Slashdot Mirror


Cingular Patents the Emoticon?

massysett writes "Mobile phone carrier Cingular Wireless may have managed to get a patent on the emoticon. The patent describes a system for selecting a displayable icon to indicate the mood or emotion of the user. It also covers text-based emoticons, 'so presumably sending :) via an SMS - if selected via a dedicated or softkey, would be a breach of the patent in future.'" My response? >:/

15 of 231 comments (clear)

  1. Hmmm by TheSpoom · · Score: 5, Funny
    --
    It's better to vote for what you want and not get it than to vote for what you don't want and get it.
    - E. Debs
  2. Good luck enforcing this one! by gasmonso · · Score: 5, Funny

    They can stick that patent in their (_|_).

    http://religiousfreaks.com/
    1. Re:Good luck enforcing this one! by ettlz · · Score: 5, Funny

      And they can kiss my shiny hello.jpg (=O=).

    2. Re:Good luck enforcing this one! by DocStoner · · Score: 4, Funny

      And all this time I thought it was a tie-fighter. That changes the intent of a lot of past conversations.

  3. Patent review by CastrTroy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    They really need to beef up their standards for patent review. Stuff like this should never even get through. People shouldn't have to spend money battling these patents in court. I think cingular should be fined for even submitting a patent which is quite obviously not novel, and just an attempt to patent something that's already used everywhere in order to squeeze money out of others

    --

    Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
  4. We'll need to see the patent...but uh... by Benanov · · Score: 4, Interesting

    You know, it looks like it's another one of those “we're doing X, but on the internet” patents, except this time it's on a phone.

    I thought that I had lost all hope in the patent system some time ago, but I just lost more.

  5. Comic Book Guy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    "There Is No Emoticon For What I Am Feeling!"

  6. What idiot approves these headlines? by unterderbrucke · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The article, even the summary, clearly indicates all they are patenting is the process of using a smiley on the phone/sending it. They are NOT patenting the smiley, that's just an inflammatory headline used to create negative response.

  7. I'm speechless by Hershmire · · Score: 4, Funny
    =X
    --
    if(!toilet_paper) roll.replace(new roll); //Stupid roommates.
  8. Not a patent - an application only by ChartBoy · · Score: 5, Informative
    The "patent number" cited in the article is not a patent number. It is an application number (the US has recently started publishing applications in keeping with the rest of the world). This is the application.

    US utility patent numbers have sequential numbers and are currently in the 6 million range. Application numbers have a year (2006) and a serial number within the year (15812).

  9. First Use by jmkaza · · Score: 4, Informative

    19-Sep-82 11:44 Scott E Fahlman :-)
    From: Scott E Fahlman

    I propose that the following character sequence for joke markers: :-)

    Read it sideways. Actually, it is probably more economical to mark
    things that are NOT jokes, given current trends. For this, use :-(

  10. Correct application number and link by HDlife · · Score: 5, Informative
    The APPLICATION NUMBER is 20060015812

    This just published and is years from becoming a patent. This is just a laundry list of claims that they want, not that they will get.

    You can see it here: http://appft1.uspto.gov/netahtml/PTO/srchnum.html/

  11. Actual patent number = 6,990,452 by hcg50a · · Score: 4, Informative

    TFA had a bogus number.

    Check the actual patent out.

    --
    HCG 50a = 2MASX J11170638+5455016
    11h17m06.4s +54d55m02s
  12. headline/summary is WRONG WRONG WRONG by amliebsch · · Score: 5, Informative
    How the hell could a patent clerk look at this and stamp it?
    It hasn't been stamped. It is just an application.

    Did they even look at it?
    They are looking at it.

    Do we have any recourse or any way to fire these morons?
    They haven't done anything.

    Why in the name of all that is holy did this GET patented?
    It isn't patented.

    Patents are out of control... I'm just wondering if anyone has any input on how the hell they get by with this bullshit.

    This headline, summary, and post represent the very worst of slashdot. A blatantly wrong headline and summary are posted that just coincidentally happen to inflame the commenters, who immediately posture and condemn without knowing any more about the subject than the misleading headline. A correction, if it is ever made, is already off the front page, and all these geeks who sincerely believe themselves to be rational and intellectually superior go off believing a complete falsehood, because it validates their beliefs.

    --
    If you don't know where you are going, you will wind up somewhere else.
  13. Patent office lists prior art too by goombah99 · · Score: 4, Informative
    [sour grapes] Rejected slashdot submission: [/sour grapes]

    An hot news story that makes the outrageous inducing claim that Cingular has just patented the Emoticon appears to be untrue, since the US Patent office shows no such listing for the claimed Cingular patent. But that's not to say it's not outrageous :-0 since in fact AT&T, some guy in kirkland WA, and a dozen others have patented the emoticon or aspects of it. Perhaps most galling is that the patents actually use the word "emoticon" to describe what they are patenting. They of course don't actually patent the emoticon itself but the act of entering an emoticon into multi-media, sort of like patenting the one-click patent versus patenting, say, commerce. Is this one of the whackiest patents ever :-p

    --
    Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.