Slashdot Mirror


WMF Exploit Sold Underground for $4,000

tero1176 writes "Eweek has a story with information from Kaspersky showing that exploit code used in the WMF malware attack was being peddled on underground sites by rival Russian hacker groups for $4,000 in early December. The first sign of an exploit was traced back to the December 1, 2005, a full month before anti-virus vendors started noticing mysterious WMF files rigged with malicious executable code. It serves as more proof that the market for malware is well and truly alive."

17 of 166 comments (clear)

  1. Maybe they should get involved... by ackthpt · · Score: 5, Funny
    It serves as more proof that the market for malware is well and truly alive."

    Do you suppose Microsoft will try to enter this market, too?

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    1. Re:Maybe they should get involved... by ozmanjusri · · Score: 4, Funny

      You are hear by forbidden from ever using statistics or percentages again.

      You are the only one here who thinks hereby is spelled "hear by" or throw is spelled "through". *

      You are hereby forbidden to use the English language in a pedantic and patronising manner ever again.

      * Probably not true

      --
      "I've got more toys than Teruhisa Kitahara."
  2. What, you expected... by Orrin+Bloquy · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...open source exploits for a commercial OS?

    Joke, don't waste your mod points here.

    --
    "Made up/misattributed quote that makes me look smart. I am on /. and I must look smart."
  3. Access to this market by davidgrouchy · · Score: 5, Funny

    Will my AT&T "platinum," "gold" and "silver" levels of Internet access provide access to this underground market ?

  4. Russians eh? by Dragon+of+the+Pants · · Score: 4, Funny

    In Soviet Russia, code exploits you!

  5. Windows Only? by ackthpt · · Score: 5, Interesting
    As usual, Mac and Linux users are unaffected and wonder why everyone relies on such unreliable software. And the world turns...

    So you think Mac and Linux are as unlikely to be unaffected by such?

    While it might be hard to purposely code exploits into Windows and Mac, if you were an insider plotting to take advantage of it some day and don't mind losing your job over it. Isn't it more possible to pull a fast one on Open Source, assuming you covered your tracks well enough the few would find it on first glance.

    I remember a mud client, early version of Tintin, IIRC, which would make all players shout "Snowy rules, OK" if a client saw some particular text. Not necessarily as bad as it could have been, someone could code the client to [remove all, drop all, flee] on a command if they had wanted. People only became aware of the stunt after the coder logged onto a mud and said "yo"

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    1. Re:Windows Only? by user24 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Already tried - a little while ago someone tried to slip a backdoor into the linux kernel.

      Fortunately, the backdoor was caught via exactly the kind of peer review that open source allows.

      see http://kerneltrap.org/node/1584

      with open source, it's easier to get trojaned code in, but harder for it to stay there. on the reverse, who knows what could be lurking in MS code? I quote:

      "A senior Microsoft Corp. executive told a federal court last week that sharing information with competitors could damage national security and even threaten the U.S. war effort in Afghanistan. He later acknowledged that some Microsoft code was so flawed it could not be safely disclosed."
      (http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,3959,5264,00.asp)

    2. Re:Windows Only? by AndroidCat · · Score: 4, Funny
      I remember a mud client, early version of Tintin, IIRC, which would make all players shout "Snowy rules, OK" if a client saw some particular text.

      Not unlike Slashdot where certain text will cause all readers to post "All your base", "Soviet Russia", "..only old people", "3. Profit!" comments.

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  6. And who is surprised by theCat · · Score: 5, Interesting

    There have been shadowy glimpses of this "other economy" for a while, in the bot army cottage industry and the various rackets where popular sites are threatened with black-out if they don't pay for "protection". But all that is just the warmup to the big show.

    Organized crime has found the internet, and they seem to like what they see. It's just like one huge, dark alley lined with endless smoke-filled lounges. Lots of seamy places to meet up. Anonimity if you want it. Under-the-table dealings. Faceless bosses and eager young turks with itchy trigger fingers.

    The perfect growth media for scum and parasites.

    --
    =^..^= all your rodent are belong to us
  7. The War Against Spam by Phroggy · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This is a huge issue that the general public is completely unaware of. Most people still believe that viruses are created as an annoying prank by kids with something to prove. This may be true in some cases, but most of the malware out there now is created for a very specific purpose: building a botnet that can be sold for cold hard cash to the highest bidder. Who's buying them? Spammers.

    It used to be that spammers would look for open relay servers in third-world countries, and let those servers do all the work of actually sending the messages. The server administrators either didn't care, or didn't know how to fix the problem, and the language barrier made things difficult. So, people started making blacklists of known open relays, and just refusing any mail that came from those IPs. Spammers would keep finding more open relays, and the blacklists grew.

    Eventually, mail servers started coming pre-configured not to allow relaying, and as servers were upgraded, spammers had to move on. Spammers started commissioning worms, paying people to write software that would infect Windows machines remotely over the Internet, and open up a backdoor for the spammers to access. Suddenly you've got hundreds of thousands of IP addresses responsible for sending spam, with many of them on dynamic IPs. There's no good way to blacklist them all, since they keep changing!

    Enter Windows XP Service Pack 2, with a software firewall enabled by default. As people upgrade, worms like Code Red and Nimda are no longer effective. So what's next? Spreading viruses through e-mail, IM, and the Web.

    So, look for improvements in antivirus software in the next couple of years, as the war against spam continues. Then look for the spammers to find a new way to get their crap into your inbox.

    --
    $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
    $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
    1. Re:The War Against Spam by drinkypoo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Enter Windows XP Service Pack 2, with a software firewall enabled by default. As people upgrade, worms like Code Red and Nimda are no longer effective. So what's next? Spreading viruses through e-mail, IM, and the Web.

      You left out something important: Outlook express would execute code by default, so email was kind of the de facto vector for virus propagation until they started closing down OE [somewhat] and that's when worms really took off.

      Before that, it was mostly viruses attached to programs. You'd attach a new virus to some really desirable warez and upload the stuff to a BBS. The BBS owner would run the software and the virus would attach itself to lots of other software, any time they repacked it for their chosen archive format...

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  8. DRM needed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Ironically, copies of the exploit were pirated by a group of Chinese hackers and sold on Ebay for pennies on the dollar...

  9. A "Do we report it" Story by OctoberSky · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This is one of those "Do we, the media, report it?" stories.
    This article is pretty meaningless as far as the bigger picture goes, and it probably could have gone unpublished in my mind and no one would have really cared. But it may do more damage than good by being published.
    This article shows, and maybe it's because I work with criminals all day (Public Defenders office), that writing malware pays. Before it was for notoriety or to prove you could or to piss people off, but now it can provide an income source and I think we will be seeing more of it from now on just because people are going to be trying to make a buck off of it.
    We live in a socitey where a Million-Dolllar-Homepage gets filled (it recently did), where the Gotti family has its own TV show and where Carrot top is a rich man. Our lust for money leads us down the less then friendly paths, and this article reports, once again... that crime does infact pay.

  10. Re:Actually... by tajmorton · · Score: 4, Informative
    --
    Tell the truth and you won't have so much to remember.
  11. unknown name? by AyeRoxor! · · Score: 4, Funny

    "[...] the vulnerability was detected by an unnamed person around Dec. 1, 2005."

    Ok, what are the chances that this person really has no name?!

    I'm going to have to call shenanigans on this whole article.

  12. Great seller! by saboola · · Score: 4, Funny

    Exploit works as advertised!!! Speedy email!! Would Buy From AGAIN!! A+++++++++++! :)

  13. Society back to the stone age? by mnmn · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I've seen powerouts but geez. Stone age? People in the Bronze age didnt require MS Windows did they?

    At best millions of people will be bugged and Linux and Apple vendors will have a hell of a time selling their OSes.

    --
    "Give orange me give eat orange me eat orange give me eat orange give me you." -Nim Chimpsky