Slashdot Mirror


Solar Energy Becoming More Pervasive

TheUploader writes "RenewableEnergyAccess is reporting that Solatec LLC has released a stick-on solar panel kit that charges your hybrid while parked. In related news, the world's largest photovoltaic system will be built, not on the roofs of Priuses, but on the ground of Nevada, and will provide clean energy for the US military."

72 of 484 comments (clear)

  1. How to market!? by JDSalinger · · Score: 5, Informative

    The Prius has an MSRP of $21,725. At 10% the cost of the car, the solar panel kit ($2,195) seems like a reasonable deal, considering it facilitates 10% better gas mileage. At 55 mpg, the gas cost to drive 200,000 miles (at $2.20/gallon) is $8,000. At 60 mpg, the gas cost to drive 200,000 miles (at $2.20/gallon) is $7,333. The difference is $666. Considering the kit costs over three times what the gas savings amount to, it is hard to market on account of good money-sense. The only consolation is the concept of helping mother nature. I have limited understanding of the fabrication process of the solar panels, so it would be hard to say whether or not mother nature profits from this scenario.

    1. Re:How to market!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And the Corolla has an MSRP of $14,105. At 40 mpg, it's gonna cost you $11,000 to get the same 200,000 miles out of it. Sure it's $3,000 more on gas, but you're coming out $7,620 ahead on the cost of the vehicle. Why buy a hybrid at all, then?

    2. Re:How to market!? by sonofagunn · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Now factor in rising gas prices and resale value...

    3. Re:How to market!? by The+Fun+Guy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That assumption of 200,000 miles is over the entire life of the car, right? At 20K/yr, this is roughly ten years. Will the photovoltaic panel continue to provide energy at the same efficiency over 10 years? Doubtful. Solar panels degrade in efficiency over time, maybe by as much as 10% per year.

      In the first year, that $2200 kit will save you a whopping $66, assuming that the manufacturer's claims are accurate. You would do better to put that $2200 in a savings account earning 3% and use the interest ($66) to pay for the extra gasoline. Repeat that for 10 years and you'll be no worse off from the amount of money you spent on gas, plus you'll have $2200 in the bank instead of a 10-year old photovoltaic rig.

      --
      The man who does not read good books has no advantage over the man who cannot read them. - Mark Twain
    4. Re:How to market!? by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Yeah...but, it looks like CRAP. Can't they make these 'green' cars look nice and sporty?

      They hit the economy car segment first, because that is where is is marketable as a gas saving feature. For sports cars, however, you'll be seeing hybrids very soon from a number of different manufacturers and they will be very, very fast to accelerate off the line, given the benefits of stable power at the low end of the spectrum. Toyota and Mitsubishi's concept demos this year seemed particularly nice.

    5. Re:How to market!? by iezhy · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yeah...but, it looks like CRAP. Can't they make these 'green' cars look nice and sporty?

      check out this one before you say that again..

    6. Re:How to market!? by CastrTroy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Why are people even buying cars in the first place? If you city has good public transit, you could take the bus back and forth to work each day, and rent a car for the weekends for less then the price of owning a car. $15 a day to rent a car, plus $15 a day for insurance, that's $30 a day, times 8 days for weekends in a month, and you at $240 a month. That covers insurance, and your car. You'd never have to pay for repairs, and you'd never have to worry about your car breaking down. You probably don't even need a car every weekend, so your costs go down. If you just rented a car every time you really needed to use a car, you'd probably spend a lot less. I realize that some people need to commute long distances to get to work, but there's plenty of people who don't. If you don't need your car to get back and forth to work every day, you probably don't need a car at all.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    7. Re:How to market!? by afidel · · Score: 2, Informative

      Toyota has designed the battery pack of the Prius to be totally recyclable. Also the battery pack is covered under warrenty for 8 years 100,000 miles

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    8. Re:How to market!? by soft_guy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Why are people even buying cars in the first place? If you city has good public transit, you could take the bus back and forth to work each day, and rent a car for the weekends for less then the price of owning a car.

      Many people do not live in such a city. Also, even if you live in a place with public transit, it is unlikely that it will go where you want to go when you need to get there. One place I lived had "public transit" (bus), but I had to drive a mile to get to the nearest bus stop. Even then, it took me about 3X longer to get to work than if I had driven my car. The only reason I didn't drive to work was the parking cost was too high where I worked.

      Then I moved to another place where I could take a different kind of public transit to work - ferry boat. I could walk from the boat to work, but on the other side of the water I had to drive 30 minutes to get to the boat. No bus was available and even if it had been it would have been too inconvienient.

      In my experience public transit works only in a few cities and for a few people in those cities. Plus, public transit is as expensive as a car (or more), very dirty, very crowded, and very likely to screw you and leave you stranded. If you are 30 seconds late, you are screwed. Oh, I can't get to work today because there is a strike. Or a bomb threat. Or a holiday. Oops, we changed our schedule from the fall schedule to the summer schedule today and now you cant' get home. Your fault for not reading some fine print.

      Bah! I will never vote for public transit and I avoid it when I can (which is most of the time.)

      --
      Avoid Missing Ball for High Score
    9. Re:How to market!? by taniwha · · Score: 4, Informative

      can't agree more - my prius will drag just about anyone from a standing start, especially on a hill - it's that high torque electric motor that does it - instant power you just don't get from an gas engine without trashing your clutch

    10. Re:How to market!? by cayenne8 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      "But your bit about performance is bunk. The Honda Accord hybrid is one of the fastest sedans out there."

      Well....what exactly is the 0-60 mph of the Honda Accord? That's what I'm interested in. I don't want 'sedan' performance numbers. I want something that can hit 60 in about 5 sec or less...preferrably less. What I'm wanting...is a 'green' version of the Z06 Vette or a Viper. Something that looks amazingly good, and has true performance.

      I'd go green in a heartbeat if they could do that.

      It isn't being superficial...it is getting what I want. Life is way too short not to do and get what you want to make your life happy.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    11. Re:How to market!? by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You're wrong about the economy marketing. Hybrids tend to be expensive, government handouts notwithstandings.

      Perhaps you're not understanding the difference between "marketing a hybrid engine as a economy feature" and "a hybrid engine being an economy feature." In any case I know four people with hybrid cars. They all drive to work in a medium sized town (public transit is workable for some here, but not all). Three of them are computer geeks and one is a young, idealistic, hippy type. Two of the former who explained their purchase said that the subsidy from the feds and the state combined with their opinion that oil prices were on the rise made it a reasonable financial decision. Also they liked the added range in a state with long empty stretches of highway.

      who are too misinformed and ignorant1 to realize a hybrid does nothing for mother nature, unless you drive it in the city.

      Hybrids get greatly increased mileage for the first dozen miles of so, no matter what the driving environment. You can argue about the energy that went into production versus the gas saved or something, but to characterize anyone who buys one as "misinformed and ignorant1[sic]" is pompous in the extreme.

    12. Re:How to market!? by wattersa · · Score: 5, Interesting

      > Why are people even buying cars in the first place? If you city has good public transit, you could take the bus back and forth to work each day, and rent a car for the weekends for less then the price of owning a car. $15 a day to rent a car, plus $15 a day for insurance, that's $30 a day, times 8 days for weekends in a month, and you at $240 a month.

      I'll answer the economic question first and the philosophical question second. I live in San Francisco near SF State, my job is 12 miles away on the Peninsula, and my commute options are:
      *Driving*
      Ford Crown Victoria LX: $15488 in August 2000, pre-owned with 23,000 miles.
      4.6L V-8, 200 horsepower, 17/25 mpg (22 overall). 88,000 miles driven in 5.5 years = 16,000 miles/year. Gas costs at $2 per gallon avg over last 5.5 years = $1500 per year = $4 per day.
      Insurance: $68 per month with all my discounts = $2.27 per day.
      Maintenance: 3 oil changes per year at $60 at Jiffy Lube plus misc. maintenance averaging $300 per year = $480/yr = $1.30 per day.

      Total consumables cost per day of car use for ownership: $7.57 per day, assuming equal use on all days of the year (long trips on weekends make up for non-use, etc).
      Depreciation: car now worth $4500 = $11,000 depreciation over 5.5 years = $2000/yr = $5.50 per day.

      Total cost for car ownership, daily use for commuting and pleasure, etc etc: $13.07 per day.
      Time spent commuting: ~35 minutes per day for a 24 mile round trip. My car is in my apartment garage so I walk directly to it, drive to the office garage, and walk into the office.

      The question is whether public transit costs more than that amount per day.
      *Public Transit*
      Bus to Daly City BART station: $1.50, 10 minute walk away, ~5 minutes spent waiting for the bus. 5 minute ride to BART.
      $1.75 for BART ticket. 5-10 minutes spent waiting for train.
      20 minute train ride to Millbrae.
      Transfer to Caltrain, $1.50 ticket.
      10 minute train ride.
      Walk 5 minutes to office in downtown San Mateo.
      One-way cost: $4.75
      Time spent: 62 minutes.
      Double it for daily total: $9.50, 120 minutes avg.
      Assume use is halved on weekends for recreation, $4.75 and 60 minutes.

      Car: $4770 per year = $13.07 per day avg.
      Public transit: $2825 per year = $7.70 per day avg.

      Car: 35 minutes per day transit time
      Public transit: 98 minutes per day
      The question now is whether the time difference makes up for the higher cost of ownership. During the week I make $45 per hour. I save over an hour per day by driving. So I can work more per day and still have the same amount of leisure time as if I worked less and took public transit. If I work the full extra hour, I make an extra $39.63 per day by driving!

      Now the philosophical argument.

      For people under time pressure, public transit is the worst. You end up wasting a lot of time waiting around, getting tickets, waiting in line, waiting in the terminal, walking between trains, climbing stairs, and the like. Then you have the often neglected and graffittied vehicles filled with somber, depressed people. Not to mention panhandlers, drug addicts, and blabbermouths on their cell phones trying to catch up on work and not getting much done. I would rather work (and get paid for it) than spend time sitting in a train waiting to arrive at the next station. In my car I have the ultimate freedom in transport: I'm reverse commuting, which means no rush hour traffic and no waiting, I have my iPod hooked up and I can replay the same song 100 times in a row if I want, and I can take a beautiful leisurely drive on highway 280 south, "the world's most beautiful freeway," and luxuriate in the knowledge that if nothing else, I made it in life to the extent that I can afford to drive to work until gasoline reaches about $18 per gallon because I use less than two gallons per day and made that extra $39. Driving makes absolute sense to me, especially as cars get more efficient. Add to that the freedom of being able to go wherever I want at any

    13. Re:How to market!? by drinkypoo · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Actually, the problem is that you don't get instant torque from a gasoline engine. Electric motors make peak torque at 0 RPM. However, my car has only 155bhp and 155ft-lb stock, and I have nothing more than intake/exhaust for performance, and I will roast your little bimbo box hybrid off the line, because I have a hard suspension (no squat) and a close-ratio transmission. Trust me, I've done it before :P (And for all those others out there reading this, no, I don't think it was an impressive feat.)

      And uh, clutches were meant to be trashed :)

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    14. Re:How to market!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative
      A quick search will tell you the Accord hybrid does 0-to-60 in about 6.7 seconds. Very respectable IMO. It's not going to beat a Viper, but then again this technology wasn't originally intended as a performance boost. You don't see sedans running in Le Mans very often, do you?

      It isn't being superficial...it is getting what I want.

      I'm sorry, but what you want is superficial since one of your main concerns is what the car looks like. That's the definition of superficial, being primarily concerned with the 'surface' aspect of the car. You can fairly argue that being superficial isn't bad, but it's false to say "I want a pretty car but I'm not superficial".

    15. Re:How to market!? by Valdrax · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It isn't being superficial...it is getting what I want. Life is way too short not to do and get what you want to make your life happy.

      That sums up everything that is wrong about modern consumer society in two sentences.

      --
      If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
    16. Re:How to market!? by CastrTroy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So, obviously, none of your transit system offer monthly passes. At 9.50 a day, that's $285 a month. I don't know of any public transit system that charges that high of a rate for a monthly pass. It's usually under $100 for most transit systems. A quick look at the BART website shows that you can get deals if you don't buy your tickets one at a time. Plus it's a little more convenient to not have to buy a ticket every time you need one. Also, your 36 minutes in the car that you are driving is 36 minutes in which you can do nothing but drive. If you spend 98 minutes on the bus/train each day, then there's other things you can be doing with your time that you spend commuting. You could even to work, and see if you can bill for the time since you are actually working. Does it really matter that you aren't physically in your office. Plus according to the AAA, driving a car on average costs between $5500-$7000 a year. So maybe you're on the lower end of the average, but I don't think your numbers are that accurate.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    17. Re:How to market!? by CastrTroy · · Score: 2, Informative

      Ottawa has a transit way which is a road that only the buses can use. It's amazing. Really helps to speed things up. I think the major reason people have such a bad view of buses is because they all stick them on the same roads as the cars, making them slow. When they give the busses their own roads, kind of like the trains having their own tracks, things can move quite quickly.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    18. Re:How to market!? by bobcat7677 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      That figure of "0 battery packs replaced in prius ever" is misleading. Toyota is quick to make this claim...but it's based on some tricky definitioning. I have seen several accounts in different forums of people getting their battery packs replaced in the prius under warranty. Toyota claims that no batteries have been replaced for being "worn out". The way they get away with this is by labelling all the batteries they have to replace as "defective" instead of "worn out". I find it difficult to believe though that someone could have their car a year and put 70 - 100,000 miles on their car before deiscovering that their battery pack is "defective". Linakage: http://www.hybridcars.com/discussion/discussthread .php?thread_id=254&replies=9

    19. Re:How to market!? by drinkypoo · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I've even heard that there will be a new Nissan Skyline hybrid. Supposedly, the weight of the batteries and motors isn't hugely higher than the weight of the AWD system that it's replacing. The new car would likely have electric drive in front and conventional drive in the rear. But then, there's more Skyline rumors than Apple rumors...

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    20. Re:How to market!? by Synn · · Score: 2, Informative

      Why are people even buying cars in the first place? If you city has good public transit, you could take the bus back and forth to work each day, and rent a car for the weekends for less then the price of owning a car.

      Because almost every city in the US doesn't have a good public transit system. Owning a car is expensive, 100-200 a month in insurance, 300-400 a month in payments and worse health. But people pay that because they have little other choice.

      In most cities in America the public transit system is barely surviving and is typically bailed out by the local city so people who can't afford cars have transportation at all. Bus schedules for those cities typically suck as they're trying to save as much money as possible. When I was without a car in Fort Wayne Indiana, taking the bus would turn what was normally a 20 min car trip into an hour plus bus ride. And that doesn't include the time spent waiting on the bus in freezing cold weather.

    21. Re:How to market!? by thc69 · · Score: 2, Funny
      I guess it depends on your point of view...
      You pulled out your wallet, and bought a big inneficient engine, and you pull it out and pay too much for gas.
      That's funny, because I was thinking: "Hmm...155bhp and 155ft-lb...Wow, he outran something with that puny tin can?"

      I, of course, drive an "I don't give a flying fuck about you"-mobile, because I in fact DO need to move heavy loads long distances almost every day, for my job. Of course, as a result, I've gotten so used to my elbows and knees not rattling against the plastic of the claustrophobic cockpit of a compact car, that I'll never drive anything without a bench seat again, which pretty much limits me to pickups and full size SUVs, or maybe an occasional Buick...

      Anyway, when not encumbered by my 6000 pound trailer, my "fuck you and the environment, I'm a redneck and proud of it"-mobile would probably drive circles around the "155bhp and 155ft-lb"-tincan, the "Will Somebody Please Think Of The Children"-Prius, and whatever you drive. Of course, if it failed to steer in those circles (if I was interested in handling, I'd have gotten the Toyota, but the GMC is much more comfortable and handles heavier loads), then my "you're gonna die in an accident with me"-mobile will either run over your car or shear off the roof (and your head).

      This "you're all gonna hate me now"-comment was brought to you by "I sure hope Biodiesel gets mass produced and distributed so I can buy a diesel truck next time and not have to worry about supporting the terrorists"-guy.
      --
      Procrastination -- because good things come to those who wait.
    22. Re:How to market!? by God'sDuck · · Score: 2, Funny
      "Surround the electric motors in a feedback loop based on the radar/visual/whatever range to the car in front of you....Kick your feet up and relax as your car automatically paces the car in front of you. The acceleration and "braking" would be so gentle you would barely feel it."

      Geez....THAT would totally suck the fun out of driving....

      not when you hack the firmware to follow little old ladies at a distance of 0.1 inches...
  2. Economics working as usual. by CyricZ · · Score: 2, Insightful

    So often we hear fuss about our petrol supply running out. Sure, perhaps someday it will. But like usual, basic economics will take care of the situtation for us. When one energy source becomes increasingly scarce, it will become more expensive. Thus other technologies, such as windmills and solar panels, will become relatively cheaper. And thus people and businesses will switch towards them, as in this case. Anyone with any economics background would have known that decades ago.

    --
    Cyric Zndovzny at your service.
    1. Re:Economics working as usual. by gebbeth · · Score: 5, Insightful
      So often we hear fuss about our petrol supply running out. Sure, perhaps someday it will. But like usual, basic economics will take care of the situtation for us. When one energy source becomes increasingly scarce, it will become more expensive.

      Thats all well and good if all you use oil for is fuel. We use oil heavily in the production of all sorts of products, including plastics and a whole plethora of petrochemicals. We should curtail our oil user as a fuel now so that we can continue to use oil for its other users without having to pay 5 times the current price for a plastic toothbrush.

      --
      A closed mouth gathers no foot.
    2. Re:Economics working as usual. by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 2, Interesting

      So we make wooden toothbrushes. :) And make more things from wood. It's an excuse to plant more trees, wood looks and feels nicer and it biodegrades a tad better than plastic. Can also make common things like that from ceramics and other materials. Heck, I *hate* plastic bathroom/kitchen stuff. Wood, ceramic or glass for me, please.

    3. Re:Economics working as usual. by Russ+Nelson · · Score: 2, Insightful

      To an extent you are correct, but it is only because people are not content to let free markets work. Because no one is in control, people think that markets are not under control. So they start to coerce market participants, with the idea that they know better than them.

      Free market planning is called "speculation". If you ask people if speculation is a good thing, they'll invariably say that it's bad. That's because speculation and politics are at odds with each other for controllling society. Politicians get the upper hand in this conflict because they can claim to be working for "the people" while speculators are in it for the money. Politicians appeal to people's ignorance and emotions. So, yeah, it's not that free markets don't work, it's that people won't let them work.
      -russ

      --
      Don't piss off The Angry Economist
  3. Solar Energy Becoming More Pervasive... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Since we got rid of that evil Mr. Burns and his sun blocker. Not to mention all that incessant hooting.

  4. I thought that... by TubeSteak · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I thought that there are other more efficient ways to harness solar energy.

    Like polishing up a bunch of mirrors and focusing them on a source of water. You boil the water, steam spins a turbine and you get electricity.

    Do solar panels really give us the most bang for the buck?

    --
    [Fuck Beta]
    o0t!
    1. Re:I thought that... by sonofagunn · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yeah, that would fit on the roof of a Prius.

    2. Re:I thought that... by 0xABADC0DA · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Indeed. Back when (for perspective) I calculated the Iraq War as being worth about 105 replacement world trade towers, adjusted for inflation, I also calculated the investment in terms of solar energy. Using existing solar boiler technology (in use in smallish generator arrays) it came to about 5% of our totaly energy use per year of all sources of energy, coal + solar + nuclear + oil.

      In short, by now we have doubled the spending that was based on and we could have had upwards of 10% of our energy from green solar power. Of course there are problems such as solar not being available at night or in bad weather, and taking a lot of space in the desert, and transmitting the power. Of course you can store power during the day at some loss and the largest power demand is during the day for air conditioning. I didn't calculate the space it would take however, but there's a *lot* of desert in the southwest that gets a *lot* of sun.

      But anyway these objections are largely missing the point that we've been screwed by the retards in office who are openly hostile towards science. $400 billion buys a lot of solar plant, or a lot of solar cell research, or a lot of wind turbines, etc. Instead we have jack to show for it.

    3. Re:I thought that... by randomErr · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I believe you are correct in that solar towers are more efficient. But I think the reason the military is using solar panels is three fold.

      First, in the event of an attack it would be drop a set of solar panels into a bunker then drop a tower with steaming hot water down into silo.

      Second, a series of panels produce a lot less heater. Without a central source of heat, heat seekers would have trouble locking onto target.

      Third the panels would stretch out over miles and work independent of each other. If an attack would happen on one section of solar nodes, the other sections would still keep working.

      --
      You say things that offend me and I can deal with it. Can you?
  5. Let's triple the petrol cost. by CyricZ · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Let's triple or quadruple the cost of petrol, for instance, perhaps due to a stagnant American economy or an American attack on Iran. Now you may just see some benefits to such a system. Of course, if the prices rise quickly on such an essential commodity, things might change relatively fast. You may not have a job to drive to, for instance.

    --
    Cyric Zndovzny at your service.
    1. Re:Let's triple the petrol cost. by Alex+P+Keaton+in+da · · Score: 2

      Har- what about good old love of the planet. I am by no means stereotypical environmentalist, but even when i lived in an apartment where the heat was included in the resnt, I still turned down the heat while I was gone for the day and while I slept. (Although that cost me nothing in terms of $$$)
      Recycling is an effort where I live, but I do it anyway.

      --
      And All I Ask is a Tall Ship And a Star to Steer Her By
    2. Re:Let's triple the petrol cost. by Rei · · Score: 3, Informative

      A good polyurethane substitute can be produced from soy. Most plastics, lubricants, hydraulic fluids, artificial rubbers, and the host of other petroleum products critical to modern society don't have very good biosubstitutes.

      However, if power becomes cheap, that's not a problem. Hydrogen + CO + pressure and heat produces a mixture of various hydrocarbons; that's how the Nazis produced oil late in WWII.

      --
      It's time for Operation Crazy Plan.
    3. Re:Let's triple the petrol cost. by kfg · · Score: 2, Insightful

      . . .if the prices rise quickly on such an essential commodity, things might change relatively fast.

      Like, because the production of solar cells is inherently energy intensive their cost is going to rise proportionate the rise in oil prices.

      The essential problem is that it's always going to be easier and cheaper in the short run to use stored energy than it is to live on a budget of incoming energy.

      KFG

    4. Re:Let's triple the petrol cost. by shmlco · · Score: 2, Interesting

      To quote, "ExxonMobil announced $36 billion in profits -- in profits -- last year. That's three billion dollars every month, which if ExxonMobil were a country would make it the 90th richest country in the world. This astronomical number is a 42-percent increase from last year's record-breaking profits. Chevron also bested its record profits for the second year in a row, raking in $27.4 billion in 2005. This is, once again, the company's highest profits in its 126-year history."

      --
      Any sect, cult, or religion will legislate its creed into law if it acquires the political power to do so.
  6. will they stay stuck? by DeveloperAdvantage · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I suppose at 0.6mm thick and with "aircraft grade adhesive" they must stick very well, but I still can't shake the image of these going flying off while driving on the expressway. Certainly a step in the right direction though.

    --
    FREE - Java, J2EE and Ajax Audiobooks for Software Developers - www.DeveloperAdvantage.com
  7. Re:Hybrids/Electic purity by CyricZ · · Score: 4, Funny

    It's widely known that those men want want loud and/or fast cars are often the men with the smallest penises.

    It is also widely known that compared to other men, American men have by far the smallest penises in the world. They try to make up for their genital deficit by driving the biggest, nosiest vehicles they can debt themselves into.

    Frankly, I'm glad I'm European, and I ride a bicycle. The only problem I run into is keeping my cock from getting tangled in the bike chain.

    --
    Cyric Zndovzny at your service.
  8. What about Stirling Engines? by AK+Marc · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I thought http://www.stirlingenergy.com/ was a better solution

    1. Re:What about Stirling Engines? by stefanlasiewski · · Score: 3, Informative

      I spoke to one of the engineers a few years ago. They clean it exactly as you would expect: with some light detergent and a hose. No rubbing-- scraches the mirrors and requires more effort then a simple hosing down.

      In one test, they attached little sprayers (I think they were using the sprayers from a drip irrigation system) to the panels to spray it down every morning. Worked pretty well.

      --
      "Can of worms? The can is open... the worms are everywhere."
    2. Re:What about Stirling Engines? by Chagrin · · Score: 2, Interesting

      My main complaint with Sterling engine power generation is that it still relies on the same "buy your power from the power company" principle as it's only more economical than PV at large scales.

      Clean energy is one half of the equation; power independence is the other. If every house's roof could be occupied with a Sterling generation system as easily as a PV system I'd be all for it.

      --

      I/O Error G-17: Aborting Installation

  9. Facts don't see to match hype. by pdawson · · Score: 5, Informative

    Sadly, based on my understanding of the product described in the article, I don't see any way it can achieve any real MPG improvement. It only charges the small accessory 12V battery used for starting the car and running the power accessories(AC, steering, radio, etc). It provides no juice to the 28 200V main battery bank modules that power the engine.

    1. Re:Facts don't see to match hype. by pdawson · · Score: 3, Interesting

      It's called "conservation of energy". The energy in that 12V battery has to come from somewhere. If it comes from solar panels instead of from gasoline, you're using less gasoline. Period.


      Yes, but even if it eliminated the need to charge the single 12V battery at all, that does not account for 10% of the car's energy usage, 1-3% perhaps, as compared to the 28x 200V NiMh modules.
  10. Re:Not my kind of option... by Adult+film+producer · · Score: 3, Interesting

    You need something like this then... although it's not really suited for anything other than hotdogs. http://sci-toys.com/scitoys/scitoys/light/solar_ho tdog_cooker.html

    There are plenty of designs available for nice solar ovens & fryers.. anything collapsible is usually a little more work, but worth the effort.

  11. Such restraint will happen automatically. by CyricZ · · Score: 2, Insightful

    But such curtailing will happen automatically. As oil becomes more scarce, the price will rise. And thus will rise the prices of products which require oil for their production. So the price of plastics will rise, for instance. People will begin to choose relatively cheaper alternatives. So your toothbrush will likely cost a dollar. But it may consist of a wooden handle, rather than a plastic one.

    --
    Cyric Zndovzny at your service.
  12. Make it a nice even $2500 by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    And include some extra Li-Ion battery capacity and a plug-in bridge rectifier so that it's solar-and-grid-and-gas, and this would be *really* interesting for a dealership add-on. I'm willing to bet you could push it to nearly 25% increase in efficiency.

    --
    SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
  13. It depends on your output by PIPBoy3000 · · Score: 2, Informative

    If you're looking to heat water, the focused mirrors on pipe approach works fairly well (or just paint something black and move pipe water through it). Essentially you're just using various tricks to store heat produced from sunlight in a fairly efficient manner.

    If you're looking at powering televisions and radios, though, you need to have electricity. Photovoltaics generally work best for that. Turning heated water into electricity does work, though at a lower efficiency.

    There's other issues, of course. Just because photovoltaics are more efficient doesn't make them cheaper. There's the long-term costs and how much investment you're willing to make in order to get your cost savings.

  14. But you're not getting the full picture. by CyricZ · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Yes, a particular product today may require oil. But as the price of oil increases due to increased scarcity, manufacturers will instead switch to relatively cheaper non-oil alternatives. So often times you'll end up getting the same products, but they'll be made of a different, cheaper material.

    It's happened with coins, for instance. While certain coins one contained large amounts of copper, they now are made mostly of zinc with a thin coating of copper.

    Remember, plastic is only used so often today because it is so cheap. Once the price of plastic rises, people will switch to other materials which are relatively cheaper.

    I lived a good portion of my life before plastic became widespread. We used glass bottles instead of plastic bottles for many drinks, for instance. Somebody who grew up only using plastic might have a difficult time accepting the idea of not using plastic products. But it's more than possible, and was reality even just a few decades ago.

    --
    Cyric Zndovzny at your service.
    1. Re:But you're not getting the full picture. by Ced_Ex · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I lived a good portion of my life before plastic became widespread. We used glass bottles instead of plastic bottles for many drinks, for instance. Somebody who grew up only using plastic might have a difficult time accepting the idea of not using plastic products. But it's more than possible, and was reality even just a few decades ago.

      However, you may want to consider the energy required to produce/recycle glass? Heating of the sand to produce glass requires enormous amounts of heat, much of which is likely produced through burning of oil or gas.

      The steel caps used must be made from processed iron ore.

      Oil touches every aspect of your life, and if oil prices go up 3 times, so do the prices of everything else.

      --
      Live forever, or die trying.
  15. Good Looking Hybrids by nroose · · Score: 2, Interesting
  16. In Pacific NW, Solar is very useful by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Here, we get about 70-80 percent of the electricity from a solar cell on a grey and cloudy day - yeah, it rains a lot here - but many people have hybrid cars. Way more than most other places.

    So, while the hybrid car is sitting in the carpool lot, a rooftop solar panel can charge up the battery - or maybe carpool lots could provide these as plug-ins - while your car is washed clean by the soothing misty rains that drive you insane. Saves on gas cost - especially with the new plug-or-pump electric hybrids that let you plug in if you want to or just use gasoline/biodiesel.

    Or you can use cheap hydro or wind power (3/4 of our energy supply) to plug in and do the same thing.

    It's not like your car was doing anything - it might as well charge up while it's taking up valuable real estate.

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  17. Go VW! by RingDev · · Score: 2, Informative

    Side note, we get less then 20% of our oil from the middle east, if they drop out completely we would just push harder on Venezuala.

    On the other hand, if you buy a brand new VW Gold tdi (turbo diesel) for about the same cost (nicely loaded just under $22k) you get 45mpg (realistic estimate, not inflated EPA). So your fuel costs are similar to the of the Pirus but you have a car with significantly more power and pep. You also have a vehicle that can be feed 100% biodiesel and run with out a drop of petrol. And given the ruggedness of Diesel engines and the VW quality, you have a car that will continue to get 45mpg for 200,000. Compared to the Prius which is going to need new batteries every 3-5 years.

    -Rick

    --
    "Most people in the U.S. wouldn't know they live in a tyrannical state if it walked up and grabbed their junk." - MyFirs
    1. Re:Go VW! by RingDev · · Score: 3, Informative

      "Significantly, particulate emissions have been reduced by over 90 percent in the past 15 years." - http://www.greencar.com/index.cfm?content=features 13

      "The TDI is certified to the tough minimum Tier 1 requirement - this is the stringent California standard for what is permitted from a car's tailpipe. The TDI could have been certified to even stricter requirements if not for NOX and particulate emissions, which are naturally higher in diesel engines because of their exceptional combustion efficiencies.

      Volkswagen is confident these NOX levels can be lowered using new technology if the sulfur level in our nation's diesel fuel was reduced. For this very reason, Volkswagen and the other members of the Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers have advocated lower federal sulfur content standards in both diesel and gasoline fuels." - http://tedshelton.blogspot.com/2005/11/good-custom er-service-from-vw.html

      There's plenty more out on the web. the TDI with current US petrol diesel will have a higher particulate rate per gallon spent, but a lower rate per mile due to their improved efficiency.

      -Rick

      --
      "Most people in the U.S. wouldn't know they live in a tyrannical state if it walked up and grabbed their junk." - MyFirs
    2. Re:Go VW! by syphax · · Score: 2

      From the article:

      However, those who follow the latest advances in clean diesel technology know that diesel's future is cleaner, and better. Still, impressions of old are difficult to overcome.

      Apparently so. Thanks for the scoop.

      --
      Simple Unexpected Concrete Credible Emotional Stories
    3. Re:Go VW! by RingDev · · Score: 2, Informative

      My bust. I was incorrect, prius batteries are better protected then I had been originally told.

      As for diesel exhaust, check for yourself, modern diesels (VW TDI) are 50 state legal, including California's Tier 1. And running biodiesel drops the emissions even more. In any case emissions per mile are lower across the board then gasoline engines.

      -Rick

      --
      "Most people in the U.S. wouldn't know they live in a tyrannical state if it walked up and grabbed their junk." - MyFirs
    4. Re:Go VW! by HaggiZ · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Back to the source of the oil. Iran is the second largest OPEC nation, an organisation which controls almost 40% of global oil production. Even by your own figures, I think a sudden loss of one fifth of your oil supply would have a drastic affect on the price of oil. Don't forget the US is not the only country burning oil at a terrible rate, many other countries are going to be bidding for that Venezualan oil if/when the middle east decide they don't want to deliver to anyone in the "coalition of the willing".

      The slightest hiccup in oil production over the past 12 months (hurricanes, strikes, fires, threats of civil unrest, military coups, etc.) have regularly resulted in +10% movements in price. I can only imagine what would happen to prices if 20% of production just suddenly turned off, and really turned off not just speculation on what might occur.

  18. Slashdotted! by Frazbin · · Score: 5, Funny

    Looks like a CLOUD passed over their SERVER FARM!

    Ha! Ha ha! Ha! Ha, ha ha! Ha ha, ha, ha!

    Ah, renewable energy! Endless mirth!

  19. Slashdotted! Link to cached copy by jonathankpa · · Score: 2, Informative

    Got this message on trying to view the article:

    "Hi folks, sorry for this message. Slashdot has just picked up a story (that we ran two months ago!) and the resulting traffic has driven our server to it's knees. We'll be back on line when things settle out, so please stand by.
    We're experiencing technical difficulties, please bear with us while we work to resolve them.
    Please bookmark RenewableEnergyAccess.com for future reference.
    Thank you for your patience."

    Therefore, here's a cached copy from Google:
    http://tinyurl.com/7amp7

    --
    I Thess. 5:16-18. "Elephants are the only mammal not known to jump."
  20. Re:Golf ball-sized hail? by Fishstick · · Score: 2, Informative

    Don't know about the cells being used on this particular car-top application, but in general modern solar cells are built to resist wind and hail damage.

    for example:
    http://www.gepower.com/prod_serv/products/solar/en /faqs/resid_sys.htm#faq23
    Can the modules withstand high winds and hail?

    The panels are supported by our roofer-designed mounting system that has been tested to withstand 125 mph (200 kph) winds and can work on almost every type of roofing material. Our modules can withstand one inch (2.5 cm) hailstones at 50 mph (80.5 kph).


    Of course, if your car is already doing 50 mph....

    --

    There is much cruelty in the universe, John.
    Yeah, we seem to have the tour map.

  21. Just good sense by Brunellus · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Any system that simplifies or minimizes the logistical load on any military installation or deployment is good for the military. For them, the issue isn't so much the absolute cost, but the availability of electric power when they might need it. Might not have been trivial in an age where field telephones could be energized by hand cranks...but considering the amount of information technology that goes to war with a post-modern army, it's not a bad thing for the guys in uniform to be investigating. If photovoltaics mean that installations in the field will not need as many gallons of diesel fuel to run generators, that diesel can be put to better use ferrying other needed supplies, or evacuating casualties.

  22. Re:Hybrids/Electic purity by jd142 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Who wants a silent car? We want a car with a soundtrack to be noticed by.

    I want a silent car. I don't want or need to be noticed by everyone, just as long as I'm not literally invisible so they run in to me. ;)

    I feel no need to impress people on the street with the sound of my car's motor. Don't care what they think.

  23. Hydrogen Farming by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 3, Interesting
    I think it would make more sense to put solar cells out in the desert (there's lots of square miles of desert) near water and existing natural gas pipelines. Use the sunlight to make hydrogen, oxygen, and heavy water. Ship the hydrogen through the natural gas system (yes you can do this) as a substitute for natural gas. Take the oxygen away in tanker trucks for industrial use, and sell the heavy water to the government. There is no pollution, demand peaks, or major changes necessary to make use of this resource.

    Then pay me my commission on this idea that I never hear talked about otherwise in any serious manner.

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
  24. Re:Solar Energy != Free Energy by pclminion · · Score: 2, Informative
    But there is also the issue of solar energy heating our atmosphere and the ground.

    Unless you're storing vast amounts of energy in the largest batteries known to mankind, any energy captured by solar cells is going to quickly turn back into heat again anyway. May I remind you that that is exactly what would have happened had we not captured that energy in the first place.

    Now, if you covered a large portion of the planet with solar cells, and used that power to run a giant laser which blasted that energy off into space, never to return, then you might run into some problems. But we don't use energy like that.

  25. Re:Solar Energy != Free Energy by mikael · · Score: 2, Informative

    Read up on the "urban heat sink effect" of large cities. For every 1 mile radius of city, the core temperature rises up by 1 degree centigrade. So the core temperature for a large city can actually be 10 degrees higher than in the suburbs. And urban development causes rainwater to run off 10 times faster than if it were being soaked up by natural vegetation. This has the effect of disrupting local weather patterns to the extent that a city can actually created a rainfall shadow; an area downwind of the central core which has an artificially higher rainfall (which might not be too bad unless it's acid rain). NASA have more details.

    The effect of solar panels is negligible compared to what we have already done.

    --
    Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
  26. Put solar on your house, not the car by protonbishop · · Score: 4, Interesting
    disclaimer: that's what I do(I have a electric car, so I plug it in at night).

    Putting solar cells on your car is dumb:

    1. deal with aerodynamics (not a problem with my house)
    2. can't orient cells correctly (hard enough finding a close parking space, now you have to have one in the sun, with a WSW tilt (for us northern hemispherians)
    3. ANY SHADE across solar panels, even a tree branch, dramatically decreases its efficiency (like having one dead battery in your flashlight: the whole thing fails).
    4. size matters... 1kW system is about 120 square feet -- that's just not going to power much of a car. Consider 400wh to power car one mile & assume you get 5 equivalent hours/day parking & 30 square foot car top. That's enough power to drive 4 miles when the sun shines.

    Having PV grid-tied, means you feed electricity onto the grid at typically peak usage times, then recharge your car at night at off peak rates.

  27. Re:Go VW! Diesel is more! by drinkypoo · · Score: 2, Informative

    A Prius' real-world mileage is less than a Golf or Jetta TDI, so it's about a wash.

    Meanwhile, the Prius doesn't run on any alternative fuels, while the TDI will (with some degree of modification, NOT including engine internals) run on vegetable oil. Veggie oil kits will run you $650 to abotu $1200 depending on what kind you get. The higher-dollar kind is a single-tank conversion (from Elsbett) that lets you put diesel, kerosene, veggie oil, whatever into the same tank. I'm planning to get it for my Mercedes 300SD.

    Assuming we're not going to cut down our vehicle use, there is only one rational answer to propelling them, assuming current technology: Build a bunch of hydroponic algae farms for the production of biodiesel. The leftovers can be used for fertilizer, and meanwhile the algae will be producing oxygen that we need desperately given that we're destroying oceanic life at unprecedented rates and oceanic algae is the source of the vast majority of our oxygen.

    Hybrids won't help here, and the total energy cost of the hybrid is probably a LOT higher than a TDI, given the batteries and electrical system.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  28. Quite a bit... by DerekLyons · · Score: 2, Funny

    So solar power goes from providing 1x10-1000000000 of our power supply to providing 1.1x10-1000000000, that's a *lot* more prevalent - yes!

  29. If I put solar on my house will it burn up my car? by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 2, Interesting

    But, do you park your car at home? Most people park at work.

    The best thing to do, IMHO, is to:

    1. get a plug-able biodiesel hybrid car. (most hybrids don't plug in)
    2. drive to the nearest park and ride or carpool to work.
    3. plug in your biodiesel hybrid car at the park and ride or work carpool lot - either to wind-power or solar-power or hydro-power.
    4. PROFIT!

    Nothing wrong with having solar in your house, but it's best used there if you're:
    a. retired;
    b. working at home;
    c. taking the biodiesel bus or hydro-powered SkyTrain to worl; or
    d. using it to heat the hot water heater or provide passive solar stored for evening heat.

    [ok, so I was one of the first 100 Solar Energy Society of Canada members ...]

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  30. 10%/year..Gotta call FUD/Bullshit by lwiniarski · · Score: 2, Informative

    I agree it's not economical, but 10%/year degradation is FUD.
    More like 1-2%/year for good panels in normal radiation.

    (10-20% over TEN years)

    Here's a graph..(read down)
    http://www.solarstorms.org/Svulnerability.html

  31. Fooey. by Weaselmancer · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The major selling point for any car is image. Thus these hybrids need more grunt in their exhaust.

    Maybe, if you're sixteen. Me, I'm interested in 60mpg. I'd drive a neon pink VW bus if it gave me 60mpg.

    And while we're talking image, do you think that the only viable image is some neon riced-out rollerskate with a thousand dollar exhaust system? I'd rather have the image of someone who gives a crap about our current oil problems rather than a guest extra from 2 Fast 2 Furious.

    --
    Weaselmancer
    rediculous.
  32. Re:Go VW! Diesel is more! by Kadin2048 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The other thing that needs to be considered is what kind of driving you do.

    A gasoline hybrid like the Prius gets its best mileage in city, stop-and-go driving, because of the regenerative braking.

    A diesel engine gets its best milage while cruising on the highway at a basically constant speed, in the transmission's highest gear.

    I used to drive a diesel VW and *loved* it. It was fun to drive (torquey as hell) and had excellent highway range, well in excess of 500 miles to the tank. However that mileage went into the toilet if I had to do a lot of stop and go driving. Still better than a conventional gasoline car for the same driving, but nothing like a hybrid.

    I think there will be a place for both types of vehicles in the future, and which one is most efficient for you depends on the type of driving you do. For me, it's almost highway driving -- a hybrid wouldn't have much of an advantage.

    The other thing to consider is the air conditioning and heating requirements. I have heard it said that the hybrids derive a lot of their fuel savings by being able to shut off the gas engine when it's not needed (in city driving), but that if you have the A/C running, it won't shut off because there's no way to run the compressor electrically. If anyone can verify this I'd be interested ... but if it's true, it could seriously impact the efficiency numbers in certain climates. A diesel engine sees some efficiency hit as a result of the A/C compressor, but its not that significant. (I measured the MPG of my VW with the compressor running and not, and could never get a good handle on what the change was. It was below the error caused by month-to-month differences in my driving style, anyway.) I don't know about anybody else, but I am not prepared to drive without air conditioning, at least until gas is well into the double-digit dollars per gallon.

    What I would like to see is a diesel-electric hybrid: combine the best of both worlds.

    I also wish that there was some sort of tax relief for diesel passenger vehicles on the diesel fuel taxes, which are really excessive. They're aimed at truckers, but they've had the side-effect of making diesel artifically expensive relative to gasoline, and hurting diesel car development in the US. This is too bad, because it's a technology that really has a lot of potential. There are better/alternative ways of taxing trucking than putting a tax on diesel fuel. At the very least, we should have some sort of rebate program to allow diesel passenger car owners to get back the difference in taxes they pay over an equivalent amount of gasoline (if not the amount of gasoline that they would have needed to buy to drive the same number of miles, which would be more fair).

    --
    "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."