Best Buy Working Towards Ending Mail-in Rebates

chibbie writes "Best Buy is finally working towards ending mail-in rebates by 2007. Rebates will still be around, but you will be able to file them online, and receive your check much quicker. I guess this means Best Buy doesn't hate their customers after all."

Comments

It's Not Enough

[Al Mutasim]

Why not just deduct the rebate at the cash register? We all know that's doable. No, their dream is to extract from each customer the maximum personal price. Those willing to pay full price do, and those only willing to pay a lower price get it. Willingness to do senseless work determines who falls in what camp--it's just like coupon clipping.

Re:It's Not Enough

[bigdavex]

My mother regularly saves 30%~50% on groceries because she clips coupons and uses her frequent shopper card. She saves the reciepts to show me and everytime, I ask her when the supermarkets will just start giving her food for free.

She's not saving more than I am by going to the Low Bill or the Aldi and buying generics. The receipts only prove that she would've been screwed if she bought brand names at full price.

Re:It's Not Enough

[91degrees]

It is senseless. You gave them $500 for them to give back to you to get it at the price it would have been if there were no rebates.

Re:It's Not Enough

[SurgeonGeneral]

You are right, mail in rebates are definately a tactic that companies like Best Buy use to get people in the door, but there is another reason to use mail in rebates that most people probably dont realize.

When you deal with mass quantities of sales like Best Buy does, a lot of money flows in and out the doors. Keeping the money in the door for as long as possible before it has to flow back out allows for the corporation to maximize its use of the money while it has it.

If it takes a minimum of, say, 40 days to process a mail in rebate, thats about 30 days that Best Buy gets to hang on to your money. More correctly though, thats 30 days that it gets to USE your money. With the massive amounts of small purchases that come in, this really adds up, and the interest obtained from holding that money for those 30 days is a valuable source of income for Best Buy. Further to this, when you get a large cash float income for reinvestment like Best Buy can obtain through this process, the interest payments and investment returns go way, way up. I can gaurentee you that this is a revenue stream that Best Buy tries to maximize.

Re:It's Not Enough

[Servants]

Exactly. It's a mistake to think of unredeemed rebates as "free money" for a company; the expected non-redemption rate gets factored into the price.

Suppose Best Buy sells a drive for $100, with a $50 rebate that half their customers send in. Then they take in $75 per sale, on average.

Alternatively, they could sell it to everybody for $75 in the first place, with no rebates.

Or, they could implement an online rebate system. If this leads 3/4 of their customers to get the rebate, the offered rebate could only be $33 instead of $50 to get the same average revenue per system.

It's an empirical question for the company which setup will allow them to make the most sales. (Note that this is somewhat independent from the base amount of profit they make per unit; if they decided a drive only needed to sell for $60 on average, they'd still be faced with the same set of choices.) It's a separate question which system an individual buyer prefers. If you're allergic to rebate checks, or if your time is extremely valuable, you'd prefer #2. If you just want the best price, it's in your interest to have a system like #1 where few other people bother to obtain the rebate, allowing the company to make the discount quite large.

One conclusion you could draw from this plan, then, is that Best Buy has decided to cater more toward relatively well-off customers who value their time highly, and less toward customers who shop on price.

onrebate

[Anonymous Coward]

Why assume that Best Buy is trying to help out the customer? Maybe they're trying to make it more efficient for themselves to eat your money.

Has anyone else had any experience with the online rebate firm onrebate.com? They ate my rebate claiming insufficient documentation (which I know is wrong...), but the worst part is they will not even allow me to resubmit anything to them. After waiting on hold for 30 minutes, the nice customer service representative explained how their decision was final, with no option for recourse whatsoever. Then she even transferred me to her manager, a filled-up voicemail box. Emails have gone unanswered for a month. Apparently they're affiliated with tigerdirect.com, which I understand has equally craptastic customer service. At this point, I'm gonna go to Fry's and try to get them to fulfill the rebate they promised me, as the rebate firm is effectively impossible to contact.

Personally, I think it's safe to assume that Best Buy is no different, and unless they prove otherwise, I'll assume that they "hate their customers after all."

They still hate us...

[Fallen Kell]

They just want our email addresses now so they can sell to every spam company in existance, that is all. I mean, its a great plan. They know for a fact that everyone has access to mail, but not everyone has access to the web. I think the only real good thing about this now is that we will no longer need to send in the UPC code which may get "lost" and deny you the rebate.

opt-in

[TubeSteak]

guess this means Best Buy doesn't hate their customers after all.

Sure they do.

Best-Buy is computerizing their "Who to Hate" process.

The best part is that it's opt-in.

When you file a rebate, you opt-in!

Rebates mean you pay extra taxes

[iplayfast]

Think about it. You buy a $1000 item for $800, but you are taxed on $1000. I hate rebates and will pay extra to avoid them. The only rebates are the ones on stuff thats being thrown out for next to nothing. Sometimes you can actually make money on those :0

Optimism

[Guppy06]

"I guess this means Best Buy doesn't hate their customers after all."

No, it means they can harvest (and sell) your address and contact info without having to pay for the envelope opener and data-entry team. That, and the cookies (oh, the cookies).

Re:I don't think so.

[Achoi77]

They just makes it easier to keep track of people who flub up their rebate submissions. Mix up a rebate tracker number (or whatever it's called), or make a typo in your receipt number- and your rebate is invalid. BAM - there goes $60 you're never going to see. Perhaps you caught your mistake, and you want to resubmit it with the correct number; the computer will catch you resubmitting, and will consider you trying to dupe your rebate submission (you know, to 'catch' all those evil-doers that are trying to cheat the system by submitting over and over again *yeah right*) and will void your rebate. By having it all computerized, you remove the human element (i.e. the people that are paid to process your rebate forms via mail, and have them verify that the rebate is not void), and they save money by not having to hire people to process the mail-in rebates, AND accurately keep statistical analysis of the percentage of failed submissions to notify the accountants how much Best Buy has *saved* by not having to honor your rebate. Most of the time people won't care, since they will be able to do it right the first time, but if you mess up - poor internet connection, or cat jumped on keyboard and pressed enter or even just a typo or mixup- it just gives bestbuy a reason not to honor that rebate check.

Best Buy doesn't hate customers, they just hate customers that are trying to nickle and dime them - and that includes everybody that shops with rebates in mind.

Re:Second Link

[loraksus]

It really pisses me off that he groups those together, like people who bought a discounted computer are just as bad as those who are getting rebate checks from items they've already returned to the store.

Absolutely. The head of Best Buy has an "interesting viewpoint" on the people who support his stores.
I won't mince words, he goes on batshit insane rants about his customers pretty often, and seems to think that he is entitled to make profit (and as such, anyone who costs him profit by using a coupon, pricematching, etc is stealing directly from him), but that really isn't the issue.
I have no problem with them validating rebates and punishing people who submit rebates and then return a product. Shit, if it becomes a pattern, take them to court or even have the DA file charges, but as you said, there is a difference between someone who engages in fraud and someone who wants to get a good deal and uses a pricematch and a coupon on an item that also has a rebate.

Speaking of which - they already have a computerized validation system for rebates that apparently takes data from their POS system, if you return something, your rebate submission will be rejected. The 2 year timeline is completely unrealistic and is, quite frankly bullshit (many others have pointed this out)

It also pisses me off that they are angry that some customers are forcing them to really honor the terms THEY MADE UP about price matching...

Oh. My. FSM.
Pricematching at Best Buy is like dealing with a schizophrenic. You never know what is allowed and what isn't. Sometimes you can use a coupon with a pricematch, sometimes you can't, sometimes the coupon price is subtracted from the pricematch, sometimes the after rebate price is used - it goes on and on and is really annoying.
Even the stuff on the "pricematching sign" can be completely ignored by the managers. Managers will just shrug their shoulders when you read the sign to them and say something like "Well, that's how it is" as if you are in an episode of the Sopranos.

To their credit, they have been cementing their position on several issues, although virtually every single policy change that they have set in stone has been hostile to their customers. Many of their rebates now specifically state that the rebate is not valid if a pricematch is performed on the item (terms like this were on the WD HDD rebate I filed about 6 months ago) and there are other examples.
I really don't care, their prices aren't competitive on the items that I purchase (techie stuff) and the hassle isn't worth it either. To say nothing of the fact that a lot of items that they have good prices on are on perpetual backorder or are cancelled with no explanation given (During the black friday weekend, they cancelled several of my orders - a laptop, a Radeon X700 and something else, but they charged my card as soon as I placed the order, and didn't refund it until several days later)

Re:For what it's worth...

[noidentity]

Wow, maybe they can streamline it more in the future. I'm thinking of a system like this (just an idea; don't attack me if I've oversimplified it):

1. Cashier scans item
2. Terminal looks up price
3. Customer pays that amount

Re:I don't think so.

[Professor_UNIX]

Mix up a rebate tracker number (or whatever it's called), or make a typo in your receipt number- and your rebate is invalid.

I think you're being just a little bit unfair to Best Buy here. Staples has had "Easy Rebates" for awhile now and they really are a hell of a lot easier. Go to their website, type in the number on your receipt, and receive your rebate check two weeks later. Simple. If you can't type in a stupid number on a receipt then something is really wrong with you. I'd rather check a number a few times on a receipt than home some minimum wage monkey can read my chicken scratch when I hand-write a rebate onto those little receipt rebate forms.