without my very explicit knowledge and consent. Defaulting to off with a prominent opt-in dialog is a perfectly good solution to this.

    So it appears that it was just an oversight on their part, a concern that never crossed their minds, and that they were willing to make corrections as soon as the issue was brought to their attention. That seems quite forgivable, and indeed I'm proud of Apple for reacting so quickly and correctly.

  33. Re:Podcast the damn thing. by elrous0 · · Score: 2, Funny
    How many of us are there?

    If the box office numbers for Serinity are any indication, not many.

    -Eric

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.