Slashdot Mirror


IE7 Leaked

lju writes "IE7 has been leaked according to pcpro. From the article: '...last Friday it was revealed that a build of the new browser - version 5299 - along with numerous screenshots, was available online.' "

6 of 408 comments (clear)

  1. I'm certain... by Billosaur · · Score: 5, Informative
    ...that IE7 leaks all right. Anyone want to place bets on how secure it is?

    IE7 Screenshots

    --
    GetOuttaMySpace - The Anti-Social Network
  2. Leaked? by Comatose51 · · Score: 4, Informative

    It's been available for some time now legally. I believe you have to be a member of MSDN. I'm using it right now on my work PC. It's like IE 6 with tabs and with some rough edges. The build I'm using doesn't add "http://" for you, which is a bit annoying but might not be a bad security precaution. Tabs pretty much work like FF.

    --
    EvilCON - Made Famous by /.
  3. it was leaked on friday by madnuke · · Score: 4, Informative

    Wow it sure does take long for news to filter through, I would stay clear of it though as I nearly had to reformat as it broke AVG and numerous other things. Even when its released I will stick with firefox.

  4. Coral Cache by Frankie70 · · Score: 4, Informative

    here

    The original seems to be slashdotted.

  5. Re:Leaks? I'll show you LEAKS! by AuMatar · · Score: 4, Informative

    That isn't the job of glibc, its the job of the OS. At program termination, the OS knows what memory an app used and simply marks those pages (in RAM and the pagefile) as unused.

    glibc is in charge of memory during the running of the program. WHen you call new or malloc, it takes memory from a pool to satisfy the request. If it doesn't have enough, it requests additional pages from the OS. When you call delete or free, it takes that memory and puts it back in the pool. What I'm not sure is if glibc returns memory to the OS if the pool gets big enough. If it doesn't, the program isn't really leaking memory, but memory use will never go down.

    --
    I still have more fans than freaks. WTF is wrong with you people?
  6. Re:Obligatory Troll... by Trevahaha · · Score: 4, Informative

    I think it's actually somewhat "difficult" to install ActiveX anymore. Since their updates in SP2, you have to click on the information bar and explicity state that you want to install this ActiveX (and it gives you a warning about how it can be unsafe).

    I mean, I'm the first one to admit that IE has been very crappy in the past... but IE6 SP2 (other than the damn rendering, of course, but there's hope for IE7)does a pretty good job of being secure.