Slashdot Mirror


360 Hackers Claim Full Read/Write Ability

Technology Sweden writes "According to the site Xbox-Scene, a program is available to transfer saved-games and more from the memory card or hard drive. This opens up a whole new world for the 360. Soon we might be able to run our own home brewed games and show our favourite Xvid movies."

76 comments

  1. Good News for the Homebrews by eldavojohn · · Score: 4, Informative
    So there are already sites out there for Dreamcast, Xbox, PS2 and a multitude of other consoles/handhelds. This will make it a lot easier for homebrew execution to get started on the Xbox 360 for those who welcome it. It technically isn't legal since these developers don't have developer licenses but since they don't sell their homebrew apps, they usually aren't targeted.

    What a lot of people are interested in will probably be the porting of older consoles through known emulators to the Xbox 360. I don't want an Xbox 360 but we'll see how well this development takes off. I long for an emulator that plays my old SNES games as it is kind of cumbersome to have many many systems to hook up. A fully functioning Link to the Past on Xbox 360 would make me buy it.

    For those of you looking for free game ISOs to dump from the internet to your Xbox 360, this is not something that will allow this yet as from the article:
    Note: Before people try to launch crazy ideas again: No this does not allow you to copy retail games (signed for XBOX360DVD media only) to the HD and play them. It's a tool that gives you access to the Xbox 360 HD and Memcard from a PC, it does not hack/bypass any security.
    So there's no free games yet. On top of that, you can't shell out the boot sequence from a disc to use it for launching your own homemade application. Hopefully we'll see that in a few more months. I myself am not really interested in "free" games, just want to be able to use my Xbox as a real toy instead of the confines of those who can afford the insane developer's license fee.

    Anyone else notice that this article reads like an advertisement for 360gamesaves? There's three links to it.
    --
    My work here is dung.
    1. Re:Good News for the Homebrews by TheFlamingoKing · · Score: 2, Insightful
      "I long for an emulator that plays my old SNES games as it is kind of cumbersome to have many many systems to hook up. A fully functioning Link to the Past on Xbox 360 would make me buy it."

      Xbox and Dreamcast have fully ported emulators that run at speed with full sound. What's the problem?

      I will honestly say that my modded Xbox is one of my most prized possessions. While the Xbox is not what I would call portable it is nice to be able to take all my favorite Xvid rips with me to a friend's house or on vacation. And it was so much cheaper and easier to do than build a media center pc.

      And I think Microsoft knows about this, as they have discontinued selling the first Xbox at $149, and now only sell the Forza pack exclusively at $179, fifty bucks more than you could get a PS2 for.

    2. Re:Good News for the Homebrews by AKAImBatman · · Score: 2, Informative

      It technically isn't legal since these developers don't have developer licenses but since they don't sell their homebrew apps, they usually aren't targeted.

      What's illegal about developing for the XBox 360? There's no law that says, "you must obtain a license to produce software for a game console."

      There is a law that makes it illegal to circumvent protection mechanisms (DMCA), but the standard "reverse engineering for compatibility" loophole was left intact. (Albeit not as strong as it once was.) AFAIK, no one has challenged a console maker in court over reverse engineering for compatibility, making it a legal issue that's still up in the air.

      And before anyone brings up Nintendo v. Atari (Tengen), allow me to remind you that Atari never finished reverse engineering the lockout chip. Instead they obtained the patent information under false pretenses, and then attempted to get away with reproducing Nintendo's IP.

    3. Re:Good News for the Homebrews by The-Bus · · Score: 1

      Perhaps more important for existing 360 owners who don't wish to change any hardware or software of their console is the ability to stream or read video off the console's hard drive or an attached external USB drive. Right now, that can be done with pictures and audio, but not video. Sure, you can do it if you have a Windows Media Center PC (or Vista) but in the meantime there's nothing else.

      For Mac users, a company has software that will allegedly let you stream audio and see pictures from a Mac OS X box. It is not free but I have heard reports on forums that it does work.

      I would imagine that just like last time for large changes in hardware or software, people who want to run Xbox Live and have homebrew apps are going to be SOL. And buying a second 360 right now is not only pricey, but also difficult because of the continuing availability problems.

      --

      Small potatoes make the steak look bigger.

    4. Re:Good News for the Homebrews by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just so you are aware, the Revolution WILL come with a NES, SNES, and N64 emulator. You'll just have to buy the games online through Nintendo. If they're smart, they won't charge much for these older games. At least that's my hope. I want my classic gaming all in one console, legally.

    5. Re:Good News for the Homebrews by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It technically isn't legal since these developers don't have developer licenses but since they don't sell their homebrew apps, they usually aren't targeted.

      I am sorry, but I haven't looked far into all the legal stuff, but it seems very odd for you not to be able to sell homebrew games for the X-Box 360. I also don't know what law they would be breaking. Can you inform me, please?

    6. Re:Good News for the Homebrews by 88NoSoup4U88 · · Score: 2, Funny
      I long for an emulator that plays my old SNES games as it is kind of cumbersome to have many many systems to hook up.

      So you're buying a Revolution?

    7. Re:Good News for the Homebrews by b1t+r0t · · Score: 2, Informative
      "I long for an emulator that plays my old SNES games as it is kind of cumbersome to have many many systems to hook up. A fully functioning Link to the Past on Xbox 360 would make me buy it."

      Xbox and Dreamcast have fully ported emulators that run at speed with full sound. What's the problem?

      So which emulator would that be for Dreamcast? DreamSNES hasn't been updated for over three years, and it does not run all games at full speed with full sound. Super Famicast is better at some things, but after a bit of googling around, apparently it doesn't hit the all games full speed mark either. It's more like 80-85% with both sound and full graphics emulation turned on. Overclocking the DC can help some, but not enough. Plus, DreamSNES has a problem with the sound that causes the "wind" sound in Chrono Trigger (such as on that bridge to the castle jail) to be played as a buzzing noise.

      When I see a Dreamcast SNES emulator that will run Chrono Trigger at 100%, then I'll start believing. Until then, picture the "I WANT TO BELIEVE" poster with a Dreamcast instead of a UFO.

      --

      --
      "Open source is good." - Steve Jobs
      "Open source is evil." - Microsoft
    8. Re:Good News for the Homebrews by Flounder · · Score: 1
      So you're buying a Revolution?

      Well, you know. We all want to change the world.

      --

      No boom today. Boom tomorrow. There's always a boom tomorrow. - Cmdr. Susan Ivanova

    9. Re:Good News for the Homebrews by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Quick! Somebody get busy in the GIMP! I want that for my new desktop, but I'm lazy!

    10. Re:Good News for the Homebrews by Schitzoflink · · Score: 1

      Exactly, I'm thinking 1-2 dollars a NES, 3-5 SNES, 10-15 N64 I would def spend my money on that

      --
      Mr. T carries a postage stamp in his wallet at all times on the back is a list of all the fools he doesn't pity
    11. Re:Good News for the Homebrews by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I myself am not really interested in "free" games, just want to be able to use my Xbox as a real toy instead of the confines of those who can afford the insane developer's license fee.

      [sarcasm]May I suggest an antitrust suit? It is monopolistic to impose restrictions on the media playable on a piece of hardware just to protect your own investments and interests![/sarcasm]

      Also, you may want to stop calling them "games"

      (look ma! three Slashdot articles in one! woo!)

      -Nis

    12. Re:Good News for the Homebrews by EvilIdler · · Score: 1

      It's not illegal, but I'm sure Microsoft wouldn't give you the
      right to stamp commercial software with an Xbox logo if you
      haven't paid them for a devkit (or whatever it is that exchange
      gives you).

      Some major stores wouldn't take in software that isn't "approved"
      either.

    13. Re:Good News for the Homebrews by Rhys · · Score: 1

      I don't believe he said "I long to pay companies more money to use content I already own again." Which seems to be what you meant, unless Nintendo & co have come out and said the old content will be free if you buy a Revolution. (possible, I don't pay much attention to next-gen news)

      Of course, then there's the question of "a free lunch" but we'll leave that to philosphers.

      --
      Slashdot Patriotism: We Support our Dupes!
    14. Re:Good News for the Homebrews by JoeGTN1 · · Score: 1

      Anyone else notice that this article reads like an advertisement for 360gamesaves? There's three links to it.

      XBox-Scene is a news site. Similar to the one you're reading, the software they are talking about was written by the people at 360gamesaves and the first half of the article is a quote from 360gamesaves.

    15. Re:Good News for the Homebrews by cornface · · Score: 1

      Exactly, I'm thinking 1-2 dollars a NES, 3-5 SNES, 10-15 N64 I would def spend my money on that

      You obviously haven't looked at how proud ($$$) they seem to be of their GBA NES/SNES ports...

    16. Re:Good News for the Homebrews by Destoo · · Score: 1

      >>You obviously haven't looked at how proud ($$$) they seem to be of their GBA NES/SNES ports...

      Box. Art. Shipping. Cartridge. Marketing.. They all cost money.

      I doubt there's going to be a TV spot and a graffiti media blitz for the ability to download Paper Boy on the Revolution. Or repay for re-design and print of the paper manual and maps of Legend of Zelda.

      I would expect 1/4 of the price of the carts.. But I will probably be wrong.
      We'll know when it's there. (or when it leaks)

      --
      Nouvelles de jeux et technologies en français. TC
  2. All too easy... by voice_of_all_reason · · Score: 4, Funny

    This will be a day long remembered. It has seen the end of DRM, it will soon see the end of the rebellion.

    1. Re:All too easy... by TubeSteak · · Score: 1

      It's a trap!
      -Admiral Akbar

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
  3. How Does M$ View This? by eldavojohn · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I wonder how this news is seen in Microsoft's eyes?

    1. A security flaw that needs to be analyzed and fixed in a possible firmware update.
    2. A sign that players want a sort of "utilities" disc that allows them access to hardware in the machine. Much like the Linux kit that was made available for the PS2.
    3. A possible idea to expand upon and a valuable tool for their developers to learn from.
    4. Rest of the world? That doesn't exist inside Microsoft so this utility program actually was never written. We know what our customers want and that's that.

    --
    My work here is dung.
    1. Re:How Does M$ View This? by ClamIAm · · Score: 1

      5. A revenue stream to be exploited.

  4. Argh, Matey! by AKAImBatman · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Soon we might be able to run our own home brewed games and show our favourite Xvid movies.

    Which is to say that piracy of 360 downloadable games will soon flourish.

    Are there really any examples of "homebrew" games for modern systems? Being as complex as they are to program, I don't really see why anyone would bother homebrewing a game on the 360 when they can produce the exact same software for the PC. (Much quicker and easier, too.)

    I could see the possibility of turning the 360 into a PVR, but doesn't it seem like purchasing or building a dedicated PVR for less $$$ would make more sense? Do you really want to spend $400 just to hack it into a machine that you could have had for $150-$200?

    I'm all for the school of thought that says, "It's my hardware, I want to do with it what I want." But sometimes it's okay to say, "this is cool, even thought I don't really have a real use for it yet." :-)

    1. Re:Argh, Matey! by hal2814 · · Score: 1

      "Are there really any examples of "homebrew" games for modern systems?"

      The only ones I can think of are emulators which run (you guessed it) pirated games for the most part.

      As far as semi-modern systems go, there is BattleSphere for the Atari Jaguar.

      It is important to note though that as a PVR the 360 could in theory record playback an HD signal so it might be worth the $400 for that.

    2. Re:Argh, Matey! by Fred+Or+Alive · · Score: 1

      By homebrew, it usually actually means emualtors, and most of the software people actually run on those emulators is copyright infringing as well.

      I think the main idea of running stuff from a console is conveinience, you don't have to mess around configuring a PC etc. to run well on a bog standard TV, you just plug it in and it just works.

      --
      10 PRINT "LOOK AROUND YOU ";
      20 GOTO 10
    3. Re:Argh, Matey! by amliebsch · · Score: 1

      There is one I really like for xbox called "Super Mario War." It uses sounds and sprites from all the different mario games, but is essentially a four-player battle mode (similar to the challenge mode in SMB3, but with different point-scoring goals). Four-player is great, and I love enabling the UT sounds (boing boing boing M-M-M-M-MONSTER KILL!!!) It's a blast.

      --
      If you don't know where you are going, you will wind up somewhere else.
    4. Re:Argh, Matey! by christopherfinke · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Are there really any examples of "homebrew" games for modern systems?
      I don't know if this counts, but there is the newly available "Mario Adventure," which was produced by an individual who hacked the SMB3 game engine to produce an entirely new 2-D Mario adventure. I played it on my Dreamcast last night, and it is a great deal of fun.

    5. Re:Argh, Matey! by Valdrax · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I could see the possibility of turning the 360 into a PVR, but doesn't it seem like purchasing or building a dedicated PVR for less $$$ would make more sense? Do you really want to spend $400 just to hack it into a machine that you could have had for $150-$200?

      You're looking at this problem from the wrong angle. Would you rather spend $550-600 for an Xbox 360 and a PVR, or just $400 for an Xbox 360? What if it could also serve as an emulator, a wireless A/B/G router with firewall, and a three-processor, Linux, websurfing / media PC that runs on 160 Watts? Heck, the thing already plays DVDs and streams music without hacks.

      The moment that Linux becomes available for the XBox 360, I'm buying one even if it means that I can never boot a game on it without Microsoft patching and eliminating my Linux system. I don't care about Xbox 360 games and plan to never buy one; I just want a cheap, powerful, energy efficient Linux PC. Making MS subsidize my Linux box is only a cherry on top.

      --
      If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
    6. Re:Argh, Matey! by Turmio · · Score: 1

      Are there really any examples of "homebrew" games for modern systems? Being as complex as they are to program, I don't really see why anyone would bother homebrewing a game on the 360 when they can produce the exact same software for the PC. (Much quicker and easier, too.)

      Try this for an example for instance. Sure, many of the titles are ports of existing software to Xbox. But as with all things that involve some hackery, there's never need for question why. You'll always get the ultimate answer: because you can. And quite frankly, that's all the reasoning you need. Oh, and speaking about Xbox. It's pretty much a PC running stripped down Windows and is programmed accordingly (after you manage to get your own, unsigned code to run on it, but as we all know, that's been possible for longer time than anyone remembers).

    7. Re:Argh, Matey! by forkazoo · · Score: 1
      The moment that Linux becomes available for the XBox 360, I'm buying one even if it means that I can never boot a game on it without Microsoft patching and eliminating my Linux system. I don't care about Xbox 360 games and plan to never buy one; I just want a cheap, powerful, energy efficient Linux PC. Making MS subsidize my Linux box is only a cherry on top.


      I am in the same boat, pretty much. I want a media center PC that I can use to play video on. I want to be able to control it via telnet from my laptop as an uber remote control. I want it to run a bit torrent client so I don't need another machine on all the time. I want it to be low power, and look decent in my living room in case I ever have a girl over. I don't want the hassle of building my own PC. I also want to be able to run SNES games on it.

      Now, there are plenty of options for a real PC that fits those requirements, but for the most part, none are as cheap and fast as the 360 without making me build it myself.

      The only real drawback is the fact that we are unlikely to ever see fully accelerated video for the 360 Linux. So, I won't be able to play 3D games on it, or show off 3D demos at parties. But, the CPU(s) have enough oomph that it should be able to play MPEG-4 and the like without too much trouble. Hopefully, mplayer will take advantage of the multiple cores by the time I get my 360! :)
    8. Re:Argh, Matey! by some+guy+on+slashdot · · Score: 1

      For what it's worth, the Nintendo DS is cracked wide open and people are writing all sorts of fun homebrew for it. (And although this emulator is a favorite, games like this one are also a big hit.)

    9. Re:Argh, Matey! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To be honest, I am not as interested in homebrew games as I am in porting freespace 2 to the X-box 360

    10. Re:Argh, Matey! by aeoo · · Score: 1

      I think if homebrew games were allowed and encouraged on consoles, they would occupy a very significant niche. For example, I'd not mind playing a console-ified OAngband (but hopefully programmed to work with fewer button presses). :) However, if it's as keying intensive as the PC version, I may have to pass. Think of games like Katamari Damaci -- I think we'd have a lot more games like that. So, just because no one is making homebrew games for consoles yet, doesn't mean people wouldn't make them if the barrier to entry wasn't so absurdly high. Trouble is, serious homebrewers will not make any games even with this R/W capability, because the official vendor (in this case MS) doesn't support them.

      Arguments like yours do nothing to improve the situation. On the other hand, if someone used this R/W capability to make a good game, even if it's just one lonely game, it might be argument enough for MS to drop its artificial barrier to entry.

    11. Re:Argh, Matey! by tepples · · Score: 1

      By homebrew, it usually actually means emualtors, and most of the software people actually run on those emulators is copyright infringing as well.

      That's a big "usually". Take Tetanus On Drugs or anything else in the GBA section of pdroms.de. What copyright does it infringe?

    12. Re:Argh, Matey! by tepples · · Score: 1

      I want to be able to control it via telnet from my laptop as an uber remote control.

      You mean "ssh"; otherwise somebody will sniff your session and switch it to the Goatse Channel.

      I want it to run a bit torrent client so I don't need another machine on all the time.

      And watch frame rate drop as the scheduler has trouble handling the demands of video playback and BitTorrent routing simultaneously.

      I also want to be able to run SNES games on it.

      How do you plan on dumping your Super NES cartridges to make the ROM files that emulators need?

    13. Re:Argh, Matey! by forkazoo · · Score: 1
      I want to be able to control it via telnet from my laptop as an uber remote control.

      You mean "ssh"; otherwise somebody will sniff your session and switch it to the Goatse Channel.


      Well, sure. But, if it is a Linux box, that's no problem. Whether I use telnet or VNC, or SSH, or roll my own control interface, I know that I can get it to work, regardless of what OS is running on the machine I want to use as a controller.

      I want it to run a bit torrent client so I don't need another machine on all the time.

      And watch frame rate drop as the scheduler has trouble handling the demands of video playback and BitTorrent routing simultaneously.


      The 360 has three cores, and bit torrent doesn't need that much CPU to keep up with my 1 Mb line. The files will all be on the 360, so there won't be a conflict of network bandwidth. The hard drive should be able to keep up with playing one compressed video while download a megabit simultaneously.

      I also want to be able to run SNES games on it.

      How do you plan on dumping your Super NES cartridges to make the ROM files that emulators need?


      Look, I'm gonna have to admit that not everything downloaded via bit torrent is going to be something that I have a license for. Maybe that makes me a bad person, but as long as I'm a bad person who can watch current Doctor Who and play SNES games, I'll be a happy bad person. And, I'll be okay with that.
  5. XBMC by laytoncy · · Score: 1

    ...waiting patiently for the day I can run XBMC on my 360. Then I can move the XBOX to another room or a vehicle.

    1. Re:XBMC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, that's me exactly. I almost never play games on my XBox anymore, but we use it as a media server with XBMC almost every day. My 3 daughters, 2 - 7, know how to load up movies by themselves, streamed from a computer in the other room.

      Until I can use the 360 the same way, I have no reason to get one.

  6. RTFA by MeanMF · · Score: 3, Informative

    People need to RTFA before submitting... The article specifically says this does NOT get around any kind of security measures present in the 360, and that this doesn't bring them any closer to running homebrew content or bypassing the 360's copy protection and DRM measures.

    1. Re:RTFA by laytoncy · · Score: 1

      Agreed...this is why I'm still "waiting patiently".

    2. Re:RTFA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You must be new here.

    3. Re:RTFA by rAiNsT0rm · · Score: 1

      "People need to RTFA before submitting..."

      Wait... you do realize that this is Slashdot? Right? The only link people actually click and read is the "Comments" one to hastily post their view regardless of fact or fiction. And until recently the occasional Goaste link, Natalie Portman reference, or to pour hot grits down their pants.

      --
      http://teasphere.wordpress.com - A little spot of tea
  7. Pardon my ignorance but... by erroneus · · Score: 1

    ...perhaps someone can enlighten me on this somewhat unrelated topic.

    I have an unhacked XBOX and a bunch of games I play only on occasion. It is annoying, sometimes, how the games load so slowly. I just want to play and put it away.

    Can I, without otherwise "hacking" my XBOX hardware, copy the game disks to the internal drive to play them faster? Even if it was just one game at a time, it would improve game enjoyment significantly.

    And I do play the XBox-live once in a blue moon with my sons and family... I don't want to break that functionality either.

    So anyone got some info or links?

    1. Re:Pardon my ignorance but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    2. Re:Pardon my ignorance but... by sacherjj · · Score: 2, Informative

      Do a search for mod chips. I use the X3. This allows me to put all my XBox games in a box and not have to wait for them to load. I select them from a menu and run them. To make storage for games, you will need to add a new hard drive. I wouldn't go back. Changing games? Just hold both triggers and select (I think) and you reboot back into the menu system and start another game.

    3. Re:Pardon my ignorance but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      as a matter of fact there is:
      http://www.xbox-scene.com/xbox1data/sep/EEFlyylEyp nyXfkSdp.php

      You do need a way of transferring this to your xbox, and either the first 007 or splinter cell game disc to load it. but it works wonderfully!

    4. Re:Pardon my ignorance but... by MisterOblivious · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't an X3 be *complete* overkill? Why recomend the top-of-the-line, feature packed and expensive modchip when the parent only wants his games to load faster? A sofmod with a coldboot-to-live feature would work just fine in this case. http://forums.xbox-scene.com/index.php?showtopic=2 15055

  8. reading is 31337 by tengennewseditor · · Score: 1

    Three hundred and sixty script kiddies can read and write now? Uh oh.

    1. Re:reading is 31337 by Frizzle+Fry · · Score: 1

      y3$ \/\/3 c@N!

      --
      I'd rather be lucky than good.
  9. HDD access by the+computer+guy+nex · · Score: 1

    "This opens up a whole new world for the 360. Soon we might be able to run our own home brewed games and show our favourite Xvid movies." "

    1) You can already play your favorite movies that are on your XP Media Center PC on the 360.
    2) This has very little to do with home brewed (or pirated) games. You can already copy over music, movies, and download games from XboxLive to the HDD. M$ did the same with Xbox1 - they have allowed people access to their own HDD.

  10. TripMaster Monkey and gaming threads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He's very selective. He only posts on those topics that can earn him the best possibility of satisfying his incessant need to karma whore and get that holy frits psot. The gaming topic traditionally does not gain a lot of readers, posts, or moderation; therefore, gaming topics for the most part are not worthy of his time.

    However, he has received enough redundant, offtopic, and overrated mods that he now posts at 1 instead of 2. Granted, that could also be of his own doing; but considering what a karma whore he is, I doubt that it's voluntary.

    Actually, I don't know what's worse. The fact that he continually karma whores even with growing evidence of people getting pissed off with his karma whoring, or the fact that there are still legions of idiots who continue to mod him up for even the most inane posts.

    Go ahead, mod me off-topic. That doesn't make what I've said any less true.

  11. My bets are firmly on #1. by Valdrax · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Microsoft's Xbox team (if they ever had the attitude) learned the hard way about #4, and #2 & #3 are in fact reinforcing reasons for attitude #1 to be the most likely.

    If you haven't noticed, Microsoft is marching firmly in lock step with the recording and movie industries over the idea that customers should not be allowed to use what they purchase in ways that do not make Microsoft more money. Letting developers learn how to put stuff on the machine without going through MS's SDK could lead to homebrew games. Allowing people to write home-brew games means letting there be games that are sold (or worse given away) without paying Microsoft the license fee that makes up for selling Xbox 360s at a loss. Allowing utility access to the hardware might lead to putting Linux on a 360, thus making MS subsidize non-Windows computers that will play licensed games (and make up the loss), or allow the playing of pirated games.

    If this is based on a security problem that can be patched in software, MS will treat it as a critical fix and release a patch for it ASAP.

    --
    If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
    1. Re:My bets are firmly on #1. by Saige · · Score: 1

      My understanding is that Microsoft sees that the recording/movie/television industries aren't going to make content available to people without DRM, and given the choice between having DRM content available, and not having content at all, would rather have the former. Would you rather have no content at all? Honestly?

      And yes, I'm sure this will be seen as a security issue, assuming there's any such issues here. Remember that the important issues here are preventing the copying of games, the hacking of games and game saves that allow cheating, and cheating over Xbox Live. Unfortunately, protecting against such things pretty much rules out homebrew development. I really do suspect that if there was some sort of means that they could use to prevent piracy and cheating, and yet allow end users to do homebrew development, then they'd do it.

      --
      "You know your god is man-made when he hates all the same people you do."
    2. Re:My bets are firmly on #1. by Valdrax · · Score: 1

      I really do suspect that if there was some sort of means that they could use to prevent piracy and cheating, and yet allow end users to do homebrew development, then they'd do it.

      I don't. Microsoft does not like non-commercial software development at all. It represents a model in fundamental conflict with the existence of their business.

      The big reason they wouldn't like it though is that all the money Microsoft makes off of the 360 comes from big developers who have to pay license fees to have access to the tools needed to make their titles run on the hardware. Everything that gives a reason to buy an Xbox 360 without buying a number of licensed games for it gives customers a reason to never let MS recover the money lost on a product sold for under cost. Any method usable by a "homebrew" developer could be used by a big company too in theory.

      Homebrew development means a loss of control for Microsoft, and Microsoft likes control. All monopolies and cartels eventually get addicted to it.

      --
      If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
  12. So by galdosdi · · Score: 1

    So other than those 360 dudes, are all the other hackers illiterate?

  13. Don't celebrate just yet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    This is basicly a file system driver and nothing more. In fact the free60 devs(free60.org) have had a filesystem driver like this for thier linux project for weeks. This is just the windows flavour. there is not a ata password on the harddrives this time around. They harddrives even advertise the feature or switching between systems. it didn't take anything special to read/write the drive. It is standard sata. Homebrew is no where near possible yet. the xex(360 executables) are signed. the pirs archives which all live downloads are stored in are signed. the harddrive is signed based on its model and serial number so you can't upgrade to a larger one. everything is very protected. This is merely a tool to explore and transfer some savegames right now.

  14. That number seems wrong by Unanimous+Cowturd · · Score: 0
    Only 360 hackers can fully read and write? That doesn't seem accurate. Many of the ones I've talked to were quite literate. Eloquent, even.

    Oh no, wait...

  15. 360 Different Than First Xbox by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Most of the people who would be interested in a hacked 360 already have working and hacked Xboxes.

    With the massive number of hardware problems the 360 has there isn't going to be any great demand for such an unreliable piece of hardware. I doubt these hacking attempts will go very far other than among the crowd who likes hacking hardware just for the sake of doing it.

    Just see for yourself the massive number of malfunctioning 360s at stores or listen to people who work at stores with 360 kiosks to get a feel for just how messed up Microsoft's 360 hardware has turned out. The 360 is not something you want to count on running 365/24/7 in your home entertainment center. Sure you might get luck and get one that works, but there is little reason to risk 400+ dollars if you already have a working Xbox.

  16. Sadly, no by jeffmeden · · Score: 1

    What, you expect Microsoft to give you extra functionality for free? If you arent happy with the loading speed buy a 360! Seriously, though, it is trivial to install a hacked bios (as many others pointed out) without modifying the hardware with the older Xboxes (wont work with boxes MFRd after april 04, i believe) but you will lose LIVE functionality altogether. If you want to retain it, you need a chip that can be installed and set to enabled (running games off the hard drive) or disabled (running games off conventional media and connecting to LIVE). If you try to connect to LIVE without taking this precaution, your specific Xbox serial number will be banned for life from the service.

    1. Re:Sadly, no by erroneus · · Score: 1

      Very informative indeed. I learned quite a bit about the softmod process in a short time. I now know that I need to buy two things -- first, a game that can be exploited, second a device to allow me to transfer save-game files. Well, three things actually, since I don't have a save-game card yet.

      As for XBox live? Well I just may buy a second XBox anyway... easier to play with the kids anyway... so one modded and the other not. And just be make it less likely that the modded will talk to Live, I'll just block it on my WRT-54GS loaded with the latest DD-WRT. :)

      Thanks much people.

  17. Good News for the Warzers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Come on, why can't people be honest and admit that is what they really are looking forward to? I really suspect that a good amount of those who claim not to be interested in getting and running console/handheld XYZ games for free are not telling us the truth....

    And lets not forget all the "homebrew" emulators of classic systems that people are running, like you amassed all of those ROMs and ISOs legally. Especially all those MAME ones, you own all 5,000 arcade games, all of which you dumped the ROMs yourself and keep the machines in a shack in your backyard.

  18. Sega v. Accolade by tepples · · Score: 1

    There's no law that says, "you must obtain a license to produce software for a game console."

    Other than patent law? If the disc format or cartridge format is a patented invention, than anybody who makes use of the invention without the OK of the patent holder is liable for patent infringement.

    AFAIK, no one has challenged a console maker in court over reverse engineering for compatibility, making it a legal issue that's still up in the air.

    Accolade, a developer of unlicensed software for Sega Genesis consoles, successfully defended against a lawsuit from Sega. The ruling of the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in Sega Enterprises v. Accolade was that the Sega Mega Drive (called Genesis in North America) was not patented, that reverse engineering as practiced by Accolade was lawful, and that the court refused to enforce use of a trademark/copyright based security system as an ersatz patent. But most consoles nowadays are not put together from off-the-shelf parts in the way that the Genesis was. Post-DMCA there is also Lexmark International v. Static Control Components.

    1. Re:Sega v. Accolade by Sensible+Clod · · Score: 1
      anybody who makes use of the invention without the OK of the patent holder is liable for patent infringement

      I think you meant anybody who makes money off of the invention (or attempts to). It's never been illegal to make something for yourself, even if it has technology from 10,000 patents. It's also never been illegal to give said object to someone else. It is, however, illegal to infringe on the patent holder's right to make money (or attempt to) off of their invention.

      Remember, patents don't give patent holders any power over your ability to make stuff.

      --

      The difference between spam and poop is that you don't have to dig through septic tanks looking for real food. -- Me
  19. "No content at all"? by tepples · · Score: 1

    Would you rather have no content at all?

    I would rather have no proprietary content at all. If all the content is free (e.g. Free Art License) or semi-free (e.g. CC by-sa-nc), there's still a market.

    1. Re:"No content at all"? by Saige · · Score: 1

      OK, fair enough, I over-generalized. Of course there would still be free content. But I would suspect that your view - that you'd rather have no proprietary content than have DRM - while popular here on Slashdot, isn't the prevailing opinion overall. And it's not like Microsoft not supporting DRM would prevent it from happening - look at iTunes.

      And remember, one of the reasons that Microsoft backs HD-DVD over Blu-Ray is that HD-DVD restrictions are not as severe as those for Blu-Ray. The consumer ends up with more restrictions - more severe DRM - with Blu-Ray.

      --
      "You know your god is man-made when he hates all the same people you do."
    2. Re:"No content at all"? by tepples · · Score: 1

      And it's not like Microsoft not supporting DRM would prevent it from happening - look at iTunes.

      Difference is that the iTunes software also allows the user to encode a homebrew .wav file into .mp3 or .m4a, formats that lack digital restrictions management, and load it onto an iPod player. The Xbox 360 does not allow this with games, nor does it allow this with video unless you also buy an expensive Windows XP Media Center PC.

  20. Multitasking. by tepples · · Score: 1

    Would you rather spend $550-600 for an Xbox 360 and a PVR, or just $400 for an Xbox 360?

    If it meant an Xbox 360 game turning off so that it could record a show, then I'd pay more for a pair of machines that can play games and record video at once. Or what if I have more than one TV in my house?

    What if it could also serve as an emulator

    How would one lawfully obtain ROM dumps? Except for the GBA, a copier isn't affordable nor sold at retail.

  21. XP Media Center lock-in? by tepples · · Score: 2, Interesting

    You can already play your favorite movies that are on your XP Media Center PC on the 360.

    So now, with a Linux server, how do I emulate the necessary parts of an XP Media Center PC to get Xbox 360 streaming to work?

    1. Re:XP Media Center lock-in? by NutscrapeSucks · · Score: 1

      According to Microsoft, it's just HTTP.

      Mac software that streams to an XBox360 was just released, so the Linux stuff can't be too far behind.

      --
      Whenever I hear the word 'Innovation', I reach for my pistol.
    2. Re:XP Media Center lock-in? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's about Windows Media Connect which can be used on a standard XP computer to stream pictures and music. No Media Center or Vista required for that. Unfortunately, though the protocol involved here supports video streaming as well, the Xbox 360 is crippled so it'll only stream video from a media center.

      And that's not just HTTP... the Xbox 360 functions as a media center extender and uses RDP and a secondary channel for audio/video. So for Linux video streaming in the future, my eye is on xrdp.

  22. Personal use exemption? by tepples · · Score: 1

    It's never been illegal to make something for yourself, even if it has technology from 10,000 patents.

    Can you back up this assertion? I seem to remember 35 USC 271 not having a broad personal use exemption. Or are you speaking of the patent law of a specific jurisdiction outside the United States?

    1. Re:Personal use exemption? by Sensible+Clod · · Score: 1
      Indeed, it appears you are quite right (thanks for the link, BTW). The "personal use exemption", as you well put it, appears to be valid in Europe, but NOT in the U.S. of A.

      It seems to me that it used to be valid here. If so, I then wonder, When was it changed?

      --

      The difference between spam and poop is that you don't have to dig through septic tanks looking for real food. -- Me
  23. To bust the "homebrew == piracy" myth by tepples · · Score: 1

    Look, I'm gonna have to admit that not everything downloaded via bit torrent is going to be something that I have a license for.

    The problem is that the dominance of emulators in the homebrew scene combined with the widespread unauthorized copying of classic video games through BitTorrent, eMule, and similar computer programs might lead console makers to believe that homebrew implies piracy, whether of current games or of classic games. We need examples of substantial non-infringing homebrew programs in order to make a case against this myth.

  24. No. MS expected this. by Namarrgon · · Score: 1
    Evidence: see this. The harddisk is not locked in any way.

    The original Xbox HDD was password-locked to the machine, and used a custom filesystem loosely based on FAT. On the 360, they deliberately didn't lock the drive, not even with a common password. They didn't even bother to change the filesystem. No encryption, no obfuscation, nothing.

    MS obviously knew the HDD would be one of the first lines of attack, yet they made no particular effort to secure its contents - in fact, they actually reduced the protection. Why would they do that?

    This time round, they have a far more secure model (motherboard communication is encrypted, kernel ram is checksummed, and the per-box keys & hypervisor are built into the CPU itself, where it can't be extracted with anything less than an electron microscope). If they left the HDD exposed, it's because they didn't care if it was modded; they clearly feel confident that it can't compromise the rest of the system. Time will tell, of course, but as useful as Xplorer360 is, it's hardly a great step towards running homebrew code.

    --
    Why would anyone engrave "Elbereth"?
  25. Better than digg by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Slightly.